Ingeborg Ribsskog - Baron Adeler Malteserordenen E-post til slottet om Mette-Marit videoen Er noe galt i Martine-saken? Problemer med Grandiosa? johncons-MUSIKK johncons-REISE johncons-FOTBALL

fredag 19. september 2008

Anmeldelse av voldtekt, fra Siri Rognli Olsen, på Abildsø, i 1990. (In Norwegian).





Mer om krig mot norske/norrøne/blonde. (In Norwegian).

Jeg synes mer og mer tyder på, som om det er en systematisk krig, mot norske/blonde/norrøne, i Norge, i hvertfall på Østlandet, der jeg har vokst opp.

Og også i Trondheim.

Fordi, jeg må ta med noe personlig nå, for dette virker litt alvorlig.

Da jeg bodde på Abildsø, i 1990, første året jeg studerte i Oslo.

Da fikk jeg besøk, av en jente fra Trondheim, som jeg traff på englandsbåten, Braemar, fra Oslo til Harwich, sommeren 1989.

Hun og ei lyshåra venninne, som hadde skifta fornavn nylig, de var på besøk hos meg, på Abildsø, for venninna var formann i alarm fancluben, og the Alarm, hadde konsert, på Chatau Neuf, eller hva det heter, studenthuset på blindern der.

Og da bodde de hos meg, en helg, på Abildsø.

Og siste kvelden, natt til søndag, mener jeg det var, så la hu Siri Rognli Olsen seg, oppi vannsenga, sammen med meg.

Så gikk jeg for å børste tenna, eller noe.

Og da, så kom jeg tilbake, så lå hu lederen i alarm-fancluben, Caroline, eller noe, på gulvet, på noe liggeunderlag vel, og flasha den rosa trusa si, når jeg gikk forbi henne, på vei tilbake til senga mi.

Og hun var ganske lekker, så det regarte jeg vel på.

Så jeg lå på ryggen, og halvsov.

Det som skjedde da, var at hun Siri, må ha skjønt at jeg hadde bendern.

Så hun reiv til side underbuksa mi, og satt seg oppå meg, og rei meg, uten at jeg rakk å si hverken ja eller nei, og jeg ble så paff, at jeg klarte ikke å si noe.

Og det var i vannsenga, og da tror det der er sånn med vannsenger, at man blir ikke helt ordentlig tilfredsstilt, siden vannsenga gir etter såpass mye.

Så man blir bare veldig kåt, og blir ikke tilfreds, eller noe sånt.

Jeg tror det må ha vært noe sånt som skjedde.

Så gikk jeg på dass igjen, og vaska pikken, for jeg tenkte at hun kanskje hadde noen kjønnssykdommer osv., husker jeg.

Så hvis jeg skulle hatt sex med henne, som røyka og var litt frikete.

Så var jeg såpass streight, at da ville jeg ha brukt kondom.

Så jeg vil si at den raske riinga hennes, var en slags voldtekt.

Jeg lurer på om jeg ikke skal anmelde det og, det hadde kanskje vært en god ide, det skal jeg søren meg gjøre.

Jeg får vente til jeg får levert den første anmeldelsen, men jeg skal ha det her i bakhodet.

Og hun Siri Rognli Olsen.

Hun må ha vært noe Illuminati-greier, vil jeg si.

For hun hadde hun Caroline, som slave, virka det som.

Og, hun Siri, foreslo for meg, det må vel ha vært den helgen i 1990, på Abildsø.

At jeg burde bli noe au-pair, for en dame, i USA.

Det trodde hun var noe for meg.

Rike damer i USA, ville gjerne ha en ung mann, boende i leiligheten deres, sa hun.

Det hørtes ikke noe aktuellt ut for meg.

Jeg ville ikke gjøre noe sånn ydmykende greier.

Jeg ville ha karriære og bli rik osv. jeg.

Og få meg hus og bil og dame osv.

Så det fallt ikke helt i min smak.

Så det bare avviste jeg, den ideen hennes der, som hun prøvde å påvirke meg med.

Men jeg merker et mønster, at norske/nordiske/blonde folk, blir manipulert, til å havne i ydmykende slave aktige roller, og jentene de blir manipulert til å barbere musa, og la seg bruke som horer, av gjenger osv, som jeg forstår det.

Grunnen til at jeg begynner å se et mønster her, er jo at søstra mi, Pia, som jeg ikke har så mye kontakt med nå.

Hun fortalte meg, rundt år 2000, eller noe, at Viggo, var som en gigolo, for en dame i USA.

Og da ser jeg et mønster.

For det var dette, som hun Siri Rognli Olsen, prøvde å påvirke meg til å bli, å få meg til å ende som en slags gigolo i USA.

Så her begynner jeg å se et mønster.

At norske/norrøne/blonde folk, blir manipulert og tullet med, på en systematisk og organisert måte, gjennom hele livet.

Se på england, hvor jeg leste en avisartikkel, om at blonde engelske damer, tjener 40.000 norske mindre i året, enn engelske brunetter.

Jeg har studert statestikk, på HiO Ingeniørhøyskolen, i Oslo, og jeg tror ikke at en så stor forskjell i lønn, kan være tilfeldig.

Så her er det nok en organisert krig mot lyshårede, vil jeg si.

