johncons: 13. juni 2008

fredag 13. juni 2008

Kommentar overflødig. (In Norwegian).

E-mail from Human Rights Watch, 13/6/08.

Google Mail - RE: Helen/Fwd: Inhumane treatment from the Government.

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

RE: Helen/Fwd: Inhumane treatment from the Government.

HRW UK
<hrwuk@hrw.org>

Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:12 PM

To:
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Dear Mr. Ribsskog,

Thank you for contacting Human Rights Watch. We are an
independent, nongovernmental organization that collects and disseminates
research and information about human rights violations all over the
world. Human Rights Watch conducts fact-finding investigations into human
rights abuses, and then publishes these findings in books and reports. We
use these publications to influence the human rights policy of governments and
intergovernmental institutions, but we do not work at the individual level.

As an organization that specializes in the gathering and
sharing of information, we are not a service-delivery organization. We regret
that we are not able to deal with people on an individual basis, and that we
cannot respond to individual requests for assistance with human rights
violations. However, we wish you well in your struggle for human rights.

Kind regards

Helen Raynsford

Helen
Raynsford

Human Rights Watch

2-12
Pentonville Road

London N1 9HF

Phone: 020 7713 2769

Fax: 020 7713 1800

Email: helen.raynsford@hrw.org

Web: www.hrw.org

From: Erik Ribsskog
[mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008
2:34 PM

To: HRW
UK

Subject: To: Helen/Fwd: Inhumane
treatment from the Government.

Hi,

I called earlier today, regarding an e-mail that I hadn't recieved an
answer to, and then we agreed,

that I would send the e-mail again, since it couldn't be found on your
system.

So here's the e-mail again.

Hope you have the chance to please give some help or advice regarding this!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Mar 19, 2008 1:41 PM

Subject: Fwd: Inhumane treatment from the Government.

To: HRW UK
<hrwuk@hrw.org>

Hi,

I can't see that I've recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, that's why
I'm sending it again.

Hope this is alright!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Jan 31, 2008 11:25 AM

Subject: Re: Inhumane treatment from the Government.

To: HRW UK <hrwuk@hrw.org>

Hi,

ok it says this on your website:

'Human
Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around the
world.

We stand
with victims and activists to prevent discrimination, to uphold political
freedom, to protect people from inhumane conduct in wartime, and to bring
offenders to justice.

We
investigate and expose human rights violations and hold abusers accountable.

We
challenge governments and those who hold power to end abusive practices and
respect international human rights law.

We enlist
the public and the international community to support the cause of human rights
for all.'.

It says
that you 'investigate and expose human rights violations and hold abuser
accountable'.

I'll try
to explain a bit better, and summarise some of the things that has been going
on:

- In
December 03, in Bjørndal, in Oslo,
Norway, I
overheard that I was followed by 'the mafia'.

- In July 05, I was chased away from my uncles farm in Kvelde, outside
of Larvik in Norway,
by people

with dogs and guns.

- And I've also been chased by what seems to be mafia in France, Germany and Holland etc, in 2005.

- And in Liverpool, in 05 and 06, I've
been working in a company, Arvato, which seems to have been

infiltrated by a criminal network, and there were problems with illigal
management methods and

organised harassment etc.

- And in my home, in Liverpool, now
last month, I'm getting visits by 'phoney' inspectors from the

water-company, who are saying that they want to inspect the
water-meter, even if my flat hasn't got

a water-meter installed.

And the inspector was also looking in the boiler-room and the
electricity-cabinet, for the water-meter.

And then I called United Utilities, and they say that their
representatives never inspect the electricity-

cabinet.

So theres obviously something 'phoney' going on.

And I'm also worried about what has happened with some of my former collegues
at Arvato, who I think

can have been victims for trafficing, prostitution etc., possibly
organised from within the company.

So these are some of the things that has been going on.

There have also been more things, but there have been so many things going on,
that's it hard to focus

and summarise it all, I'm sorry I'm a bit overworked.

The problem, is that I've been contacting the police in both Norway and Britain, and they don't want to

give me any advice or information, or any help at all, even if it's
clear that I'm having problems with

being followed/chased by criminal networks etc.

And the incident with the 'phoney' water-company inspector, I think, must be
someone from the Government,

like police or intelligence, and I also get 'phoney' people contacting
me on my facebook-page, which also

seems something from like the police.

So it's obvious that the governments in both Norway
and Britain
are spying on me.

And they don't want to tell me what's going on, they're keeping me uninformed.

And I think this is like torture, because I've heard and seen that I'm
being followed by mafia and I understand that I'm

being spyed on by the government, and I'm worried about some of my
former collegues at Aravto, who I havn't heard

from in more than a year, and whom someone seems to have been
making 'phoney' facebook pages in the name of.

