Ingeborg Ribsskog - Baron Adeler Malteserordenen E-post til slottet om Mette-Marit videoen Er noe galt i Martine-saken? Problemer med Grandiosa? johncons-MUSIKK johncons-REISE johncons-FOTBALL
Viser innlegg med etiketten Arbeidsrett. Vis alle innlegg
Viser innlegg med etiketten Arbeidsrett. Vis alle innlegg

lørdag 24. september 2011

Jeg sendte en e-post til Handelshoegskolen i Bergen

Hjelp med arbeidssaker/Fwd: Til rektor Tom Colbjørnsen/Fwd: Mulig prosjektoppgave for mastergrader etc./Fwd: Mulig prosjektoppgave for studenter på f.eks. Masterstudium i styring og ledelse
Reply |Erik Ribsskog to nhh.postmottak, executive
show details 3:21 PM (0 minutes ago)

fromErik Ribsskog eribsskog@gmail.com
tonhh.postmottak@nhh.no

ccexecutive@nhh.no

dateSat, Sep 24, 2011 at 3:21 PM
subjectHjelp med arbeidssaker/Fwd: Til rektor Tom Colbjørnsen/Fwd: Mulig prosjektoppgave for mastergrader etc./Fwd: Mulig prosjektoppgave for studenter på f.eks. Masterstudium i styring og ledelse
mailed-bygmail.com

hide details 3:21 PM (0 minutes ago)


Hei,

kan Handelshoegskolen i Bergen vaere saa snill aa hjelpe meg med to arbeidssaker, som ingen andre hjelper meg med.

Det er mot Rimi, (forklart mere om i denne linken):

http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/search/label/%27Rimi-fella%27

Og mot Bertelsmann Arvato sin Skandinaviske Microsoft Produkt-aktivering, (forklart mere om i denne linken):

http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/search/label/Arvato-case

Jeg har kontaktet nesten uttalige advokatkontor her i England, og universiteter/hoegskoler, i Norge, Danmark og England, men ingen hjelper.

'Microsoft-jobben', (ansatt av Bertelsmann), var egentlig en tullejobb, mistenker jeg, hvor CIA, eller noe, utnyttet nordiske damer, som 'hevn', eller noe, for at nordiske folk broet sin Microsoft lisensavtale.

Noe saant.

Saa noen i Norge burde ogsaa hjelpe, synes jeg.

Uansett om de fine, nordiske damene der gjorde dette frivillig, saa ble ihvertfall jeg tulla faelt med der.

Saa ogsaa i Rimi, hvor jeg ble brukt som en brikke, i et spill fra ledere oppover i systemet.

Altsaa utnyttet, og jeg fikk nok, og proever naa aa ta opp problemene.

Dere er omtrent de siste jeg kan spoerre om dette vel, ihvertfall av akademier i Norge, mener jeg, saa veldig bra om dere kan hjelpe meg, med raad om hvordan jeg kan faa disse arbeidssakene opp for retten.

Gjerne som prosjektoppgaver for Master-studenter i Arbeidsrett, for eksempel.

Paa forhaand takk for eventuell hjelp!

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog
Date: 2011/8/5
Subject: Til rektor Tom Colbjørnsen/Fwd: Mulig prosjektoppgave for mastergrader etc./Fwd: Mulig prosjektoppgave for studenter på f.eks. Masterstudium i styring og ledelse
To: info@bi.no


Hei,


min tidligere troppsjef, i Geværkompaniet, Løytnant Frøshaug, skriver i av Forsvarets tidsskrifter, at hvis du ikke vet helt sikkert hvor du bør sende noe, så send det til toppen.

Jeg prøver derfor dette nå.

Jeg har en arbeidssak, mot RIMI/ICA, hvor jeg ble tullet med av driftsdirektøret og distriktsjefer og det som var, da jeg jobbet som butikksjef, på Rimi Kalbakken, i 2001, (og det var også problemer i andre butikker, jeg jobbet i Rimi fra 1992 til 2004).


Jeg ønsker å få de pengene i erstatning, som den arbeidssaken er verdt, og at problemene som var i de butikkene jeg jobbet, skal blir mer kjent.


