From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
To: enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 18:55:18 +0000
Subject: Complaints Manager Mr Douglas Cleaver.

Hi,

I was adviced by Sarah Brown in an e-mail today, that it was possible to
complain to you, about some
problems with the IPCC.

The problems are:

1. I sent Joanne Fitzgerald, IPCC, an e-mail on 10/11, about the problem
that I had lost a bit of confidence
with the Police Department, due to episodes in conection with a meeting on
Walton Lane Police Station on 8/11.

Fitzgerald sent my e-mail to Mr. Gibbs, but he didn't answer back.


2. I sent Fitzgerald a new e-mail on 5/12, where I brought up three issues:

- How to deal with a letter from the police.

- How to deal with a letter from the IPCC, in conection with an harassment
episode on Walton Lane Police Station on 8/11.

- The problem with Mr. Gibbs not answering the e-mail I sent Fitzgerald on
10/11. (Which she forwarded him).

Only the second issue, surrounding the letter from IPCC, was answered, by
Sarah Brown.

Fitzgerald had joined a new department, Brown explained, and this was why
she answered the second issue, but the
two other issues, with the letter from the police, and why Gibbs hadn't
answered, remained unaswered.

So I think something must have gone wrong at the IPCC here, since I think
all of these issues should have been looked
at, dealt with, and answered by the IPCC.

So I think this should maybe be investigated, what it is, that has been
going on here.


3. Also Brown adviced me later, on 11/12, to contact the Police Department,
regarding the problem that I had lost confidence with
the Police Department.

This I don't makes that much sense.

Also she didn't answer back until yesterday, when I expained again why I had
lost confidence with the Police Department,
when they needed an answer within three weeks from 3/12.


4. Also, I think that the complaint to do with the harassment-episode on
Walton Lane Police Station on 8/11, should maybe
have been investigated collected with the other complaint and appeal,
regarding unproffesional conduct from members of the
Merseyside Police, since I think the new harassment-incident, could be
linked with the old complaint and appeal.

And also the problems with the psd departments e-mail address, and the notes
and e-mails from the psd department, should
be investigated collected with the other complaints.

Also the conduct of Sgt. Smyth, in the meeting on 8/11, where I think he
used some unregulated methods when writing the
witness statement, I think should be investigated together with the other
mentioned complaints/problems.

I'm going to forward the other two e-mails I've sent the IPCC today, the one
sent to Sarah Brown, and the one sent to Lynne Overend.

Please just contact me if there is something I have forgotten to explain
well enough surrounding this.

Hope that this is alright!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
To: lynne.overend@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 18:18:41 +0000
Subject: Letter from 31/12.

Hi,

I'm refering to your letter from 31/12, where you explain that the
Merseyside Police have applied
for a dispensation on not investigate a complaint.

Since I hadn't answered their letters.

I only recieved the last of these letters, and I had earlier contacted the
IPCC on 10/11, explaining
that I had lost a bit of confidence with the Police Department.

So thats why I sent the letter from the Police Department, sent on 3/12, to
the IPCC, on 5/12,
asking how I should deal with this letter, since I had lost a bit of
confidence in them.


I sent an e-mail to the IPCC on 5/12, where I asked what I should do
regarding the letter from the
Police from 03. December, since I had lost a bit of confidence with the
police, like I wrote in the
e-mail from 10/11.

This was forwarded to the case-worker Mr. Gibbs, who is dealing with the
appeal.

But he hasn't answered me back on this.

And when I sent the letter from the Police Department, to the IPCC on 5/12,
then I wasn't
answered on how to deal with the letter, which I asked about.

There were several issues that I brought up in the e-mail from 5/12, but I
think something must
have gone wrong, since Joanne Fitzgerald had started working in another
department.

I sent Fitzgerald two letters that I wondered how to deal with.

One from the Police, and one from the IPCC.

Also I brought up the problem on why Mr. Gibbs hadn't contacted me back,
even if Fitzgerald
wrote in the e-mail from 21/11, that she had been forwarded my e-mail from
10/11.

