toCustomerContactCentre@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
ccTAYLORG@unhcr.org
bcceftacourt@eftacourt.int
dateThu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:09 PM
subjectUpdate/Fwd: FW: Case ref 2011/016499
mailed-bygmail.com
hide details 2:09 PM (0 minutes ago)
Hi,
I've been thinking more about your latest e-mail now, (where you list your records, which I haven't seen before).
Regarding this case: 2007/006341:
I have to say that it was news to me, that the Merseyside Police have got a dispension in this case.
They ridiculed me, and called me 'Miss', (and much more).
How would you like it if someone called you 'Mister'?
Where can I complain about this dispension?
Regarding this case: 2011/015104., (Eviction from University of Sunderland):
This eviction was only a few weeks ago.
So even if it seems to have been a misunderstanding somewhere, it should still be possible for you to investigate the Police.
They didn't have an Eviction Order from the Court, and they placed me in a hostell, where the landlady said their very though and very friendly, by chatting with Council-staff about me, behind my back, (this was how it seemed to me), after evicting me from my university-room, and off-loading me, early in the morning, by the Sunderland Council-office.
The Burger King case:
I have not been talking with the Police at Burger King.
This complaint must be in regards with that the Police don't reply when I send them crime-reports.
Regarding this case: 2011/016499:
Is this case regarding that the Police don't reply to my e-mails?
Hope you can clear this up!
Regards,
Erik Ribsskog
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog
Date: Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 2:36 PM
Subject: Re: FW: Case ref 2011/016499
To: !Customer_Contact_Centre
Hi,
this isn't the way I remember it.
I think the complaint when I was thrown out from University like by the Gestapo was serious.
I can't remember that I haven't given you consent in this.
This seems highly unlikely to me.
Then I have been tricked, I think, by the IPCC.
You helped the Police get out of this I think.
And you also make up funny cases about Burger King.
This is ridiculus.
Erik Ribsskog
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:36 PM, !Customer_Contact_Centre
Dear Mr Ribsskog
Our records show that your appeal is in relation to the police failing to investigate allegations of harassment. I have set out your cases below for clarity-
2007/006341- This complaint was in relation to the way in which the police responded to your attempts to report serious organised crime. The complaint was sent to the force on 11 May 2007. You made an appeal to the IPCC on 28 August 2007, which was upheld. Merseyside Police then sent an application to the IPCC to dispense with the case. The IPCC made a decision to grant the dispensation.
2007/017332- This complaint was in relation to an allegation of harassment against the female officer on the front desk at Walton Lane Police Station. As you did not provide your consent for your complaint to be forwarded to the Professional Standards Department (PSD) of Merseyside Police- no action could be taken on this case.
2008/001710- This complaint was in relation to the staff at Burger King, you were therefore sent a letter to inform you that this matter does not fall within our remit and no further action was taken.
2011/004716- This complaint was in relation to police stealing an axe and harassing you. This complaint was sent to the PSD at Merseyside Police on 25 August 2011.
2011/015104- This complaint relates to allegations that the police helped Sunderland University to evict you. We requested your consent on 26 August 2011, however we did not receive a response to that email- therefore no further action could be taken on this case.
2011/016499- This case relates to allegations that the police have failed to investigate your allegations of harassment. You submitted an appeal on 11 October 2011, which has been passed to our appeals department for a response.
Further to my email of 15:03, you have sent a further 6 emails. I have requested on several occasions that you do not send emails that are in relation to your details being used on websites, as we are already aware of your concerns. Criminal matters do not fall under the remit of the IPCC. Please note if we continue to receive further emails that are unrelated to the IPCC then we may need to consider restricting your access by email. You should now await a response from our appeals team.
Kind regards
Laura Bailey
Casework Manager
Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)
North Region - Sale
Phone: 08453 002 002
Email: CustomerContactCentre@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
______________________________________________
From: !Customer_Contact_Centre
Sent: 17 October 2011 15:03
To: 'eribsskog@gmail.com'
Subject: Case ref 2011/016499
Dear Mr Ribsskog
I acknowledge receipt of your emails.
I am aware that the basis of your complaint is that you have reported harassment to the force and you feel that your concerns have not been responded to. However, as stated in my previous email, the IPCC does not need to be copied into emails in relation to people using your details on websites. The IPCC has received your appeal in relation to this matter and you will be contacted by the appeals department in due course. I would be grateful if you could refrain from sending any further emails in relation to your details being used on websites as we are already aware of your concerns.
Kind regards
Laura Bailey
Casework Manager
Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)
North Region - Sale
Phone: 08453 002 002
Email: CustomerContactCentre@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.