Ingeborg Ribsskog - Baron Adeler Malteserordenen E-post til slottet om Mette-Marit videoen Er noe galt i Martine-saken? Problemer med Grandiosa? johncons-MUSIKK johncons-REISE johncons-FOTBALL

Friday, 8 August 2014

Jeg sendte en e-post til Virgin

Erik Ribsskog

Your ref: LTR011/Fwd: Ofcom reference: 1-266978842

Erik Ribsskog Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 9:56 PM

To: CollectionsAccountReview@virginmedia.co.uk
Cc: info@cisas.org.uk
Bcc: OCCtelecoms , Phso Enquiries , Q&A , Legal Services Ombudsman , enquiries@legalombudsman.org.uk, info@canter-law.co.uk, admin , "emb.london" , post , she , Bjørn Ribsskog , "hv-02.kontakt" , Politikk Høyre , amnestyis , "EUteam@amnesty.org" , "SCT@amnesty.org.uk"
Hi,

I'm refering to your letter, from 6/8, which I received today, (and
attach a scanned copy of).

I've sent about this case, to Cisas and Stephchange.

So I'm waiting to hear back from them, about this.

So I'm going to contact you back, when I hear more, from Cisas.

I didn't realize you at Virgin actually had an e-mail-address, (that
is monitored), before I read your letter.

Or else I would have e-mailed you much before, about this.

(I'm not such a big fan, of chats and online-contact-forms.

And I don't have a land-line, and have had little credit on my mobile,
due to that the Jobcentre have stopped, to send me jobseekers
allowance, (I have to say)).

Your engineer also distroyed my printer, (even if I fixed it with
super-glue, but anyway), and drilled an extra hole, in my lounge-wall,
that he filled with 'silver', like he called it.

This I wanted to complain about.

(I haven't gotten to complain to you before.

Because I haven't had your e-mail-address.

And have tried to send the complaint, by Ofcom etc., I think it was.

So this is now more than a year ago).

Also, I wanted to complain about, that you needed something like four
or five visits, to my flat, to install a broadband-line.

And you changed a box, in my wall, to do with the new broadband-line.

(Is that why Police say e-mails I haven't written are from my IP-address.

Because you've put some 'funny' stuff in my wall)?

BT only needed one visit and one engineer, when I got a new
broadband-line, on my room, in Mandeville Street, in 2006.

Yet Virgin needed like four visits, and five engineers here, to
install a broadband-line, (at my current address), last year.

This I wanted to complain about.

Regards,

Erik Ribsskog


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 5:42 PM
Subject: Re: Ofcom reference: 1-266978842
To: OCCtelecoms <OCCtelecoms@ofcom.org.uk>
Cc: info@cisas.org.uk


Hi,

thank you for your e-mail!

I send a copy-email to the internet adjudicator then.

I tried to look more at Virgins website now, and had a chat with Phil.

But when I tried to call the mobile-number he mentioned, then it
wasn't free, (anyway), and I'm out of credit on my mobile, since I
haven't gotten my jobseekers allowance lately.

And I attach a copy of the conversation with Phil.

I think it's strange they don't have an e-mail-address.

I used to be with BT Broadband, (from 2006 to 2011), and they were
possible to e-mail.

But when I moved to Sunderland, in 2011, then BT sent me a cheque, for
around £150, I think.

So they must have double-charged me, for some months, I think.

And then discovered this, later.

I really wanted to use a credit they had.

But I think what happened was that BT double-charged me instead.

So like some sharia, or something?

So BT freaked me out, I have to say.

And that's why I chosed Virgin now.

But if I'd known they don't use e-mail, then I would have chosen Talk
Talk, (or another internet-supplier), I think.

Just to try to update.

Thanks again for the e-mail.

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog


On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 1:39 PM, OCCtelecoms <OCCtelecoms@ofcom.org.uk> wrote:
> Ofcom reference: 1-266978842
>
>
>
> 04 August 2014
>
>
>
> Dear Mr Ribsskog
>
>
>
> Thank you for contacting Ofcom about Virgin Media Ltd.
>
>
>
> Although we are unable to get involved in individual disputes, I realise
> that you have approached us for help and will explain how you can progress
> your complaint.
>
>
>
> If you have already contacted Virgin Media Ltd and feel you have been dealt
> with poorly or unreasonably, you can ask them to take your complaint to a
> higher level. You can find out how to do this from your service provider’s
> code of practice. This should detail their full complaints procedure and
> will be available through its website and customer services. Some service
> providers also print complaint information on the back of their phone bills.
>
>
>
> You are likely to resolve your dispute by following the complaints
> procedure, but if you exhaust this and remain unhappy, you should ask your
> service provider to send you a letter outlining their final position. This
> is known as a ‘deadlock’ letter.
>
>
>
> Once you have received a deadlock letter, you may be able to take your
> dispute to an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) scheme. You can also take
> your dispute to an ADR scheme if it remains unresolved 8 weeks after you
> first complained.
>
>
>
> An ADR scheme is an important piece of consumer protection which every
> service provider has to belong to. They are free and independent services
> available to residential or small business (up to 10 employees) customers.
> Service providers must abide by an ADR’s decision, but if you are
> dissatisfied with the outcome you are free to consider legal action.
>
>
>
> For information, Virgin Media Ltd is a member of the Communications and
> Internet Services Adjudication Scheme (CISAS) for the purpose of ADR. You
> can contact CISAS at:
>
>
>
> CISAS
>
> International Dispute Resolution Centre
>
> 70 Fleet Street
>
> London
>
> EC4Y 1EU
>
>
>
> Phone: 020 7520 3827
>
> Email: info@cisas.org.uk
>
> Website: www.cisas.org.uk.
>
>
>
> With regards to the quality of customer service given by your provider,
> whilst this does not fall under our remit, it is in a provider’s own
> interest to treat their customers well. Additionally, we record all of the
> complaints we receive, so can identify issues of general consumer concern.
> If we notice a particular increase in similar complaints against the same
> provider, we may raise this with them for internal review.
>
>
>
> I hope you find this information helpful and can confirm that I have
> recorded details of your experience. If you need more advice, you can visit
> our website at: www.ofcom.org.uk or phone the Consumer Contact Team on: 0300
> 123 3333 or 020 7981 3040. You should quote the reference number at the top
> of this letter.
>
>
>
> Yours sincerely
>
>
>
> Charlotte Sperry
>
> Consumer Contact Team
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> ******************************************************************************************************************
> For more information visit www.ofcom.org.uk
>
> This email (and any attachments) is confidential and intended for the use of
> the addressee only.
>
> If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the
> message and delete it from your system.
>
> This email has been scanned for viruses. However, you open any attachments
> at your own risk.
>
> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and
> do not represent the views or opinions of Ofcom unless expressly stated
> otherwise.
> ******************************************************************************************************************


virgin.jpg
110K

PS.

Her er vedlegget:

virgin

Jeg fikk et brev fra Virgin

virgin

Jeg sendte en e-post til the Legal Services Ombudsman

Erik Ribsskog

New complaint about the Law Society/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: New complaint about Huyton Jobcentre/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint to Jane Finn, Manager Birkenhead Benefit Centre, Ref.: SG270967D/Fwd: More impersonation-emails/Fwd: Your Email Enquiry <<#22175-3 []

Erik Ribsskog Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 9:24 PM

To: Legal Services Ombudsman
Cc: enquiries@legalombudsman.org.uk
Bcc: info@canter-law.co.uk, admin , "emb.london" , post , she , Bjørn Ribsskog , "hv-02.kontakt" , Politikk Høyre , amnestyis , "EUteam@amnesty.org" , "SCT@amnesty.org.uk"
Hi,

I've mixed you up with the Legal Ombudsman now, I think.

But this was really meant for LSO, (who I complained about the Law
Society to, around 2008, if I'm not mistaking).

Now it's a new complaint.

I've sent them and law firms many e-mails about that I wanted to swith
solicitor-firm.

But today it was still Linskills who represented me in court.

And I was found guilty.

In this murder of justice-case where I'm being framed.

So this I wanted to complain about.

I'm attaching a file I got in court today, from the probation-service,
and another file, about the court-hearing.

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

Here is something I wrote on my blog, (in Norwegian), about this
trial, earlier today:

'PS 2.

Jeg gikk til retten, klokka halv ni, i dag morges.

Rettsaken min skulle begynne, klokka 10.

Men det stod på brevet, at jeg burde være der, en halvtime før.

(Noe jeg har ignorert tidligere.

Ettersom at min tidligere advokat, Colin Simber, hos Linskills, hadde
bedt meg, om å ignorere dette).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

PS 3.

