Noname 501
Noname 502
Noname 503
Noname 504
Noname 505
Noname 506
Noname 507
Noname 508
Noname 509
Noname 510
Noname 511
Noname 512
Noname 513
Noname 514
Noname 515
Noname 516
Noname 517
Noname 518
Noname 519
Noname 520
Noname 521
Noname 522
Noname 523
Noname 524
Noname 525
Noname 526
Noname 527
Noname 528
Noname 529
Noname 530
Noname 531
Noname 532
Noname 533
Noname 534
Noname 535
Noname 536
Noname 537
Noname 538
Noname 539
Noname 540
Noname 541
Noname 542
Noname 543
Noname 544
Noname 545
Noname 546
Noname 547
Noname 548
Noname 549
Noname 550
PS.
Linkene ovenfor åpnes i egne vinduer.
PS 2.
Her kan man se det, at til og med Norsk Kulturråd støtter Wikipedia, og ber folk om å bidra, på dugnaden der.
(Kanskje istedet for å drive med egne prosjekter).
Men Wikipedia er jo ikke norsk-eiet, og organisasjonen er ikke så kjent.
(Det finnes jo ikke organisasjonskart, osv).
Og Wikipedia tjener jo penger, (på donasjoner osv.), så å kalle dette dugnad blir kanskje ikke helt riktig.
Og skyggesidene, til Wikipedia.
Nemlig det at man, (hvis man har uflaks ihvertfall), blir behandla som 'dritt' der.
(Som jeg har skrevet om, i tidligere bloggposter, under etiketten 'E-poster fra Philip Gabrielsen').
Det nevnes ikke.
Så jeg vet ikke om man skal snakke om et Wikipedia-hysteri her.
Jeg ville sett for meg Wikipedia som et supplement, til norske kulturprosjekter.
Og ikke som en erstatning.
Men det er kanskje andre som har andre meninger.
Det er mulig.
Mvh.
Erik Ribsskog
PS 3.
Her er mer om dette:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/118350883/Noname-537
lørdag 29. desember 2012
Jeg sendte en ny e-post til Amnesty
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Regarding help from Amnesty
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 4:02 PM
To:
SCT@amnesty.org.uk
Cc:
amnestyis <amnestyis@amnesty.org>
Hi,
you at Amnesty have adviced me to contact the Sivilombudsmannen.
But the Sivilombudsmannen isn't doing his job.
E.g. the Norwegian Embassy in London, have stopped replying to me, and the Sivilombudsmannen said I had to be content, since the Foreign Ministry in Oslo, replied to me.
Also, the Sivilombudsmannen ignores that ministers like Kristin Halvorsen in Norway, and her ministry 'Kunnskapsdepartementet', (Ministry of Knowledge), ignores my correspondence, and doesn't reply to me.
Also other ministries are involved.
The Sivilombudsmannen is useless, he doesn't do his job at all.
You at Amnesty have adviced me to contact him.
I want to complain about this poor advice.
How can you advice people to contact useless organisations like Sivilombudsmannen?
Erik Ribsskog
On Fri, Nov 2, 2007 at 12:06 PM, <SCT@amnesty.org.uk> wrote:
Dear Erik
Thank you for your further email. I
am sorry that Amnesty International UK is unable to advise on your situation,
although I have come up with the following link to the website of the Norwegian
Ombudsman, who may be able to help.
http://www.sivilombudsmannen.
I hope you are successful in finding
some assistance.
Best wishes
John Hook
Supporter Care Team
Amnesty International UK
Tel: 020 7033 1777
www.amnesty.org.uk
Amnesty International UK
The Human Rights Action Centre
17-25 New Inn Yard
London
EC2A 3EA
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
30/10/2007 00:48
To
cc
Subject
Hi,
thank you very much for your answer!
Are you sure that don't getting help when one are in the
risk of being executed/sacrificed/tortured, isn't
under the cathegory 'cruel, inhuman
or degrading treatment', like you are mentioning in your e-mail?
I also suspect that this case falls under this point:
'ending extra-judicial executions and "disappearances"'.