So there were three issues brought up in the e-mail from 5/12.

But I only got an answer on one of the issues. (How to deal with the letter
from the IPCC regarding the harassment-case
from Walton Lane Police Station on 8/11)., since I thought this incident
probably must have been conected with the other
complaint and appeal, and probably should have been investigated collected,
the way I see it.

The other two mentioned issues, remained unanswered.

So I think something must have gone wrong, at the IPCC, since the other two
issues weren't answered.

And also I think the complaints should be dealt with collected.

So I'm going to forward this e-mail, and the other e-mail, which I sent you
and Brown earlier today, to the person Brown
mentioned that deals with complaints at the IPCC, Complaints Manager Mr
Douglas Cleaver.

So then I think it's maybe best to wait until these issues have been looked
at by Mr. Cleaver, until we decide how to
go further with the complaint(s)?

So please tell me if you agree with this.

Hope that this is alright!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
To: Sarah.Brown@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk Sarah Brown
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 17:43:07 +0000
Subject: Re: IPCC Case Reference 2007/017332

Hi,

yes, you sent me an e-mail on 11/12, where you told me to address my
concerns with having lost confidence with the Police Department with the
Police Department.

And makes no sense to me really.

And I sent this e-mail again on 11/12, which I didn't recieve an answer to
before yesterday:

' Hi,

thank you very much your answer!

But the Standards Unit don't even know their own e-mail address.

And when I go there to discuss the complaint against the Police, then I'm
being harassed.

I'm not sure if it's right that I should go back to the meetings with the
Police then.

I think that would like saying that I liked to be harassed, and thats not
what I mean at all.

Do you understand what I mean now?

Thank you very much again for your answer!'.
And today I got a letter from your collegue at IPCC; Lynne Overend, telling
me that the Merseyside
Police have applied to the IPCC for a dipspensation, to not investegate a
complaint, since I haven't
answered the letter send to me on 23 November 2007 (which I didn't recieve)
or the final letter
sent on 03. December 2007 (Which I did recieve).

I sent an e-mail to the IPCC on 5/12, where I asked what I should do
regarding the letter from the
Police from 03. December, since I had lost a bit of confidence with the
police, like I wrote in the
e-mail from 10/11.

In the email from 5/12, to Joanne Fitzgerald, IPCC, I wrote:

'I'm wondering a bit on how I should go forward with these letters, since,
like I wrote to you on
10/11, I have lost a bit of confidence in the Merseyside Police, due to the
problems mentioned
in my e-mail from 10/11, with the problems conected with the way my
complaint from 3/5, and the
appeal from 26/8, have been dealt with by them, and more.'.

I still don't think it's right that I should deal with the Police
Department, when I've lost confidence
in the Police Department.

And now, the time-limit for answering the Police Department on the mention
letter has passed.

And I think this problem, on how to deal with the letter, should have been
made clear by the IPCC,
by now.

So I'm going to complain about this, to the e-mail address you mentioned.

Also, I'm beginning to wonder if these complaints aren't linked, so that
they should be investigated
collected?

So I'm going to bring this up as well.

Also, I'm going to send a copy of this e-mail to Lynne Overend, since she
sent me a letter, on 31/12,
which I recieved today, where she explained that the Police Department wants
to not investigate the
complaint, since their letter (which I have asked the IPCC for advice on how
to deal with on 5/12),
haven't been answered.

So I hope that this is alright.

I think it's fine to get this made clear, since I did bring up several
issues in the e-mail I sent the IPCC
on 5/12, and then I think all of these issues should be addressed.

Even if Fitzgerald have joined another department, I think that all of the
issues mentioned in the letter
should have been addressed by the IPCC.

So there must have been something that has gone wrong here.

So I'll bring this up with the person you mentioned, that deals with the
complaints, and also with
Lynne Overend, who sent the letter from 31/12, which I recieved today.

