Ingeborg Ribsskog - Baron Adeler Malteserordenen E-post til slottet om Mette-Marit videoen Er noe galt i Martine-saken? Problemer med Grandiosa? johncons-MUSIKK johncons-REISE johncons-FOTBALL

Monday, 27 July 2009

Han her var nok mer sikkert i bestemor Ingeborgs familie. Han ble dømt til døden, for å ha gjort en dårlig jobb, da britene vant slaget om København

kommandant københavn

http://lokalhistoriewiki.no/index.php/Hans_Christopher_Gedde

PS.

Det stedet der i Fredrikstad, var der jeg egentlig skulle ha vært i militæret.

Men da jeg flytta til Oslo, i 1989, så meldte jeg adresseforrandring, hos Folkeregisteret.

Selv om dette ikke var vanlig, å gjøre, for studenter.

Men jeg forklarte det, at den adressen jeg hadde da, hos min onde stemor, må man vel si, Haldis, ikke var 'brukanes', som adresse for meg, i tilfelle jeg fikk viktige brev dit.

For jeg hadde ikke noe kontakt med disse.

F.eks., da jeg var i militæret så hadde kusina mi, Susanne, konfirmasjon, og da var det ingen som sa fra til meg.

Og i bryllupet til Tommy, fetteren min, i 2002, (som var i nettopp Fredrikstad), så kjefta kusina mi, Susanne, på meg, for at jeg ikke kom i konfirmasjonen hennes, i 1993.

Men ingen sa fra til meg, om at hu skulle ha konfirmasjon, så det var nesten ikke noe kontakt, mellom meg og faren min og hans dame Haldis da.

Så derfor skifta jeg adresse, til Enebakkveien 239 B, på Abildsø, hvor jeg leide en hybelleilighet, i kjelleren hos et eldre par, Gunnar og Berit Hansen, mens jeg studerte.

Så da ble det forrandret hvor jeg skulle i militæret, fra Fredrikstad til Elverum.

(Og da slapp jeg også å dra til Nord-Norge, noe jeg var litt skeptiskt til, for jeg var så tynn, så jeg frøys fælt, hvis det ble for kaldt, og jeg var ikke så god til å gå på ski osv, så jeg syntes det var bra å tjenestegjøre i Elverum, hele tjenestetiden, for da kunne jeg dra tilbake til Oslo, hver helg, og til og med gå på byen i Oslo hvis jeg ville, eller jobbe, som jeg for det meste gjorde, og jeg besøkte søstra mi, som bodde sammen med noen 'blackiser', Monica og Siv, fra Røyken, på Grunerløkka, noen ganger).

Så sånn var det.

Så det var altså bare tilfeldig, at jeg ikke endte opp i Fredrikstad, og ble boende i de kasernene, som min forfar, eller en i slekten til bestemor Ingeborg, visstnok da, konstruerte, i Gamlebyen der.

(For på det sølvølkruset, som jeg fikk i fødselsdagsgave av bestemor Ingeborg, i 2004, så viste bestemor Ingeborg meg, at det helt tydelig var gravert inn 'Gedde', på det sølvkruset, fra 1700-tallet, sikkert fra noen i samme slekten, som han som bygde den kasernebygningen i Fredrikstad da, som sikkert var bra å ha, for å forsvare seg mot svenskene osv.)

Men men.

Men hva som skjedde i forbindelse med slagt om København.

Om den festningen var bra nok, eller ikke, det vet jeg ikke.

Den festningen har jeg lest om før, tre kroners batteri, og den skulle visstnok være nesten uinntagelig.

Så noe rart skjedde nok i forbindelse med forberedelsene til slaget om København, hvor vel britene ødela hele Danmark-Norges flåte, mener jeg å ha lest.

Og det er vel også et av Nelsons største seiere, som jeg mener er symbolisert, på det monumentet, på Exchange Flags, rett borti gata her, i Liverpool.

Da ser man at fire folk sitter i lenker.

Og den ene skal symbolisere slaget om København, har jeg lest.

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg kom på.

Forfaren min, Ove Gjedde, var visst lennsherre i Numedal, hvor farmora mi er fra, og i Brunlanes, hvor jeg vokste opp, og mormora mi flytta til

ove gjedde

http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ove_Gjedde

PS.

