Hi,
I'm just trying to send this e-mail again, to the e-mail address on
your website, since I haven't
recieved an answer yet, from the e-mail address that was used to send
me your last letter.
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: Document14
To: CTS Public enquiry account 1 <PUBLICENQ1@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk>
To Mr. Kevin Allen/Reference: T20645/8
Thank you for your letter, that I recieved today.
You write that I'm unhappy with the IPCC investigation.
But no, this is not why I wrote you.
I'm unhappy with that the IPCC aren't answering my e-mails at all.
So they aren't communitaction.
So we can't get to communicate about any investigation.
So who should one contact, if the IPCC, aren't answering their
phone-calls and e-mails?
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 9:15 AM, CTS Public enquiry account 1
<PUBLICENQ1@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:
> Please see attached response.
>
> **********************************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are private and intended
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
> If you have received this email in error please return it to the address
> it came from telling them it is not for you and then delete it from your
> system.
>
> This email message has been swept for computer viruses.
>
> **********************************************************************
>
> The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure
> Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership
> with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi
> this email was certified virus free.
> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> recorded for legal purposes.
>
|
|
