Jeg sendte en ny e-post til the Jobcentre

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

---

New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: To Mr. John Upton's line-manager, Merseyside District Office - Complaint about Sencia

---

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>	Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 8:03 PM
To: CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk
Hi again, or on third thouht. Maybe one in my complaint 2, from earlier today should say that Senica are being ignorant. Because they ignore the fact, that I've comlained to them about the CV not being finished yet, when they say I've declined to use it. So I think in complaint 2, that one could say, that Sencia are being ignorant. Yours sincerely, Erik Ribsskog ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> Date: Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 7:51 PM Subject: Update/Fwd: To Mr. John Upton's line-manager, Merseyside District Office - Complaint about Sencia To: CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk Hi again, I'm from Norway, so I have to think about things a bit. But in my complaint 2, from the e-mail earlier today. To explain a bit more, I think Sencia takes things out of contexts, when they write, that I declined to use the CV. Because I don't think the CV was finished yet. So then they take it out of context when they complain about that I have declined to use the CV. This is common sence, that a CV should be fine and finished before one use it. So Sencia have been like making some 'spin' here, I think, and taken things out of context, and in that way not given a real presentation of reality. Probably intentionally, I think, to cover up that I went through Employment Zones with them, without even getting a finished CV. So Senica are lying really, I'd say, when they say I've declined to use the CV, because then they 'make themselves stupid', like we have a term in Norway saying, and that's a reason to complain I think, that Senica 'make themselves stupid', and refuse to see wholer picture, but in stead takes this out of contexts, about that I've declined to use their CV, when this was because it wasn't properly finished, the errors weren't fixed and my IT-skills weren't put on the CV. I wanted Sencia to contact University of Sunderland, and hear if they could asses my IT-skills, like I had contacted their 'CV-department' about. But then Mr. Ellis insisted he would asses my IT-skills in my first PA-meeting at Sencia. But he didn't do this, during the whole of Employment Zones, so the CV I got towards the end of Employment Zones, didn't contain an assessment of my IT-skills. So Mr. Ellis didn't keep his word, I'd say, like I think I've also explained about in my earlier corresponence with the Jobcenter regarding the problems at Sencia. Just something more I thought about, as an update, regarding my two compaints, in my e-mail, from earlier today. Yours sincerely, Erik Ribsskog ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> Date: Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 6:24 PM Subject: To Mr. John Upton's line-manager, Merseyside District Office - Complaint about Sencia To: CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk> Hi, thank you for your, (Mr. Upton's), letter from 23/12. You write: 'On the second point regarding your revised CV. I am told by Sencia that the adviser did produce a revised version of your CV on two pages but that you declined to use it'. This doesn't mirror the thruth. So therefore I think I have to make a new complaint. 1. In the first meeting, Mr. Ellis, at Sencia, insisted, he'd asses my IT-skills, for the revised version of my CV. He didn't do this, but gave me a CV-version where my IT-skills weren't written about on. 2. Mr. Ellis wrote in a gap, in my employment-history, with Rimi, in Norway, on his version of my CV. And he didn't want to edit this error. He also wrote on a degree, on the CV, that I don't really have, (at least not yet, it's with NITH in Norway. And I don't know if they'll send the degree or not, it depends on if they'll accept my modules from Oslo University College, faculty of engineering). So the fact's aren't right on the CV. (Like I also explained in the first complaint, I seem to remember). And I wanted to be on level, with my Personal Advisor, at Sencia, about the facts on my CV, so I wanted Mr. Ellis to edit the CV, and send me a second version. (This is how companies like Ladders produce CV's, if I've understood it right. I'm on Ladders so I have a high income-potential, that I would have wanted my CV to reflect). So one can't just say, like you do, that I 'declined to use' the CV. I think what you right in your letter doesn't reflect reality. I simply wanted to get the CV fine, before I started to use it. Then one can't just say I declined to use it. That's really not how it was, but the CV I got from Sencia was more like a draft, full of errors, and with extra degrees on. I could have been charged for fraud maybe or at least lost my job later, if I had sent companies CV's with extra degrees on, and then gotten a job, if it had then later been found out, that I hadn't really got this CV. So Sencia has just given me a drafted version of a CV. And when I want to contribute, with getting the CV fine, then they say I decline to use it. But I can't say I've been given a finished CV. So I have to say that you lie when you say I've declined to use it. The problem is that I haven't been given a finished CV. So you twist the thruth a bit in you letter. But I understand that this is just what Sencia have told you. But Sencia don't tell you the thruth, if what you write in your letter is right. So I think this complaint should be escalated to your line-manager, since he then can find out who's lying about the CV, you or Sencia. Or rather, I'll send this e-mail to Mr. Uptons line-manager, on second thought. Hope this is alright! Yours sincerely, Erik Ribsskog

---