Det er visst delte meninger, kan det virke som, om bestemor Ingeborgs del av familien stammer fra denne Ove Gjedde.

Har bestemor Ingeborg fortalt røverhistorier?

gjedde

PS 2.

Her fant jeg det slektstreet.

Men jeg tror ikke det er copyright, på det slektstreet.

Det stod ikke noe om det ihvertfall.

http://www.gedde-dahl.no/

Riksadvokaten sendte min anmeldelse av Spesialenheten, (siden de ikke ville etterforske politiet, i forb. med ran av Rimi Nylænde), til Statsadvokaten




Google Mail - SV: Purring/Fwd: Anmeldelse av Spesialenheten til Riksadvokaten for slapphet/unnfallenhet i tjenesten










Google Mail


Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>




SV: Purring/Fwd: Anmeldelse av Spesialenheten til Riksadvokaten for slapphet/unnfallenhet i tjenesten











Elisabeth Fredriksen
<elisabeth.fredriksen@riksadvokaten.no>



Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 1:40 PM




To:
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>








Vedlagt oversendes til Dem som gjenpartsadressat, riksadvokatens
brev av 27. juli d.å. til Hedmark og Oppland
statsadvokatembeter.





-----Opprinnelig melding-----
Fra: Erik Ribsskog
[mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Lagt inn: 23.juli2009 23:04
Lagt
inn i:
Postmottak HPM Riksadvokaten
Diskusjon: Purring/Fwd:
Anmeldelse av Spesialenheten til Riksadvokaten for slapphet/unnfallenhet i
tjenesten
Emne: Purring/Fwd: Anmeldelse av Spesialenheten til
Riksadvokaten for slapphet/unnfallenhet i tjenesten

Hei,


jeg kan ikke se å ha mottatt noe svar på denne e-posten ennå, og sender
derfor denne purringen.



Mvh.



Erik Ribsskog




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date:
2009/6/6
Subject: Anmeldelse av Spesialenheten til Riksadvokaten for
slapphet/unnfallenhet i tjenesten
To: postmottak@riksadvokaten.no


Hei,


jeg jobbet som butikksjef, på Rimi Nylænde, på Lambertseter i Oslo, i
1999, hvor vi hadde en

ransbølge der.


Etter det første ranet, (som var den helgen vi byttet frysere der),
så ble jeg innkalt til Grønland

Politistasjon, for å se om jeg kjente igjen raneren, i en boks de hadde
der, med bilder, fredagen,

seks dager etter ranet.


Etterforskeren der, han viste meg en boks med lyshårede kriminelle
da, regner jeg med, men

raneren var så 'våken' under ranet, så jeg kunne ikke se han på noen av
bildene.



Men etterforskeren, han la tommelen sin, på toppen av bildeesken, sånn at
et bilde, satt mellom

tommelen hans og esken.


Så nikket han liksom mot tommelen sin da.


Så kikket jeg på det bildet, men han så så trøtt ut, så jeg kunne
ikke si om det var han raneren,

for han så så våken ut, under ranet.



Så jeg forklarte bare at jeg kunne ikke kjenne igjen raneren, på noen av
bildene.


Men jeg er helt sikker på, at etterforskeren, han ville at jeg skulle
si, om han på bildet under tommelen,

at 'der er han raneren ja'.


Så dette var forsøk på å påvirke vitne, er jeg 100% sikker på.



Men så sier Spesialenheten, at jeg er for upresis, i min
beskrivelse.


Men, dette ranet stod det jo til og med om i avisa, og var vel
sikkert i nyhetene på TV og.



Så at Spesialenheten ikke skal klare å finne ut hvilken etterforsker
dette er, det ser jeg på

som svada/slapphet fra Spesialenheten.


Legg også merke til at de skriver 'Med hilsen' og ikke 'Med vennlig
hilsen', som vel er vanlig å skrive

i Norge, det synes jeg er litt ekkelt fra Spesialenheten, og jeg lurer på
om de har noen slags følelser

ovenfor meg, som de ikke har klart å bearbeide(?)



Det synes jeg i såfall er rart, for jeg har ikke vært i Hamar, siden
1993, da jeg var i militæret i Elverum.


Kanskje det er derfor de ikke liker meg, siden jeg var i militæret i
nabobyen og ikke i Hamar?