At least this is how it seems to me, even if these things
can be difficult to document sometimes I
guess, at least before it has happened.
But not getting help from the government is a specific
human rights violation.
Your Norwegian section, answered me that they can't investigate
crime-cases, which was not what I
asked them for advice on at all.
So I don't understand how they could be right, since they didn't even understand
the problem.
The problem was lack of help from the Government, and
also harassment, probably 'set ups' from the
Government, and that they speculate, in not answering
e-mails etc.
And it seem like someone have instructed my bank, not to give me a loan
or an overdraft as well.
And the Government isn't informing me on what's goving
on, even it's clear to me that I'm followed
by mafia, like I've heard it being said.
And also, even if the company I used to work in is/was
full of criminals, I guess mafia/mob, and
the Police are only pretending that nothing is going on,
and are keeping me in the dark about all
this.
So without me being an expert on human rights, I can't
see it differently, than that the Government
must be breaching my human rights, and I haven't managed
to get any help regarding this.
But since you are working with human rights issues, then
maybe you know a bit about how to
deal with problems like this, so maybe you could give
me some advice regarding who I should
contact, or how should go forward with cases like this?
I understand that you aren't working on cases were human
rights are being breached by Governments(?)
And I know that I've already written an e-mail to you
regarding this.
But I thought I'd try just once more, to hear if you knew about any organisations
who deals with problems
involiving human rights being breached by Governments,
in the way I've explained in this e-mail.
Thanks in advance for any help!
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
On 10/29/07, SCT@amnesty.org.uk
<
SCT@amnesty.org.uk>wrote:
Dear Erik,
Thank you for your email.
However, I'm afraid that the Norwegian Section is correct as the issue
you raise does not fall within our mandate.
Amnesty International works on specific human rights violations, and our
mission focuses in particular on:
torture, and other forms of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment;
Of course there are many other issues of concern around the world, but
Amnesty does not have the resources to work on every issue.
The issues we work on are decided by our membership through our internal
democratic decision-making processes.
I hope that you may be able to find some assistance from another organisation.
Rachel Armitage
Supporter Care Team
Amnesty International UK
Tel: 020 7033 1777
www.amnesty.org.uk
Amnesty International UK
The Human Rights Action Centre
17-25 New Inn Yard
London
EC2A 3EA
<
eribsskog@gmail.com>
26/10/2007 02:47
To
cc
Subject
Hi,
I'm a Norwegian living in Britain, and I've been in contact with the Norwegian
department of Amnesty,
regarding lack of respect from the Government in connection with human
rights issues.
What I've contacted them about, was that the Norwegian Government, (Politidirektoratet/
isn't answering my e-mails.
And also the 'Spesialenheten' (the Norwegian equivalent of ipcc), have
been using more than six months,
and have still not decided if they are going to investigate my complaint
against representatives from
the Norwegian special police 'Kripos', or not.
So it's obvious that they are delaying this.
This might not seem so important, but the point is, that this is in regards
to me being followed by organised
criminals or mafia, in both Norway and Britain.
And the point is, that this can lead to people being killed/executed/tortured.
And also, if the police is aware of this, like the Norwegian police are,
since I've told them, and still don't help,
maybe they have problems getting evidence against the criminals/mafia,
and then hope that they will kill,
so that they will get evidence in that way. (I would call it people sacrifice).
This is how it seems to me that it must have been, or still is, for all
that I know.
And I contacted the Norwegian department of Amnesty, earlier this week,
but they only said that Amnesty
wasn't dealing with investigating crime.
But that's not at all what I contacted them about, I contaced them about
the problem that the Government
are ignoring peoples rights, with the consequense that people can end up
murdered/tortured etc.
So I think, since they are working with human-rights issues, on a daily
basis, then I can't really understand,
how it could be possible for them to not understand what I was contacting
them about.
So I'm a bit worried that something might be wrong in the Norwegian Amnesty
department.
And this case is also linked to Britain, so I was wondering if it's right
that Amensty aren't dealing with
serious breaches of human rights from Governments.