Da jeg dukket opp, i retten, cirka klokka halv ti.

Så var Solicitior Danielle Gibbons, fra Linskills der.

(På tross av at jeg har sendt mange e-poster.

Til the Law Society og til advokatkontorer.

Fordi at jeg ville at et nytt advokatkontor, skulle representere meg.

Siden at Linskills tulla, (vil jeg si), når de sendte meg brev.

For jeg fikk brev i posten, om en ny 'avtale', dagen etter, at denne
avtalen, skulle ha funnet sted.

Og så fikk jeg klagebrev også, om at jeg ikke hadde møtt, på dette møtet.

Og Solicitor Colin Simber, (også fra Linskills), skrev også et brev,
en stund før dette igjen, hvor han sa opp advokatforholdet).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

PS 4.

Danielle Gibbons, hu hadde med seg en koffert, (hvis jeg ikke så helt feil).

Og jeg var oppe i andre etasje der, og så på lista, over hvor
rettsaken skulle være.

(Den skulle være, i rettsal 7.

Som lå i første etasje.

Og de to foregående gangene, som jeg har blitt 'dratt', til denne retten.

Så var rettsakene i en rettsal, i andre etasje.

Jeg hadde ikke engang fått med meg det, at de hadde rettsaler, i
første etasje der).

Gibbons ville chatte med meg, i en 'lukket møteboks' der.

Og hu forklarte det, at de hadde prøvd å få utsatt rettsaken.

For de ville at en ekspert, skulle se på, min gamle PC.

For å prøve å finne bevis, på at jeg ikke hadde sendt e-postene.

(En metode, som jeg selv synes, at virker litt dum.

Hvorfor ikke be om å få etterse bevisene, til politiet.

Eller hvorfor ikke kontakte Google.

Og få de til å bekrefte, at jeg ikke hadde sendt, disse e-postene.

Nei, dette virker som tull og tøys, (og kanskje litt som et
sofistikert hijack-forsøk), fra Linskills, synes jeg.

Gibbons var i andre etasje der, ved siden av en stor neger, i dress,
(husker jeg).

(Hvis jeg ikke blingsa, og det var konstabel Lester, (som jeg seinere
så i etasjen under), da).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

PS 5.

Før rettsaken startet, så fikk Gibbons meg til å skrive under, på et ark.

Om at Sarah Bamber ikke behøvde å vitne, for min del.

(Noe sånt).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

PS 6.

Rettsaken varte, fra cirka klokka 10-11, til cirka klokka 16, i dag.

Gibbons prøvde å få utsettelse.

Men retten nektet.

(Gibbons ville ha tid, til å få sett på den gamle PC-en min, (før rettsaken).

En PC, som Lester 'rappa', i april, var det kanskje.

Noe sånt).

Rettsaken gikk etterhvert videre, (med mange pauser).

Sarah Bamber dukka opp der, for å vitne.

Hu forstod bare cirka halvparten, av spørsmålene, fra dommeren, (vil jeg si).

(Hvis dette ikke var spørsmål, fra aktor, da.

Det husker jeg ikke helt).

Sarah Bamber visste seg å være en 47 år gammel 'Miss'.

Hu hadde jobba i cirka femten år, på the Jobcentre.

(Noe sånt).

Og i cirka seks-sju år, (var det vel), på Aintree Jobcentre.

(Noe sånt).

Denne 'Miss'-en, hadde også en datter, (ble det nevnt igjen).

(Uten at jeg vet, hvordan en Miss, kan ha en datter.

For Miss betyr vel frøken.

Og en frøken er vel en jomfru, skulle man vel tro.

Men dette var kanskje den gjenfødte Jomfru Maria, da.

Noe sånt).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

PS 7.

Jobcentre-sjefen Cathrine, (fra Aintree Jobcentre), var det vel.

Hu slapp å vitne, (av en eller annen grunn).

Og da var det konstabel Lester, som skulle vitne.

Han sa det, at de to aktuelle ip-adressene, var fra min PC, og
Liverpool City Council.

(Noe sånt).

Men dette var bare hans vitneforklaring.

Det ble vel ikke fremlagt noen papirer, som liksom skulle bekrefte dette.

(Sånn som jeg forstod det, ihvertfall).

Lester sa at det fantes to typer ip-adresser.

Statiske ip-adresser.

Og en annen type ip-adresser, som ikke var statiske.

(Dette var vel noe som jeg hadde forklart, i et avhør, på enten
Wavertree eller St. Anne St. politistasjon, i enten januar eller
april).

På spørsmål fra Gibbons, så svarte Lester det, at han ikke hadde noe
særlig bra IT-kunnskaper.

(Noe sånt).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

PS 8.

Gibbons ga meg råd, om ikke å vitne.

(Dette var vel etter en pause, som var fra cirka halv et til kvart på to, vel.

Noe sånt).

Og jeg hørte da på det, og vitna ikke.

Og de tre med-dommerne, de satt kanskje i en halvtime, (eller noe
sånt), for å finne ut hva de skulle dømme.

(Dette var to damer og en mann.

En lyshåret dame, i 50-åra.

En afrikansk dame, i 50-åra.

Og en mann, i 60/70-åra, med 'kronprins Haakon-skjegg'.

Noe sånt.

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

PS 9.

Han i juryen, med skjegget.

Han sa det, at de dømte meg som skyldig, fordi at jeg ikke ville vitne.

(Noe sånt).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

PS 10.

Dommeren, (var det vel), foreslo, noe med 'probation'.

Og aktor, (var det vel), sa det, at jeg ikke var straffet fra før.

Men bare hadde en advarsel, for 'theft', fra 2008.

Så det var greit for han.

(Noe sånt).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

PS 11.

Aktor sa mye negativt om meg, i sitt slutt-innlegg.

Han sa blant annet et par ting, som fikk meg til å ta opp min syvende sans-bok.

Og gjøre et par notatet.

Og det var, at jeg var en 'fantasist'.

Og at jeg ikke viste noe 'empaty', ovenfor Sarah Bamber.

Gibbons spurte meg seinere, hvorfor jeg hadde skrevet opp noen notater.

Og jeg forklarte det, at jeg aldri hadde blitt kalt noe lignende, av
fantasist, tidligere.

Så jeg reagerte negativt på det.

(Jeg synes at det er æreskrenkelse, for å si det sånn).

Og de kunne vel ikke forvente det, at jeg skulle være som ektemannen
til Sarah Bamber.

De blandet følelser inn i det.

Min rolle er ikke å vise empati, ovenfor Sarah Bamber.

Det må hennes ektemann/kjæreste gjøre, mener jeg.

Jeg blir uskyldig straffet, for noe jeg ikke har gjort.

Og så får jeg skjenn, for å ikke vise empati, ovenfor en
arbeidsformidlings-byråkrat, (som er som ei heks, i møtene, vil jeg
si).

Dette blir som noe russisk, vil jeg si.

Aktor gjorde også et poeng av det, at jeg ikke hadde noen venner.

Og at alt mitt sosialliv, foregikk via nettet.

Det er jo som i kommunist-Russland, vil jeg si.

De blir så personlige og klamme, vil jeg si.

Og aktor sa også noe om 'aliens', osv.

Så dette var jo helt hinsides, (vil jeg si).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

PS 12.

Aktor leste opp referater, fra møtene, mellom Lester og hans kolleger,
og meg, på politistasjonene.

Men annenhvert ord omtrent, var 'inaudible'.

(Altså 'umulig å høre'.

Noe sånt).

Nettbutikkene mine, ble ikke nevnt.

Bøkene mine ble nevnt bare en gang.

Men bloggen min, den nevnte aktor, veldig mange ganger.

Og han sa også noe sånt som, (da han leste opp referater, fra møtene
med meg, på politistasjonene), at jeg var en: 'Earlier home defence
man in Iraq'.

(Hvis jeg hørte det riktig).

Så her har det vært noe klussing, med referatet, (eller noe i den
duren), vil jeg si.

(Noe sånt).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.'.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 7:16 PM
Subject: Re: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: New complaint about Huyton
Jobcentre/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint to Jane Finn, Manager Birkenhead
Benefit Centre, Ref.: SG270967D/Fwd: More impersonation-emails/Fwd:
Your Email Enquiry <<#22175-3 []
To: "findasolicitor@lawsociety.org.uk" <findasolicitor@lawsociety.org.uk>
Cc: enquiries@legalombudsman.org.uk


Hi,

ok, I send about this to the Legal Ombudsman then.