Med vennlig hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

Ringte Viggo. (In Norwegian).

Nå ringte jeg Viggo, på 001 954 968 1930.

På gymet han jobber, i USA.

Det var han som svarte på telefonen når jeg ringte gymet.

Men han svarte med amerikansk aksent, at han 'har ikke tid til å prate med deg'.

Det synes jeg var litt uhøflig.

Men dem har jo mye å gjøre i USA, folk jobber så mye der, så dem har mye å gjøre på jobben.

Så da skjønner man jo det, at dem ikke har tid å skravle i telefonen hele dagen.

Det skjønner man.

Med vennlig hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

Hun dama hos politiet ble plutselig så rar og grøtete i stemmen, da jeg ringte, så jeg legger det her på blogg og. (In Norwegian).





Dr. Jekyl og Mr. Hyde. (In Norwegian).

Fattern er en jovial kar, som ikke går av veien, for å hjelpe å ringe, eller for å dra på ligningskontoret, for å hente noe skjema for å melde flytting til utlandet osv., og sende det.

Men når han drikker noen ganger, da hender det at han blir litt amper.

Jeg husker en julaften på Bergeråsen.

Det kan vel kanskje ha vært 1986 eller 87, eller noe.

Da var det et eller annet som hadde skjedd.

Og da unngikk vi fattern litt, for det hadde vel vært noe kontroverser av noe slag da.

Det var like før julemiddagen, mener jeg å husker, i huset til Haldis, og det var jeg og fattern og søstra mi, og Christell og Haldis, som var der.

Det kan ha vært etter middagen og, for fattern var full.

Men jeg huska det først som at det var før middagen.

Noe sånt.

Og da hadde vi vært litt lunkne eller avvisende til fattern da kanskje, og ikke vært så hyggelige mot han da.

Det var kanskje noe som hadde skjedd i månedene før jul.

Det husker jeg ikke helt sikkert.

Men i hvertfall så smallt det fra fattern da, i fylla.

Da ble han plutselig som Mr. Hyde, eller Dr. Jekyll, eller hva man skal kalle det.

Og da sa han, at vi burde ikke oppføre vårs sånn som vi gjorde, for han visste ting om alle oss han.

Så han begynte å true oss litt, på julaften.

Så det kan jo være, at han blir litt som Dr. Jekyll og Mr. Hyde, når han drikker, noen ganger.

Men nå var han edru når han ringte om skjema i dag da.

Så det er jo bra, at han ikke drikker når han er på ligningskontoret osv.

Så da har han vel kontroll i hvertfall.

Det får man regne med.

Med vennlig hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

Nå var det sånn, at hun Cecilie Hyde, fra Svelvik.

Hun begynte å ende opp en del i leiligheten min, sammen med søstra mi, i 88 og 89.

Om det kan ha hatt noen rar sammenheng med Dr. Jekyll og Mr. Hyde aktivitetene til fattern.

Hun frøken Hyde, hun bodde jo omtrent i leiligheten min, i noen måneder, mellom jul og 17. mai, i 89.

Så det var kanskje litt snodig.

Men det er mye rart.

E-mail to the Home Office.




Google Mail - To the Minister of Justice/Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153










Google Mail


Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>




To the Minister of Justice/Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153











Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>



Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:42 AM




To:
public.enquiries@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk






Hi,

 

I've been having some problems with the IPCC, that they don't want to investigate some problems,

regarding a complaint against the Merseyside Police.

 

They have freed the Police, even if it's clear that the Police have done a lot of things wrong, they

have been operating with phoney e-mail addresses, and they have been calling me 'Miss Erik

Ribsskog', and they have been lieing, and sending me to the CAB, saying they are Government,

when they are a charity, and much more.

 

I also sent an update, with a new complaint, and I thought the complaints should be investigated

collected.


But the IPCC didn't want to do this.


I think the whole process there is a mess now.

 

My last two e-mails to them, haven't been answered at all.

 

I think this is unaceptable by an institution like the IPCC, that have an important function

in society.

 

At first, I thought that these problems I've been having, with the IPCC and the Police, could be due

to, that I am a Norwegian citizen.

 

But I've now contacted EFTA, who explained to me, that since I am an EEA-citizen, then I have the

same rights in Britain, as a UK citizen.

 

So I don't think I should be bullied by the Police like this, or 'messed with', by the IPPC, like this then.


I've thought that it was the Ministry of Justice, that IPCC sorted under, in Britain, since it's like this Norway, that

Spesialenheten, the Norwegian equivalent of the IPCC, are sorting under the Ministry of Justice there.

 

So I've been having a rather leangthy correspondence, with the Ministry of Justice, regaring the problems with

the IPCC.

 

But today, I recieved an e-mail from the Ministry of Jusitice, that's in this forward, where it was expained to me,

that the IPCC, is in fact, sorting under the Home Office.


So I'm sorry that I've been comunicating with the Ministry of Justice, regarding the problems with the IPCC, when

I understand now, that I should have been contacting you.

 

Sorry about this!

 

I think you should maybe contact the IPCC, and look through the files, for the compaints I've sent them, and the

correspondence, since I think there must be some problems there, since they aren't answering my e-mails etc.

 

So I hope very much, that you have the chance to have a look at this!