Hope that this is alright!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog






On 1/3/08, Sarah Brown wrote:
>
> Dear Mr Ribsskog,
>
> Thank you for your email.
>
> I wish to inform you that, I did not have dealings with your previous
> complaints and therefore I do not have knowledge of their content .
>
> In the emails which you have sent me you expressed that you had lost
> confidence in the police. I informed you in my email dated 11 December that
> you should address these concerns to the Professional Standards Department
> directly. I also informed you how the IPCC was able to assist you with
> regards to your complaint and that we required your consent to proceed. You
> may wish to familiarise yourself with this email.
>
> I believe I answered your queries in your email. If you disagree and would
> like to make a complaint that the IPCC failed to answer your email please
> contact out Complaints Manager Mr Douglas Cleaver. Please entitle emails to
> Mr Cleaver at the following address: *enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk*
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> *Sarah Brown*
> *Casework Manager*
> *Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)*
> *90 High Holborn, London WC1V 6BH *
> *Phone: 0207 166 3934*
> *sarah.brown@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk*
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 02 January 2008 17:42
> *To:* Sarah Brown
> *Subject:* TRIM: Re: IPCC Case Reference 2007/017332
>
>
> Hi,
>
> thank you very much for your answer!
>
> But shouldn't the ipcc have answered me regarding the letter from the
> Merseyside Police Complaints Investigation Bureau, that I sent the ipcc on
> 5/12?
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> Erik Ribsskog
>
>
> On 1/2/08, Sarah Brown wrote:
> >
> > Dear Mr Ribsskog.
> >
> > Thank you for your email.
> >
> > I would like to inform you of the following. I am the case work manager
> > for a complaint you have made against a female member of police staff at
> > Walton Lane Police Station in November 2007. It is not too late for the
> > police to consider this complaint, if you would like the police to consider
> > this complaint please provide your consent to forward the details of your
> > complaint to the Professional Standards Department. Unless you provide
> > consent I am unable to assist you further with this matter. I am aware you
> > are thinking about this.
> >
> > With regards to any questions you have about the police complaints
> > procedure please feel free to contact me on my telephone number or email
> > address as previously provided. If you have any urgent quires please
> > contact the telephone number for the department where an available member of
> > staff will be able to speak to you, this number is 0845 3 002 002.
> > If you prefer to use email and have an urgent query please contact *
> > enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk* where an
> > available member of staff will contact you.
> >
> > Please note that the IPCC will not be able to make decisions on your
> > behalf, pass comment about your complaint or make comment about contact you
> > have had with the police, this is so that the IPCC can remain independent
> > and impartial, as we may have to make decisions about your complaint at a
> > later stage.
> >
> > As I have stated in my previous correspondence any concerns or queries
> > you have about the investigation into your complaint should be directed and
> > discussed with the Professional Standards Department of the Merseyside
> > Police as it is their responsibility to investigate your complaint.
> >
> > Any further emails you send me I will copy to your file, however I will
> > not respond unless you are making a new complaint against police, have a
> > question about the complaints procedure or you wish to continue with the
> > your complaint (case reference 2007/017332) and you are providing me with
> > your consent. This is due to high work volume.
> >
> > Yours sincerely,
> >
> >
> > *Sarah Brown*
> > *Casework Manager*
> > *Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)*
> > *90 High Holborn, London WC1V 6BH*
> > *Phone: 0207 166 3934*
> > *sarah.brown@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk*
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > *From:* Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
> > *Sent: *02 January 2008 16:50
> > *To:* Sarah Brown
> > *Subject:* Re: IPCC Case Reference 2007/017332
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > like I wrote, I'm going to need a bit of time to think this through.
> >
> > There is also the issue with the psd wanting an answer before Christmas
> > regarding the letter I asked the ipcc about
> > in the e-mail from 5/12:
> >
> > ' found that I had to contact you again, since I haven't heard anything
> > from Mr. Gibbs, and in the meantime, I've recieved one letter from the
> > Merseyside Police Complaints Investigation Bureau,
> > from 03/12 (it also says that they sent a letter on 23/11, but I can't
> > see that I have recieved
> > that letter).'.
> >
> > That I sent Joanne Fitzgerald at the ipcc.
> >
> > It's the letter from the Merseyside Police Complaints Investigation
> > Bureau, that I'm also wondering about now,
> > since they needed an answer before Christmas.
> >
> > And I haven't heard anything back from the ipcc regarding this, even I
> > sent the e-mail on 5/12.
> >
> > So now this is to late already, to send a letter or do anything, since
> > the police needed a reply before Christmas,
> > and the ipcc have yet to get back to me regarding this.
> >
> > So I was wondering what has been going on regarding this.
