Hi,
I'm the great-great-great grandson of Danish industry-pioneer Anker Heegaard.
I read in the biografy-notes, after Poul Heegard:
That he claims to be related to Anker Heegaard.
But I can't see that this is right, even if I've started with genealogy, as a hobby.
It says in the link abouve, (in chapter 1.25), that he had a cousin named Anker 'Lilleanker' (little-Anker), who later became a famous business-man and got a street named after him, in Copenhagen, etc.
Poul Heegaard writes, or 'writes' (if it's forged), that his fathers fathers name, was Poul, (the same name as himself).
But I have no Paul Heegaard, as my ancestor.
And I should have had, if Anker 'litte-Anker' Heegaard, was his cousin.
He says this cousin was two years older than him, but noone of my ancesters, in the Heegaard-line, are in that age.
(I've checked many places on MyHeritage).
And the street is named after the most famous Anker Heegaard, who was born around 70 years before Poul Heegard.
So this is just non-sense.
In the next chapter he writes that his great-grandfather knew the Danish king Christian VIII, and was his friend, and talked with him in private, two hours each year.
It's just to dum.
I think those notes, ('Små livserindringer fortalt til mine børn og børnebørn', by Poul Heegaard, written in Fåvang, Norway, 11/2/1945, most probably is forged.
And I understand that you have published an article:
E. S. Munkholm og H. J. Munkholm, Poul Heegaard, In History of Topology (Ioan James, ed.), to appear, Elsevier, 1998.
Which is based on 'Små livserindringer..'.
So I think that article could be inacurate, due to this.
One should perhaps remember, that Heegaard, was sent to Oslo, after a conflict with a Boar-brother, Wikipedia says.
His brother was on the Manhattan-project, inventing the atom-bomb.
The atom-bomb could be a plot, and the mentioned biografy, ('Små livserindringer..', by Poul Heegaard), could be part of a cover-up.
He was probably very intelligent, and the sionists probably didn't want him to stay in Copenhagen, in case he saw throug the brain-washing surrounding the atom-bomb.
Something like this?
That's just a theory.
But I think 'Små livserindringer', by Poul Heegaard, 1945, must be forged.
That I'm almost 100% certain about.
(And I've learned a bit at least about research at the University of Sunderland, in 2004, at the Final Year Project, in Bachelor Computing, by teacher Peter White.
But I didn't get my study-loan from Norway, untill January 2005, (four months late), so I couldn't concentrate that much about my studies there, so I was so lagged behind, when I got the study-loan, so then I instead tryed to get a job, since I though that seemed more sensibel, at the time).
So I think I should have gotten this right.
So I'm trying to whistle-blow about this.
Thanks in advance for any help sorting this out!
Yours Sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>Date: 2010/6/27
Subject: Fwd: Dere publiserer forfalskede erindringer etter den kjente matematiker Poul Heegaard
To: Finn Gaunaa <
finn@gaunaa.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: 2010/6/27
Subject: Fwd: Dere publiserer forfalskede erindringer etter den kjente matematiker Poul Heegaard
To:
ku@ku.dk
Hei igjen,
jeg vet at min tipptippoldefar, Anker Heegaard, ikke er adelig.
Men du er jo så god på slektsforskning.
En kjent dansk matematiker, Poul Heegaard, sier at han var i slekt med min tipptippoldefar.
Og at en fetter av han het Anker 'Lilleanker' Heegaard.
Og hans farfar het også Poul Heegaard, (som han selv).
Men disse fettere må jo ha samme farfar, Poul Heegaard.
Og ingen av mine forefedre, etter Anker Heegaard, (eller hans far), heter noe med Poul.
Så jeg tror dette må være en forfalskning.
Har du eventuelt noen synspunkter.
Selv om jeg vet at jeg maser mye.
Men det kan jo være alvorlig, mener jeg, hvis kjente matematikere, får forfalsket deres erindringer.
Mvh.
Erik Ribsskog
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>Date: 2010/6/27
Subject: Dere publiserer forfalskede erindringer etter den kjente matematiker Poul Heegaard
To:
ku@ku.dkHei,
jeg er tipptippoldebarn, av den kjente industriherre, Anker Heegaard.
Jeg har drevet litt med slektsforskning.
Og jeg har derfor lest erindringene etter Poul Heegaard, som ligger på deres server:
Det står at Poul Heegaard, hadde en fetter kalt 'Lilleanker', som var et par år eldre.
Og denne skulle ha noe med jernstøberiet i Frederiksværk, å gjøre.
Men jeg får ikke årstallene til å stemme.
Det står også at hans farfar het Poul Heegaard.
Men det het ingen av mine forfedre.
De het alle noe med Anker Heegaard.
Altså, hvis hans fetter het Anker, og ble kalt 'Lilleanker, så skulle hans far eller farfar ha vært 'Store-Anker', mener jeg.
Men hans far het Sophus Heegaard, og hans farfar Poul Heegaard.
Disse bodde også i Slagelse, og ikke i København, hvor Anker Heegaards far var fra, og de må ha bodd i København, siden ihvertfall 1800.
Mens Poul Heegaard, han ble født i 1871, og sier at disse bodde i Slagelse, på 1870-tallet.
(Et helt annet sted på Sjælland).
Poul Heegaard skriver også at hans oldefar var venn med kong Christian VIII, (Christian Frederik).
Så dette er tydelig bare tull.
Synes jeg det virker som.
Hvordan kan dere ha slik makkverk på deres servere, og legitimere dette sludderet.
Folk vil jo da tro på dette siden dere er Københavns Universitet.
Dere burde skamme dere!
Dette er nok noe med brødrene Bohr, og sionistene og atombomben som nok er en illusjon, vil jeg tippe.
(Dette står i kapitell 1.25 og 1.26).
Lykke til videre med hjernevaskingen av 'the sheeple' og en 'New World Order'.
Skamme dere burde dere, et universitet skal drive med dette tullet.
Dere er en skam for den siviliserte verden og alt som heter akademiske verdier.
Erik Ribsskog