Nei, hvem vet, men jeg tror de kanskje er for opptatt av tipping, som
også er i Hamar, og for lite opptatt

av politiarbeid, hos Spesialenheten.


Så det hadde kanskje vært en ide å flytta Spesialenheten til en by
hvor de ikke har tipping?


Ihvertfall burde det kikkes på fra dere, hva det kan komme av, at
Spesialenheten er så slappe.



(Se også tidligere henvendelser fra meg angående den samme
Spesialenheten).


Med vennlig hilsen


Erik Ribsskog



Vedlegg: Brev fra Spesialenheten med dato 27.
mai.






Felles.PDF
28K








PS.

Her er brevet som Riksadvokaten sendte:

img004

Jeg fikk en e-post fra the Financial Ombudsman, klage-avdelingen, som skulle se over den klagen jeg sendte da, skriver de




Google Mail - Complaint/Fwd: Reminder/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail










Google Mail


Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>




Complaint/Fwd: Reminder/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail











Service Review Manager
<srmanager@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>



Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:14 AM




To:
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>








Dear Mr Ribsskog




Thank you for your e-mail. I
have asked a member of my team to look into your concerns.



They will make contact with you in due course.





Service Review Team


(on behalf of the Service Review Manager)






From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 24 July 2009 20:00
To: Service Review
Manager
Subject: Complaint/Fwd: Reminder/Fwd: Complaint against
RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail


Hi,


the Financial Ombudsman is sending me e-mails, at 7. o'clock, on Sunday
morning!


I think this is rude and inpolite and an invasion of my privacy.



I've tried to contact your operations manager, and ask for an explanation,
about how this behaviour

from the Financial Ombudsman, can happen, but she have refused to
explain.


I know that 7. o'clock, on a Sunday morning, is the last time of the
week, that I want to deal

with bank-complaints.


How can this happen?


And why are you treating your staff like this, why don't you let them
have rest-days?



Regards,


Erik Ribsskog






---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Collins, Jackie <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>
Date:
Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:42 AM
Subject: RE: Reminder/Fwd: Complaint against
RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail
To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>




Dear Mr
Ribsskog


I believe I
have answered all of your questions in my previous email, and I am not
prepared to enter into any further discussions regarding this
matter.


Please feel
free to email me however, if you have any queries regarding your
complaint.



Regards


Jackie
Collins

Operations Manager
Direct Dial : 020 7964
0116

Direct Fax: 020 7964 0117








From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 23 July 2009 22:23
To: Collins,
Jackie
Subject: Reminder/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier
e-mail





Hi,


I can't see that I've received an answer to this e-mail yet, so I'm trying
to send it again.



Best Regards,


Erik Ribsskog




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at
2:18 PM
Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail
To:
"Collins, Jackie" <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>


Hi,


I think I have the right to know this, when your representatives send me
e-mails at

seven o'clock, on a Sunday morning.


I think you should send your business e-mails within the
business-hours, and I'm

conserned about how you treat your staff, and I've contacted Acas about
this.



If you do not expect your staff to work 12-14 hours a week, seven days a
week,

then why are the working on a Sunday morning at six o'clock.


People are going to think that your representatives are some kind of
slaves, if

they have to work at the time of the week, when the other people in
England,

are on their way back from the pub.



If people get e-mails at this hour, they are going to start writing answers
while

they are still drunk.



This sounds insane to me, to have people working, at six o'clock, on a
Sunday

morning, answering e-mails that they could have answered on a Monday.


You have to pay them overtime, for work they just as well could have
done on

a week-day.


Your institution is extreamly poorly managed, and you are wasting the
tax-

payers money, with all the unessesary over-time.



I think there is a law in this country saying that Government should have
openness,

so I think you should explain what the reason for your very strange and
akward

working-hours are.



Sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog








On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Collins, Jackie <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>
wrote:



Dear Mr
Ribsskog


Thank you
for your email.


You will
excuse me for not going into the finer details of our staffing working hours
and holiday allowance. I will however, reassure you we certainly
do not expect or allow our staff to work 12 to 14 hours a day 7 days a
week.



Regards


Jackie
Collins

Operations Manager
Direct Dial : 020 7964
0116

Direct Fax: 020 7964 0117








From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 30 June 2009
16:31



To: Collins, Jackie
Subject: Re: Complaint against
RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail





Hi,


Monday to Friday, 8 am to 6 pm, is alright, I think.