And also how I should go forward if I wanted to complain about the Norwegian
of Amnesty, since it seems to
me that something must be wrong there.
And I think that this would be serious, since I've always thought that
Amnesty is an important organisation,
and that you are doing valuable work around the world.
I'm also going to forward you copies of the correspondence I've been having
with the Norwegian deparment
of Amnesty regarding this.
I know that they are in Norwegian, but I'm sending them anyway, just for
formalitys sake.
I hope that this is alright, and I hope that you have the chance to have
a look at this!
Thank you very much for your help in advance!
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
Mer om Twitter-klage, (Helgal_ribbe)
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
#7032135 Twitter Support: update on "Offensive content - Helgal_ribbe"
Twitter Support
<notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com>
Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 2:42 PM
Reply-To:
Twitter Support <support+id7032135@twitter.zendesk.com>
To:
johncons <eribsskog@gmail.com>
##- Please type your reply above this line -##
Hello,
This is confirmation that Twitter has received your report.
What else can you do?
• Do not respond to the user. We have found that responding to someone who is intentionally attempting to aggravate you or others encourages them to continue their behavior.
• Block the user. You can block the user using the blocking feature described here: https://support.twitter.com/
• Learn more about how to deal with abusive users: https://support.twitter.com/
• Learn how to flag inappropriate media here: https://support.twitter.com/
Contact Law Enforcement
If something has gone beyond the point of a personal conflict and has escalated to the point of believable violent threats, whether it be online or offline, please contact your local law enforcement so they can accurately assess the validity of the issue.
If contacted by law enforcement directly, we can work with them and provide the necessary information for their investigation of your issue. You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines (https://support.twitter.com/
Please remember...
Twitter is a platform that provides a global communication service which encompasses a variety of users with different voices, ideas, and perspectives. As a policy, Twitter does not mediate content or intervene in disputes between users.
Please keep in mind that filing multiple reports will not resolve your issue faster. Rest assured, we are working as quickly as possible, but our ability to respond may be delayed due to a high number of tickets. We thank you for your patience.
Thanks,
Twitter Trust & Safety
------------------------------
Your ticket number: #7032135
Message-Id:8EJZKMJA_
Mer om Twitter-klage, (paranoidpsykose)
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
#7031933 Twitter Support: update on "Offensive content - paranoidpsykose"
Twitter Support
<notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com>
Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 2:14 PM
Reply-To:
Twitter Support <support+id7031933@twitter.zendesk.com>
To:
johncons <eribsskog@gmail.com>
##- Please type your reply above this line -##
Hello,
This is confirmation that Twitter has received your report.
What else can you do?
• Do not respond to the user. We have found that responding to someone who is intentionally attempting to aggravate you or others encourages them to continue their behavior.
• Block the user. You can block the user using the blocking feature described here: https://support.twitter.com/
• Learn more about how to deal with abusive users: https://support.twitter.com/
• Learn how to flag inappropriate media here: https://support.twitter.com/
Contact Law Enforcement
If something has gone beyond the point of a personal conflict and has escalated to the point of believable violent threats, whether it be online or offline, please contact your local law enforcement so they can accurately assess the validity of the issue.
If contacted by law enforcement directly, we can work with them and provide the necessary information for their investigation of your issue. You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines (https://support.twitter.com/
Please remember...
Twitter is a platform that provides a global communication service which encompasses a variety of users with different voices, ideas, and perspectives. As a policy, Twitter does not mediate content or intervene in disputes between users.
Please keep in mind that filing multiple reports will not resolve your issue faster. Rest assured, we are working as quickly as possible, but our ability to respond may be delayed due to a high number of tickets. We thank you for your patience.
Thanks,
Twitter Trust & Safety
------------------------------
Your ticket number: #7031933
Message-Id:CERXCEAE_
Mer om Twitter-klage, (ribbemiddag)
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
#7031752 Twitter Support: update on "Offensive content - ribbemiddag"
Twitter Support
<notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com>
Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 1:48 PM
Reply-To:
Twitter Support <support+id7031752@twitter.zendesk.com>
To:
johncons <eribsskog@gmail.com>
##- Please type your reply above this line -##
Hello,
This is confirmation that Twitter has received your report.
