Aftenposten Message Board Post, 11/2. (In Norwegian).

Poststreik 2
cons
11/02 17:26
At dem skulle streike i to måneder, det synes jeg hørtes drøyt ut, og lurer på om det ikke kan være noe lureri ute å gå et eller annet sted her.
Anmeldinnlegg
Poststreik
cons
11/02 17:25
Nå kommenterer jeg om den artikkelen, ( www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/sport/article2249924.ece), hvor det stod at et brev man sendte med posten til England, før jul, ikke hadde kommet frem i februar, grunnet poststreik. Det er greit at det var poststreik, men at posten skulle bli forsinket i to måneder da. Det tar vel ikke mer enn en dag eller to å sende et brev til Storbritannia.

http://e24.no/oppogfrem/article2248668.ece#AF

Enclosure 1, letter to Tesco, 11/2.

Phoney.
Nå var det ei phoney-aktig dame på Tesco.

Mørkt hår, i 20-åra med miniskjørt, som bare kjøpte en baguette, og som jobba der, virka det som, for hu gikk ikke ut.

Ligna på lignende plot av hu rødhåra på Spar for noen uker siden.

Og tiggerne i Matthew Street virker litt for årvåkne og studerende spørr du meg.

Som jeg har tenkt før, så skjedde det nok noe da jeg sendte de e-postene fra Arvato i 2006.

Også later bare alle som om det ikke har skjedd noe.

Det er sikkert greit det.

Men at dem skal late som om det ikke finnes noe som heter menneskerettigheter og, det er vel litt drøyt.

Og hva med et åpent og demokratisk samfunn?

Skal dem la folk gå rundt i årevis, uten å fortelle dem hva det er som foregår, sånn at folk kan gå videre med livet sitt?

Utforsk annet under samme kategorier: Diverse
Dette stykket ble skrevet på torsdag, 10 januar, 2008 klokken 19:06 og ble skrevet under Diverse. Du kan følge diskusjonen via en RSS 2.0 strøm for innleggets kommentarer. Du kan kommentere under, eller eller peke til denne permanente pekeren fra din egen blogg. Din kommentar blir synlig umiddelbart, men den kan bli sensurert ved en senere anledning. Rediger dette innlegget.

Letter to Tesco, 11/2.

Erik Ribsskog

Flat 3

5 Leather Lane

Liverpool 11. February 2008

L2 2AE

Tesco Customer Service

FREEPOST SCO 2298

Baird Avenue

Dundee

DD2 3TN

COMPLAINT

On Thursday, 10/1, right before closing-time, at around 11.50 pm., I arrived at your

Tesco Metro shop, in Liverpool City Center.

When I went around to do the shopping, I noticed young woman in her early

twenties, I think.

She only wore like a mini-skirt, or a small black dress, so that dress looked like

a mini-skirt.

So she looked like she was going out to town, eg. clubing.

So I thought it was a bit strange that she was walking around in the shop.

When I got to the check-out, I saw that the woman with the mini-skirt/short dress,

only had bought a baguette.

I used to work in a food-shop-chain in Norway for many years, Rimi, and there we

called those types of baguettes, half-baked.

It looked like the type we called half-baked, bread-products that one get half-baked

from the bread-supplier, and then store in the shop-frezer-room, and then bake them

for a minutes in the shop, and then sell them.

Then they are like fresh from the baker.

But, I remeber that I thought it was a bit strange that someone would buy a baguette

this late. (11.55 pm).

And also that the shop still had half-baked baguettes at this hour, because I remember

from working in the shops in Norway, that baguettes were a product that people ate for

breakfast/lunch, and which the shop didn't bake in the evenings.

Then the shop baked different types of bread.

So it was maybe a bit strange that the young woman, with the dress/mini-skirt, looking

like she was heading for town, would buy a baguette, that had probably been laying in

the shop's half-baked display all day, since the early morning or maybe noon.

When I got to the check-out.

The express check-out, was the only check out open.

Then the customers were served by the about 30 y.o., maybe, woman, working there full

time, (since I've seen her there many times from before).

She has dark hair, is not that tall, and she more or less always have big rings under her eyes.

And I think she likes Tim Cahill, because I think she mentioned him to her collegue one

day I was shopping.

It was probably this day, or the time when I went there before this day.

She put the baguette, on the place where she then put the food I had bought.

The young woman with the mini-skirt/short dress, was just standing there, and just let

the baguette lay there, on the same place where the check-out woman placed the

food I'd bought.

So the woman delayed bringing her bakery-product with her out of the shop, and the check-out

woman, put my food very close to the other womans bakery-product.

And then, when I had finished, then I was let out, through the half-closed-down security-gate,

by a guard, I think he was.

But the woman with the mini-skirt/small dress, wasn't exiting the shop.

She returned passed the regular check-out area, and didn't exit the shop, even if the time was

around 11.55 pm. - 0.00 am.

So she must have been working there, I think, because I was the last customer in the shop, and

after I had left, the gates were shut down, it seemed to me.

So I thought this incident was a bit strange.

Especially since I've been having problems with what seems to be a criminal network of some type,

at my previous workplace, on shops/resturants in town like: Burger King, McDonalds, Lidl; Spar,

Argos, Currys, Iceland.

So it seems like this incedent could be part of some type of pattern.

Because, from working around fifteen years, in food-shops in Norway, this didn't seem like a natural

incident.

And the woman also appeared, like from Nowhere, right after I'd entered the shop.