But you also let your staff work Sunday mornings, at 6 am.



It seems to me that you overload your representatives with work, and that
they have to

work 12 to 14 hours 7 days a week.



I thought slavery was forbidden in our time.



Why do you let your representatives work every Sunday morning, when other
people in

England are on their way home from the pub?



Do your staff get summer-holiday at all?


Sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog





On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Collins, Jackie <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>
wrote:



Dear Mr
Ribsskog


We
always try to provide the best service we can to our customers, and
sometimes that means offering our staff the option of working overtime
during very busy periods.


Please
be assured that they have to work within strict time guidelines, and these
are always checked by Operations Managers to ensure they are not working too
many hours.


The
service our department offers is outside of the usual office hours of
9am till 5pm because we have found that a lot of our customers have
difficulties contacting us whilst they are at work themselves during the 9am
to 5pm times, so we have opening hours of 8am - 6pm, as do many firms
these days.


I hope
this explains.



Regards



Jackie
Collins

Operations Manager

Direct
Dial : 020 7964 0116

Direct Fax: 020 7964
0117








From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 29 June 2009
19:32
To: Collins, Jackie



Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier
e-mail





Ok,


that sound very fine!



But, why is that you let your representatives work over-time every
Sunday then?


Shouldn't you as a main rule conduct your business, within the
business hours?


Yours sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog




On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Collins, Jackie
<jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>
wrote:



Dear
Mr Ribsskog


Rosemary Cox has passed your complaint to me to take over as
you have requested that she no longer deals with your
case.


I can
confirmed that a letter has been sent to the firm, and we have asked that
they issue you with a final response letter within 14 days. We have
also asked them to copy us in on that response.


If you
remain unhappy with the firms response, or you have not received a
response from them within 14 days, please let me know and I will arrange
for your complaint to be moved forward for investigation by an
Adjudicator.


Regards



Jackie Collins
Operations
Manager

Direct Dial : 020 7964
0116

Direct Fax: 020 7964
0117








From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 28 June 2009 11:17
To: Cox,
Rosemary
Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier
e-mail


Hi,


I don't think it's any use with me repeating myself.



I don't think you should handle my complaint.


The reason is, that if you are to overworked, you get to
tired.



And in dealing with complaints like these, one obviously needs ones
judgement, to be like

it should be.


If one are out of balance, like I think you could be, then I
don't think this is good for how the

complaint is being dealt with.


So please do as I ask Mrs .Cox, and tell your manager what I
said, that I want someone else

to deal with my complaint, due to that I think that you must be
overworked.


Haven't you seen how fine the weather is today, you should have a
day off in the fine weather,

I think.


Sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog





On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Cox, Rosemary
<Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>
wrote:







Dear Mr
Ribsskog


Thank you for your
e-mails


As previously advised I am not going to
debate with you the working hours of this
office.


I have written to you today to advise the
steps we are taking with your complaint. If the firm fail to resolve the
situation for you, your complaint will be passed onto our adjudication
area for further consideration of the concerns you have
raised.


I should add that
we do not tolerate rude or insulting language at this
office
, and would expect any further communication to be sent in
a more acceptable manner.



Kind Regards


Rose Cox


team manager







From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 28 June 2009 10:43



To: Cox, Rosemary
Subject: Re: Complaint
against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail





Hi,


of course you can work on Sundays if you want.


But business e-mails should just be sent within the
business-hours.


Or else, what's going to happen, is obvious.


Someone are going to come drunk home from town, and answer the
business-e-mails when they are drunk, which is what has happened today,
with our correspondence.


If this is something, you didn't know from before, then I think
this Financial Ombudsman-stuff is just a load of crap really.



Try to use the head that God gave you when you were born!


Sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog





On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Cox, Rosemary
<Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>
wrote:







Dear Mr Ribsskog


Thank you for your e-mail


I must admit to being surprised and
confused with the content of the
e-mail
.


We are an extremely busy department and we often
work at the weekends, this is obviously of help
to consumers as we are able to deal with their complaints in
a more timely manner. I would suggest that
It is entirely up to each individual business to
determine which hours their staff will work and I do not intend
debating this with you.