What else can you do?
• Do not respond to the user. We have found that responding to someone who is intentionally attempting to aggravate you or others encourages them to continue their behavior.
• Block the user. You can block the user using the blocking feature described here: https://support.twitter.com/
• Learn more about how to deal with abusive users: https://support.twitter.com/
• Learn how to flag inappropriate media here: https://support.twitter.com/
Contact Law Enforcement
If something has gone beyond the point of a personal conflict and has escalated to the point of believable violent threats, whether it be online or offline, please contact your local law enforcement so they can accurately assess the validity of the issue.
If contacted by law enforcement directly, we can work with them and provide the necessary information for their investigation of your issue. You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines (https://support.twitter.com/
Please remember...
Twitter is a platform that provides a global communication service which encompasses a variety of users with different voices, ideas, and perspectives. As a policy, Twitter does not mediate content or intervene in disputes between users.
Please keep in mind that filing multiple reports will not resolve your issue faster. Rest assured, we are working as quickly as possible, but our ability to respond may be delayed due to a high number of tickets. We thank you for your patience.
Thanks,
Twitter Trust & Safety
------------------------------
Your ticket number: #7031752
Message-Id:QFD1S5PR_
Mer om Twitter-klage, (Ballfjernerhjel)
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
#7031688 Twitter Support: update on "Offensive content - Ballfjernerhjel"
Twitter Support
<notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com>
Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 1:39 PM
Reply-To:
Twitter Support <support+id7031688@twitter.zendesk.com>
To:
johncons <eribsskog@gmail.com>
##- Please type your reply above this line -##
Hello,
This is confirmation that Twitter has received your report.
What else can you do?
• Do not respond to the user. We have found that responding to someone who is intentionally attempting to aggravate you or others encourages them to continue their behavior.
• Block the user. You can block the user using the blocking feature described here: https://support.twitter.com/
• Learn more about how to deal with abusive users: https://support.twitter.com/
• Learn how to flag inappropriate media here: https://support.twitter.com/
Contact Law Enforcement
If something has gone beyond the point of a personal conflict and has escalated to the point of believable violent threats, whether it be online or offline, please contact your local law enforcement so they can accurately assess the validity of the issue.
If contacted by law enforcement directly, we can work with them and provide the necessary information for their investigation of your issue. You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines (https://support.twitter.com/
Please remember...
Twitter is a platform that provides a global communication service which encompasses a variety of users with different voices, ideas, and perspectives. As a policy, Twitter does not mediate content or intervene in disputes between users.
Please keep in mind that filing multiple reports will not resolve your issue faster. Rest assured, we are working as quickly as possible, but our ability to respond may be delayed due to a high number of tickets. We thank you for your patience.
Thanks,
Twitter Trust & Safety
------------------------------
Your ticket number: #7031688
Message-Id:Q5KGY6AM_
Mer om Twitter-klage, (Mchansern)
Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>
#7031592 Twitter Support: update on "Offensive content - Mchansern"
Twitter Support
<notifications-support@twitter.zendesk.com>
Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 1:27 PM
Reply-To:
Twitter Support <support+id7031592@twitter.zendesk.com>
To:
johncons <eribsskog@gmail.com>
##- Please type your reply above this line -##
Hello,
This is confirmation that Twitter has received your report.
What else can you do?
• Do not respond to the user. We have found that responding to someone who is intentionally attempting to aggravate you or others encourages them to continue their behavior.
• Block the user. You can block the user using the blocking feature described here: https://support.twitter.com/
• Learn more about how to deal with abusive users: https://support.twitter.com/
• Learn how to flag inappropriate media here: https://support.twitter.com/
Contact Law Enforcement
If something has gone beyond the point of a personal conflict and has escalated to the point of believable violent threats, whether it be online or offline, please contact your local law enforcement so they can accurately assess the validity of the issue.
If contacted by law enforcement directly, we can work with them and provide the necessary information for their investigation of your issue. You can point local law enforcement to our Law Enforcement Guidelines (https://support.twitter.com/
Please remember...