So this is more or less driving me insane.

I've been smashing up the houshold-equipment, and I've considered killing
myself and/or the police, since it's making

me go insane, that they won't tell me anything, even if it's more than
a year ago, that I sent the e-mails from Arvato,

to the press, explaining that there were some organised harassment
etc., going on there.

But the British police just pretends that there has been nothing going on.

Like the Norwegian police are doing, they aren't even answering my e-mails or
phone-calls, when I try to contact them,

regarding the how to deal with the situation, with that I've overheard,
and seen, that I'm being followed by mafia, and that

I was chased from uncles farm in 2005, and around Europe,
also the same year.

So I have
been thinking that it is one's right to get information from the police about
what's going on, when oneself are

involved in a case.

And also, that one have the right to ask for advice on how to deal with
haveing problems with criminal networks etc.

But the police refuse to tell me anything, they won't give me any information
or advice, and this has been going on since

December 2003, in Norway,
and then from 2004/2005 in Britain.

So I think I have the right to get some information and advice, before
I loose my mind completly here.

But the police in both countries don't seem to think that.

So that's why I'm trying to contact you, because I was wondering if you by any
chance, have some information, regarding,

if it isn't my right to get information and advice from the police in
situations like this, when one are almost going insane,

since one don't know what's going on?

Also, I've been contacting the Norwegian department of Amnesty
International, but they are only harassing me, and

pretending to not understand what I mean, so I thought it would maybe
be right to complain about the department,

since I think that they should know how to answer enquieries like that,
without any lying or harassment.

So I hope very much that you have the chance to have a look at this.

I'm sorry that I've been using a bit of time to reply, but I havn't got much
founds, so I have to work a lot of overtime etc.,

so I've had to use a lot of time at work.

So I think it would be very fine if you had the chance you have a look
at this again!

Hope this is alright, and thanks in advance for the help!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

On 1/31/08, HRW UK <hrwuk@hrw.org> wrote:

Dear Erik
Ribsskog,

Thank you
for your email. I am afraid Human Rights Watch is a research and advocacy
organisation which does not usually deal with individual cases of human rights
violations apart from our current reports in progress. We do not have the
resources or expertise to give advice on individual cases of human rights
problems and would suggest you consult a lawyer and/or a non-governmental
advice centre.

We are
regretful that we can't be of more assistance and sincerely hope your situation
is improved as quickly as possible.

Yours
kindly,

Helen
Raynsford

From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008
7:42 AM

To: HRW
UK

Subject: Inhumane treatment from
the Government.

Hi,

I was
just wondering if you by any chance could have any possiblity to please help
with some problems

with
inhuma treatment from the Government.

I've been
followed by one or more criminal networks, and the police don't want to give me
any help, or

information
or advice on how to deal with this.

And it
also seems like the governments of the United
States, Britain
and Norway,
may have used me

like a
living target against some mafia, possibly Albanian.

And I've
been trying to contact a lot of organisations about these problems, but I
haven't managed

to get
any help, so I would think it would be very fine if you would have had the
oppertunity to please

help me
with the problems with the inhume treatment from the different Governments.

Thank you
very much for your help in advance!

Yours
sincerely,

Erik
Ribsskog

Trond Giskes håndtlangere. (In Norwegian).

Nettavisen, eller side2 heter det kanskje, skrev at Norwegian Wood festivalen ikke ville gi Trond Giske gratisbillett:

Fire ganger skal kulturdepartementet ha bedt om to fripass for Trond Giske på Norwegian Wood. (SIDE2:) Kulturminister Trond Giske er en ivrig festivalgjenger, og bør som Norges minister for kultur og idrett også få med seg noen festivaler hvert år. Stort sett blir han da også invitert. Men ikke til Norwegian Wood.

Siste nytt fra Side2: Sjekk forsiden akkurat nå!

Norwegian Wood reagerte da kulturdepartementet på vegne av Trond Giske fire ganger ba om å få fribilletter til den pågående festivalen etter å ha fått nei første gang.

LES ALT OM TORSDAGEN PÅ WOOD HER:

Foo fela!

Levende dinosaurer

Får ikke statsstøtte
- Vi har et lite antall fribilletter. De går til forretningsforbindelser og partner, familier og venner. Trond Giske passer ikke inn under noen av disse kategoriene. Han er en vanlig konsertgjenger for oss, sier Norwegian Woods festivalledelse til VG.

Norwegian Wood arrangeres i år for 17. gang. Festivalen arrangeres uten støtte fra staten. Stabssjef Oddgeir Harildstad bekrefter at de forlangte betaling og at de tre ganger sa at det var riktig. Deretter fikk festivalsjef Jørgen Roll en telefon der en annen person spurte om de «sto på beslutningen».