 

Yours sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog


PS.


Here are the e-mails, that IPCC didn't answer:

 

From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
To: peter.crouch@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk Peter Crouch
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:37:05 +0000

Subject: Fwd: Your Complaint To IPCC

Hi,

I can't see that I have recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, that's why
I'm sending it again.

Hope this is alright!

Yours sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Mar 4, 2008 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: Your Complaint To IPCC

To: Peter Crouch <peter.crouch@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>


Hi,

well like I had decided to wait on the Ipcc answer which you sent me last
week.

I didn't get a letter sent to me on 10/1, so I have not recieved

confirmation of dispensation, untill I read this e-mail now.

But now I'm aware of this, and I would please like to appeal to the Ipcc,
with the reason that I haven't got any confidense
in the force, due to the reasons already mentioned.


That they have a phoney general enquiery e-mail address and more.

And I also think the cases are linked.

I have sent the new case as an update to the old case, when I have been
contacting you.


So I think they should be investigated collected, by the Ipcc.

Hope this is alright!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog


On 3/4/08, Peter Crouch <peter.crouch@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

>
> Dear Mr Ribsskog,
>
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> I understand that you have lost of confidence in the Merseyside Police and
> have decided to await confirmation of dispensation. It appears from my

> records that a dispensation was granted by IPCC and a letter sent to you on
> 10th January 2008.
>
> With regard to any more recent complaints that we have forwarded to
> Merseyside Professional Standards department (PSD), the same situation may

> arise if you do not respond to any letters you have been sent. You may be
> better advised to cooperate with the PSD, despite your lack of confidence,
> allowing them to complete any enquiries they intend to make. At the end of

> this process you then may have a right of appeal to the IPCC. Ultimately the
> decision is yours, but I just wanted to make it clear that you may
> disadvantage yourself by not cooperating.
>
> yours sincerely

>
> *Peter Crouch*
> *Senior Casework Manager*
> *Telephone Complaints Centre*
> *Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)*
> 90 High Holborn
> London WC1V 6BH
> Direct Line: 020 7166 3123

> Personal Fax: 020 7166 3423
> E-mail: peter.crouch@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

> *Sent:* 28 February 2008 19:12
> *To:* Peter Crouch
> *Subject:* Re: Your Complaint To IPCC
>
>
> Hi,
>
> thank you very much for your answer!
>
> Like I exlained earlier, I've lost a bit of confidence in the Merseyside

> Police, due
> to the phoney e-mail addresses etc., so I don't think theres any point in
> me
> going to any more meetings with them etc.
>
> I'll just wait untill they're finished, and then I'll appeal to the Ipcc,

> for the Ipcc,
> to have a look at the incidents collected.
>
> Like I informed the Ipcc about in one of the former e-mail, which you are
> answering
> me on now, I recieved a letter from the Merseyside Police, from 3/12, last

> year,
> from an Inspector on the Complaints Investigation Bureau.
>
> It says in the letter, that they want an answer, within 21 days from 3/12.
>
> Then they were going to inform the Ipcc, that 'the need for further

> investigation
> of your complaint be discontinued because of lack of co-operation'.
>
> So I reackon I'll eighter hear from you, the Ipcc, or the Force then, once
> the Force
> have finished with their enquieries.

>
> And then I'll contact the Ipcc, when I've got confirmation from the Force
> or the Ipcc,
> that the investigation from the Force have been discontinued.
>
> Hope this is alright!

>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> Erik Ribsskog
>
>
>
>
> On 2/28/08, Peter Crouch <peter.crouch@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

> >
> > Dear Mr Ribsskog,
> >
> > I am writing in reference to your e-mail of 3rd January 2008 marked for
> > the attention of Douglas Cleaver. As the line manager for Sarah Brown

> > and previously the line manager for Joanne Fitzgerald, he has asked me
> > to respond to the concerns that you raise.
> >
> > Firstly please accept my sincere apologies for the prolonged delay in

> > contacting you.
> >
> > The first issue that you raised concerned an e-mail that you sent to my
> > colleague Joanne Fitzgerald on 10th November 2007, in which you
> > expressed a lack of confidence in the Police, following a meeting with

> > Walton Lane Police Station on 8th November 2007. You were informed by Ms
> > Fitzgerald that she had forwarded the e-mail to Michael Gibbs, the IPCC
> > Casework Manager who had been dealing with an Appeal that you had

> > submitted. Your concern appears to be a lack of response from Mr Gibbs.
> > Having looked into the matter I can see that Ms Fitzgerald asked Mr
> > Gibbs to consider whether the e-mail you had sent was part of the

> > previous Appeal. She also stated that he should pass the e-mail back if
> > he believed it to be a new complaint, which he duly did.
> > For your information the IPCC allocates the work to its staff based on

> > the category of work and geographical location of the force who are the
> > subject of the complaint. Accordingly all new complaints are dealt with
> > by my team at our London office and all Appeals, Dispensations and

> > Discontinuances are dealt with by the IPCC regional office dealing with
> > the Police Force concerned. In your case our Sale office deal with all
> > such matters regarding Merseyside Police related Appeals, Dispensation