It was late at night, so there weren't many customers in the shop, and there weren't neighter many

people outside the shop, in the streets, that late, so I think I would have normally noticed the

customer, while walking in to the shop, because I think she must have gotten there right before

me.

But I can't remember seeing the customer walking into the shop.

But I think she was probably working there.

So I guess it could be that she was working to 11.45, and then put on a mini-skirt/short dress, and

then bought a baguette, and then stayed in the shop for some reason.

And then headed for town, like she looked dressed for.

I guess it could have been like that.

But I thought it seemed a bit strange, the way she was just standing there, for several minuttes,

without picking up the baguette, while I was buying my groceries.

So I thought I'd write a complaint to you, regarding this, since I've been writing complaints to

other shops/resturants, regarding other incidents, that could maybe seem to be part of a pattern.

So I thought I'd also write this complaint.

Even if I must admit that I wrote the other complaints, before I wrote this complaint, since I'm

really sure what to complain about, other than that I thought the staff acted strange.

So I hope you have the chance to have a look at this!

I'm enclosing a blog-post I wrote, just a few minuttes after the incident. (It's in Norwegian, but I'm

enclosing it anyway, since I unfortunatly didn't have any other notes about the incident, but I

thought it was better to enclose blog-entry copy, than not enclose any enclosures at all).

It says on the blog-post, that it's written on 10/1, at 19:06.

But I've checked wich time-zone the blog is set on, and it set on timezone -5.

So the actuall date/time for the blog-post, is 11/1, 0:06.

Thats about ten minutes after the incident.

I went straight home, and wrote on the blog, since there have been many maybe a bit strange

incidents happeing.

Hope this is alright, and thank you very much in advance for your help!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

Aftenposten Message Board Posting, 11/2. (In Norwegian).

Rase etc. 11.02.08 06:59
(Svar til: Aftenposten)
cons

Ikke registrertJeg synes det virker litt om nytale, at man ikke har lov å bruke ord som rase, neger, osv, som folk er vant til å bruke fra før.

Hvis dem skal ta fra folk ordene, så får dem i det minste lage et nytt ord som betyr det samme da.

Er det riktig at man skal nekte folk som har brukt et ord hele livet, å fortsette å bruke det samme ordet?

Bare fordi noen påstår at det ikke finnes noen raser, og at mennesker kan klassifiseres etter andre ting.

Det er mulig det er riktigere å klassifisere mennesker etter blodtype f.eks., jeg er ikke noe ekspert på emnet.

Men, å kreve av andre, at de slutte å bruke et ord, er det lov det da?

Blir ikke det trakassering?

Hvis noen får lov å bruke de ordene man ønsker.

Mens andre ikke får lov å bruke de ordene man ønsker.

Dette høres litt snodig ut for meg i hvertfall, og at det kan være et form for overgrep/trakassering, ovenfor de som ønsker å bruke de ordene, som de har brukt hele livet.

En annen ting, kan kanskje være, hva hvis noen har en agenda mot f.eks. norrøne/nordiske folk da.

Så skal man ikke få lov å henvise til dem da, siden det er andre ting enn utsende, som klassifiserer mennesker bedre?

Hvordan kan man da forsvare seg mot f.eks. etnisk rensking?

Hvis ting som etnisitet/rase, ikke er lov å referere til?

Hvis noen sier, å han ble drept fordi noen ikke likte at han hadde blondt hår, og vikingeblod i årene, siden de ville utrydde alle med vikingeblod i årene, for å hevne det vikingene gjorde f.eks.

Så svarer de bare, nei for noe tøys, det er mange andre ting som klassifiserer mennesker bedre enn om de er norrøne eller ikke, så det kan ikke stemme.

Er det den retningen ting tar?

Kan det tenkes at dette tenkte forbudet mot å bruke begrepet rase, kan være del i f.eks. en pågående agenda for å utrydde folk av f.eks. norrøn rase da.

Men at hvis man forbyr folk å prate om rase, så er det ingen som kan protestere og si at de alle de norrøne forsvinner, eller at noen ble drept fordi de er norrønne, fordi det ikke er lov, (ala nytale i '1984'), det er ikke lov å bruke ordet rase og sikkert heller ikke ordet norrønn heller da.

Det blir vel neste steg eventuelt da antagelig, det er jo ikke lov å si neger, så da er det vel ikke lov å si norrøn heller antagelig.

Men jeg mistenker som sagt at slike plutselige 'forbud' mot ord, som dukker opp, kan ha en mulig politisk agenda forbundet med seg.

Jeg ser egentlig ikke noe grunn til å regulere ordene, som i '1984' f.eks., fordi jeg mener det vil regulere seg selv.

Hvis noen mener de blir trakassert, så vil de vel ta opp dette selv, og klage selv.

Man trenger vel ikke opptre som en formynder for dem, og si at, å det er så synd på dem, så vi må få forbud mot å si 'neger'.

Da mener jeg det er patronisering.

Hvis noen blir sure fordi noen sier 'neger', så burde de vel ta det opp selv.

Jeg mener det er patroninsering, hvis noen skal drive å ta opp ting på vegne av andre voksne mennesker.

Men nå skjønner jo ikke jeg alt som foregår i verden, så det er mulig det er noe jeg ikke har skjønt her.

Men det er kanskje noen andre som skjønner det, så kan dem eventuelt svare og opplyse meg da.

Så på forhånd takk for det i såfall!

http://debatt.aftenposten.no/item.php?GroupID=10&ThreadID=226219&page=1#item3444262