- En misforståelse
Kulturminister Trond Giske sier til VG at det hele må dreie seg om en misforståelse og at departementet har kjøpt to billetter på Posten til ham.

- Jeg har ingen ledsager å ha med meg for tiden. I tilfelle ville det være snakk om statssekretær Hallvard Ingebrigtsen, sier han til VG. Giske sier han ikke vet hvem det var som ringte til Jørgen Roll, men at han underveis i forsøket på å få tak i billetter fikk beskjed om at de måtte kjøpes på posten. Det ble også gjort, sier Giske.

Norwegian Wood sier at departementet opplyste at det ikke var vanlig at kulturministeren betaler.

- Vanligvis får vi gratis billetter til slike arrangmenter. Det ville ikke Norwegian Wood og det er helt i orden, sier Giske til VG.

http://www.side2.no/musikk/article1982172.ece

Jeg gjorde noe research, på nettet, om Trond Giske, siden jeg skjønte at noe ikke var som det burde være i Norge, og jeg leste også, at noen skrev, at Giske hadde vært full på Stortinget, på noe debattforum, eller lignende.

Så da bestemte jeg meg for å søke litt på Trond Giske, en dag, i fjor, var det vel.

Da mener jeg at jeg fant noe, om at Giske faktisk hadde sånne håndtlangere, som sjekket damer for han:

Nå er det ikke akkurat Oslo jeg bor i, så det at han [Stoltenberg] kom hit til vår by burde i det minste ha vært en liten attraksjon for litt flere mennesker. For meg var det en stor opplevelse, kanskje større enn den gangen jeg tok Trond Giske i hånden. Eller det var vel heller omvendt. En av håndlangerne hans kom bort til meg på gaten "har du lyst til å hilse på Trond Giske?" Forfjamset svarte jeg ja, uten å helt vite hva jeg gikk til. Eller hvem for den saks skyld. Det er en del år siden nå, jeg var ikke like opplyst den gangen. Han tok meg iallfall i hånden, og jeg tenker ofte, vel noen ganger... på hvor høy han faktisk er i virkeligheten.

Faktisk så tror jeg at jeg har en Ap magnet på meg ett sted. Skjult, og ufrivillig.

http://www.vgb.no/26650/perma/237012

http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/search/label/Trond%20Giske

Jeg tror at Trond Giske, på bakgrunn av den artikkelen og den blogg-posten, antagelig har en gjeng med folk, som han er 'sjef' for omtrent, privat og på jobb, og som gjør det han sier.

Er Giske noe slags mafia-boss?

Ikke vet jeg, men noe er det vel.

De her tingene virker litt underlige for meg i hvertfall.

Så noe må det vel være.

Med vennlig hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

Letter from McDonalds, 13/6/08.

E-post til DNB Nor, 13. juni 2008. (In Norwegian).

Google Mail - Konto i Svelvik Sparebank.

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Konto i Svelvik Sparebank.

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:49 AM

To:
04800@dnbnor.no

Hei,

jeg ringte kundeservice hos DNB Nor, i dag, angående en konto, som jeg hadde tidligere, i Svelvik Sparebank.

Nå har jo Svelvik Sparebank, skiftet navn, til Sparebanken Nor, og nå DNB Nor, men jeg tenkte, at jeg kunne

jo forsøke, å se om det var mulig å finne ut av hva som har skjedd.

Det som skjedde, var at foreldrene mine skilte seg, på 70-tallet.

Så skiftet moren min, etternavn, på meg, til Ribsskog.

Så var vi på ferie hos faren min og dem, litt senere på 70-tallet.

Og da tok faren min meg med i banken, og sa at jeg skulle si, at navnet mitt, var Erik Mogan Olsen.

Så, på begynnelsen av 90-tallet, så fikk jeg et brev, fra Svelvikbanken, om at jeg skulle kontakte de, angående

den kontoen.

Så dro jeg dit, det var vel sommeren 1991, hvis jeg husker riktig.

Da mener jeg pratet med en dame der, med mørkt hår, det er mulig hun het Røkås, eller noe, men det skal

jeg ikke si helt sikkert.

Men da beholdt hun bare brevet, og jeg fikk ikke noe beskjed om hva som skjedde med kontoen, enda jeg mener

det var noen penger på den kontoen.

Så, nå bor jeg i utlandet, og nå har jeg tenkt litt tilbake, på ting som skjedde på 70, 80 og 90-tallet, og da begynte

jeg å tenke på denne episoden igjen, siden jeg synes den var litt underlig.

Så da tenkte jeg, at jeg kunne jo prøve å ringe Svelvikbanken, men det var jo ikke noe direkte-nummer dit, på

websidene deres, så jeg pratet med en dame på kundeservice, som sa at jeg kunne jo sende en reklamasjon,

til f.eks. denne e-post adressen.