> > And Discontinuances.
> > Since the e-mail of the 10th November 2007 was considered a new
> > complaint it was passed back to my department where it was assigned to
> > Casework Manager Sarah Brown, Joanne Fitzgerald having since moved into

> > a different department. Ms Brown contacted you on the 7th December 2007
> > and informed you that she had taken over the matter from Ms Fitzgerald.
> > However, I can see that since Ms Fitzgerald had informed you that she

> > had passed the e-mail to Mr Gibbs, you might still have expected a reply
> > from him even though you had been contacted by Ms Brown. I apologise if
> > there was any confusion there.
> > Also in your e-mail of 3rd January I notice that you refer to advice

> > received from Ms Brown that you should contact the police regarding your
> > lack of confidence in them. You state that this doesn't make sense.
> > While I appreciate you may wish the IPCC to become involved at this

> > point, you must remember that each police force is responsible for
> > considering complaints made against that force and for recording your
> > complaint. If you are not happy with the police's decision on recording

> > your complaint, you have the right to appeal to us. Therefore, while I
> > acknowledge your frustration with the response, Ms Brown advice to you
> > was appropriate.
> >
> > You also raised 3 concerns following a new e-mail sent to Ms Fitzgerald

> > on 5th December 2007.
> > 1) How to deal with a letter from the police.
> > 2) How to deal with a letter from the IPCC, in connection with an
> > harassment episode on Walton Lane Police Station on 8/11.

> > 3) The problem with Mr. Gibbs not answering the e-mail sent on 10th
> > November 2007.
> >
> > You go on to say that you consider only the 2nd point to have been
> > answered by Sarah Brown. However I can see that Ms Brown contacted you

> > by e-mail on 11th December 2007 and stated that whilst the police are
> > conducting an investigation into your complaint the IPCC is unable to
> > intervene and is not able to dictate which department carries out this

> > investigation. She went on to say that you will need to speak to the
> > Professional Standards Department (PSD) of Merseyside Police to discuss
> > further. While I appreciate that this does not make specific reference

> > to the letter received from the police, dated 3rd December 2007, it is
> > quite clear that we were not able to intervene and that you should
> > contact the PSD. As for the 3rd point concerning Mr Gibbs not

> > responding, I assume that Mr Gibbs did not feel it was necessary to
> > contact you since Ms Brown was now dealing with the e-mail from you. Ms
> > Brown similarly did not make reference to Mr Gibbs since she had

> > informed you that she would be responding to the e-mail that you had
> > sent Miss Fitzgerald.
> >
> > The final point you make in your e-mail, dated 3rd January 2008, was,
> > broadly, that the latest complaint should perhaps be dealt with together

> > with the previously made complaints. As you will be aware, the Appeal
> > that you submitted to IPCC in August 2007 had already been upheld and
> > the Merseyside Force instructed to 'record' your complaint. Therefore

> > they were already looking into that matter and the IPCC would not have
> > been able to instruct them to add any new matters to the existing
> > complaint. However, it is entirely possible that they might have chosen

> > to add them together once the new complaint was submitted. Once the
> > Force had completed their enquiries into any of the complaints that you
> > raised, you would have had a right to Appeal to the IPCC.

> >
> > I hope that this e-mail addresses the concerns that you have raised and
> > helps to explain the process that the IPCC has to follow and the reasons
> > behind some of the decisions that we took.

> >
> > yours sincerely
> >
> >
> > Peter Crouch
> > Senior Casework Manager
> > Telephone Complaints Centre
> > Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)

> > 90 High Holborn
> > London WC1V 6BH
> > Direct Line: 020 7166 3123
> > Personal Fax: 020 7166 3423
> > E-mail: peter.crouch@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk

> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ******************************************************************************
> > The information in this email is confidential and may be legally

> > privileged.
> > It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended
> > recipient
> > please notify the sender and delete this email; any disclosure, copying
> > or

> > distribution of this email is prohibited and may be unlawful. The
> > content of
> > this email represents the views of the individual and not necessarily
> > those
> > of IPCC. IPCC reserves the right to monitor the content of all emails in

> > accordance with lawful business practice.This e-mail has been swept for
> > computer viruses but IPCC does not accept any liability in respect of
> > your
> > receipt of this email.

> >
> > Independent Police Complaints Commission
> > 90 High Holborn
> > London,
> > WC1V 6BH.
> >
> > ******************************************************************************

> >
> > The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
> > Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in
> > partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On

> > leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
> > Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> > recorded for legal purposes.
> >
>
>

> This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government
> Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership
> with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of

> problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.
> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> recorded for legal purposes.
>
>
>
>
> ******************************************************************************

> The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
> privileged.
> It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended
> recipient
> please notify the sender and delete this email; any disclosure, copying or

>
> distribution of this email is prohibited and may be unlawful. The content
> of
> this email represents the views of the individual and not necessarily
> those
> of IPCC. IPCC reserves the right to monitor the content of all emails in

> accordance with lawful business practice.This e-mail has been swept for
> computer viruses but IPCC does not accept any liability in respect of your
>
> receipt of this email.
>
> Independent Police Complaints Commission

> 90 High Holborn
> London,
> WC1V 6BH.
>
> ******************************************************************************
>
>
> The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government

> Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in
> partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On
> leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> recorded for legal purposes.
>



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: general.queries <general.queries@justice.gsi.gov.uk>

Date: Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 9:59 AM
Subject: RE: To the Minister of Justice/Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153
To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>





Dear Sir,


 


Thank you for your email,


 


The Ministry of Justice are not responsible for the IPCC.