Who also complained about you to, to do with my employment-case, in 2007.

(If I remember it right).

It's a bit strange, that the Law Society, advice me to contact the
same law-firm again.

(The one in Bootle, who didn't have their e-mail address on their web-site).

When I had complained about this, to you, before.

So I'm not sure, if you are pulling my leg here, (again).

Erik Ribsskog


On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 5:27 PM, findasolicitor@lawsociety.org.uk
<findasolicitor@lawsociety.org.uk> wrote:
> Dear Erik Ribsskog
>
> As The Law Society is not a law firm and we cannot  represent nor advise you
> in legal matters,may I ask that you do not contact us with regards to your
> ongoing case as we cannot be of any further assistance. May I also
> respectfully ask that you refrain from "cc 'ing"us in your emails.
>
> Yours Sincerely,
> Dawn
> Find a Solicitor Administrator
> DD: 020 7316 5550
> http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/find-a-solicitor/
>
>
> P    Help save paper - do you need to print this email ?
> This electronic transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely
> for the addressee(s). If you have received this message in error please
> return it to the originator immediately and delete it from your computer. If
> you are not the intended recipient you should not use, copy, alter or
> disclose the contents of this message. All information or opinions expressed
> in this communication and/or any attachments are those of the author and not
> necessarily those of the company. The company accepts no responsibility for
> loss or damage arising from its use, including damage from viruses or other
> harmful content.
>
> The Law Society has authorised Prolog to respond to Find a Solicitor e-mails
> on their behalf.
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> Original Message:
> From: eribsskog@gmail.com
> Sent: 15:30:06
> To: findasolicitor <findasolicitor@lawsociety.org.uk>
> Cc: info@canter-law.co.uk
> Subject: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: New complaint about Huyton
> Jobcentre/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint to Jane Finn, Manager Birkenhead
> Benefit Centre, Ref.: SG270967D/Fwd: More impersonation-emails/Fwd: Your
> Email Enquiry <<#22175-39409
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I haven't heard from Miss Kennedy, at Cobleys, so I thought I'd try to send
> it to Canter, Levin & Berg.
>
> Which was the third company you mentioned, the first time I contacted the
> Law Society about the Linskills-complaint.
>
> I also attach a letter I got in the post from Linskills today.
>
> It has no name, and they write my first-name wrong.
>
> Also, I don't think they do it right, regarding this case.
>
> It must be easier to show that the evidence is wrong, or contact Google.
>
> This seems a bit like a sophisticated hi-jack attempt to me.
>
> That someone try to get to my e-mail-adress, blog (with employment-cases
> and memoirs), web-shop etc., (I do more than one thing on the internet,
> which has commented about, on telly, in Norway, by Norwegian celebrity
> Jenny Skavlan, who thought that was strange, if she's does different things
> herselves, she's both an actor and a fashion-designer, and calls herselves
> an 'IT girl', I've read, after she attacked me, on telly, in co-operation
> with Norwegian musician Thomas Seltzer from the Norwegian rock-band
> Turbonegro and he's also a comedian, or something, on telly).
>
> The police also stole my computer, to do with the case, when Miss Kennedy
> represented me.
>
> (Then they said I'd sent harassment-emails to an Ingus-woman, (and now they
> say a Jobcentre-woman.
>
> So this could be that Ingeus try to get to my memoirs etc., as part of the
> government-programme for unemployed.
>
> With actor-cops, etc.
>
> What do I know).
>
> But that computer they never offered me back.
>
> But I've been unemployed since 2008.
>
> And the laptop I bought new, in 2005, stopped working that well, around
> 2009/2010.
>
> So the two computers that the police has stolen from me, are just two
> computers, that I've bought, for around £100 each, from shops in and around
> Dale Street, that sell old, refurbished computers.
>
> So they are just 'emergency-computers', that one might as well call 'scrap'
> almost, I think.
>
> And after the police stole the last computer from me, (in January I think),
> then I just bought a new computer, for £50, at a local 'dodgy-shop'.
>
> (Since I can't afford to buy new computers.
>
> Since I'm unemployed.
>
> And don't get e.g. my inheritance or to sell my property, in Norway, it
> seems).
>
> So I'm not this interested, in the old scrap-computers.
>
> But Linskills are, it seems.
>
> I wonder if this is just to exterminate me and hijack me, as part of some
> new age government programme.
>
> Who knows.
>
> The court-case also seems a mess.
>
> It isn't clear what's going to happen there tomorrow, I think.
>
> I've been on two meetings there.
>
> And they've also had at least two case management-meetings, I think they're
> called.
>
> And I haven't seen any evidence yet.
>
> And I don't know if anyone else have.
>
> And the Police who says I've sent them Lester, (even if I know of course I
> haven't sent these mails, and they also dramatize about them, I think, and
> call them stalking etc., probably just inventions, to get to my web-shop
> and memoirs etc, I guess, a web shop which Ingeus started doing some
> 'gypsy-stuff' around, when they dragged me there, on some
> Jobcentre-programme, one of many).
>
> So this is just a mock-case, I think.
>
> Since Ingeus now owns me, or something.
>
> Since I'm unemployed.
>
> Who knows.
>
> Regards,
>
> Erik Ribsskog
>
> PS.
>
> And Linskills has also written something, with a pen, on the letter.
>
> That I doesn't understand what means.
>
> It alienating and freaks me out, I think.
>
> This company I don't like.
>
> So I don't really want to have anything to do with them, in court,
> tomorrow, or any later time.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 5:27 PM
> Subject: Re: Complaint/Fwd: New complaint about Huyton Jobcentre/Fwd:
> Update/Fwd: Complaint to Jane Finn, Manager Birkenhead Benefit Centre,
> Ref.: SG270967D/Fwd: More impersonation-emails/Fwd: Your Email Enquiry
> <<#22175-394099#>> [ > To: "findasolicitor@lawsociety.org.uk" <findasolicitor@lawsociety.org.uk>
> Cc: Leanne Kennedy <l.kennedy@easylaw.co.uk>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> yes, I've been with Cobleys before, in a case, that was similar with this
> case, (and really part of this case, I think).
>
> Perhaps Miss Kennedy there could sort this again, I was thinking.
>
> (Since she knows the case a bit).
>
> So I send a copy-email to her.
>
> Thank you very much for the reply.
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> Erik Ribsskog
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 4:50 PM, findasolicitor@lawsociety.org.uk <
> findasolicitor@lawsociety.org.uk> wrote:
>
>> Dear Erik Ribsskog,
>>
>> Thank you for contacting Find a Solicitor (“FAS”), a service provided by
>> The Law Society to assist members of the public obtain details, where
>> possible, of an accredited firm or individual who may be able to advise
>> and/or represent them on legal matters.
>>
>> Please see below a list of 3 firms in the L4 5XJ area that are qualified
>> to advise you further:
>>
>> DPP Law Ltd
>> 268 Stanley Road
>> Bootle
>> Merseyside
>> L20 3ER
>> 0151 933 5525
>>
>>
>> James Murray Solicitors
>> 41 Merton Road
>> Bootle
>> Merseyside
>> L20 7AP
>> 0151 933 3333
>>
>> Cobleys LLP
>> 19-23 Sir Thomas Street,
>> Liverpool
>> Merseyside
>> L1 6BW
>> 0151 242 900
>>
>> Please click on the following link to search for further solicitors in
>> your area: www.lawsociety.org.uk/find-a-solicitor/
>>
>> As The Law Society is not a law firm and we do not represent nor advise
>> persons in legal matters,may I respectfully ask that you refrain from "cc
>> 'ing" Find a Solicitor in your emails.
>>
>>
>> Yours Sincerely,
>> Dawn
>> Find a Solicitor Administrator
>> DD: 020 7316 5550
>> http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/find-a-solicitor/
>>
>>
>> P Help save paper - do you need to print this email ?
>> This electronic transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely
>> for the addressee(s). If you have received this message in error please
>> return it to the originator immediately and delete it from your computer.
>> If you are not the intended recipient you should not use, copy, alter or
>> disclose the contents of this message. All information or opinions
>> expressed in this communication and/or any attachments are those of the
>> author and not necessarily those of the company. The company accepts no
>> responsibility for loss or damage arising from its use, including damage
>> from viruses or other harmful content.
>>
>> The Law Society has authorised Prolog to respond to Find a Solicitor
>> e-mails on their behalf.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Original Message:
>> *From: *eribsskog@gmail.com
>> *Sent: *15:34:48
>> *To: *"findasolicitor@lawsociety.org.uk" <findasolicitor@lawsociety.org.uk
>> >
>> *Cc: *me-customersupportliverpool@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk;
>> rcjchancery.judgeslisting@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk; admin <
>> admin@lpl-norwegian-consulate.org.uk>; "emb.london" <emb.london@mfa.no>;
>> post <post@mfa.no>; she <she@topdanmark.dk>; "Bjørn Ribsskog" <
>> bribsskog@gmail.com>;
>> *Subject: *Re: Complaint/Fwd: New complaint about Huyton Jobcentre/Fwd:
>> Update/Fwd: Complaint to Jane Finn, Manager Birkenhead Benefit Centre,