Så det er derfor jeg sender denne e-posten nå, for jeg lurte på hva som foregikk, i forbindelse, med at jeg ikke fikk

noe beskjed om hva som skjedde med den kontoen, og pengene som var på den.

Jeg vet jeg ikke ligger så bra ann, når det gjelder saldoen, på den vanlige kontoen min hos dere, så det er vel ikke

mest på grunn av pengene, som jeg skriver denne e-posten, for det må vel balanseres, fra den andre kontoen

uansett.

Men jeg var litt nysgjerrig angående hva som egentlig har foregått da.

Så jeg håper det er mulig å finne ut mer om dette.

På forhånd takk for hjelp i såfall!

Med vennlig hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

Purring på manglende svar, e-post til Schibsted, 13. juni 2008. (In Norwegian).

Google Mail - Angående klage på Torry Pedersen i VG, mm.

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Angående klage på Torry Pedersen i VG, mm.

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:46 AM

To:
schibsted@schibsted.no

Hei,

jeg kan ikke se at jeg har mottatt noe svar på denne e-posten ennå, så derfor prøver jeg å sende den igjen.

Håper dette er i orden!

Med vennlig hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Jun 10, 2008 1:33 PM

Subject: Angående klage på Torry Pedersen i VG, mm.
To: schibsted@schibsted.no

Hei,

tidligere i år, så ringte jeg VG, for å høre hvordan jeg skulle gå frem, med å sende en klage,

på VG Nett osv.

Så fikk jeg beskjed om å sende et brev til administrerende direktør i Verdens Gang.

Det gjorde jeg, her i februar måned.

Så har jeg ikke klart å få noe svar på dette brevet.

Så så jeg gjennom notatene mine nå, og da begynte jeg å lure litt på hva dette, med det

manglende svaret, kunne komme av.

Så tenkte jeg, at jeg kunne jo ringe VG, og høre hva e-post adressen til administrerende

direktør var, så kunne jeg eventuelt prøve å sende en e-post, for å høre hva som har skjedd

med det nevnte brevet.

Så ble jeg satt over til VG redaksjonen, og da forteller de meg, at nå har Torry Pedersen

blitt administrerende direktør for hele VG, og ikke bare VG Nett.

Og jeg husker jo det, selv om det er noen måneder siden jeg sendte klagen, at jeg ringte

Pedersen, da han jobbet i VG Nett, og da presanterte han seg ikke engang, da han svarte

på mobilen, så at han har blitt administrerende direktør, det syntes jeg hørtes litt rart ut.

Men jeg søkte på nettet for sikkerhets skyld, og da så jeg jo det, på Wikipedia, at dette stemte.

Men jeg tenkte, at siden denne klagen, er på blant annet Torry Pedersen, så er det vel litt feil,

hvis klagen skal behandles av Torry Pedersen.

Da blir det vel som at samme person sitter på begge sidene av bordet, omtrent som under

forhandlingene om delelinjene i Barentshavet når Treholt og Evensen, eller hva han het, var

med.

Så jeg lurte på om dere har noe forslag, til hvem jeg burde kontakte da, for å eventuelt få

noe fremgang på denne floken?

Jeg kopierer inn en kopi av brevet her, og jeg kan også sende vedleggene på nytt, når jeg

vet hvilken person det er, som er riktig person for å kikke på klagen osv.

Håper dette er i orden, og på forhånd takk for hjelp!

Med vennlig hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

Her følger en kopi av det nevnte brevet, fra februar:

Erik Ribsskog

Flat 3

5 Leather Lane

Liverpool 4. februar 2008

L2 2AE

Storbritannia

Verdens Gang A/S

Administrerende Direktør

Akersgata 55

N-0180 Oslo

Norway

KLAGE

Jeg har hatt noen problemer med trakassering, sletting av tråder, sperring av brukerkonto, og

manglende svar/dårlig kundebehandling, fra VGD og VG Multimedia.

Det er snakk om følgende problemer:

1. En tråd jeg startet på VGD, 'Kjeller', ble slettet midt på natten, i 2-3 tiden, natt til søndag 15.

september i fjor.

For det første, så var det ingen åpenbar grunn for slettingen, og for det andre, så synes jeg

det var merkverdig at VGD skulle slette en tråd, midt på natten, natt til søndag, når mer eller

mindre hele Oslo eller Norge, er ute på puben, eller gjør hva som helst annet enn

rutinearbeid.

F.eks., så vet jeg at BBC's debattforum, har steng hele helgen, fra fredag kveld til mandag

morgen, så jeg synes det var litt bemerkelsesverdig, at VGD er i full sving med å slette tråder

kl. 2-3 om natten, natt til søndag, midt i helgen.