> >
> > Thank you very much in advance for your reply!
> >
> > Yours sincerely,
> >
> > Erik Ribsskog
> >
> >
> > On 1/2/08, Sarah Brown wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear Mr Ribsskog,
> > >
> > > Thank you for your email. I am unable to comment about the different
> > > email addresses you have been given by the police as my role is to provide
> > > information about the complaints process.
> > >
> > > Please re read the information I have provided you regarding the
> > > complaints process and decide whether you wish to continue with this
> > > process. If you do decide to continue please contact me with your consent
> > > to forward the details of your complaint to the Professional Standards
> > > Department. Please note that without your consent I am unable to assist you
> > > further regarding this matter.
> > >
> > > Yours sincerely,
> > >
> > >
> > > *Sarah Brown*
> > > *Casework Manager*
> > > *Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)*
> > > *90 High Holborn, London WC1V 6BH *
> > > *Phone: 0207 166 3934*
> > > *sarah.brown@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk *
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------
> > > *From:* Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com ]
> > > *Sent:* 02 January 2008 16:22
> > > *To:* Sarah Brown
> > > *Subject:* Re: IPCC Case Reference 2007/017332
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > but now it is to late, because the psd department was expecting an
> > > answer before Christmas, and I didn't
> > > get this email before today.
> > >
> > > Even if I sent the e-mail about this, right away, after the meeting in
> > > November.
> > >
> > > I would have to think a bit on how I should go forward with this,
> > > since I haven't really got any confidence in
> > > the department after the last harassment-episode, and the problems
> > > with the department having two e-mail
> > > addresses.
> > >
> > > I work as a company researcher now, and if a company has got two
> > > different general enquiery email addresses,
> > > then it means that something is wrong, and I wouldn't be adding the
> > > company for the business-directory, since I
> > > would think it was not a proper/thrustworthy company.
> > >
> > > Then I wouldn't have recomended the company to the customers of the
> > > directory, if the company had two different
> > > official general enquiery email addresses, there should really just be
> > > one.
> > >
> > > It's like the IPCC should have this e-mail address:
> > >
> > > *enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk*
> > >
> > > and this e-mail address:
> > >
> > > enquiries.@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
> > >
> > > And claiming that both of them were the real, official e-mail address.
> > >
> > > Then I wouldn't have trusted the ipcc, or recomended them to eg. other
> > > people/companies etc.
> > >
> > > So I need a bit of time to think this through.
> > >
> > > I'm not so used with dealing with things like this.
> > >
> > > Hope that this is alright, and thanks in advance for the reply!
> > >
> > > Yours sincerely,
> > >
> > > Erik Ribsskog
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 1/2/08, Sarah Brown wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dear Mr Ribbsskog,
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for contacting the Independent Police Complaints
> > > > Commission (IPCC).
> > > >
> > > > As stated in my previous email to you, with regards to your lose of
> > > > confidence in the police investigation into your complaint. Unfortunately
> > > > whilst the police are conducting an investigation into your complaint the
> > > > IPCC is unable to intervene and is not able to dictate which department
> > > > carries out this investigation. You will need to speak to the Professional
> > > > Standards Department (PSD) of Merseyside Police to discuss further.
> > > >
> > > > It is the responsibility of the PSD to resolve your complaint and
> > > > this may involve them contacting you to establish further facts and
> > > > understand what you would like to happened as a result of making a
> > > > complaint. If you do not wish to meet face to face with an officer then you
> > > > may wish to consider writing to the department instead. I would suggest that
> > > > you make contact with the PSD to advise them of your preferred method of
> > > > contact.
> > > >
> > > > It is your decision if you wish to continue with the complaints
> > > > process.
> > > >
> > > > If you would like to proceed with the next stage of your complaint
> > > > please provide your consent on the form I sent to your postal address on the
> > > > 30 November 2007 or you can send an email . Your consent will allow
> > > > me to forward your complaint details to the Professional Standards
> > > > Department of the Merseyside Police for their consideration.
> > > >
> > > > Yours sincerely,
> > > >
> > > > *Sarah Brown*
> > > > *Casework Manager*
> > > > *Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)*
> > > > *90 High Holborn, London WC1V 6BH *
> > > > *Phone: 0207 166 3934*
> > > > *sarah.brown@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk *
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------
> > > > *From:* Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
> > > > *Sent: *23 December 2007 20:09
> > > > *To:* Sarah Brown
> > > > *Subject:* Fwd: IPCC Case Reference 2007/017332
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I can't see that I have recieved a reply to this e-mail yet, that's
> > > > why I'm trying to send it again.
> > > >
