fredag 29. august 2008

Even more from the ush.net message-board.

johncons on Fri Aug 29, 2008 9:40 am
traffic_cone wrote:
johncons wrote:

The e-mail address, that I was given, in a meeting, was:

civil.litigation.e@merseyside.police.uk

http://www.scribd.com/doc/4848292/encl- ... laddresses

Where as the address, that is written on their letters, is:

civil.litigation.e.@merseyside.police.uk (An extra dot, after the 'e').

http://www.scribd.com/doc/4848297/encl- ... laddresses

I asked the Police about this, and then they said, that the first e-mail address, was the correct one.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/4848223/email ... resses-etc (This is where I explained to the IPCC about this,
but the actual e-mail from the Police, is one of the e-mails in this link: http://www.scribd.com/doc/4847797/walton-police-email ).

So the Merseyside Police, (the Standards Unit), have printed their e-mail address wrongly, on their offical letters.

I work as a Company Researcher, and I'm used with evaluating companies.

If a company, have two official general enquiery e-mail addresses, then I'd say that something isn't right.

And I wouldn't have trusted the company, and I wouldn't have added them on the directory, that I'm working on.

The same with the Police Standards Unit, if they have two official general enquiery e-mail addresses for the unit, and claim both to be
their official e-mail address, then I find this so unprofessional, so that I don't trust the Police-force any longer, like I reported to the IPCC.


You don't think it might be a misprint?

Especially as "civil.litigation.e.@merseyside.police.uk" wouldn't be a valid syntax for an e-mail address?


No,

I don't think it's a misprint, because I don't think the Police should use letters, with misprinted e-mail addresses on them.

Then they should have thrown them away, and printed new letters.

I've recieved at least two letters with the e-mail address written like that, on them.

The people working there, are detectives etc.

If the Police-detectives, can't detect errors like that, then I don't trust the detectives.

And I don't think that it's not a valid e-mail address syntax, since I've been sending e-mails, and got confirmed that they
have been recieved, to an e-mail address with the same syntax.


http://www.ush.net/board/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=229585&sid=9b66c5b313df46405aed9ea42e30b221