The IPCC falls under the responsibility of the Home Office, therefore any further matters you wish to raise regarding the IPCC will need to be directed to the Home Office.


 


 


Many Thanks







From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 18 September 2008 17:54
To: general.queries
Subject: Fwd: To the Minister of Justice/Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153






 




Hi,



 



I can't see that I've recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, so I'm sending it again.



 



Yours sincerely,



 



Erik Ribsskog



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 1:47 PM
Subject: To the Minister of Justice/Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153
To: general.queries@justice.gsi.gov.uk




Hi,



 



I've tried to escalate a complaint, but it doesn't seem like your representative is answering, to his



correspondence.



 



And I also thought that the original complaint, wasn't answered that well, by another of your



representatives.




So it seems to me, that there are a lot of problems in the Ministry, so I thought it would be



best, to send it to the top of the Ministry, so that you could have the chance to have a look



at these problems, and to get these problems sorted, so that I maybe could get a second



opinion, from the right person in your Ministry, to the original complaint.




Hope this is alright!



 



Yours sincerely,




Erik Ribsskog



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:42 PM
Subject: Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153
To: jan.farenden@justice.gsi.gov.uk




Hi,



 



I can't see that I've recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, so I'm sending it again.



 



Yours sincerely,



 



Erik Ribsskog




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>





Date: Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 9:31 AM
Subject: Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153
To: jan.farenden@justice.gsi.gov.uk




Hi,



 



I called the Ministry of Justice today, and I got your e-mail address, from the clerk there.



 



The reason that I'm sending you this e-mail, is that I was wondering, who it is, that one



should contact, if one are having problems with the IPCC.



 



Since they are not answering my e-mails, and I've already been in contact, with the



complaints-manager there, so I think I've escalated it, as far as it's possible to



escalate, at the IPCC.




So I was wondering, if it isn't the Ministry of Justice, that one should contact, if the



IPCC, are having problems in the way, that they aren't answering e-mails etc.



 



Thanks in advance for any help regarding this!



 



Yours sincerely,




Erik Ribsskog

---------- Forwarded message ----------



From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Jun 30, 2008 7:23 PM



Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153




To: "Holmes, Ryan" <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk>

 






Hi,



 



thank you very much for your answer!



 



I think that the IPCC, probably recieves founding from the Government.




And, I think, that if the IPCC, don't answer their e-mails etc, then this is a matter, for the Ministry,



who are administratively in charge of the IPCC.



 



Which I think must be the Ministry of Justice.



 



I don't think the Ministry of Justice, can't pretend that they aren't in charge of the Police, like



you are trying now.




So, I write this, mostly, to put it on my blog, and then I'll think further, on how to go forward with this.




Yours sincerely,




Erik Ribsskog

 




On 6/30/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:




Dear Mr Ribsskog


Thank you for your email reply of 23 June.


While I am sorry to read of your ongoing concerns, I am afraid there is little useful information I can add to the previous correspondence that you have received from this Department.


As previously explained, if you choose to further your concerns regarding your complaint with the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), you must address the matter to the IPCC directly. Similarly, the Ministry of Justice is unable to comment on or give advice on how to escalate your case with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) or the American Embassy. I can only confirm that the points you have raised have been thoroughly considered and that the Department has been as helpful as possible in answering your concerns.


I am sorry that I am unable to be of more help, but I hope you can appreciate for the reasons given above that the Department is unable to intervene in your case. Hence, any further correspondence sent that addresses the same points will be placed on file and not responded to.


Yours sincerely,


Ryan Holmes


Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division




-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 23 June 2008 14:20
To: Holmes, Ryan
Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153




Hi,



 



I've already been in contact with the Complaints Manager at the IPCC, but this hasn't resovled the problems.




I suspect could be some corruption involved there, because something is obviouslly wrong there in my opinion.



 



Also I wondering a bit on how to escalate the case I've been in contact with the FBI, or the American Embassy,



about.



 



Also, I've been in contact with the Norwegian equivalent, of the IPCC, that's Spesialenheten, regarding another,



but linked, matter.



 



And they sort under the Norwegian Ministry of Justice.




So, I think that the IPCC are sorting under the British Ministy of Justice(?)



 



If not, who should they then be sorting under?



 



Sorry if I'm asking stupid questions.



 



Yours sincerely,




Erik Ribsskog

 



On 6/23/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:




Dear Mr Ribsskog


Thank you for your email reply of 19 June.


The Ministry of Justice is unable to submit a complaint on your behalf to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC). Additionally, a complaint against the IPCC cannot be directed to the Ministry of Justice for review as this does not fall within the remit of this Department. If you wish to make a complaint against the IPCC you must do this by addressing your concerns to the IPCC directly. The information provided below outlines how to do this.


If you have a complaint or query about a casework decision, the IPCC will do their best to clearly explain the reason for their decisions and answer any concerns you have. Please note however that IPCC casework decisions are final and they will not necessarily be able to change the outcome. For further information or advice on your rights you can contact a Citizens Advice Bureau, solicitor or your local MP.