> > > > Hope that this is alright!
> > > >
> > > > Yours sincerely,
> > > >
> > > > Erik Ribsskog
> > > >
> > > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > > From: Erik Ribsskog <>
> > > > Date: Dec 11, 2007 3:47 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: IPCC Case Reference 2007/017332
> > > > To: Sarah Brown <>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > thank you very much your answer!
> > > >
> > > > But the Standards Unit don't even know their own e-mail address.
> > > >
> > > > And when I go there to discuss the complaint against the Police,
> > > > then I'm being harassed.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure if it's right that I should go back to the meetings
> > > > with the Police then.
> > > >
> > > > I think that would like saying that I liked to be harassed, and
> > > > thats not what I mean at all.
> > > >
> > > > Do you understand what I mean now?
> > > >
> > > > Thank you very much again for your answer!
> > > >
> > > > Yours sincerely,
> > > >
> > > > Erik Ribsskog
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 12/11/07, Sarah Brown wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Dear Mr Ribsskog,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you for your emailed dated 07 December 2007.
> > > > >
> > > > > Your new complaint will need to be raised separately from your
> > > > > current appeal. This is so that if the police are unable to resolve the
> > > > > matter to your satisfaction you then have the right of appeal to
> > > > > the IPCC.
> > > > >
> > > > > With regards to your lose of confidence in the police
> > > > > investigation into your complaint. Unfortunately whilst the police are
> > > > > conducting an investigation into your complaint the IPCC is unable to
> > > > > intervene and is not able to dictate which department carries out this
> > > > > investigation. You will need to speak to the Professional Standards
> > > > > Department (PSD) of Merseyside Police to discuss further.
> > > > >
> > > > > If you would like to proceed with the next stage of your complaint
> > > > > please provide your consent on the form I sent to your postal address on the
> > > > > 30 November 2007. Your consent will allow me to forward your complaint
> > > > > details to the Professional Standards Department of the Merseyside Police
> > > > > for their consideration.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yours sincerely,
> > > > >
> > > > > *Sarah Brown*
> > > > > *Casework Manager*
> > > > > *Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)*
> > > > > *90 High Holborn, London WC1V 6BH *
> > > > > *Phone: 0207 166 3934*
> > > > > *sarah.brown@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk *
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > *From:* Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
> > > > > *Sent: *07 December 2007 16:14
> > > > > *To:* Sarah Brown
> > > > > *Subject:* TRIM: Re: IPCC Case Reference 2007/017332
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > thank you very much for your answer!
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not sure if you think that this case should be dealt with
> > > > > together with the other compalaint and appeal-case (see the last e-mail I
> > > > > sent your collegue).
> > > > >
> > > > > And I was also enquiering, in connection with the e-mail I sent
> > > > > some weeks ago, were I explained that I seem to have lost a bit
> > > > > of confidence with the police department conducting the
> > > > > investigation, so I was wondering if you think that it would maybe be
> > > > > possible for another department to handle the complaint and
> > > > > appeal, like I've enquiered about earler.
> > > > >
> > > > > And I havn't recieved an answer to this enquiery.
> > > > >
> > > > > And I was wondering if I maybe should have had receved such an
> > > > > answer, because, now I'm not sure how to reply to the
> > > > > Merseyside Police, regarding the letter that I sent a scanned copy
> > > > > of, with the e-mail to your collegue.
> > > > >
> > > > > So I was wondering who I should contact, if I was wondering how to
> > > > > go forward with this.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hope that this is alright, and thanks in advance for the help!
> > > > >
> > > > > Yours sincerely,
> > > > >
> > > > > Erik Ribsskog
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 12/7/07, Sarah Brown wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dear Mr Ribsskog,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank you for contacting the Independent Police Complaints
> > > > > > Commission (IPCC). Miss Joanne Fitzgerald has asked me to reply to your
> > > > > > email regarding your new complaint. If I could inform you that Miss
> > > > > > Fitzgerald no longer works within the casework department of the Commission
> > > > > > and so will no longer have involvement in the handling of your complaints.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am the Casework Manager for your new complaint surrounding
> > > > > > issues you raised about a female front desk staff member at the Walton Lane
> > > > > > Police Station. If you would like to continue with the next stage of the
> > > > > > complaints process please provide your consent on the form that I sent you
> > > > > > on the 30 November 2007. Once your consent has been received I will forward
> > > > > > your complaint details to the Professional Standards Department of the
> > > > > > Merseyside Police for consideration.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please note that the details of your new complaint have been