By working this weekend I have been able to deal
with your complaint, which as you can appreciate is of a benefit to
you.


Perhaps you can clarify the spelling mistakes you
are referring to?


Kind Regards




Rose Cox

team manager







From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 June
2009 10:20



Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier
e-mail





Hi again,


don't you think it's strange for an institutions like yours to
send e-mails on Sunday mornings then?


Shouldn't e-mails be sent within normal business hours then
you think?



This is what it says on Wikipedia:



In
the United
States
and United Kingdom, the hours between 9 am and 5 pm are typically considered to be standard
business hours






I
think this is rather akward, as I also think your spelling-mistakes
are.


Sincerely,


Erik
Ribsskog




On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Cox, Rosemary
<Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>
wrote:






Dear Mr Ribsskog


Thank you for your e-mail


That's no problem, however I should point out
that we are not a government department, we are a independent
complaints body.


I will be in touch with your again in the next
few days




Kind Regards



Rose Cox

team manager






From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 28
June 2009 08:02



To: Cox, Rosemary
Subject: Re: Complaint
against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail





Hi,


ok that's very fine, I'm just home from town you see.


I thought it was a bit strange, since noone in Government
in Norway, work on Sundays.


Sorry about this, I forget sometimes that I'm not in Norway
any longer.


Sorry about this!



Yours sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog





On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Cox,
Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>
wrote:






Dear Mr Ribsskog


Thank you for your e-mail


I can assure you this is not
a joke, I am currently in the office working
today.


I presume that
you would like us to deal with your complaint, so am responding to
your e-mails
today



Kind Regards



Rose Cox

team manager







From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 28
June 2009 07:36
To: Cox, Rosemary
Subject: Re:
Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail





Hi,


why do send the e-mails early on a Sunday morning, by the
way.


Is this some kind of joke?



Sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog




On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Cox,
Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>
wrote:




Dear Mr Ribsskog


Thank you for your
e-mails


I will contact
you again once I have considered the
information.


Kind Regards



Rose Cox

team manager







From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 27
June 2009 14:59
To: Cox, Rosemary
Subject:
Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail





Hi,


thank you for you e-mail, that I recieved today.


I'll contact your collegue back, regarding the
Barclays-complaint.



I sent the complaint on RBS Dale St., to Yvonne Williams at
RBS, but she

also harassed me, like this, she writes 'Dear Ms Ribsskog',
even if my name

is Erik, and in Britain, you have a movie called 'Erik the
Viking', and Eric is

also a quite usual name, in English-speaking
countries.


So I think Yvonne Williams, the complaint-investigator,
also bullied me.



I think this must have been a deliberate mistake.



This ended with the complaint being partly resolved, in the
way that RBS,

gave me the bonus of £100, for moving my account to them,
from Barclays,

(who I also had problems with, that I'll exlain about to
your collegue, like I

mentioned earlier).


I'll also find the actual complaint against RBS Dale
St. now, and forward it

to you.


What I meant with the complaint-form, was that it
didn't look anything at all

like the ones you've sent me now.


Maybe the complaint-form I was sent, was to do with
other financial institutions,

than banks?


Like share-fonds etc?



Have you also got other complaint-forms, other than to
banks, perhaps someone

sent me the wrong form intentionally?



Just a thought I had.


But anyway, thank you very much for your e-mail, and
I'll also find the actual

RBS Dale St. complaint, and e-mail it to you now.


Yours sincerely,



Erik Ribsskog





---------- Forwarded message
----------
From: Williams, Yvonne
(CRU)
<Yvonne.Williams@rbs.co.uk>
Date:
Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 4:30 PM
Subject: RE: Earlier
e-mail
To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>




Dear Ms Ribsskog


Could you please arrange another copy of your email to be
sent to me for my investigation


Regards


Yvonne Williams





From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 19 June
2007 14:04
To: Williams, Yvonne
(CRU)
Subject: Earlier e-mail


*** WARNING : This message
originates from the Internet ***


Hi,


I'm refering to the e-mail I sent you on 5/6.


I was just wondering if you have recieved this e-mail,
because I cant see

that I have recieved any answer to it yet.


Please just contact me if you want me to send you the
e-mail again.


Yours sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog


The Royal
Bank of Scotland plc, Registered in Scotland No. 90312.
Registered Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2
2YB

Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services
Authority.