If you have a complaint about a member of staff at the IPCC, in the first instance you can contact the person concerned and the matter may be resolved there and then. As mentioned in my previous email, Casework Manager Sarah Brown is one of a number of IPCC staff that has conducted an investigation into your file and she can be contacted on 0207 166 3934 should you wish to discuss the details of your complaint further. However, since you mention that Miss Brown has not contacted you in the past, you may wish to raise any issues of concern through a line manager, or write to the Internal Complaints Manager. Alternatively, you can download a complaint form via the link


http://www.ipcc.gov.uk/index/contact-us/complaints_ipcc.htm and make your complaint against the IPCC using the contact details below.


Internal Complaints Manager


Independent Police Complaints Commission


90 High Holborn


London


WC1V 6BH


Fax: 0207 404 0695


Email:


internal.complaints.unit@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk.


I do hope that this information is of some use to you.


Yours sincerely,


Ryan Holmes


Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division


 




-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]



Sent: 19 June 2008 20:35
To: Holmes, Ryan

Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153




Hi,



 



thank you very much for your e-mail, and the advice!



 



I wanted to complain about the IPCC, since the whole case is a mess, and they don't reply to my e-mails,



and they don't call me, you mention Brown, she has been supposed to call me, regarding the problems



with the missing answers on the e-mails, but she haven't called.




I think that the IPCC must have some serious problems, with handeling the complaints I sent them,



which I view as one case really.




So I was wondering, how I could submit this complaint, on the IPCC, to the Ministry of Justice.




If you think that you could please submit this complaint for me.



 



Also, I've contacted the FBI, in the American Embassy, in London.



 



And I asked them, on how should go forward, regarding reporting a crime in the US, that someone,



has set up a hate-blog against me there.



 



The FBI/The American Embassy Legal Advice, tells me to contact my local police-station, about this.




But I've lost a bit of confidence, with the Merseyside Police, due to the things mentioned in the



complaints, sent to the IPCC, and more.




And then I thought, that I could contact the IPCC about this then, since I didn't think I could contact



the local Police about this.



 



But now there has been so much problems, with the IPCC, so that I've lost a bit of confidence, in



the IPCC, as well.



 



So then I have to contact the Ministry of Justice about this, since I don't think that eighter the



Merseyside Police or the IPCC, have showed themselves, to be worthy, of much confidence,



unfortunatly.




So I'm mentioning this now.



 



Hope this is alright!




Yours sincerely,




Erik Ribsskog





 



On 6/19/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:




Dear Mr Ribsskog


Thank you for your email reply of 5 June. I am also in receipt of your email dated 13 June.


As explained in my previous reply, the Law Society is the regulatory body for solicitors in England and Wales and will keep a comprehensive list of solicitors practising in your local area. Their website promotes a searchable database to help you find a solicitor which allows you to search by firm name, area of law and/or post code. To alleviate your concerns about contacting the Law Society due to previous personal experiences, I should point out that this list is a resource to assist the public locate suitable legal representation and promote solicitors across England and Wales. You can access the facility via the following link:


http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/choosingandusing/findasolicitor.law.


Alternatively, you could also look through a local directory, such as the Yellow Pages, which might help identify a suitable firm. As suggested in my previous reply, you may wish to contact the Law Centres Federation on 0207 428 4401 who can provide contact details for your local Law Centre. Also, you may find it helpful to access the Community Legal Services Direct website for information on providers of legal advice at


www.clsdirect.org.uk. These are all alternative options available to you that do not involve the assistance of the Law Society.


With regard to the complaint you have submitted to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), I have contacted the IPCC to investigate the status of your complaint. Senior lawyers at the IPCC inform me that without your expressed consent, I am unable to obtain any information that relates to your complaint. I was informed however that Casework Manager Sarah Brown is one of a number of IPCC staff that has conducted an investigation into your file and she can be contacted on 0207 166 3934 should you wish to discuss the details of your complaint further.


I do hope that this information is of some use to you.


Yours sincerely,


Ryan Holmes


Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division




-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 05 June 2008 01:51
To: Holmes, Ryan
Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153





Hi,



 



thank you very much for your e-mail!



 



I have been thinking about contacting the Law Society, regarding getting a list, like you say,



for law firms, who take on law-cases on a 'pro bono' service basis.




But, like I might have forgotten to explain, the Law Society, are already involved in this,



I have complained about them to the Legal Services Ombudsman, who I have been contacting



you about.




So I've maybe lost a bit of confidence, in the Law Society, since I think they gave a bit of wrong



information, and some errors, that I thought were a bit strange, so they are really involved in this



from before.




So then I was wondering about, if it would be right to involve the Law Society again, since they



are involved from before.




Maybe there is someone else one could contact about getting the name of companies like this?




Sorry if I'm asking a lot of questions.




I've also sent a complaint, on the Merseyside Police, to the IPCC.




But the IPCC, aren't dealing with the complaint at all, it seems, so I was wondering who I should



contact then, if I wanted to compain about the IPCC not dealing with the complaint on the Police?



 



Sorry again that I'm asking so many questions!




Thanks in advance for the reply!