> > > > > > noted under reference : 2007/017332. Please quote this reference when
> > > > > > contacting the IPCC regarding your new complaint.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yours sincerely,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *Sarah Brown*
> > > > > > *Casework Manager*
> > > > > > *Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)*
> > > > > > *90 High Holborn, London WC1V 6BH*
> > > > > > *Phone: 0207 166 3934*
> > > > > > *sarah.brown@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk*
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ******************************************************************************
> > > > > The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
> > > > > privileged.
> > > > > It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the
> > > > > intended recipient
> > > > > please notify the sender and delete this email; any disclosure,
> > > > > copying or
> > > > > distribution of this email is prohibited and may be unlawful. The
> > > > > content of
> > > > > this email represents the views of the individual and not
> > > > > necessarily those
> > > > > of IPCC. IPCC reserves the right to monitor the content of all
> > > > > emails in
> > > > > accordance with lawful business practice.This e-mail has been
> > > > > swept for
> > > > > computer viruses but IPCC does not accept any liability in respect
> > > > > of your
> > > > > receipt of this email.
> > > > >
> > > > > Independent Police Complaints Commission
> > > > > 90 High Holborn
> > > > > London,
> > > > > WC1V 6BH.
> > > > >
> > > > > ******************************************************************************
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the
> > > > > Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless
> > > > > in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On
> > > > > leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
> > > > > Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
> > > > > and/or recorded for legal purposes.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the
> > > > Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in
> > > > partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In
> > > > case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.
> > > > Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
> > > > and/or recorded for legal purposes.
> > > >
> > > > The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
> > > > Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in
> > > > partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On
> > > > leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
> > > > Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
> > > > and/or recorded for legal purposes.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the
> > > Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in
> > > partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In
> > > case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.
> > > Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
> > > and/or recorded for legal purposes.
> > >
> > > The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
> > > Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in
> > > partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On
> > > leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
> > > Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
> > > and/or recorded for legal purposes.
> > >
> >
> >
> > This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government
> > Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership
> > with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of
> > problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.
> > Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> > recorded for legal purposes.
> >
> > The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
> > Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in
> > partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On
> > leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
> > Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> > recorded for legal purposes.
> >
>
>
> This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government
> Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership
> with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of
> problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.
> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> recorded for legal purposes.
>
>
>
>
> ******************************************************************************
> The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
> privileged.
> It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended
> recipient
> please notify the sender and delete this email; any disclosure, copying or
>
> distribution of this email is prohibited and may be unlawful. The content
> of
> this email represents the views of the individual and not necessarily
> those
> of IPCC. IPCC reserves the right to monitor the content of all emails in
> accordance with lawful business practice.This e-mail has been swept for
> computer viruses but IPCC does not accept any liability in respect of your
>
> receipt of this email.
>
> Independent Police Complaints Commission
> 90 High Holborn
> London,
> WC1V 6BH.
>
> ******************************************************************************
>
>
> The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
> Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in
> partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On
> leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> recorded for legal purposes.
>