Og jeg har også overhørt, i 2003, at jeg er forfulgt av mafiaen, og i år, så har jeg overhørt at

jeg (mot min vilje og viten), har blitt brukt som 'target guy', av politiet.

Så jeg mistenker at politiet kan ha vært blandet inn i denne slettingen, som en type

overtramp/maktmisbruk, for å prøve å skjule at de har brukt meg som 'target guy', og også

dekke over andre ting de har gjort galt, så derfor synes jeg dette burde undersøkes formelt.

2. Noen dager etterpå, så innrømmer moderator at slettingen var feil, likevel ville de ikke

gjennopprette tråden.

Jeg ringte å pratet med Torry Pedersen om dette, 23. januar i år, men han bare vifta det unna,

og svarte at, 'det var vel ingenting som var tapt for evigheten'.

Som man vel kan si om det meste, og som jeg synes vitner om en uproffesjonell holding både

ovenfor folks meninger og yttringer og også om dårlig kundebehandlig.

3. Jeg hadde noe problemer med personangrep rettet mot meg, på VGD, og jeg skrev, som

jeg husker var vanlig fra da jeg hang på Engelsk Fotball forumet mye, for noen år tilbake,

'Klage sendt', på forumet, etter at jeg hadde rapportert personangrepet.

Men da får jeg selv advarsel, fra VGD, for å ha skrevet 'klage sendt'.

Jeg er ganske sikker på at det er, mer eller mindre, vanlig praksis, på VGD, å skrive 'klage sendt'.

Så jeg mener dette kan tyde på trakassering, mot meg, fra VGD moderatorenes side.

For jeg mistenker at VGD moderatorene ikke sender advarsel til alle som skriver 'klage sendt'.

Men jeg mistenker at de ville bli kvitt meg fra forumet, og bare fant på en grunn for å gi meg

advarsel.

Jeg søkte på hvor mange som hadde skrevet 'klage sendt', før meg, og da hadde 20 stykker

skrevet 'klage sendt', de siste fire dagene.

At jeg skal få advarsel, for noe som, mer eller mindre, alle gjør, det er det ingen tvil om, for

meg, om at må sies å være trakassering mot meg, fra VGD.

Så dette synes jeg er alvorlig, og det kan tyde på at VGD har en agenda her.

Jeg mistenker at VGD samarbeider med politiet, eller andre, for å dekke over ting som har skjedd,

i forbindelse med organisert kriminell aktivitet, og/eller maktmisbruk fra myndighetenes sin side.

4. Mod tillot at en tråd jeg skrev på forumet, 'Klage sendt', skeiet ut fra tema, og var vel selv med

på å ødelegge den tråden.

Det virket som om Mod ikke ønsket en debatt om tema, og med vilja ødela diskusjonen, og det

har jeg vanskelig for å se at kan kalles noe annet enn trakassering.

5. Mod. svarte ikke på mitt innlegg 2605, det virket som om de spekulerte, på en eller annen

måte, fordi de svarte, når jeg startet en ny tråd.

Så at de med vilje unngikk å svare, av en eller annen anledning.

Nå skriver jeg dette fra notater, så jeg husker ikke helt nøyaktig sammenhengen, men det burde

komme fram ved å se på mitt innlegg 2605, jeg mener å huske at det virker veldig rart, som om

VGD drev å overvåkte det jeg skrev, og spekulerte i å ikke svare, før jeg opprettet en ny tråd.

Nå er jo dette noen måneder siden, men det er hvertfall slik jeg husker det, fra notatene.

6. 23. november i fjor, så sendte jeg en e-post til torry.pedersen@vg.no, med en purring,

angående manglende svar, på klagene ovenfor, om trakassering på VGD.

Men jeg mottok ikke noe svar på denne e-posten.

7. 14. desember i gjor, så la jeg igjen en beskjed på Torry Pedersens mobilsvar, om han kunne

ringe meg tilbake, i forbindelse med denne klagen.

Men jeg hørte ikke noe tilbake i forbindelse med dette.

8. 23. januar, så prøvde jeg å ringe Pedersen igjen, og da fikk jeg prate med han, på mobil,

tror jeg det var.

Men han presanterte seg ikke, når han tok telefonen.

9. Og når det gjaldt klagene, 1-5, listet ovenfor, så nektet han å svare på mer enn de to første,

så jeg fikk ikke forklart ordentlig dette, angående det jeg opplevde som trakassering fra VGD.

Pedersen nektet å svare på mer enn de to første spørsmålene, og henviste bare til at 'VG

utøver sitt redaktøransvar etter det de finner formålstjenlig'.