 



Yours sincerely,




Erik Ribsskog

 



On 4/25/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:



Dear Mr Ribsskog


Thank you for your email reply of 7 April, in which you request further advice on ways to proceed forward with your complaint against the Legal Services Ombudsman (LSO).  To assist you with your concerns, I shall set out the avenues of legal assistance available to you that acknowledge your specific financial concerns.


Firstly, while I understand you have already been in contact with the Citizen's Advice Bureau (CAB), you may also wish to consider contacting your local Law Centre.  Contact details for your local Law Centre can be found via the Law Centres Federation on 0207 428 4401, or by accessing their website www.lawcentres.org.uk. You may also find it helpful to access the Community Legal Services Direct website for information on providers of legal advice at www.clsdirect.org.uk.  Alternatively, you may choose to contact Community Legal Advice for free confidential help regarding your legal queries on 0845 345 4345.


Secondly, it may be worth investigating the possibility of a Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA).  This allows a solicitor to accept a case on a 'no won, no fee' basis, under which they receive a fee from you only if the case is won.  It is worth pointing that the solicitor's standard fees can be increased by up to 100% to reflect the degree of risk to the solicitor in taking the case on (the 'success fee').  However, should you lose your case, you may still be liable to pay the successful party's costs, as well as expert witness fees and other disbursements.  There are insurance schemes that, for a premium, provide cover for these items.  As part of the implementation of the Access to Justice Act 1999, we have made it possible for the successful side to recover their lawyer's success fee and insurance premium form the loser. Effectively, this has made the operation of conditional fees fairer and more attractive to clients.


Thirdly, some solicitors may be prepared to take on your case on a pro bono agreement (i.e. provide you with a free service).  You can contact the Law Society who can provide you with a list of solicitors that may provide pro bono services.  The Law Society is the regulatory body for solicitors in England and Wales and you can write to them at the following address:


The Law Society


113 Chancery Lane


London


WC2A 1SX


Tel: 0870 606 2555.


Alternatively, you can access the Law Society's website at www.solicitors-online.com.


I do hope that you find this information useful.


Yours sincerely


Ryan Holmes


Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division


This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.


Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.


This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.


 


This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.


This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.


Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.


This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.




This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.



This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.


Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.


This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.




This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.


This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.


Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.


This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.


 


 


 


 



This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.






This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.


Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.


This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.












Telefon til NAV Larvik. (In Norwegian).

Nå ringte jeg NAV i Larvik, og prata med Åse Berit Lunde der.

Hun gjorde seg litt rar i stemmen.

Og sa, at hun kunne ikke sjekke for alle 40.000 som bodde i Larvik.

Jeg måtte forklare at det holdt å søke på mitt personnummer.

Og hun lurte på hva jeg jobbet med osv.

Og gjorde seg vanskelig, vil jeg si.

Så her lurer jeg på, om det var noe lurifaks.

Vi får se.

Hun hørtes også nervøs ut hun her Lunde.

Så hva dem driver med der, det kan man kanskje lure på.

Fattern ringte. (In Norwegian).

Nå ringte fattern angående noe ligningsattest osv.

Nå skal Christell gifte seg, med han svenske samboern sin da, sa fattern.

Mathias, heter vel han.

Jeg trodde dem var gift fra før jeg da.

Men da skal dem i hvertfall gifte seg nå.

Så da får kanskje Jan slutte å kikke på henne i dusjen nå da.

Vi får se.

Med vennlig hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

Det her synes jeg var rart, for jeg har ikke ført noen selvangivelse for 2006. I England behøver man ikke det, når man er vanlig lønnsmottager.




Google Mail - VS: Vedr. Erik Ribsskog










Google Mail


Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>




VS: Vedr. Erik Ribsskog











"Nørholmen, Per Jarle"
<per.norholmen@skatteetaten.no>



Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 9:11 AM




To:
"Barth-Nilsen, Brita" <brita.barth-nilsen@skatteetaten.no>


Cc:
eribsskog@gmail.com








Skattyter ringte og ønsket tilsendt kopi av den selvangivelse som vi har lagt til grunn for året 2006.


Han kjenner ikke til den inntekten som fremgår av skatteoppgjør og lurer på om noen har sendt inn selvangivelse i hans navn.


Det foreligger ikke opplysninger  om lønn i G-databasen.


Du fant tydeligvis papiroppgaven forleden og har den sikkert fortsatt.


Til Erik ditt telefonnummer som jeg noterte fikk jeg ikke til å slå igjennom drefor kopi av denne e-post


Med hilsen


Per Jarle Nørholmen


Rådgiver, Veiledning


Skatt sør


Grimstad


Besøksadresse: Televeien 1, 4879 Grimstad


Postadresse: Postboks 2412, 3104 Tønsberg


Telefon: 37 25 83 25


Telefax: 33 74 12 00


Sentralbord: 800 80 000





_____________________________________________

Fra: Barth-Nilsen, Brita

Sendt: 17. september 2008 10:58

Til: Eieland, Inga Marie

Emne: Vedr. Erik Ribsskog


Når det gjelder inntekt på kr. 111.190,- er dette inntekt som han selv har ført på selvangivelsen som tilleggsopplysning. Han sier at det er lønn fra Psykiatrien i Vestfold. Det er rart at det ikke er innberettet.


Mvh


Brita Barth-Nilsen










E-post til Justissekretariatene. (In Norwegian).