Now I think it's like this.

If you are hunted around the world by some mafia etc.

And you try to stand up, and cooperate with the police etc., on fighting crime etc.

Then, if you manage to help the police, then the police f. you off.

And they don't tell you anything.

And they talk sh*t about you, behind your back to other people etc.

And they don't tell you anything at all, and try to make you go insane and/or kill yourself etc.

So that's what one get for trying to stand up against organised criminal networks etc.

The only question is, who are the biggest smart-asses, the criminals or the police?

That's how I suspect it is.

So one should maybe think twice before trying to cooperate with the police, because if they get control, then you could possibly end up even worse off.

So the British Government didn't like that I quit my studies in Sunderland, to try to get a place to live and a job in London, since my advicors from Oslo University College, had told me that it was almost impossible to get a job around there etc.

And the studies wasn't going that well, since my study-finance was delayed etc., for some strange reasons, and I had to deal with a lot of other things than studies, like calling to Norway all the time, to get payment-arrangments on my bills etc., and switch the moduls at the University all the time, due to the problems with getting the moduls accepted for the study-finance etc.

And also, Oslo Univesity College, put many obstacles in the way, for me to study abroad, which I think seem a bit 'phoney' now, when I look back at it.

Like they were supposed to send a study-finance application for me, which they didn't, and it seems to me like they made up a lot of excuses for not letting me participate on the Erasmus-programme.

So the studies didn't go so well.

But I liked it in Sunderland, and I didn't really want to move.

But I remembered the advisors at Oslo University College, said that it wasn't easy to get work, and also it would have a bit strange to quit the studies and try to get a job.

And my face was distroyed still, so I thought the best thing was to go to another town or city.

And then try to get my own place, like Uni. of Sunderland wouldn't give me for some reason, but insisted that I went to live at the Forge.

And when I got my own place, then I had planned to take contact with the Police in Norway.

The ones working with organised crime etc., and tell them about what was going on, what I knew about it.

And try to cooperate with them, and find out how to deal with the problems.

But I think maybe the British Police didn't like that I quit the studies.

I intended to pay for the studies, but I just wanted to get a job and a flat and then call the Uni. and get a payment arrangement.

Because I didn't think the money was enough to last, if I payed all I owed the Uni. at once.

I wanted to get control of my life first, and then pay the Uni.

Since I didn't want to end up without a place to live and without a job, and without any money.

So that's why I decided to just go to London, since I thought it should be easier to get a job there, from what I had heard.

And then I think the police didn't like this.

And they must have used me, in the way, that they have told some criminal networks lies etc. about me, maybe through some un-uniformed police, like secret police, like pretending not to be police.

And then they have spyed on me, to look and see what the criminals would do, etc. maybe.

Or maybe for some other reason.

Something like this, I think must have been going on.

At least this is what I suspect, something like this.

What is it thats going on.

The British Government knows that the Norwegian Government has chased me away from Norway, so they are just ignoring my rights, and use inteligence to control me, and what else have they done.