Jeg har skrevet om problemene på min blogg, under tagen 'Rimi-fella':


http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/search/label/%27Rimi-fella%27


For det ble liksom satt opp en felle mot meg, av distriktsjef Per Øivind Fjellhøy & Co., i år 2000.

Jeg jobbet som butikksjef på Rimi Nylænde, (gamle Balstad), på Lambertseter, og ble tilbudt og begynne i en større butikk, etter to år.

Nemlig Rimi Kalbakken.

Jeg hadde shinet opp Rimi Nylænde syntes jeg, og hadde så god kontroll, at det ble kjedelig å jobbe der, vil jeg si.


Så jeg slo til på den.


Jeg ble 'programmert' av Fjellhøy aka. PØF om at 'vi vil at du skal drive Rimi Kalbakken som Rimi Nylænde'.


Distriktsjefen på Rimi Kalbakken, Anne Neteland, hun ville ikke ha noe møte med meg, før jeg begynte på Rimi Kalbakken.

(Noe jeg hadde ventet meg).


Jeg visste at den forrige butikksjefen hadde 300' i året, (en som het Kenneth som var yngre enn meg, og med kortere fartstid i Rimi vel).


Og jeg lå på 260'.


Som assistent så hadde jeg gått opp 10.000 i lønn, da jeg begynte i en større Rimi butikk, Rimi Bjørndal, (som ledd i karrieren min), i 1996.


Så jeg regnet med at jeg kom til å gå opp i lønn, siden Rimi Kalbakken var mer enn dobbelt så stor, som Rimi Nylænde, når det gjaldt areal og omsetning.

Og siden jeg visste det, (en tidligere kollega, fra Rimi Bjørndal, David Hjort, hadde fortalt meg det), at Kenneth hadde 300' i året, pluss frynsegoder som kjøregodtgjørelse mm.


Så da Anne Neteland ikke ville prate med meg, om hverken lønnsforhøyelse, eller noe, så følte jeg meg lurt.


Jeg klagde fælt, og vi ble enige om et kompromiss, jeg skulle få 280' i året.

Men jeg og Anne Neteland kom skeivt ut da.

Så det gikk noen måneder før hun fikk sagt til meg, at 'du er så dårlig til å nullstille deg'.

Men det var jo fordi Fjellhøy hadde sagt det, at 'vi vil at du skal drive Rimi Kalbakken som du driver Rimi Nylænde nå'.

Men etter noen måneder, på Kalbakken, så skjønte jeg det, at Neteland ikke var med i disse 'vi'.


Så da skjønte jeg at jeg ble lurt opp i stry.


Og ville ut av Rimi.

Noe jeg klarte i 2002, da kom jeg meg inn på Bachelor IT-studie, ved HiO IU.

Jeg hadde studert Informasjonsbehandling, i to år, på begynnelsen av 90-tallet, på NHI.


Så jeg hadde noen fag i bakhånd.

Jeg ville ta det rolig noen år, for jeg var fullstendig utslitt, må man vel si, etter mange års hardslit i Rimi, spesielt etter at jeg begynte som Assisterende Butikksjef, under Kristian Kvehaugen, på Rimi Bjørndal, i 1996 og fram til 2001 da, da jeg sluttet på Rimi Kalbakken.


Så her var det en felle som jeg havnet i.


Distriktssjefene/de høyere lederne, i Rimi, motarbeidet hverandre, vil jeg si, og jeg havnet i klemma, og mistet autoritet ovenfor medarbeidere og ble til slutt bare ydmyket og nedverdiget der, på Rimi Kalbakken, og fikk medarbeiderne mot meg, og ble sliten, for jeg prøvde jo også å holde standarden oppe, sånn at butikken ikke skulle få dårlig renome, blant kundene.

Det er også mye mer som skjedde.

Driftsdirektør Rune Hestenes og den da nye regionsskjefen, (Steinar noe vel), var innom Rimi Kalbakken, et par dager før 17. mai 2001 vel.