Google Mail - Deres referanse 2008/02046 IV/Fwd: Til Fylkesmannen, Oppdatering.










Google Mail


Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>




Deres referanse 2008/02046 IV/Fwd: Til Fylkesmannen, Oppdatering.











Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>



Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 9:04 AM




To:
post@justissekretariatene.no






Hei,

 

jeg viser til deres brev, av 16. september, hvor dere skriver, at min søknad om fri rettshjelp,

avvises, blant annet på grunn av at:

 

'Det anses derfor ikke nødvendig med bistand fra advokat for å kunne anmelde et forhold

til politiet'.

 

Men dette er en misforståelse.


Min søknad gjaldt veldig mye problemer, som jeg har med offentlig forvaltning.


Blant annet, en klage på Kripos, som har vært hos Spesialenheten og Riksadvokaten, og som

jeg sendte til Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus, i mai måned.


Så denne burde ha endt opp hos dere også.


Jeg sender nå, som en 'forward', i denne e-posten.


Så jeg har altså kontaktet politiet (Kripos), men de bare 'tuller' med meg.

 

Jeg har sendt klage på de til Spesialenheten, men den har vært hos Riksadvokaten, og ikke

blitt tatt til følge.


Jeg har også tatt kontakt med Kripos, om andre problemer, men Kripos har ikke svart på

e-postene mine.


Så dette har jeg tatt med politidirektoratet, justisdepartementet, SMK og Sivilombudsmannen.

 

Men her har Sivilombudsmannen begynt å 'tulle' nå.

 

Nå ser jeg jo at dere i Justissekretariatene, er underlagt Justisdepartementet, som jo er innblandet

i klagen fra før.


Så jeg ser jo at dere nok kan være i en dobbeltrolle her.


Ala bukken som passer havresekken, bare for å ta et eksempel.


Men jeg prøver i hvertfall å sende denne e-posten, for jeg tror ikke alle bilagene som jeg har sendt

fylkesmannen, kan ha kommet fram til dere.


Så om det er sånn, at jeg skal sende de samme bilagene til dere, som jeg har sendt Fylkesmannen.

 

Angående problemene, med at jeg blir tullet med, av offentlig forvaltning mm. i Norge og England.


Eller om det er sånn at dere har fått dette av Fylkesmannen, for det virket ikke sånn på brevet deres.


Så håper jeg dere har mulighet til å svare på dette!


Med vennlig hilsen

 

Erik Ribsskog


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: 2008/5/11

Subject: Til Fylkesmannen, Oppdatering.
To: postmottak@fmoa.no



Hei,

 

jeg viser til klage på medarlbeider hos dere, sendt 1. april, i år, med purring 17. april, (som jeg ikke har mottatt

noe svar på fra dere), og sender med dette en oppdatering til søknaden min om fri rettshjelp.


Det er snakk om en klage på Kripos, som ikke ble tatt til følge av Spesialenheten og Riksadvokaten.

 

Men det ble informert, at jeg har anledning, til å ta dette opp i en rettsak.

 

Og det ønsker jeg å gjøre, siden jeg synes avgjørelsen, om å henlegge klagen, var uforståelig/feilaktig, siden

jeg synes at feilene fra Kripos sin side, var såpass alvorlige, at jeg synes det var uansvarlig av Spesialenheten

og Riksadvokaten, å bare henlegge klagen uten videre.


Jeg sender med kopi av brev fra Spesialenheten og Riksadvokaten, angående henleggelsen, og jeg kommer

også til å videresende en e-post, som inneholder klagen på Kripos, som ble sendt Spesialenheten i april i fjor.

 

Håper dette er i orden, og at jeg snart hører noe mer fra dere!

 

Med vennlig hilsen


Erik Ribsskog






2 attachments
scan0003.gif
96K
scan0004.gif
243K







Bloggarkiv

Populære innlegg

Om meg

Bildet mitt
Overhørte på Rimi Bjørndal, (jeg jobbet som butikksjef/leder i ti år, i mange forskjellige butikker), i 2003, at jeg var forfulgt av 'mafian', mm. Har etter dette ikke fått rettighetene mine, i mange saker. Blogger derfor om problemer med å få rettigheter, mm. Mine memoarer, (Min Bok 1-10), kan også finnes på johncons-blogg, (se: 'Etiketter'). Jeg blogger også om slektsforskning, (etter at min danskfødte mormor, som var etter adelige/kongelige, døde i 2009). Har også vært såvidt innom Høyre/Unge Høyre, i sin tid. Har også studert informasjonsbehandling/IT/Computing, (på NHI, HiO IU og University of Sunderland). Har også bakgrunn fra handel og kontor, (grunnkurs, økonomi med markedsføring og data). Er/var også i Heimevernet, (etter at jeg ble overført dit, etter førstegangstjeneste i infanteriet, (og en rep-øvelse i mob-hæren), i forbindelse med omorganiseringer, i Forsvaret, etter den kalde krigen). Blir også utsatt for mye nettmobbing, mm. johncons-blogg, (og mine memoarer og nettbutikk), er kjent fra TV-programmet Tweet4Tweet, i 2012, (selv om jeg måtte klage, for programmet var veldig useriøst/nedlatende, mm.).

Totalt antall sidevisninger

Etiketter