Twitter is a platform that provides a global communication service which encompasses a variety of users with different voices, ideas, and perspectives. As a policy, Twitter does not mediate content or intervene in disputes between users.
Please keep in mind that filing multiple reports will not resolve your issue faster. Rest assured, we are working as quickly as possible, but our ability to respond may be delayed due to a high number of tickets. We thank you for your patience.
Thanks,
Twitter Trust & Safety
------------------------------
Your ticket number: #7031592
Message-Id:WRX4TZWF_
Fler e-poster fra Philip Gabrielsen
Noname 451
Noname 452
Noname 453
Noname 454
Noname 455
Noname 456
Noname 457
Noname 458
Noname 459
Noname 460
Noname 461
Noname 462
Noname 463
Noname 464
Noname 465
Noname 466
Noname 467
Noname 468
Noname 469
Noname 470
Noname 471
Noname 472
Noname 473
Noname 474
Noname 475
Noname 476
Noname 477
Noname 478
Noname 479
Noname 480
Noname 481
Noname 482
Noname 483
Noname 484
Noname 485
Noname 486
Noname 487
Noname 488
Noname 489
Noname 490
Noname 491
Noname 492
Noname 493
Noname 494
Noname 495
Noname 496
Noname 497
Noname 498
Noname 499
Noname 500
PS.
Linkene ovenfor åpnes i egne vinduer.
PS 2.
Etter å ha lest 'dagens bolke' med 'Philip Gabrielsen e-poster', så la jeg merke til blant annet det, at Wiki-administrator Jeblad aka. John Erling Blad, som har vært mye omtalt, på johncons-blogg, i forbindelse med blokkeringen av meg, på Wikipedia.
(Og vel også etter at Blad har trakassert meg, på Twitter, hvis jeg husker det riktig.
Og Øivind Sæther aka. Xiando har vel også publisert en del negative ting, om John Erling Blad aka. Jeblad, på sitt nettsted Xiandos Information, hvis jeg husker det riktig).
Så la jeg merke til, at Jeblad skriver på dette lukkede forumet, at han faktisk er ansatt, i Wiki.
Og han har også en dobbeltrolle, (sånn som jeg ser det).
For selv om han er ansatt, i Wiki, så redigerer han også artikler, som en vanlig bruker.
Så Wikipedia sliter kanskje med en del dobbeltroller her, (kan det virke som, for meg).
Og en ting jeg som 'mobbeoffer' på Wikipedia har savnet.
Det er et organisasjonskart.
Wikipedia har liksom Wiki-en, men den er litt vanskelig å finne fram på, noen ganger, for nye brukere, synes jeg.
Hva med å ha et 'vanlig' nettsted og, med kontaktinformasjon og organisasjonskart, osv.
For det er vel et paradoks, at Wikipedia, som handler om å presentere informasjon, er så lite flinke, til å presentere informasjon, om sin egen organisasjon, som ihvertfall jeg synes at de er.
(Siden jeg ikke har klart å finne ut at Jeblad er ansatt i Wiki.
Og siden jeg ikke har klart å finne organisasjonskart, for Wikipedia.
Og siden de har dette lukkede forumet, hvor de tar opp ting.
Ting som vel like gjerne kunne ha blitt tatt opp i åpenhet?).
Så sånn er det.
Bare noe jeg tenkte på.
Mvh.
Erik Ribsskog
PS 3.
Her er mer om dette:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/118265532/Noname-470
PS 4.
Man kan også se det, at når engelsk Wikipedia får tyn, på et norsk nettsted, (for at de ikke blokkerer folk som Meco fra Xiandos Information), så blir de norske wikipedianerne stolte, og tar dette som 'kudos'.
Så man ser igjen, (mener jeg), at de norske Wikipedianerne lever i sin egen 'andedam', og ikke har noe særlig fellesskap, med wikipedianere, fra andre land.
Snarere tvert imot, må man vel si, at det virker som.
Så sånn er nok det.
PS 5.