Og da psyket jeg meg opp, og klagde til Hestenes, når jeg plutselig så han og regionssjefen i butikken.


Han Hestenes er ganske høy og myndig, så jeg var kanskje ikke så velformulert.


Men han sa det, at jeg hadde fått en ny butikk, (Rimi Langhus, som jeg begynte i, rundt Kristi Himmelfartsdag, i 2001, som butikksjef), og derfor skulle ikke jeg klage.

Men, jeg ville klage på distriktsjefene, men Hestenes ville ikke ha en prat med meg, om problemene.


Så jeg fikk ikke rydda opp i det.

Etter dette, så prøvde jeg også å forklare, for distriktsjefen på Rimi Langhus, Anne Katrine Skodvin, at jeg var på vei ut av Rimi, og prøvde å forklare hva som hadde foregått, rundt den her 'Rimi-fella' da, som jeg kaller dette for nå.

Men Skodvin ville ikke bli innblandet.

Og jeg ville vel skremt assistent Sølvi der, på Rimi Langhus, og de andre der, hvis jeg satt på kontoret og skulle ringe til Rimi-Hagen.


Da hadde nok dem trodd at det hadde klikka for meg.

For det var jo over 500 butikker i Rimi, på den tiden, og Rimi-Hagen, han var det vel bare direktørene som fikk prate med, tror jeg.

Så jeg gikk ikke høyere enn driftsdirektøren, av redsel for å få 'kink i nakken', og at folk skulle tro det hadde klikka for meg, for å si det sånn.


Jeg vil jeg gjerne få de pengene som den arbeidssaken er verdt.


Og at problemene i firmaet skal bli mer kjent.

Det er vel bare BI, i Norge, vil jeg tippe på, som er store nok, til å stå opp mot ICA, når det er tull i det store firmaet vel.

Det er jo skandinavias største detaljistkjede, i omsetning, har jeg lest på Wikipedia.

Kan dere være så snill å hjelpe meg, hos BI.

Kan en professor gi råd, om hvordan jeg kan får pengene som denne arbeidssaken er verdt.

Og også få det til sånn, at det som har foregått, blir mer kjent.

Eventuelt, kan noen studenter føre min sak, som en 'Final Year Project', i retten, i Norge, (noen som vil bli master eller professor i arbeidsrett kanskje), og med råd av en professor hos dere kanskje, få det til sånn, at jeg får realisert denne arbeidssaken, i penger og at problemene i denne arbeidssaken blir mer kjent.


Håper dere har mulighet til å hjelpe meg med dette!

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog
Date: 2011/8/1
Subject: Re: Mulig prosjektoppgave for mastergrader etc./Fwd: Mulig prosjektoppgave for studenter på f.eks. Masterstudium i styring og ledelse
To: stein.lavik@bi.no


Hei,


ok, Bergen ja.

Det skulle til han lederen i Sandvika det her, hva er det han heter igjen?

Mvh.


Erik Ribsskog



2011/8/1


Jeg kan dessverre ikke hjelpe deg med dett.


Vennlig hilsen
Stein Lavik

BI Bergen
tlf. BI / mobil 98251607
priv. 55 53 03 29
Privat mobil 46 42 89 60

tirsdag 30. juni 2009

Jeg sendte en e-post om tilstandene hos the Financial Ombudsman, til Acas, som jobber med rådgivning innen arbeidsrett osv. (In Norwegian)




Google Mail - The Finacial Ombudsman, using staff as slaves/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail










Google Mail


Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>




The Finacial Ombudsman, using staff as slaves/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail











Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>



Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:48 PM




To:
acas@eclogistics.co.uk






Hi,

I've contacted you earlier, about that I was being used as a slave, and that
they had illigal management methods, at Bertelsmanns Scand. Microsoft-activation,
in Liverpool.


Now, people at the Financial Ombudsman, are also being used as slaves, it seems.

Or this could be connected with a cover-up, of the Bertelsmann/Microsoft-case, that
I am being bullied by Government, to cover up what went on there.


Please send this e-mail to the right people in Acas.

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog


---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

To: "Collins, Jackie" <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>


Hi,

Monday to Friday, 8 am to 6 pm, is alright, I think.


