Ingeborg Ribsskog - Baron Adeler Malteserordenen E-post til slottet om Mette-Marit videoen Er noe galt i Martine-saken? Problemer med Grandiosa? johncons-MUSIKK johncons-REISE johncons-FOTBALL
Viser innlegg med etiketten EU-kommisjonen i Sverige. Vis alle innlegg
Viser innlegg med etiketten EU-kommisjonen i Sverige. Vis alle innlegg

onsdag 18. august 2010

Jeg sendte en ny e-post til EU




Gmail - Oppdatering/Fwd: To Arthur Pooley/Fwd: Your e-mail of 22/8/2009










Gmail


Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>




Oppdatering/Fwd: To Arthur Pooley/Fwd: Your e-mail of 22/8/2009











Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>



Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:05 PM




To:
Eric.Degerbeck@ec.europa.eu






Det er ikke riktig dessverre, det gjelder bare noen få av sakene.

Og det er bare bullshit det de skriver.

Jævla svensker, dere har vel blitt albanere hele gjengen.

Käldë köttbüllär tïl jül,


Erik Ribsskog


On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 3:44 PM, <Eric.Degerbeck@ec.europa.eu> wrote:



Bäste Herr Ribsskog,


tack för dina e-brev till Pierre Schellekens, chef för
EU-kommissionens

representation i Sverige.


Av korrespondensen att döma har EU-kommissionen redan givit
dig svar

i de angelägenheter du tar upp. Därför kommer inga vidare
åtgärder att vidtas

i anledning av dina meddelanden från EU-kommissionen i
Sveriges sida.


Bästa hälsningar,


Eric Degerbeck

Mediechef

EU-kommissionen i Sverige






From: Erik Ribsskog
[mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 8:26
PM
To: SCHELLEKENS Pierre (COMM-STOCKHOLM)
Subject:
Oppdatering/Fwd: To Arthur Pooley/Fwd: Your e-mail of
22/8/2009


Hei,


som jeg nevnte i min e-post til dere igår, så har jeg også sendt noe til
EU-kommisjonen i Danmark.


Som jeg klagde på, siden de søkte om meg og Mette-Marit, på Google,
så jeg på StatCounter, som jeg har på bloggen min.



(Jeg har også sendt om dette til norsk UD).


Men det skjer visst ingenting, rundt denne/disse sakene.


Så hvis dere kan ta dette i samme slengen og, eventuelt.


Isåfall så hadde det vært veldig bra!


Mvh.


Erik Ribsskog




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date:
Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 3:56 PM
Subject: To Arthur Pooley/Fwd: Your e-mail of
22/8/2009
To: SG-PLAINTES@ec.europa.eu


Hi,

I'm just sending you a reminder, since I haven't heard anything from
you, after I received you letter from 22/12, last year.


Hope this is alright!



Yours sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <SG-PLAINTES@ec.europa.eu>

Date: Tue, Dec 22,
2009 at 9:51 AM
Subject: Your e-mail of 22/8/2009
To: eribsskog@gmail.com













fredag 13. august 2010

Jeg sendte en klage på the Financial Ombudsman, til EU-kommisjonen i Sverige




Gmail - Klage på the Financial Ombudsman, Storbritannia/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail










Gmail


Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>




Klage på the Financial Ombudsman, Storbritannia/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail











Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>



Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:46 PM




To:
pierre.schellekens@ec.europa.eu






Hei,

kan dere se på the Financial Ombudsman, i England også?

(Ombudsman er jo et svensk ord, mener jeg).

De tuller, og trakasserer, på den måten at de sender meg e-poster, klokken halv åtte, på en søndag morgen, (like etter at jeg har kommet hjem fra 'krogen', som de sier i Sverige).


Det må da være sånn at de har spionert på meg, og vet at jeg har vært på byen, og så sender på et tidspunkt de vet jeg ikke er så våken?

Det har jo ikke noe med 'business hours' å gjøre.


Er det politiet/mob/mafia som tuller?

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:17 AM
Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail
To: "Cox, Rosemary" <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>



Hi,

I don't think it's any use with me repeating myself.

I don't think you should handle my complaint.

The reason is, that if you are to overworked, you get to tired.


And in dealing with complaints like these, one obviously needs ones judgement, to be like
it should be.

If one are out of balance, like I think you could be, then I don't think this is good for how the

complaint is being dealt with.

So please do as I ask Mrs .Cox, and tell your manager what I said, that I want someone else
to deal with my complaint, due to that I think that you must be overworked.


Haven't you seen how fine the weather is today, you should have a day off in the fine weather,
I think.

Sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog




On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk> wrote:





Dear Mr Ribsskog


Thank you for your e-mails


As previously advised I am not going to debate with
you the working hours of this office.


I have written to you today to advise the steps we
are taking with your complaint. If the firm fail to resolve the situation for
you, your complaint will be passed onto our adjudication area for further
consideration of the concerns you have raised.


I should add that we do not
tolerate rude or insulting language at this
office
, and would expect any further communication to be sent in a more
acceptable manner.