Og sa han, at han, 'hadde svart på det han trengte å svare på', og avsluttet samtalen.

Det synes jeg var litt dårlig kundeservice, fordi jeg fikk jo ikke da forklart ordentlig hva klagen

gikk ut på, for eksempel dette med trakasseringen fra VGD, under punkt 3. osv.

For jeg synes at det ikke er riktig at man skal bli trakassert på debattforum.

Såvidt meg bekjent, så er slike ting, som trakassering, også ulovlig ifølge norsk lov.

Og at man ikke lar den som ringer, få lov å fullføre samtalen, og heller ikke presanterer seg, når

man svarer på telefonen, det synes jeg nok, er nokså uhøflig ovenfor VG Multimedia sine kunder.

Og som nevnt ovenfor, så mistenker jeg at politiet har noen form for aksjon pågående, for å

skjule feil de har gjort, iom. at de bl.a. har brukt meg som 'target guy', mot mafiaen, uten

min tilatelse/viten.

Så det virker som om politiet bruker ulovlige metoder, for å dekke over feil de har gjort.

Og jeg mistenker, som skrevet ovenfor, at politet, eller andre utenfor VGD, kan ha vært

involvert i sletting av debattråder, midt på natten, natt til søndag, som nevnt i pkt. 1.

Og muligens også i forbindelse med de andre nevnte tilfellene av trakassering.

Nå er vel disse punktene alvorlige nok i seg selv, men på bakgrunn av situasjonen, med

at jeg har overhørt at jeg er forfulgt av mafian, og også har overhørt at jeg har blitt brukt

som 'target guy', av noe norsk eller utenlandsk etterettning eller politi da, jeg regner med

det må være norsk, britisk eller amerikansk politi eller etterettning.

Så jeg håper Verdens Gang har muligeten til å behandle denne klagen på en ansvarlig

måte, og håper at dere har muligheten til å undersøke denne klagen formelt.

Jeg sender ved en kopi av e-poster sendt VGD i forbindelse med de overnevnte klagene,

og jeg sender også med en kopi av en e-post, sendt Human Rights Watch, med en

mer detaljert forklaring på noen av problemene nevnt ovenfor, i forbindelse med organiserte

kriminelle nettverk og politi/myndigheter, etc.

Håper dette er i orden, og på forhånd mange takk for hjelp!

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

E-post til leder Norsk Presseforbund, Per Edgar Kokkvold, 13. juni 2008. (In Norwegian).

Google Mail - Spørsmål i forbindelse med klage.

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Spørsmål i forbindelse med klage.

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:41 AM

To:
kokkvold@online.no

Hei,

jeg kan ikke se at jeg har mottatt noe svar på denne e-posten ennå, så jeg prøver å sende den igjen.

Håper dette er i orden!

Med vennlig hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Apr 18, 2008 2:58 PM

Subject: Spørsmål i forbindelse med klage.
To: kokkvold@online.no

Hei,

jeg har et spørsmål i forbindelse med en klage jeg sendte til en medarbeider hos dere som heter Kjell Nyhus,

i forrige uke.

Jeg har klagen i en blogg-post forresten, det er på denne linken:

http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/search/label/Oppsumering%20av%20trakasseringen%20fra%20Harry%20Wad.%20%28Journalist%20og%20fotograf%20i%20Wikipeida%20og%20nettavisen%20%27Koordinator%27%29.

Så får jeg en e-post tilbake fra medarbeideren deres.

Så sier han, at han kontaktet denne nettavisen, (Koordinatoren).

Så har ansvarlig redaktør der sagt, at de ikke er en avis/nettavis, men bare tilrettelegger informasjon fra skoleverket.

Mens på nettsiden deres, så står det, at de er en nettavis.

De kan vel ikke bare skrive på websiden deres, at de er en nettavis, og så påstå til dere, at de bare tilrettelegger informasjon

fra skoleverket?

Så lenge de har en online publikasjon, og en ansvarlig redaktør, så er de jo en nettavis.

Så jeg lurer på hvorfor PFU kommer med skrøner, som man vel må kalle det.

Så jeg vet ikke hvorfor dere driver med sånt, så håper jeg dere får stramma opp han medarbeideren deres litt, for sånn tull,

det hører vel ikke noen steder hjemme.

Så jeg håper at jeg kan få noen svar på de spørsmålene i denne e-posten, og at dere slutter med det tullet deres.

Med vennlig hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

E-mail to the Ministry of Justice, 13/6/08.

Google Mail - Our ref: TO08/2153

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Our ref: TO08/2153

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:35 AM

To:
Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk

Hi,

I can't see that I've received an answer to this e-mail yet, that's why I'm sending it again.

By the way, I've also been in contact with the IPCC again, and it seems like the situation there is

a bit complicated/problematic, with the complaints and correspondence etc.