This e-mail message is confidential and for
use by the addressee only. If the message is received by anyone
other than the addressee, please return the message to the
sender by replying to it and then delete the message from your
computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily secure. The Royal
Bank of Scotland plc does not accept responsibility for changes
made to this message after it was sent.

Whilst all
reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of
viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure
that the onward transmission, opening or use of this message and
any attachments will not adversely affect its systems or data.
No responsibility is accepted by The Royal Bank of Scotland plc
in this regard and the recipient should carry out such virus and
other checks as it considers
appropriate.





This e-mail and any attachments
are confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you
are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachment from your
system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy,
disclose or take any action in reliance to it.


This e-mail and any attachments have
been checked by virus detection software before transmission.
You should carry out your own virus checks on the contents of
this communication. We accept no liability for any loss or
damage which may be caused by software viruses or by
interception or interruption of this mail.


Unless otherwise indicated, this
e-mail has no contractual effect and may only be used for the
purpose(s) indicated in it. The statements and opinions
expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do not
necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service
Ltd.


This email has originated from the
Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh
Wall, London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a limited
company in England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as
above.












This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not
the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and
delete this e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are
not the intended recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any
action in reliance to it.


This e-mail and any attachments have
been checked by virus detection software before transmission. You
should carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this
communication. We accept no liability for any loss or damage which
may be caused by software viruses or by interception or
interruption of this mail.


Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail
has no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s)
indicated in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this
e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect
those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.


This email has originated from the
Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall,
London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in
England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as above.












This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not
the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and
delete this e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are
not the intended recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any
action in reliance to it.


This e-mail and any attachments have been
checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should
carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this
communication. We accept no liability for any loss or damage which
may be caused by software viruses or by interception or interruption
of this mail.


Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail
has no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s)
indicated in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this
e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those
of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.


This email has originated from the
Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall,
London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in
England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as above.












This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete
this e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the
intended recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in
reliance to it.


This e-mail and any attachments have been
checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should
carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication.
We accept no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by
software viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail.


Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has
no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s)
indicated in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail
are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the
Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.


This email has originated from the
Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall,
London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in
England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as above.












This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this
e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to
it.


This e-mail and any attachments have been
checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should
carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication.
We accept no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by
software viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail.


Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has
no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated
in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of
the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd.


This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,
United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.
3725015. Registered office as above.












This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this
e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to
it.


This e-mail and any attachments have been
checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry
out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept
no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software
viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail.


Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in
it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the
author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman
Service Ltd.


This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,
United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.
3725015. Registered office as above.












This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this
e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to
it.


This e-mail and any attachments have been checked
by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your
own virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no
liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or
by interception or interruption of this mail.


Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it.
The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service
Ltd.


This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,
United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.
3725015. Registered office as above.












This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this
e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to
it.


This e-mail and any attachments have been checked
by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own
virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for
any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception
or interruption of this mail.


Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it.
The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service
Ltd.


This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,
United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.
3725015. Registered office as above.













This e-mail and any attachments are confidential
and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient,
please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachment
from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy,
disclose or take any action in reliance to it.


This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by
virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own
virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for
any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception or
interruption of this mail.


Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The
statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do
not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.


This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United
Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015.
Registered office as above.












This e-mail and any attachments are confidential
and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient,
please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachment
from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy,
disclose or take any action in reliance to it.


This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by
virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own
virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for
any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception or
interruption of this mail.


Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The
statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do
not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United
Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015.
Registered office as above.












Jobbsøking i England: Jeg sendte e-post til University of Sunderland, om de kunne sende meg resultatet av en engelskprøve jeg tok der, i 2004




Google Mail - English-test










Google Mail


Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>




English-test











Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>



Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:22 PM




To:
gateway@sunderland.ac.uk






Hi,

I studied at the University of Sunderland in 2004 and 2005, on the study
abroad programme.

I had some problems with my study-finance from Norway, so I had to end
my studies before I got my degree, due to the problems with this, and with

my home university not wanting to accept the modules I'd chosen, for some
reason.

But, I think it looks a bit stupid, not to have any files from when I studied
in Sunderland, so I thought that perhaps I could try to get a file with the

result of my English-test, that all study abroad students had to take,
where I got the best result, so that I didn't have to take English courses.