But you also let your staff work Sunday mornings, at 6 am.

It seems to me that you overload your representatives with work, and that they have to

work 12 to 14 hours 7 days a week.

I thought slavery was forbidden in our time.

Why do you let your representatives work every Sunday morning, when other people in

England are on their way home from the pub?

Do your staff get summer-holiday at all?

Sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog




On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Collins, Jackie <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk> wrote:


Dear Mr Ribsskog


We always try to provide the best service we can to our
customers, and sometimes that means offering our staff the option of working
overtime during very busy periods.


Please be assured that they have to work within strict time
guidelines, and these are always checked by Operations Managers to ensure they
are not working too many hours.


The service our department offers is outside of the usual
office hours of 9am till 5pm because we have found that a lot of our
customers have difficulties contacting us whilst they are at work themselves
during the 9am to 5pm times, so we have opening hours of 8am - 6pm, as do
many firms these days.


I hope this explains.


Regards



Jackie
Collins

Operations Manager
Direct Dial : 020 7964
0116

Direct Fax: 020 7964 0117







From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 29 June 2009 19:32
To: Collins,
Jackie

Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier
e-mail


Ok,


that sound very fine!



But, why is that you let your representatives work over-time every Sunday
then?


Shouldn't you as a main rule conduct your business, within the business
hours?


Yours sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog




On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Collins, Jackie <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>
wrote:



Dear Mr
Ribsskog


Rosemary
Cox has passed your complaint to me to take over as you have requested that
she no longer deals with your case.


I can
confirmed that a letter has been sent to the firm, and we have asked that they
issue you with a final response letter within 14 days. We have also
asked them to copy us in on that response.


If you
remain unhappy with the firms response, or you have not received a response
from them within 14 days, please let me know and I will arrange for your
complaint to be moved forward for investigation by an
Adjudicator.


Regards



Jackie Collins
Operations Manager

Direct Dial
: 020 7964 0116

Direct Fax: 020 7964
0117








From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 28 June 2009 11:17
To: Cox,
Rosemary
Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier
e-mail


Hi,


I don't think it's any use with me repeating myself.



I don't think you should handle my complaint.


The reason is, that if you are to overworked, you get to tired.



And in dealing with complaints like these, one obviously needs ones
judgement, to be like

it should be.


If one are out of balance, like I think you could be, then I don't
think this is good for how the

complaint is being dealt with.


So please do as I ask Mrs .Cox, and tell your manager what I said,
that I want someone else

to deal with my complaint, due to that I think that you must be
overworked.


Haven't you seen how fine the weather is today, you should have a day
off in the fine weather,

I think.


Sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog





On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>
wrote:







Dear Mr Ribsskog


Thank you for your
e-mails


As previously advised I am not going to debate
with you the working hours of this office.


I have written to you today to advise the steps
we are taking with your complaint. If the firm fail to resolve the situation
for you, your complaint will be passed onto our adjudication area for
further consideration of the concerns you have
raised.


I should add that we do
not tolerate rude or insulting language at this office, and
would expect any further communication to be sent in a more acceptable
manner.



Kind Regards


Rose Cox


team manager







From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 June 2009
10:43



To: Cox, Rosemary
Subject: Re: Complaint against
RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail





Hi,


of course you can work on Sundays if you want.


But business e-mails should just be sent within the
business-hours.


Or else, what's going to happen, is obvious.


Someone are going to come drunk home from town, and answer the
business-e-mails when they are drunk, which is what has happened today, with
our correspondence.


If this is something, you didn't know from before, then I think
this Financial Ombudsman-stuff is just a load of crap really.



Try to use the head that God gave you when you were born!


Sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog





On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>
wrote:







Dear
Mr Ribsskog


Thank
you for your e-mail


I must admit to being surprised and
confused with the content of the
e-mail
.


We are an extremely busy department and we often work at the
weekends, this is obviously of help to consumers as we are able
to deal with their complaints in a more timely manner. I would
suggest that
It is entirely up to each individual
business to determine which hours their staff will work and I do not
intend debating this with you.