I was told earlier this week, that I would hear back from the IPCC, but I haven't heard back from

them yet.

But I thought I should update you about this, since I've already mentioned this, in the e-mail I'm

sending again now.

Hope this is alright!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Jun 5, 2008 1:50 AM

Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153
To: "Holmes, Ryan" <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk>

Hi,

thank you very much for your e-mail!

I have been thinking about contacting the Law Society, regarding getting a list, like you say,

for law firms, who take on law-cases on a 'pro bono' service basis.

But, like I might have forgotten to explain, the Law Society, are already involved in this,

I have complained about them to the Legal Services Ombudsman, who I have been contacting

you about.

So I've maybe lost a bit of confidence, in the Law Society, since I think they gave a bit of wrong

information, and some errors, that I thought were a bit strange, so they are really involved in this

from before.

So then I was wondering about, if it would be right to involve the Law Society again, since they

are involved from before.

Maybe there is someone else one could contact about getting the name of companies like this?

Sorry if I'm asking a lot of questions.

I've also sent a complaint, on the Merseyside Police, to the IPCC.

But the IPCC, aren't dealing with the complaint at all, it seems, so I was wondering who I should

contact then, if I wanted to compain about the IPCC not dealing with the complaint on the Police?

Sorry again that I'm asking so many questions!

Thanks in advance for the reply!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

On 4/25/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

Dear Mr Ribsskog

Thank you for your email reply of 7 April, in which you request further advice on ways to proceed forward with your complaint against the Legal Services Ombudsman (LSO). To assist you with your concerns, I shall set out the avenues of legal assistance available to you that acknowledge your specific financial concerns.

Firstly, while I understand you have already been in contact with the Citizen's Advice Bureau (CAB), you may also wish to consider contacting your local Law Centre. Contact details for your local Law Centre can be found via the Law Centres Federation on 0207 428 4401, or by accessing their website www.lawcentres.org.uk. You may also find it helpful to access the Community Legal Services Direct website for information on providers of legal advice at www.clsdirect.org.uk. Alternatively, you may choose to contact Community Legal Advice for free confidential help regarding your legal queries on 0845 345 4345.

Secondly, it may be worth investigating the possibility of a Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA). This allows a solicitor to accept a case on a 'no won, no fee' basis, under which they receive a fee from you only if the case is won. It is worth pointing that the solicitor's standard fees can be increased by up to 100% to reflect the degree of risk to the solicitor in taking the case on (the 'success fee'). However, should you lose your case, you may still be liable to pay the successful party's costs, as well as expert witness fees and other disbursements. There are insurance schemes that, for a premium, provide cover for these items. As part of the implementation of the Access to Justice Act 1999, we have made it possible for the successful side to recover their lawyer's success fee and insurance premium form the loser. Effectively, this has made the operation of conditional fees fairer and more attractive to clients.

Thirdly, some solicitors may be prepared to take on your case on a pro bono agreement (i.e. provide you with a free service). You can contact the Law Society who can provide you with a list of solicitors that may provide pro bono services. The Law Society is the regulatory body for solicitors in England and Wales and you can write to them at the following address:

The Law Society

113 Chancery Lane

London

WC2A 1SX

Tel: 0870 606 2555.

Alternatively, you can access the Law Society's website at www.solicitors-online.com.

I do hope that you find this information useful.

Yours sincerely

Ryan Holmes

Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

E-mail to Sue Thomas, CAB, 13/6/08.

Google Mail - Your complaint about Liverpool Central CAB

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Your complaint about Liverpool Central CAB

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:26 AM

To:
Sue.Thomas@citizensadvice.org.uk

Hi,

I can't see that I've recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, that's why I'm sending it again.

Hope this is alright!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: May 12, 2008 5:12 PM

Subject: Re: Your complaint about Liverpool Central CAB
To: "Thomas, Sue" <Sue.Thomas@citizensadvice.org.uk>

Hi,

thanks very much for your e-mail.

I was wondering about the street theater operation, that was going on, at the CAB, in April of last year,

and was included in the complaint.

(With the gay-looking CAB-representative helding the meeting in the dark etc.).

I wonder what happened with this issus, noone seems to have commented on this, or is my knowledge of

the English language that is failing me, English only being my second language?

Thanks in advance for the reply!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

On 5/12/08, Thomas, Sue <Sue.Thomas@citizensadvice.org.uk> wrote:

When the Independent Adjudicator sent you her reivew (on 24th April), she said that Citizens Advice would consider the report and then write to you. I am sorry that my reply is a little late but I was away from the office last week and so have only been able to finish my letter to you today.