That file would have been very fine to have.


So I was wondering if you know who I should contact then, that has to do
with files like this, at the Language-study department.

Thanks in advance for the help!

Yours sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog







Jeg sendte Facebook-melding til Frode Vidar Holm, en kar på Berger, om Lene Andersen, ei som gikk i klassen vår

frode vidar holm

Hvis vi ser på antall faste lesere på bloggen, så kan vi se at det har vært en økning på nesten 100%, fra 1. til 2. kvartal

stor økning

Haldis er ikke på Facebook. Men hu her ligna litt. Det her tror jeg må være niesa til Haldis, eller noe sånt noe

haldis humblen

Nå er det sommerferie, men antall lesere på bloggen ligger fortsatt på ca. 2000 i uka, hvorav over 700 er faste lesere. Takk til alle lesere!

antall lesere

Brukte bestemor Ingeborg nettverket sitt mot meg, siden jeg flyttet til faren min?

I det siste har jeg lurt litt på, om det kan ha vært sånn, at bestemor Ingeborg, har brukt sitt nettverk, for å plage meg, siden hun ikke likte at jeg flyttet fra moren min, til faren min, i 1979.

Bestemor Ingeborg, har jo kjente danske besteforeldre som Anders Gjedde Nyholm og en annen bestefar var industriherre, sønn av den kjente industrigrunderen Anker Heegaard, og disse hadde jernstøperiet i Frederiksværk, som kanskje er like kjent i Danmark, som sølvgruvene i Kongsberg, i Norge?

Hvem vet.

Ihvertfall så kunne man se dette nettverket til bestemor Ingeborg da, på hennes runde fødselsdagsselskaper.

Da dukket det opp folk fra Norge, Danmark og England, i hennes selskaper.

Folk jeg ikke ante hvem var, og vel opp mot 20-30 stykker.

Som holdt taler osv., mens oss som var i familie med bestemor, vi holdt sjelden tale, hvis ikke tante Ellen dristet seg frempå da.

Og sønnen til min fars nye dame, (min far lot jo meg bo alene på Bergeråsen, siden han fant en ny dame, et halvt år etter at jeg flyttet dit), hun hadde to stesønner, Jan og Viggo, som var halvt danske.

Og Jan (Snoghøj), var det nettopp, som agerte 'Kirsten Giftekniv' da, og fikk faren min til å besøke moren hans, Haldis, siden Jan og faren min, begge var i sykkelklubben, hvor faren min begynte noen måneder etter et jeg flytta dit.

Dette må ha vært våren 1980, at faren min begynte i sykkelklubben, ble kjent med Jan Snoghøj, som da var 16 år, og Jan inviterte så faren min, til å besøke sin mor, Haldis, som bodde i et hus, på Bergeråsen, med tre barn, Viggo, Jan og Christell.

Så flyttet faren min ned dit da, og ble som en far for Viggo, Jan og Christell da.

Og så ble vel mer Ågot og Øivind, på Sand, min fars foreldre, de ble mer som mine foreldre da, selv om jeg ikke syntes at det ble det samme med, jeg ville jo helst ha en ordentlig far og mor da, jeg bodde jo ikke på Sand, jeg bare spiste middag der.

Men men.

Men det var nok bedre enn å bare bo alene på Bergeråsen.

Det hadde nok vært fælt, hvis jeg ikke hadde hatt muligheten til å gå bort på Sand, for det huset til Ågot og Øivind der, det var nesten som mitt barndomshjem og, for etter at faren min skilte seg, med mora mi, så bodde faren min hos foreldrene sine, så da vi var på besøk hos faren vår, så bodde vi i huset til Ågot og Øivind da.

Så i det huset, så var jeg minst en gang i året, vil jeg si, fra jeg ble født, til jeg var i begynnelsen av 20-åra, for de flytta ikke så mye rundt og sånn, som resten familien, min fars foreldre, Ågot og Øivind da, (selv om Øivind døde rundt 1983 vel).

Men men.

Men kan bestemor Ingeborgs nettverk ha vært så mektig, at hun kunne trekke i noen tråder, også fikk Jan Snoghøjs danske familie han til å invitere min far hjem til Haldis.

Kan det ha vært noe slikt som har foregått, er det som jeg driver å lurer litt på nå for tiden da.