>> Ref.: SG270967D/Fwd: More impersonation-emails/Fwd: Your Email Enquiry
>> <<#22175-394099#>> [
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> thank you for your e-mail!
>>
>> My post-code is L4 5XJ.
>>
>> I also got a letter, from the court, today.
>>
>> I haven't sent these harassment e-mails at all.
>>
>> This is just that they frame me.
>>
>> The police-man, (from the police-station etc.), Lester, is a liar.
>>
>> (He lied to a woman at the police-station, about a code-lock not working.
>>
>> But he said to the earlier solicitor, that he had forgotten the code.
>>
>> Also he said he had evidence proving I'd sent the e-mails.
>>
>> But it's just lies, I know I haven't sent them).
>>
>> So it's the police who have bad character, I think.
>>
>> I don't want anyone to say this about me, (that I have bad character).
>>
>> Also, I've being punished a lot, by the Jobcentre.
>>
>> For their mistakes.
>>
>> They have banned me from my five closest jobcentres.
>>
>> They mess with me if I go to a jobcentre further away.
>>
>> They say I have to be seen in a screened room.
>>
>> And they also have stopped paying my allowance, (I have to say), they owe
>> me around £900 in missing jobseekers-allowance-payments, since January.
>>
>> So I have to do stuff like trying to get credit cards, and look for coins
>> on the street, to survive.
>>
>> So this is more like an execution, really.
>>
>> So I also copy Amnesty about this.
>>
>> Thanks again for the reply!
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Erik Ribsskog
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:36 AM, findasolicitor@lawsociety.org.uk <
>> findasolicitor@lawsociety.org.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Good Morning
>>>
>>> Thank you for contacting Find a Solicitor (“FAS”), a service provided by
>>> The Law Society to assist members of the public obtain details, where
>>> possible, of an accredited firm or individual who may be able to advise
>>> and/or represent them on legal matters.
>>>
>>> In order for us to assist you, we require a postcode on which to base our
>>> search. As we have not been provided with this information we are unable
>>> to give you details of firms/solicitors in your area. Please provide this
>>> information to enable us to proceed with your search.
>>>
>>> Alternatively, please click on the following link to search for a
>>> solicitor in your area: www.lawsociety.org.uk/find-a-solicitor/
>>>
>>> If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us
>>> on 0207 242 1222 or via email at findasolicitor@lawsociety.org.uk
>>>
>>> If we do not hear from you within a period of 4 working days we will
>>> assume that you have found the assistance you require elsewhere.
>>>
>>> Yours sincerely,
>>>
>>> Dawn
>>>
>>> Find a Solicitor Administrator
>>> DD: 020 7316 5550
>>> http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/find-a-solicitor/
>>>
>>>
>>> P Help save paper - do you need to print this email ?
>>> This electronic transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely
>>> for the addressee(s). If you have received this message in error please
>>> return it to the originator immediately and delete it from your computer.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient you should not use, copy, alter or
>>> disclose the contents of this message. All information or opinions
>>> expressed in this communication and/or any attachments are those of the
>>> author and not necessarily those of the company. The company accepts no
>>> responsibility for loss or damage arising from its use, including damage
>>> from viruses or other harmful content.
>>>
>>> The Law Society has authorised Prolog to respond to Find a Solicitor
>>> e-mails on their behalf.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Original Message:
>>> *From: *eribsskog@gmail.com
>>> *Sent: *20:40:58
>>> *To: *findasolicitor <findasolicitor@lawsociety.org.uk>
>>> *Cc: *me-customersupportliverpool@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk;
>>> rcjchancery.judgeslisting@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk; admin <
>>> admin@lpl-norwegian-consulate.org.uk>; "emb.london" <emb.london@mfa.no>;
>>> post <post@mfa.no>; she <she@topdanmark.dk>; "Bjørn Ribsskog" <
>>> bribsskog@gmail.com>;
>>> *Subject: *Complaint/Fwd: New complaint about Huyton Jobcentre/Fwd:
>>> Update/Fwd: Complaint to Jane Finn, Manager Birkenhead Benefit Centre,
>>> Ref.: SG270967D/Fwd: More impersonation-emails/Fwd: Your Email Enquiry
>>> <<#22175-394099#>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I want to complain about this company.
>>>
>>> They don't sign their e-mails.
>>>
>>> And I think it's impolite when they write that they don't need to receive
>>> more e-mails.
>>>
>>> And it's strange that their general enquiry e-mail-address is the
>>> e-mail-address of a specific staff.
>>>
>>> I only contacted this company, since the first company didn't have an
>>> e-mail-address on their web-site.
>>>
>>> Two out of two solicitor-companies aren't fine, I think.
>>>
>>> It's like Liverpool is a hell-hole.
>>>
>>> This I wanted to complain about.
>>>
>>> Do you know about a better law-firm, please?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Erik Ribsskog
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Joanne Dalton <JoanneDalton@msbsolicitors.co.uk>
>>> Date: Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 1:55 PM
>>> Subject: RE: New complaint about Huyton Jobcentre/Fwd: Update/Fwd:
>>> Complaint to Jane Finn, Manager Birkenhead Benefit Centre, Ref.:
>>> SG270967D/Fwd: More impersonation-emails/Fwd: Your Email Enquiry
>>> <<#22175-394099#>>
>>> To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: Paul Gallagher <PaulGallagher@msbsolicitors.co.uk>, Hayley Catherall
>>> <HayleyCatherall@msbsolicitors.co.uk>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Paul Gallagher has tried to contact you today. Can you please call him
>>> on 0151 281 9040.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I do not need to receive any more emails.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
>>> *Sent:* 04 August 2014 13:52
>>> *To:* Contact-Us
>>> *Cc:* CONTACT-US; DWP ICE gateway team
>>> *Subject:* New complaint about Huyton Jobcentre/Fwd: Update/Fwd:
>>> Complaint to Jane Finn, Manager Birkenhead Benefit Centre, Ref.:
>>> SG270967D/Fwd: More impersonation-emails/Fwd: Your Email Enquiry
>>> <<#22175-394099#>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> today I went for a Personal Adviser Interview at Huyton Jobcentre.
>>>
>>> (I haven't really asked for a Personal Adviser.
>>>
>>> And I really want a Jobseeking-adviser.
>>>
>>> If I have to have an advisor.
>>>
>>> And not a Personal Adviser, (I'm not sure how this title should be
>>> interperated)).
>>>
>>> I gave the letter to a woman there, in her 50's perhaps with brown hair.
>>>
>>> (I didn't see her name.
>>>
>>> She wasn't wearing a name-sign.
>>>
>>> But an ID-sign, around her neck.
>>>
>>> And she wasn't that tall, so the id hang a bit low, so I didn't manage to
>>> read what it said.
>>>
>>> Name-signs would be more customer-friendly, I think, than the
>>> ID-bracelet.
>>>
>>> I'm an earlier Store Manager who is used with checking that the staff
>>> wore their name-signs at work, by the way).
>>>
>>> At Huyton Jobcentre it was chaos.
>>>
>>> The brunette went and chatted with some other staff, about my letter, and
>>> punched on several computers, I think.
>>>
>>> She said it wasn't on the system, (to a collegue, I think), I overheard.
>>>
>>> And I overheard that someone in the queue, (I hadn't been asked to sit
>>> down), had a meeting with the same adviser, (Lynn), around the same time,
>>> as me.
>>>
>>> I was then asked to sit down, (after around ten minutes).
>>>
>>> I had barely sat down.
>>>
>>> And then a security-guard told me to go to a screened room, I think they
>>> called it.
>>>
>>> Like I'm a criminal, or something!
>>>
>>> Then I got to speak with a Gary, in room 4.
>>>
>>> He said a mistake had happened.
>>>
>>> So that I couldn't have the meeting today.
>>>
>>> (He said Lynn wasn't at work.
>>>
>>> But I guess he lied.
>>>
>>> Since I overheard that Lynn was having another meeting, while I was
>>> queuing).
>>>
>>> So I took two buses, for a total of one and a half hours, (each way), for
>>> no reason at all.
>>>
>>> It was like the first meeting I had, at Huyton Jobcentre, earlier this
>>> year.
>>>
>>> The Royal Airforce-guy, (I'm not sure if it was Gary), just didn't want
>>> to speak with me, the first day, that I went there.
>>>
>>> I had to go back, the next week.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> And then the earlier Royal Airforce-guy, (at least he claimed to have
>>> worked for them), squezed two meetings into one apointment, it seemed
>>> like,
>>> to me.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Lynn wasn't available, Gary said, by the way.
>>>
>>> Gary said he had to speak with my other adviser.
>>>
>>> (I hope this doesn't mean that Sarah Bamber is working with my files
>>> still.
>>>
>>> After she has taken me to court, with some false acusations about me).
>>>
>>> Gary didn't way any name, just 'other adviser'.
>>>
>>> Gary also asked me if I was alright, at the beginning, of the meeting.
>>>
>>> I don't know why he became personal.
>>>
>>> I think this is a bit personal.
>>>
>>> I asked him, if he was alright, (so to not be patronised myself).
>>>
>>> Gary said he had felt better.
>>>
>>> So perhaps Gary needs a holiday, one could think.
>>>
>>> He didn't looked like he had shaved this morning eighter, I think.
>>>
>>> (I've served me conscription-service in the Norwegian infantry, and have
>>> worked as a store manager.