<<Ribsskog-Liverpool Central.doc>>

Sue Thomas
Head of Advice Policy & Standards
Tel: 020 7833 7034 Mob: 07970 990425

P please consider the environment - do you really need to print this email?

The Citizens Advice service helps people resolve their legal, money and other problems by providing information and advice, and by influencing policymakers. Citizens Advice is an operating name of The National Association of Citizens Advice Bureaux.

Information and Advice www.adviceguide.org.uk

For information about our campaigns, to volunteer or support us www.citizensadvice.org.uk

NOTICE: this e-mail originates from Citizens Advice, an operating name of The National Association of Citizens Advice Bureaux (Charity Registration Number 279057, VAT number 726 0202 76, Company limited by guarantee, Registered Number 1436945 England, Registered office Myddelton House, 115-123 Pentonville Road, London N1 9LZ). It contains proprietary information, some or all of which may be legally privileged. It is for the intended recipient only. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, please notify the author by replying to this e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or reply to this e-mail (other than for the reason stated above).

This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for Content Security threats, including computer viruses.

E-mail to the LGO, 13/6/08.

Google Mail - complaint against Liverpool City Council our ref 08 000 279

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

complaint against Liverpool City Council our ref 08 000 279

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:18 AM

To:
st3york@lgo.org.uk

Hi,

I can't see that I have recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, so that's why I'm sending it again.

Hope this is alright!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: May 21, 2008 8:03 AM

Subject: Re: complaint against Liverpool City Council our ref 08 000 279
To: st3 york <st3york@lgo.org.uk>

Hi,

I'm refering to our phone-call, on Monday, where I explained that I would have a closer look at the compaint, and

call you back the next day. (Tuesday, yesterday).

Unfortunaltly, I was a bit busy yesterday, but I have thought a bit more about this now, so I'm sending you this

e-mail.

Like I explained in the phone-call, my main complaint, against the gym, was that the (female) washing-staff,

where washing the mens chaning-room, within the opening hours, on several (at least two) occations.

I also explained, that I had been working-out in other council/university-run gyms, in Oslo and Sunderland,

but that I hadn't seen this before, that the female washing-staff was washing the mens changing room,

within the opening hours.

I've been thinking a bit more about how to explain this, and I think one must probably say, that this, that

the washing-women wash the mens changing-room within the opening hours of the gym, must be said

to be indicent(?)

And this gym is not like a private gym, but it's a council run gym, open to all members of the public, and

run by the tax-payers money.

The council, explained that they had changed the 'washing-regime', after recieving my complaint, but after

I've been thinking more about this, I think it's a bit strange anyway.

Since, I think that the staff at the gym should have stopped the washing-women, acting like this, I remember

that there was plenty of staff there, the last time this happend, they were just standing in the reception-area,

without doing any work-tasks, maybe 10 or 15 minutes before the gym closed, looking at me, more or less,

smiling, when I left the gym, the last time this happend.

So, I think that staff must have been aware of this.

So, I think that there must have been something going on at the gym, since the staff didn't react, when the

washing women did this.

So I don't think it's enough by the Council, to say they've changed the washing regime, since I think there

must be problems with the staff as well, since they didn't reflect or react at this procedure.

I think both the washing-staff, and the gym-staff and management, should have understood, by themselves,

that it's maybe a bit indecent, to let the washing-women wash the mens changing-room during the opening

hours of the gym, while the changing-room is being used.

So I think that there must be something going on there, since noone reflected on this.

So, I think that maybe the situation at the gym, should be looked a more into, by the Ombudsman, since

I think that there must have been something strange going on there.

I haven't had the time to look at the complaint that much, and this was from last year, so I don't remember

the details that well, but I remember that I was thinking, that there were a lot of strange things going on at

the gym.

So I'm forwarding you the complaint I sent the gym, so maybe you could have a look at this, and see what

you think yourselves, of the other complaints than the main complaint mentioned in this e-mail, if you don't

think the things going on at the gym, weren't a bit strange.

So then I'll trust your judgement on the other complaints, since I am a bit after shedule with work etc. here.

Hope this is alright!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

On 5/14/08, st3 york <st3york@lgo.org.uk> wrote:

Dear Mr Ribskkog

I refer to your complaint against Liverpool City Council. I tried calling you today and last Wednesday but have been unsuccessful. I would like to have a chat with you about your complaint. Please would you telephone me today or on Monday, Tuesday or Wednesday next week (19-21 May) sometime between 9.15am and 4.30pm so that I can make progress on your complaint. If I am not available when you call, please leave a message giving details of the best time to get back to you.

Yours sincerely

Julie Murray

Investigator

Commission for Local Administration in England

Tel: 01904 380220

Website: www.lgo.org.uk

NOTICE - This message contains information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you have received this message in error please advise us at once and do not make any use of the information.