By working this weekend I have been able to deal with your
complaint, which as you can appreciate is of a benefit to
you.


Perhaps you can clarify the spelling mistakes you are referring
to?


Kind
Regards




Rose
Cox

team
manager







From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 28 June 2009 10:20



Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier
e-mail





Hi again,


don't you think it's strange for an institutions like yours to send
e-mails on Sunday mornings then?


Shouldn't e-mails be sent within normal business hours then you
think?



This is what it says on Wikipedia:



In
the United
States
and United
Kingdom
, the hours between 9 am and 5 pm are typically considered to be standard business
hours






I
think this is rather akward, as I also think your spelling-mistakes
are.


Sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog




On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Cox, Rosemary
<Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>
wrote:






Dear
Mr Ribsskog


Thank you for your e-mail


That's no problem, however I should point out that we
are not a government department, we are a independent complaints
body.


I will be in touch with your again in the next few
days





Kind
Regards



Rose
Cox

team
manager






From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 28 June 2009 08:02



To: Cox, Rosemary
Subject: Re: Complaint
against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail





Hi,


ok that's very fine, I'm just home from town you see.


I thought it was a bit strange, since noone in Government in
Norway, work on Sundays.


Sorry about this, I forget sometimes that I'm not in Norway any
longer.


Sorry about this!



Yours sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog





On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Cox, Rosemary
<Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>
wrote:






Dear Mr Ribsskog


Thank you for your e-mail


I can assure you this is not a
joke, I am currently in the office working
today.


I presume that you
would like us to deal with your complaint, so am responding to your
e-mails today



Kind Regards



Rose Cox

team manager







From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 June
2009 07:36
To: Cox, Rosemary
Subject: Re:
Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail





Hi,


why do send the e-mails early on a Sunday morning, by the
way.


Is this some kind of joke?



Sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog




On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Cox, Rosemary
<Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>
wrote:




Dear Mr Ribsskog


Thank you for your
e-mails


I will contact you again once
I have considered the
information.


Kind Regards



Rose Cox

team manager







From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 27
June 2009 14:59
To: Cox, Rosemary
Subject:
Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail





Hi,


thank you for you e-mail, that I recieved today.


I'll contact your collegue back, regarding the
Barclays-complaint.



I sent the complaint on RBS Dale St., to Yvonne Williams at
RBS, but she

also harassed me, like this, she writes 'Dear Ms Ribsskog',
even if my name

is Erik, and in Britain, you have a movie called 'Erik the
Viking', and Eric is

also a quite usual name, in English-speaking countries.


So I think Yvonne Williams, the complaint-investigator,
also bullied me.



I think this must have been a deliberate mistake.



This ended with the complaint being partly resolved, in the way
that RBS,

gave me the bonus of £100, for moving my account to them, from
Barclays,

(who I also had problems with, that I'll exlain about to your
collegue, like I

mentioned earlier).


I'll also find the actual complaint against RBS Dale St.
now, and forward it

to you.


What I meant with the complaint-form, was that it didn't
look anything at all

like the ones you've sent me now.


Maybe the complaint-form I was sent, was to do with other
financial institutions,

than banks?


Like share-fonds etc?



Have you also got other complaint-forms, other than to banks,
perhaps someone

sent me the wrong form intentionally?



Just a thought I had.


But anyway, thank you very much for your e-mail, and I'll
also find the actual

RBS Dale St. complaint, and e-mail it to you now.


Yours sincerely,



Erik Ribsskog





---------- Forwarded message
----------
From: Williams, Yvonne
(CRU)
<Yvonne.Williams@rbs.co.uk>
Date: Tue,
Jun 26, 2007 at 4:30 PM
Subject: RE: Earlier e-mail
To: Erik
Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>




Dear Ms Ribsskog


Could you please arrange another copy of your email to be
sent to me for my investigation


Regards


Yvonne Williams





From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 19 June 2007
14:04
To: Williams, Yvonne (CRU)
Subject:
Earlier e-mail


*** WARNING : This message originates
from the Internet ***


Hi,


I'm refering to the e-mail I sent you on 5/6.