>>>
>>> So I'm a bit aware of things like this).
>>>
>>> Gary wasn't that clear, regarding how and when, I was going to hear, from
>>> the Jobcentre, next time.
>>>
>>> I wanted to know how I should go forward.
>>>
>>> But Gary couldn't even say, if I was going to get a letter, in the post,
>>> from JCP, or not.
>>>
>>> So this was poor customer-service, I think.
>>>
>>> How should I go forward now, I was wondering.
>>>
>>> The Jobcentre have around five times, the last months, stopped my claim,
>>> by mistake.
>>>
>>> And then you have punished me, for _yours_ mistakes.
>>>
>>> And you haven't paid me jobseekers-allowance, for a random number of
>>> weeks, (it seems), to do with these mistakes you've done, when you
>>> stopped
>>> my claim.
>>>
>>> Even if I've every time this has happend, has ASAP explained to you, that
>>> my claim hasn't really ended.
>>>
>>> Then you at JCP should have cleaned up your mistake.
>>>
>>> But no, you just tell me my claim has ended.
>>>
>>> I have to file a rapid reclaim.
>>>
>>> No cleaning up here.
>>>
>>> No appologizes for that you've done mistakes.
>>>
>>> But you make me almost starve to death, (by stopping my allowance, for a
>>> month or more, at a time), instead of cleaning up your mistakes.
>>>
>>> This reminds me, about something, that my Assistant Manager Kjetil
>>> Prestegarden once said, (when I was Store Manager, at Rimi Kalbakken, in
>>> Oslo, where I worked in 2000 and 2001).
>>>
>>> It's ok to make mistakes Prestegarden said.
>>>
>>> But not _only_ mistakes.
>>>
>>> I could say the same, I think.
>>>
>>> The Jobcentre is only making mistakes.
>>>
>>> Also when you say I've sent harrassing e-mail, to your staff, Sarah
>>> Bamber.
>>>
>>> I haven't done this at all.
>>>
>>> But you wont realize this.
>>>
>>> And also make more mistakes, like banning me from my five closest
>>> jobcentres.
>>>
>>> And when I go to Edge Hill or Williamsson Square Jobcentre.
>>>
>>> Then the staff there mess with me.
>>>
>>> They don't like the route I've walked there, (a staff at Edge Hill said,
>>> he said I would have had to walk past Williamsson Sq Jobcentre, to get to
>>> Edge Hill Jobcentre, from Walton. But that's a lie. It's possible to walk
>>> from Walton to Edge Hill Jobcentre without walking past Williamsson Sq.
>>> jobcentre. So this was just a provocation, I think, from John or Jimmy,
>>> at
>>> Edge Hill Jobcentre).
>>>
>>> Mistakes upon mistakes upon mistakes.
>>>
>>> And when are you going to send me the money you owe me?
>>>
>>> You owe me almost £900 in missing jobseeking allowance-payments, since
>>> January.
>>>
>>> 31/1 to 21/2.
>>>
>>> 8/3 to 30/3.
>>>
>>> 23/5 to 9/6.
>>>
>>> 20/6 to 3/7.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> And 4/7 to 17/7.
>>>
>>> I was never sanctioned, in any way, when I worked for twelve years, in
>>> Rimi/ICA, in Norway, from 1992 to 2004.
>>>
>>> So how come I get all these missing payments, from the Jobcentre, this
>>> year?
>>>
>>> The answer is, that I'm being messed with, in an organised way, it seems
>>> to me, by some e.g. underworld, at the Jobcentre.
>>>
>>> So this I wanted to complain about.
>>>
>>> If you do a mistake, try to clean it up, as soon as possible.
>>>
>>> That is something I tried to have, in the back of my mind, when I worked
>>> as a retail-manager, at Rimi/ICA, for around ten years, from 1994 to
>>> 2004.
>>>
>>> Maybe the Jobcentre should think a bit like that themselves, and stop
>>> being so arrogant and descending, (if I may say, a bit moderated version,
>>> of what I think).
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance for the fast cleaning-up, of all of these your
>>> mistakes, mentioned above.
>>>
>>> Erik Ribsskog
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: *Erik Ribsskog* <eribsskog@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 9:53 PM
>>> Subject: Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint to Jane Finn, Manager Birkenhead
>>> Benefit Centre, Ref.: SG270967D/Fwd: More impersonation-emails/Fwd: Your
>>> Email Enquiry <<#22175-394099#>>
>>> To: CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>
>>> Cc: Contact-Us <Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk>, DWP ICE gateway
>>> team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, Henrik Wedell-Wedellsborg <ww@bruunhjejle.dk>,
>>> "emb.london" <emb.london@mfa.no>, HRW UK <hrwuk@hrw.org>, amnestyis <
>>> amnestyis@amnesty.org>, Politikk Høyre <politikk@hoyre.no>, Phso
>>> Enquiries <phso.enquiries@ombudsman.org.uk>, post <post@mfa.no>,
>>> Akademikerforbundet <post@akademikerforbundet.no>, LHT Customer Service <
>>> csc@lht.co.uk>, Bjørn Ribsskog <bribsskog@gmail.com>, she <
>>> she@topdanmark.dk>, "hv-02.kontakt" <hv-02.kontakt@mil.no>,
>>> "anne-kathrine.skodvin" <anne-kathrine.skodvin@ica.no>, post <
>>> post@spesialenheten.no>, "EUteam@amnesty.org" <EUteam@amnesty.org>, "
>>> SCT@amnesty.org.uk" <sct@amnesty.org.uk>, hofmarskallatet <
>>> hofmarskallatet@kongehuset.dk>, Liverpool Direct <
>>> liverpool.direct@liverpool.gov.uk>, Vernepliktsverkets kontaktsenter ved
>>> Wenche Molstad <vpv.kontakt@mil.no>, post <post@slottet.no>, Runcorn
>>> Office <runcornoffice@taroe.org>, Info <info@tpas.org.uk>, Benefits
>>> Service <benefits.service@liverpooldirectlimited.co.uk>, "
>>> steve.rotheram.mp" <steve.rotheram.mp@parliament.uk>, LO Postkasse LO <
>>> lo@lo.no>, rcjchancery.judgeslisting@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
>>> "president@ansa.no"
>>> <president@ansa.no>, Google Press <press@google.com>, post@canica.no,
>>> kelo02@handelsbanken.co.uk
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> today I got a text-message from you.
>>>
>>> You say I've ended my claim.
>>>
>>> Have you gone insane?
>>>
>>> I've almost starved to death, twice this year.
>>>
>>> First in May and then in July.
>>>
>>> Since you stop my allowance all the time.
>>>
>>> And now this.
>>>
>>> (I also almost starved to death once last year.
>>>
>>> You haven't sent me my money, that I should have gotten last week.
>>>
>>> And I haven't eaten properly, the last days, and don't feel very strong.
>>>
>>> And now this).
>>>
>>> You have also invented that I send harassing e-mails to your staff.
>>>
>>> And now this.
>>>
>>> You've also taken me to court and banned me from my five closest
>>> jobcentres.
>>>
>>> And now this.
>>>
>>> You've also refused to speak with me, at your other jobcentres.
>>>
>>> And informing me there, that I need to be seen in a 'screened room'.
>>>
>>> (A room with a screen?).
>>>
>>> And now this.
>>>
>>> You've also told me you don't have capasity to let me register at Edge
>>> Hill Jobcentre.
>>>
>>> And now this.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Plus plus.
>>>
>>> It's like people should just kill themselves if they become unemployed, I
>>> think.
>>>
>>> With these horrible people working at JCP/DWP.
>>>
>>> Erik Ribsskog
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: *Erik Ribsskog* <eribsskog@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Date: Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:31 PM
>>> Subject: Update/Fwd: Complaint to Jane Finn, Manager Birkenhead Benefit
>>> Centre, Ref.: SG270967D/Fwd: More impersonation-emails/Fwd: Your Email
>>> Enquiry <<#22175-394099#>>
>>> To: Contact-Us <Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk>
>>> Cc: CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, tim <tim@packagingeurope.com>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've now checked up on the dates, regarding the missing jobseekers
>>> allowance-cases.
>>>
>>> The missing payments, are for the days:
>>>
>>> 31/1 to 21/2.
>>>
>>> 8/3 to 30/3.
>>>
>>> 23/5 to 9/6.
>>>
>>> And 20/6 to 3/7.
>>>
>>> The first of these cases is with ICE now.
>>>
>>> But I was wondering if you could please update me regarding when I'm
>>> going to receive the Jobseekers Allowance, for the dates 8/3 to 30/3,
>>> 23/5
>>> to 9/6 and 20/6 to 3/7.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance for any help with this!
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Erik Ribsskog
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: *Erik Ribsskog* <eribsskog@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:20 AM
>>> Subject: Complaint to Jane Finn, Manager Birkenhead Benefit Centre, Ref.:
>>> SG270967D/Fwd: More impersonation-emails/Fwd: Your Email Enquiry
>>> <<#22175-394099#>>
>>> To: Contact-Us <Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk>
>>> Cc: CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, tim <tim@packagingeurope.com>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm refering to your letter from 4/7, which I received in the post, a few
>>> days ago.
>>>
>>> (Which I attach a scanned copy of).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You write that: 'We have also decided that you have not shown good cause
>>> for the delay in making your claim from 23 May 2014 to 9 June 2014'.
>>>
>>> But, like I explain in the forwarded e-mail.
>>>
>>> What happened, was that someone impersonated me, and said I'd gotten a
>>> job, with Packagaing Europe, again.
>>>
>>> But that was just a case of criminal impersonation, like I informed you
>>> ASAP, when I heard about this fraud, from the Liverpool City Council, on
>>> 27/5.
>>>
>>> So how can you say that there has been a delay.
>>>
>>> When I informed you as soon as possible.
>>>
>>> I think it's strange that you stopped my claim, when I informed you, that
>>> this was just someone impersonating me, (like I think Packaging Europe
>>> should be able to confirm).
>>>
>>> And now you say I have delayed making my new claim.
>>>
>>> When I didn't really stop my old claim.
>>>