Her er mer om dette:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/118269169/Noname-487
PS 6.
Denne artikkelen, fra Document.no, (som er nevnt i PS 4 og PS 5), ser norske wikipedianere på som kudos, selv om den rakker ned på engelsk Wikipedia:
http://www.document.no/2012/05/wikipedia-nar-konspirasjonsteoretikere-far-r=edigere-et-nettleksikon/
PS 7.
Man kan også se det, at når man er ny, på Wikipedia, så får man ofte klint på seg, en slags fadder.
Dette husker jeg at jeg syntes at ble som noe ekstra 'herk', som man måtte vende seg til, når man var ny, på Wikipedia.
Dette tror jeg ikke var med fra starten av, på Wikipedia.
Og jeg lurer på om dette er noe sære greier, som norske wikipedianere, har funnet på?
Jeg syntes ihvertfall det, (som voksen mann), at det ble litt 'svett', å ha en sånn 'fadder', hengende over ryggen sin, når man skulle bidra, på Wikipedia.
Og hvordan blir man kvitt en slik fadder igjen, egentlig?
(Hvis man egentlig ikke vil ha en sånn fadder, fra starten av, mener jeg).
Nei, det tror jeg er nesten umulig, etter at dette først har blitt tatt opp, her og der, i Wikipedias kriker og kroker.
Og seinere, hvis man så vil klage, på faddere eller andre, på Wikipedia.
Så møter man ofte lite forståelse, fra wikipedianerne.
Ting som er klagegrunn, i for eksempel arbeidslivet.
Det ser kanskje ikke wikipedianerne på som klagegrunn, da.
Og ting som trusler om å ta noen til retten, (som vel går under ytringsfriheten, i det daglige liv), det ser wikipedianerne på som grunn, til å blokkere deg, fra Wikipedia, da.
(Som nettopp den Document.no-artikkelen, i PS 6, nevner).
Så Wikipedia er litt sært, må man vel si.
Ihvertfall når man havner inne i deres system, for å bidra, på nettleksikonet.
Man må gjennom en slags overgang, fra vanlig menneske, til wikipedianer, (kan man vel kanskje si).
Og i denne overgangsfasen, så kan man bli tulla mye med da, av mer erfarne wikipedianere.
Og så bli blokkert av disse, på grunn av nybegynnerfeil, som har blitt blåst opp, og seinere blir brukt mot en, sånn at man blir blokkert, hvis man etter dette, prøver å bidra med en eneste bokstav, på nettleksikonet.
(Som jeg har nevnt i tidligere bloggposter, om 'Philip Gabrielsen e-postene').
Så sånn er det.
Bare noe jeg tenkte på.
Men men.
PS 8.
Her er mer om dette:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/118267565/Noname-476
PS.
Linkene ovenfor åpnes i egne vinduer.
PS 2.
Etter å ha lest 'dagens bolke' med 'Philip Gabrielsen e-poster', så la jeg merke til blant annet det, at Wiki-administrator Jeblad aka. John Erling Blad, som har vært mye omtalt, på johncons-blogg, i forbindelse med blokkeringen av meg, på Wikipedia.
(Og vel også etter at Blad har trakassert meg, på Twitter, hvis jeg husker det riktig.
Og Øivind Sæther aka. Xiando har vel også publisert en del negative ting, om John Erling Blad aka. Jeblad, på sitt nettsted Xiandos Information, hvis jeg husker det riktig).
Så la jeg merke til, at Jeblad skriver på dette lukkede forumet, at han faktisk er ansatt, i Wiki.
Og han har også en dobbeltrolle, (sånn som jeg ser det).
For selv om han er ansatt, i Wiki, så redigerer han også artikler, som en vanlig bruker.
Så Wikipedia sliter kanskje med en del dobbeltroller her, (kan det virke som, for meg).
Og en ting jeg som 'mobbeoffer' på Wikipedia har savnet.
Det er et organisasjonskart.
Wikipedia har liksom Wiki-en, men den er litt vanskelig å finne fram på, noen ganger, for nye brukere, synes jeg.
