From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
To: Sarah.Brown@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk Sarah Brown
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:47:41 +0000
Subject: Re: IPCC Case Reference 2007/017332

Hi,

thank you very much your answer!

But the Standards Unit don't even know their own e-mail address.

And when I go there to discuss the complaint against the Police, then I'm
being harassed.

I'm not sure if it's right that I should go back to the meetings with the
Police then.

I think that would like saying that I liked to be harassed, and thats not
what I mean at all.

Do you understand what I mean now?

Thank you very much again for your answer!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog


On 12/11/07, Sarah Brown wrote:
>
> Dear Mr Ribsskog,
>
> Thank you for your emailed dated 07 December 2007.
>
> Your new complaint will need to be raised separately from your current
> appeal. This is so that if the police are unable to resolve the matter to
> your satisfaction you then have the right of appeal to the IPCC.
>
> With regards to your lose of confidence in the police investigation into
> your complaint. Unfortunately whilst the police are conducting an
> investigation into your complaint the IPCC is unable to intervene and is not
> able to dictate which department carries out this investigation. You will
> need to speak to the Professional Standards Department (PSD) of Merseyside
> Police to discuss further.
>
> If you would like to proceed with the next stage of your complaint please
> provide your consent on the form I sent to your postal address on the 30
> November 2007. Your consent will allow me to forward your complaint details
> to the Professional Standards Department of the Merseyside Police for their
> consideration.
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> *Sarah Brown*
> *Casework Manager*
> *Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)*
> *90 High Holborn, London WC1V 6BH*
> *Phone: 0207 166 3934*
> *sarah.brown@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk*
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 07 December 2007 16:14
> *To:* Sarah Brown
> *Subject:* TRIM: Re: IPCC Case Reference 2007/017332
>
>
> Hi,
>
> thank you very much for your answer!
>
> I'm not sure if you think that this case should be dealt with together
> with the other compalaint and appeal-case (see the last e-mail I sent your
> collegue).
>
> And I was also enquiering, in connection with the e-mail I sent some weeks
> ago, were I explained that I seem to have lost a bit
> of confidence with the police department conducting the investigation, so
> I was wondering if you think that it would maybe be
> possible for another department to handle the complaint and appeal, like
> I've enquiered about earler.
>
> And I havn't recieved an answer to this enquiery.
>
> And I was wondering if I maybe should have had receved such an answer,
> because, now I'm not sure how to reply to the
> Merseyside Police, regarding the letter that I sent a scanned copy of,
> with the e-mail to your collegue.
>
> So I was wondering who I should contact, if I was wondering how to go
> forward with this.
>
> Hope that this is alright, and thanks in advance for the help!
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> Erik Ribsskog
>
>
> On 12/7/07, Sarah Brown wrote:
> >
> > Dear Mr Ribsskog,
> >
> > Thank you for contacting the Independent Police Complaints Commission
> > (IPCC). Miss Joanne Fitzgerald has asked me to reply to your email
> > regarding your new complaint. If I could inform you that Miss Fitzgerald no
> > longer works within the casework department of the Commission and so will no
> > longer have involvement in the handling of your complaints.
> >
> > I am the Casework Manager for your new complaint surrounding issues you
> > raised about a female front desk staff member at the Walton Lane Police
> > Station. If you would like to continue with the next stage of the
> > complaints process please provide your consent on the form that I sent you
> > on the 30 November 2007. Once your consent has been received I will forward
> > your complaint details to the Professional Standards Department of the
> > Merseyside Police for consideration.
> >
> > Please note that the details of your new complaint have been noted under
> > reference : 2007/017332. Please quote this reference when contacting the
> > IPCC regarding your new complaint.
> >
> > Yours sincerely,
> >
> > *Sarah Brown*
> > *Casework Manager*
> > *Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)*
> > *90 High Holborn, London WC1V 6BH*
> > *Phone: 0207 166 3934*
> > *sarah.brown@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk*
> >
>
>
>
>
> ******************************************************************************
> The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
> privileged.
> It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended
> recipient
> please notify the sender and delete this email; any disclosure, copying or
>
> distribution of this email is prohibited and may be unlawful. The content
> of
> this email represents the views of the individual and not necessarily
> those
> of IPCC. IPCC reserves the right to monitor the content of all emails in
> accordance with lawful business practice.This e-mail has been swept for
> computer viruses but IPCC does not accept any liability in respect of your
>
> receipt of this email.
>
> Independent Police Complaints Commission
> 90 High Holborn
> London,
> WC1V 6BH.
>
> ******************************************************************************
>
>
> The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
> Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in
> partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On
> leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> recorded for legal purposes.
>

What has the Governments of Norway and Britain been doing?

Have they done so much wrong that they don't deer to bring this out in the open?

Against a normal citizen?

Coward swine!

Phoney games.

I think that I could see, when I walked to the shops today to buy food, that the Police, were watching me in the corners of their eyes, due to the way they walked when they crossed the street close to the Hogs Head pub a bit more than an hour ago.

And I thought it was strange that Saintsburys in North John St. was sold out of bread this early (around 14.00).

The manager said that they had made a mistake with the order.

But I remember from working as a shop manager in Norway, that if we had ordered to little, then we tryed to get an extra deliviry.

And to order bread is only difficult around the holidays like Christmas and Easter.

An ordinary tuesday, then you sell about the same as the ordiary tuesday of last week.

So I don't think a well run shop should run out of bread this early.

They should have noticed in the morning, if it was something wrong with the amount of bread delivered.

And that a well-run, should make an error with the order, for a regular Tuesday(?)

I'm not buying this.

And the 16 year old browned-haired girl on the way to the other Saintsburys?

Whas she employed by the police?

And how come, the Sainsbury shop in the Nations House were so stocked up with bread.

And the three Sainsbury-staff, close together by the bread-department in the North John St. shop, seemed arranged to me.

Every day I go out, the police are using people dressed like ordinary people and shop/bank staff etc. to spy on me.

At least this is how it seems to me.

I don't think the Police have got the right to do this.

I think the Police must have done something wrong, since they don't deer to tell what they have done.

I think I have the right to now what's going on.

It's supposed to be an open society.

I think the Police must have been doing something wrong, since they don't deer to deal with this.

And they are just dragging it out, which means that they are breaching my human rights.

Since they are acting inhumane.

They don't deer to deal with this openly.

They don't deer to say what they have done, but choose to spy on people and breaching their human rights.

I'm not sure who's more girly, the Police, or the sixteen year old girl on the way to the Nation House Sainsburys.

Thats my opinion at least.