>>> (It was a hoax by a group of scum-bags, like they say, in the papers).
>>>
>>> So I want you to please send me the missing jobseekers allowance, from
>>> the days 23/5 to 9/6.
>>>
>>> Also, I haven't gotten the jobseekers allowance from 31/1 to 21/2, (this
>>> case is with ICE).
>>>
>>> And not from 6/3 to around 28/3, (this case should be with the
>>> Jobcentre/DWP, but I haven't heard anything about this case, in months).
>>>
>>> And also, I haven't gotten the jobseekers allowance, from 20/6 to 3/7, (I
>>> should have gotten this payment, on Tuesday last week, on 8/7, that's
>>> almost a week delayed now).
>>>
>>> Also, JCP is taking me to court for having sent harassment e-mails to one
>>> of your staffs work-email-address.
>>>
>>> (I'm not sure if that would have been a crime since it's to someones work
>>> e-mail address).
>>>
>>> But anyway, I haven't sent these e-mails.
>>>
>>> They are also hoax-e-mails, sent by a group of scumbags, (like you say
>>> here in the UK).
>>>
>>> Like the 'funny' one about Packaging Europe, from May.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure when JCP are going to realize this.
>>>
>>> Or if you just pretend you don't understand this.
>>>
>>> As a complaint and update.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Erik Ribsskog
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: *Erik Ribsskog* <eribsskog@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Tue, May 27, 2014 at 3:45 PM
>>> Subject: More impersonation-emails/Fwd: Your Email Enquiry
>>> <<#22175-394099#>>
>>> To: Colin Simber <colin.simber@linskills.co.uk>
>>> Cc: Mervyn Pilley <enquiries@businessmanagement.org.uk>, Henrik
>>> Wedell-Wedellsborg <ww@bruunhjejle.dk>, "emb.london" <emb.london@mfa.no>,
>>> HRW UK <hrwuk@hrw.org>, amnestyis <amnestyis@amnesty.org>, Politikk
>>> Høyre <politikk@hoyre.no>, Phso Enquiries <
>>> phso.enquiries@ombudsman.org.uk>, post <post@mfa.no>,
>>> Akademikerforbundet <post@akademikerforbundet.no>, LHT Customer Service <
>>> csc@lht.co.uk>, Pia Ribsskog <pia@nfunorge.org>, Bjørn Ribsskog <
>>> bribsskog@gmail.com>, she <she@topdanmark.dk>, "hv-02.kontakt" <
>>> hv-02.kontakt@mil.no>, "anne-kathrine.skodvin" <
>>> anne-kathrine.skodvin@ica.no>, post <post@spesialenheten.no>, "
>>> EUteam@amnesty.org" <EUteam@amnesty.org>, "SCT@amnesty.org.uk" <
>>> sct@amnesty.org.uk>, hofmarskallatet@kongehuset.dk, Liverpool Direct <
>>> liverpool.direct@liverpool.gov.uk>, Vernepliktsverkets kontaktsenter ved
>>> Wenche Molstad <vpv.kontakt@mil.no>, post@slottet.no, Runcorn Office <
>>> runcornoffice@taroe.org>, Lars Aasen <lbf@lbf.no>, Info
>>> <info@tpas.org.uk>,
>>> Benefits Service <benefits.service@liverpooldirectlimited.co.uk>, "
>>> steve.rotheram.mp" <steve.rotheram.mp@parliament.uk>, LO Postkasse LO <
>>> lo@lo.no>, rcjchancery.judgeslisting@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk, CONTACT-US <
>>> CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, Contact-Us <
>>> Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> now someone have written an e-mail to Liverpool City Council, in my name,
>>> (it sems, from an e-mail I got from Liverpool Direct today).
>>>
>>> And someone impersonating me, have told the Jobcentre I'm no longer
>>> unemployed.
>>>
>>> But I haven't worked for Packaging Europe since 2008.
>>>
>>> And that job never paid £470 a week.
>>>
>>> It didn't even pay that in a month, (if I remember it right).
>>>
>>> So this is like something from some 'comedians', (or terrorists), who are
>>> doing terror and monitoring me.
>>>
>>> Something like that.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Erik Ribsskog
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: *Liverpool Direct* <Liverpool.Direct@liverpool.gov.uk>
>>> Date: Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:29 AM
>>> Subject: Your Email Enquiry <<#22175-394099#>>
>>> To: eribsskog@gmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Your email reference number is: 394099
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear Erik
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you for your e-mail about starting a job.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, we cannot help you with this matter because is does not
>>> come within the remit of Liverpool City Council. May we suggest you
>>> contact:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Department of Works and Pensions as you will need to stop your Job
>>> Seekers Allowance.
>>>
>>> If you would like any further assistance on this matter or anything else
>>> please let me know via the e-mail address below
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Kind regards
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Joanne
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Liverpool Direct Limited
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Email: liverpool.direct@liverpool.gov.uk
>>>
>>> Website: www.liverpool.gov.uk
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. Thank you
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Would you prefer to receive your council tax bill via e-mail? Go to
>>> www.liverpool.gov.uk
>>>
>>> <http://talismacimldmail.resource.local/netagent/JAC/www.liverpool.gov.uk>
>>> and complete the easy online registration form.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --- Original Message ---
>>> From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
>>> Received: 23/05/14 14:32:58 o'clock UTC
>>> To: <contact-us@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, <contact-us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk>
>>> CC:<liverpool.direct@liverpool.gov.uk>, <
>>> benefits.service@liverpooldirectlimited.co.uk>
>>> Subject: Update
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I just thought that I should update you, that I got a job today, working
>>> from home for Packaging Europe.
>>>
>>> (I also worked for them, some years ago)
>>>
>>> I earn 470 pounds a week, and have started, in the new job, today.
>>>
>>> Just an update, since I have received jobseekers allowance, until now.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Erik Ribsskog
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>> This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious
>>> content by MessageLabs for your protection
>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------ Please do not remove your unique tracking number! ------
>>> <<#22175-394099#>>
>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>> DISCLAIMER:
>>>
>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be read, copied or
>>> used only by the intended recipient(s). If you have received it in error
>>> please contact the sender immediately by returning the e-mail or by
>>> telephoning a number contained in the body of the e-mail then and please
>>> delete the e-mail without disclosing its contents elsewhere. No
>>> responsibility is accepted for loss or damage arising from viruses or
>>> changes made to this message after it was sent. The views contained in
>>> this
>>> email are those of the author and not necessarily those of the authors
>>> employer or service provider.
>>>
>>> This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious
>>> content by MessageLabs for your protection
>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> MSB Solicitors
>>> Tel: 0151 281 9040
>>> www.msbsolicitors.co.uk
>>>
>>> In support of our environmental policy, please click here
>>> <http://www.msbsolicitors.co.uk/email-policy.html> to view our
>>> regulatory information and email policy.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient then
>>> you must not copy it, forward it, use it for any purpose, or disclose it
>>> to
>>> another person. Instead please return it to the sender immediately and
>>> copy
>>> your communication to Postmaster@lawsociety.org.uk. Please then delete
>>> your copy from your system. Please also note that the author of this
>>> e-mail
>>> is not authorised to conclude any contract on behalf of the Law Society
>>> by
>>> e-mail.
>>>
>>> Stay up to date by registering for the Society’s e-newsletters at
>>> www.lawsociety.org.uk/newsandevents/newsletters.law
>>>
>>> To help us improve our service, calls may be monitored or recorded for
>>> quality and training purposes.
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient then
>> you must not copy it, forward it, use it for any purpose, or disclose it
>> to
>> another person. Instead please return it to the sender immediately and
>> copy
>> your communication to Postmaster@lawsociety.org.uk. Please then delete
>> your copy from your system. Please also note that the author of this
>> e-mail
>> is not authorised to conclude any contract on behalf of the Law Society by
>> e-mail.
>>
>> Stay up to date by registering for the Society’s e-newsletters at
>> www.lawsociety.org.uk/newsandevents/newsletters.law
>>
>> To help us improve our service, calls may be monitored or recorded for
>> quality and training purposes.
>> Thank you.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient then you
> must not copy it, forward it, use it for any purpose, or disclose it to
> another person. Instead please return it to the sender immediately and copy
> your communication to Postmaster@lawsociety.org.uk. Please then delete your
> copy from your system. Please also note that the author of this e-mail is
> not authorised to conclude any contract on behalf of the Law Society by
> e-mail.
>
> Stay up to date by registering for the Society’s e-newsletters at
> www.lawsociety.org.uk/newsandevents/newsletters.law
>
> To help us improve our service, calls may be monitored or recorded for
> quality and training purposes.
> Thank you.
>
>
>