For min mormor kunne være ganske morsk og streng og myndig, er vel det rette ordet.

Hun var så og si alltid patroniserende, og sa ting som 'så så lille Erik', til jeg var langt oppe i 30-åra.

Hun sluttet vel aldri helt å være sånn.

For bestemor Ingeborg, kunne være slem noen ganger, og gå inn for å såre folk, virker det som for meg.

Så spørsmålet er hvor 'forstyrra' var bestemor Ingeborg, og hvor besatt var hun av slike dagligdagse ting?

Var hun 'forstyrra' nok til å prøve å ødelegge sine slektningers liv, pga. at hun hadde en slags forkvaklet oppfatning av ting da?

Jeg husker jo at bestemor Ingeborg, bebreidet meg, for at søstra mi hadde en mørkhudet unge.

(Ikke at jeg sier at det er noe galt med det).

Men søstra mi, hun hadde ikke jeg noe kontroll over, da hun flytta til Oslo.

Så jeg bestemte ikke hvilke venner hun skulle ha.

Søstra mi, bodde i bofelleskap, men noen venner av henne fra skolen, og jeg kunne ikke dukke opp der, og si at søstra mi måtte gjøre sånn og sånn.

Nei, søstra mi var under min fars og Haldis' omsorg, hun bodde der under tenårene, etter å ha bodd hos sin mor i Larvik først.

Og så bodde søstra mi et par år, hos Ågot, på Sand, mens jeg studerte og jobbet, i Oslo.

(Noe Ågot klagde på, hu ble sliten av å ha Pia boende der, husker jeg at Ågot sa).

Så flytter søstra mi med noen venner til Oslo, og jeg er opptatt med jobb og studier og militæret, og har ikke noe myndighet over søstra mi.

Søstra mi har ikke noe sted å bo, når jeg er ferdig med militæret, og spørr om hu kan bo hos meg.

Jeg regna begge foreldra mine, som veldig uansvarlige, så jeg sa det var greit.

Men jeg kunne jo ikke begynne å si til henne, hvem hun skulle ha som venner og sånn.

Søstra mi var jo da, sommeren 1993, 21 og et halvt år gammel vel.

Også skulle jeg si til henne hvem hun kunne ha som venner.

Nei, det ville ikke ha fungert, fordi søstra mi var, når hun var 21 år gammel, en viljesterk person.

Så det ville aldri ha fungert.

Og i 1995, da Pia fikk Daniell, da hadde hun hatt eget rom, siden 1993, hos Ungbo.

Så det var ikke sånn at hun bodde på rommet mitt, hele tiden, det var bare noen få måneder, til hun fikk seg eget rom.

Så Pia bodde ikke hos meg, når hun fikk Daniell.

Men mormoren min bebreider meg, at søstra mi fikk en farget unge.

Så hun er tydelig vært veldig forstyrret, og hun tenkte veldig svart og hvitt da.

At søstra mi er englebarnet, og jeg er liksom, hva heter det, en som får skylden da, for alt som går galt.

Hva heter det da.

Skyldebukk?

Nei, jeg husker ikke hva det heter.

Jeg merker at det er lenge siden jeg har bodd i Norge.

Men jeg fikk skylda for alt som gikk galt da, enda jeg kanskje ikke hadde noe skyld i det.

Så bestemor Ingeborg, var forstyrra, vil jeg si.

Så spørrs det hvor forstyrra hun var.

Var hun forstyrra nok til at hun prøvde å ødelegge livet mitt, pga. noe som vel egentlig var mellom meg og foreldrene mine, dvs. hos hvilken av foreldrene mine jeg skulle bo.

Hvem vet, men det er vel lov å lure ihvertfall.

Det får man håpe.

Policy for kommentarer


Anonyme kommentarer, blir slettet, (etter en del problemer, med nettmobbing osv.).

Hvis du har et vanlig navn, så skriv gjerne noe, som skiller deg, fra andre, med samme navn, (sånn at det er klart, hvem som skriver).

Kommentarer som inneholder trakassering, (og som ikke holder seg, til temaet, i blogg-posten), blir bare slettet, (og ikke publisert).

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

For å eventuelt legge inn kommentar, så trykk på linken, til blogg-posten, (så kommer det opp et felt, hvor man kan kommentere).

Blog Archive