I was just wondering if you have recieved this e-mail,
because I cant see

that I have recieved any answer to it yet.


Please just contact me if you want me to send you the e-mail
again.


Yours sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog


The Royal Bank of
Scotland plc, Registered in Scotland No. 90312. Registered Office:
36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB

Authorised and
regulated by the Financial Services Authority.

This e-mail
message is confidential and for use by the addressee only. If the
message is received by anyone other than the addressee, please
return the message to the sender by replying to it and then delete
the message from your computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily
secure. The Royal Bank of Scotland plc does not accept
responsibility for changes made to this message after it was
sent.

Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the
transmission of viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient
to ensure that the onward transmission, opening or use of this
message and any attachments will not adversely affect its systems or
data. No responsibility is accepted by The Royal Bank of Scotland
plc in this regard and the recipient should carry out such virus and
other checks as it considers
appropriate.





This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not
the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and
delete this e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are
not the intended recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any
action in reliance to it.


This e-mail and any attachments have been
checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should
carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this
communication. We accept no liability for any loss or damage which
may be caused by software viruses or by interception or interruption
of this mail.


Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail
has no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s)
indicated in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this
e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those
of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.


This email has originated from the
Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall,
London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in
England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as above.












This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete
this e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the
intended recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in
reliance to it.


This e-mail and any attachments have been
checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should
carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication.
We accept no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by
software viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail.


Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has
no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s)
indicated in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail
are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the
Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.


This email has originated from the
Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall,
London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in
England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as above.












This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this
e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to
it.


This e-mail and any attachments have been
checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should
carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication.
We accept no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by
software viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail.


Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has
no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated
in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of
the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd.


This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,
United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.
3725015. Registered office as above.












This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this
e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to
it.


This e-mail and any attachments have been
checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry
out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept
no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software
viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail.


Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in
it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the
author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman
Service Ltd.


This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,
United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.
3725015. Registered office as above.












This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this
e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to
it.


This e-mail and any attachments have been checked
by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your
own virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no
liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or
by interception or interruption of this mail.


Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it.
The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service
Ltd.


This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,
United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.
3725015. Registered office as above.












This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this
e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to
it.


This e-mail and any attachments have been checked
by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own
virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for
any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception
or interruption of this mail.


Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it.
The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service
Ltd.


This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,
United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.
3725015. Registered office as above.












This e-mail and any attachments are confidential
and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient,
please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachment
from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy,
disclose or take any action in reliance to it.


This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by
virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own
virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for
any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception or
interruption of this mail.


Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The
statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do
not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United
Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015.
Registered office as above.
















Bloggarkiv

Populære innlegg

Om meg

Bildet mitt
Overhørte på Rimi Bjørndal, (jeg jobbet som butikksjef/leder i ti år, i mange forskjellige butikker), i 2003, at jeg var forfulgt av 'mafian', mm. Har etter dette ikke fått rettighetene mine, i mange saker. Blogger derfor om problemer med å få rettigheter, mm. Mine memoarer, (Min Bok 1-10), kan også finnes på johncons-blogg, (se: 'Etiketter'). Jeg blogger også om slektsforskning, (etter at min danskfødte mormor, som var etter adelige/kongelige, døde i 2009). Har også vært såvidt innom Høyre/Unge Høyre, i sin tid. Har også studert informasjonsbehandling/IT/Computing, (på NHI, HiO IU og University of Sunderland). Har også bakgrunn fra handel og kontor, (grunnkurs, økonomi med markedsføring og data). Er/var også i Heimevernet, (etter at jeg ble overført dit, etter førstegangstjeneste i infanteriet, (og en rep-øvelse i mob-hæren), i forbindelse med omorganiseringer, i Forsvaret, etter den kalde krigen). Blir også utsatt for mye nettmobbing, mm. johncons-blogg, (og mine memoarer og nettbutikk), er kjent fra TV-programmet Tweet4Tweet, i 2012, (selv om jeg måtte klage, for programmet var veldig useriøst/nedlatende, mm.).

Totalt antall sidevisninger

Etiketter