2 attachments

probation.jpg
106K

magistrates court.jpg
133K

PS.

Her er vedleggene:

skyldig

mer om dette magistrates court

Jeg ble dømt skyldig, i trakassering/'stalking', (av en Jobcentre-ansatt). Men jeg har ikke fått noe dom enda

skyldig

PS.

Her er mer om dette:

mer om dette magistrates court

PS 2.

Jeg gikk til retten, klokka halv ni, i dag morges.

Rettsaken min skulle begynne, klokka 10.

Men det stod på brevet, at jeg burde være der, en halvtime før.

(Noe jeg har ignorert tidligere.

Ettersom at min tidligere advokat, Colin Simber, hos Linskills, hadde bedt meg, om å ignorere dette).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

PS 3.

Da jeg dukket opp, i retten, cirka klokka halv ti.

Så var Solicitior Danielle Gibbons, fra Linskills der.

(På tross av at jeg har sendt mange e-poster.

Til the Law Society og til advokatkontorer.

Fordi at jeg ville at et nytt advokatkontor, skulle representere meg.

Siden at Linskills tulla, (vil jeg si), når de sendte meg brev.

For jeg fikk brev i posten, om en ny 'avtale', dagen etter, at denne avtalen, skulle ha funnet sted.

Og så fikk jeg klagebrev også, om at jeg ikke hadde møtt, på dette møtet.

Og Solicitor Colin Simber, (også fra Linskills), skrev også et brev, en stund før dette igjen, hvor han sa opp advokatforholdet).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

PS 4.

Danielle Gibbons, hu hadde med seg en koffert, (hvis jeg ikke så helt feil).

Og jeg var oppe i andre etasje der, og så på lista, over hvor rettsaken skulle være.

(Den skulle være, i rettsal 7.

Som lå i første etasje.

Og de to foregående gangene, som jeg har blitt 'dratt', til denne retten.

Så var rettsakene i en rettsal, i andre etasje.

Jeg hadde ikke engang fått med meg det, at de hadde rettsaler, i første etasje der).

Gibbons ville chatte med meg, i en 'lukket møteboks' der.

Og hu forklarte det, at de hadde prøvd å få utsatt rettsaken.

For de ville at en ekspert, skulle se på, min gamle PC.

For å prøve å finne bevis, på at jeg ikke hadde sendt e-postene.

(En metode, som jeg selv synes, at virker litt dum.

Hvorfor ikke be om å få etterse bevisene, til politiet.

Eller hvorfor ikke kontakte Google.

Og få de til å bekrefte, at jeg ikke hadde sendt, disse e-postene.

Nei, dette virker som tull og tøys, (og kanskje litt som et sofistikert hijack-forsøk), fra Linskills, synes jeg.

Gibbons var i andre etasje der, ved siden av en stor neger, i dress, (husker jeg).

(Hvis jeg ikke blingsa, og det var konstabel Lester, (som jeg seinere så i etasjen under), da).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

PS 5.

Før rettsaken startet, så fikk Gibbons meg til å skrive under, på et ark.

Om at Sarah Bamber ikke behøvde å vitne, for min del.

(Noe sånt).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

PS 6.

Rettsaken varte, fra cirka klokka 10-11, til cirka klokka 16, i dag.

Gibbons prøvde å få utsettelse.

Men retten nektet.

(Gibbons ville ha tid, til å få sett på den gamle PC-en min, (før rettsaken).

En PC, som Lester 'rappa', i april, var det kanskje.

Noe sånt).

Rettsaken gikk etterhvert videre, (med mange pauser).

Sarah Bamber dukka opp der, for å vitne.

Hu forstod bare cirka halvparten, av spørsmålene, fra dommeren, (vil jeg si).

(Hvis dette ikke var spørsmål, fra aktor, da.

Det husker jeg ikke helt).

Sarah Bamber visste seg å være en 47 år gammel 'Miss'.

Hu hadde jobba i cirka femten år, på the Jobcentre.

(Noe sånt).

Og i cirka seks-sju år, (var det vel), på Aintree Jobcentre.

(Noe sånt).

Denne 'Miss'-en, hadde også en datter, (ble det nevnt igjen).

(Uten at jeg vet, hvordan en Miss, kan ha en datter.

For Miss betyr vel frøken.

Og en frøken er vel en jomfru, skulle man vel tro.

Men dette var kanskje den gjenfødte Jomfru Maria, da.

Noe sånt).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

PS 7.

Jobcentre-sjefen Cathrine, (fra Aintree Jobcentre), var det vel.

Hu slapp å vitne, (av en eller annen grunn).

Og da var det konstabel Lester, som skulle vitne.

Han sa det, at de to aktuelle ip-adressene, var fra min PC, og Liverpool City Council.

(Noe sånt).

Men dette var bare hans vitneforklaring.

Det ble vel ikke fremlagt noen papirer, som liksom skulle bekrefte dette.

(Sånn som jeg forstod det, ihvertfall).

Lester sa at det fantes to typer ip-adresser.

Statiske ip-adresser.

Og en annen type ip-adresser, som ikke var statiske.

(Dette var vel noe som jeg hadde forklart, i et avhør, på enten Wavertree eller St. Anne St. politistasjon, i enten januar eller april).

På spørsmål fra Gibbons, så svarte Lester det, at han ikke hadde noe særlig bra IT-kunnskaper.

(Noe sånt).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

PS 8.

Gibbons ga meg råd, om ikke å vitne.