Hva med å ha et 'vanlig' nettsted og, med kontaktinformasjon og organisasjonskart, osv.
For det er vel et paradoks, at Wikipedia, som handler om å presentere informasjon, er så lite flinke, til å presentere informasjon, om sin egen organisasjon, som ihvertfall jeg synes at de er.
(Siden jeg ikke har klart å finne ut at Jeblad er ansatt i Wiki.
Og siden jeg ikke har klart å finne organisasjonskart, for Wikipedia.
Og siden de har dette lukkede forumet, hvor de tar opp ting.
Ting som vel like gjerne kunne ha blitt tatt opp i åpenhet?).
Så sånn er det.
Bare noe jeg tenkte på.
Mvh.
Erik Ribsskog
PS 3.
Her er mer om dette:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/118265532/Noname-470
PS 4.
Man kan også se det, at når engelsk Wikipedia får tyn, på et norsk nettsted, (for at de ikke blokkerer folk som Meco fra Xiandos Information), så blir de norske wikipedianerne stolte, og tar dette som 'kudos'.
Så man ser igjen, (mener jeg), at de norske Wikipedianerne lever i sin egen 'andedam', og ikke har noe særlig fellesskap, med wikipedianere, fra andre land.
Snarere tvert imot, må man vel si, at det virker som.
Så sånn er nok det.
PS 5.
Her er mer om dette:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/118269169/Noname-487
PS 6.
Denne artikkelen, fra Document.no, (som er nevnt i PS 4 og PS 5), ser norske wikipedianere på som kudos, selv om den rakker ned på engelsk Wikipedia:
http://www.document.no/2012/05/wikipedia-nar-konspirasjonsteoretikere-far-r=edigere-et-nettleksikon/
PS 7.
Man kan også se det, at når man er ny, på Wikipedia, så får man ofte klint på seg, en slags fadder.
Dette husker jeg at jeg syntes at ble som noe ekstra 'herk', som man måtte vende seg til, når man var ny, på Wikipedia.
Dette tror jeg ikke var med fra starten av, på Wikipedia.
Og jeg lurer på om dette er noe sære greier, som norske wikipedianere, har funnet på?
Jeg syntes ihvertfall det, (som voksen mann), at det ble litt 'svett', å ha en sånn 'fadder', hengende over ryggen sin, når man skulle bidra, på Wikipedia.
Og hvordan blir man kvitt en slik fadder igjen, egentlig?
(Hvis man egentlig ikke vil ha en sånn fadder, fra starten av, mener jeg).
Nei, det tror jeg er nesten umulig, etter at dette først har blitt tatt opp, her og der, i Wikipedias kriker og kroker.
Og seinere, hvis man så vil klage, på faddere eller andre, på Wikipedia.
Så møter man ofte lite forståelse, fra wikipedianerne.
Ting som er klagegrunn, i for eksempel arbeidslivet.
Det ser kanskje ikke wikipedianerne på som klagegrunn, da.
Og ting som trusler om å ta noen til retten, (som vel går under ytringsfriheten, i det daglige liv), det ser wikipedianerne på som grunn, til å blokkere deg, fra Wikipedia, da.
(Som nettopp den Document.no-artikkelen, i PS 6, nevner).
Så Wikipedia er litt sært, må man vel si.
Ihvertfall når man havner inne i deres system, for å bidra, på nettleksikonet.
Man må gjennom en slags overgang, fra vanlig menneske, til wikipedianer, (kan man vel kanskje si).
Og i denne overgangsfasen, så kan man bli tulla mye med da, av mer erfarne wikipedianere.
Og så bli blokkert av disse, på grunn av nybegynnerfeil, som har blitt blåst opp, og seinere blir brukt mot en, sånn at man blir blokkert, hvis man etter dette, prøver å bidra med en eneste bokstav, på nettleksikonet.
(Som jeg har nevnt i tidligere bloggposter, om 'Philip Gabrielsen e-postene').
Så sånn er det.
Bare noe jeg tenkte på.
Men men.
PS 8.
Her er mer om dette:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/118267565/Noname-476