(Dette var vel etter en pause, som var fra cirka halv et til kvart på to, vel.

Noe sånt).

Og jeg hørte da på det, og vitna ikke.

Og de tre med-dommerne, de satt kanskje i en halvtime, (eller noe sånt), for å finne ut hva de skulle dømme.

(Dette var to damer og en mann.

En lyshåret dame, i 50-åra.

En afrikansk dame, i 50-åra.

Og en mann, i 60/70-åra, med 'kronprins Haakon-skjegg'.

Noe sånt.

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

PS 9.

Han i juryen, med skjegget.

Han sa det, at de dømte meg som skyldig, fordi at jeg ikke ville vitne.

(Noe sånt).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

PS 10.

Dommeren, (var det vel), foreslo, noe med 'probation'.

Og aktor, (var det vel), sa det, at jeg ikke var straffet fra før.

Men bare hadde en advarsel, for 'theft', fra 2008.

Så det var greit for han.

(Noe sånt).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

PS 11.

Aktor sa mye negativt om meg, i sitt slutt-innlegg.

Han sa blant annet et par ting, som fikk meg til å ta opp min syvende sans-bok.

Og gjøre et par notatet.

Og det var, at jeg var en 'fantasist'.

Og at jeg ikke viste noe 'empaty', ovenfor Sarah Bamber.

Gibbons spurte meg seinere, hvorfor jeg hadde skrevet opp noen notater.

Og jeg forklarte det, at jeg aldri hadde blitt kalt noe lignende, av fantasist, tidligere.

Så jeg reagerte negativt på det.

(Jeg synes at det er æreskrenkelse, for å si det sånn).

Og de kunne vel ikke forvente det, at jeg skulle være som ektemannen til Sarah Bamber.

De blandet følelser inn i det.

Min rolle er ikke å vise empati, ovenfor Sarah Bamber.

Det må hennes ektemann/kjæreste gjøre, mener jeg.

Jeg blir uskyldig straffet, for noe jeg ikke har gjort.

Og så får jeg skjenn, for å ikke vise empati, ovenfor en arbeidsformidlings-byråkrat, (som er som ei heks, i møtene, vil jeg si).

Dette blir som noe russisk, vil jeg si.

Aktor gjorde også et poeng av det, at jeg ikke hadde noen venner.

Og at alt mitt sosialliv, foregikk via nettet.

Det er jo som i kommunist-Russland, vil jeg si.

De blir så personlige og klamme, vil jeg si.

Og aktor sa også noe om 'aliens', osv.

Så dette var jo helt hinsides, (vil jeg si).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

PS 12.

Aktor leste opp referater, fra møtene, mellom Lester og hans kolleger, og meg, på politistasjonene.

Men annenhvert ord omtrent, var 'inaudible'.

(Altså 'umulig å høre'.

Noe sånt).

Nettbutikkene mine, ble ikke nevnt.

Bøkene mine ble nevnt bare en gang.

Men bloggen min, den nevnte aktor, veldig mange ganger.

Og han sa også noe sånt som, (da han leste opp referater, fra møtene med meg, på politistasjonene), at jeg var en: 'Earlier home defence man in Iraq'.

(Hvis jeg hørte det riktig).

Så her har det vært noe klussing, med referatet, (eller noe i den duren), vil jeg si.

(Noe sånt).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

Jeg sendte en e-post til Byggmester Frank Føll AS

Erik Ribsskog

Bygg og Interiør A/S/Fwd: Tilleggsopplysninger - Strømm Trevare

Erik Ribsskog Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 6:56 PM
To: post@frankfoll.no
Cc: satrondheim@arkivverket.no, trondheim-byarkiv.postmottak@trondheim.kommune.no, kundesenter@dbschenker.com, Siri Piri , inga.sundheim@dnbeiendom.no
Hei,

fant ut, fra Riksarkivet, at min far, (Arne Mogan Olsen), og hans far,
(Øivind Olsen), solgte hagemøbler, (på 70-tallet), gjennom et firma,
som het Bygg og Interiør A/S.

Har seinere funnet ut, gjennom Riksarkivet og Statsarkivet i Trondheim.

At dette er et firma, som ble drevet, av din slektning vel, Fridtjof Føll.

Jeg synes at det er litt vanskelig, å få noe vettuge svar, fra min
far, og mine andre slektninger.

Og jeg har også drevet med slektsforskning, og ser på dette med Strømm
Trevare, som en slags fortsettelse, av slektsforskinga.

Min far og farfar nevnte ofte 'elementer', (som de lagde, for Jensen
Møbler), og køyesenger, (som de solgte gjennom annonser i
Aftenposten).

Jeg husker at onkel Håkon/Haakon, dro meg med, en eller to ganger, til
Linjegods, i Drammen, (på 70/80-tallet).

(Og de syntes han, at var vanskelige, mener jeg å huske).

Bare lurte på om din far, (eller om det er din onkel), Fridtjof Føll,
husker noe, av disse hagemøblene, som han kjøpte, fra min farfar
Øivind Olsen, og min far Arne Mogan Olsen og min onkel Haakon Mogan
Olsen, sitt firma, Strømm Trevare, på 70-tallet.

På forhånd takk for eventuelt svar!

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: 2014-08-08 17:59 GMT+01:00
Subject: Re: Tilleggsopplysninger - Strømm Trevare
To: satrondheim@arkivverket.no
Cc: trondheim-byarkiv.postmottak@trondheim.kommune.no,
kundesenter@dbschenker.com, Siri Piri <lasira@hotmail.com>,
inga.sundheim@dnbeiendom.no


Hei,

den er grei.

Da ble jeg litt klokere.

Riksarkivet nevnte jo bare den adressen, i Olav Trygvasons gate.

Mens på den tida, som Svelvik-banken/min farfar Øivind Olsen nevner
Bygg og Interiør, så holdt de jo til, på en annen adresse.

Strømm er en tidligere kommune, i Vestfold, (en kommune som nå er
slått sammen, med Svelvik).

Så det var ikke sånn, at jeg lurte på, hvem som drev Strømm Trevare.

For det var jo min farfar, Øivind Olsen, og så min far, Arne Mogan Olsen.

Sender med de skrivene, som jeg fikk, av Riksarkivet, om Strømm Trevare.

Så kanskje det blir mer forståelig.

Men mange takk for svar og informasjon, må jeg si!

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog


2014-08-08 11:17 GMT+01:00  <satrondheim@arkivverket.no>:
> Vår referanse: 2014/14567
> 8.8.2014
>
>
>
> Hei,
>
> Jeg kan dessverre ikke finne noen informasjon om Strømm Trevare, etablert
> 1961, i handelsregisteret for Trondheim byfogd.
>
> Firmaet Bygg og interiør finner jeg hos Trondheim byfogd - Handelsregister i
> serien Slettede enkeltmannsforetak (Jdb-41).
>
> Her finner jeg denne informasjonen:
>
> Bygg og Interiør
> Eier: Fridtjof Føll
>
> Registrert 27. 2.1974
> Firmaadresse i 1974: Fjordgata 43
>
> Slettet - Overtatt av A/S Bygg og Interiør 1.1.1979
> Firmaadresse i 1979: Olav Tryggvasons gate 40
>
> Det finnes dessverre ingen bilder eller tegninger av produktene som ble
> solgt av dette firmaet i mappen.
>
>
>
> Vennlig hilsen
>
> Janne Carina Strand
> Konsulent
> Statsarkivet i Trondheim
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Denne e-posten er skannet av MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For mer informasjon se
> http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> ______________________________________________________________________

14 attachments

arkiv 1.jpg
27K

arkiv2.jpg
33K

arkiv3.jpg
64K

arkiv4.jpg
103K

arkiv5.jpg
87K

arkiv6.jpg
128K

arkiv7.jpg
89K

arkiv8.jpg
117K

arkiv9.jpg
118K

arkiv10.jpg
73K

arkiv11.jpg
32K

arkiv12.jpg
61K

arkiv13.jpg
64K

arkiv14.jpg
62K

Policy for kommentarer


Anonyme kommentarer, blir slettet, (etter en del problemer, med nettmobbing osv.).

Hvis du har et vanlig navn, så skriv gjerne noe, som skiller deg, fra andre, med samme navn, (sånn at det er klart, hvem som skriver).

Kommentarer som inneholder trakassering, (og som ikke holder seg, til temaet, i blogg-posten), blir bare slettet, (og ikke publisert).

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

For å eventuelt legge inn kommentar, så trykk på linken, til blogg-posten, (så kommer det opp et felt, hvor man kan kommentere).

Blog Archive