Kind Regards


Rose Cox



team manager






From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 28 June 2009 10:43

To: Cox,
Rosemary
Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier
e-mail


Hi,


of course you can work on Sundays if you want.


But business e-mails should just be sent within the
business-hours.


Or else, what's going to happen, is obvious.


Someone are going to come drunk home from town, and answer the
business-e-mails when they are drunk, which is what has happened today, with our
correspondence.


If this is something, you didn't know from before, then I think this
Financial Ombudsman-stuff is just a load of crap really.



Try to use the head that God gave you when you were born!


Sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog





On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>
wrote:







Dear Mr
Ribsskog


Thank you
for your e-mail


I must admit to being surprised and confused with the content of
the e-mail
.


We are an extremely busy department and we often work at the weekends,
this is obviously of help to consumers as we are able to deal with
their complaints in a more timely manner. I would suggest that
It is entirely up to each individual business to determine which hours
their staff will work and I do not intend debating this with
you.


By working this weekend I have been able to deal with your complaint,
which as you can appreciate is of a benefit to
you.


Perhaps you can clarify the spelling mistakes you are referring
to?


Kind
Regards




Rose
Cox

team
manager







From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 28 June 2009 10:20



Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier
e-mail





Hi again,


don't you think it's strange for an institutions like yours to send
e-mails on Sunday mornings then?


Shouldn't e-mails be sent within normal business hours then you
think?



This is what it says on Wikipedia:



In
the United
States
and United
Kingdom
, the hours between 9 am and 5 pm are typically considered to be standard business
hours






I think
this is rather akward, as I also think your spelling-mistakes
are.


Sincerely,


Erik
Ribsskog




On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>
wrote:






Dear Mr
Ribsskog


Thank
you for your e-mail


That's no problem, however I should point out that we are
not a government department, we are a independent complaints
body.


I
will be in touch with your again in the next few
days





Kind
Regards



Rose
Cox

team
manager






From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 June 2009
08:02



To: Cox, Rosemary
Subject: Re: Complaint against
RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail





Hi,


ok that's very fine, I'm just home from town you see.


I thought it was a bit strange, since noone in Government in
Norway, work on Sundays.


Sorry about this, I forget sometimes that I'm not in Norway any
longer.


Sorry about this!



Yours sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog





On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>
wrote:






Dear
Mr Ribsskog


Thank
you for your e-mail


I can assure you this is not a joke, I am
currently in the office working
today.


I presume that you would like us to deal
with your complaint, so am responding to your e-mails
today



Kind
Regards



Rose
Cox

team
manager







From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 28 June 2009 07:36
To: Cox,
Rosemary
Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier
e-mail





Hi,


why do send the e-mails early on a Sunday morning, by the way.


Is this some kind of joke?



Sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog




On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Cox, Rosemary
<Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>
wrote:




Dear
Mr Ribsskog


Thank you for your e-mails


I will contact you again once I
have considered the
information.


Kind
Regards



Rose
Cox

team
manager







From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 27 June 2009 14:59
To: Cox,
Rosemary
Subject: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier
e-mail





Hi,


thank you for you e-mail, that I recieved today.


I'll contact your collegue back, regarding the
Barclays-complaint.



I sent the complaint on RBS Dale St., to Yvonne Williams at RBS,
but she

also harassed me, like this, she writes 'Dear Ms Ribsskog', even if
my name

is Erik, and in Britain, you have a movie called 'Erik the Viking',
and Eric is

also a quite usual name, in English-speaking countries.


So I think Yvonne Williams, the complaint-investigator, also
bullied me.



I think this must have been a deliberate mistake.



This ended with the complaint being partly resolved, in the way
that RBS,

gave me the bonus of £100, for moving my account to them, from
Barclays,

(who I also had problems with, that I'll exlain about to your
collegue, like I

mentioned earlier).


I'll also find the actual complaint against RBS Dale St. now,
and forward it

to you.


What I meant with the complaint-form, was that it didn't look
anything at all

like the ones you've sent me now.


Maybe the complaint-form I was sent, was to do with other
financial institutions,

than banks?


Like share-fonds etc?



Have you also got other complaint-forms, other than to banks,
perhaps someone

sent me the wrong form intentionally?



Just a thought I had.


But anyway, thank you very much for your e-mail, and I'll also
find the actual

RBS Dale St. complaint, and e-mail it to you now.


Yours sincerely,



Erik Ribsskog





---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:
Williams, Yvonne (CRU) <Yvonne.Williams@rbs.co.uk>
Date: Tue, Jun
26, 2007 at 4:30 PM
Subject: RE: Earlier e-mail
To: Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>




Dear
Ms Ribsskog


Could you please arrange another copy of your email to be sent to
me for my investigation


Regards


Yvonne Williams





From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 19 June 2007 14:04
To: Williams, Yvonne
(CRU)
Subject: Earlier e-mail


*** WARNING : This message originates from
the Internet ***


Hi,


I'm refering to the e-mail I sent you on 5/6.


I was just wondering if you have recieved this e-mail, because
I cant see

that I have recieved any answer to it yet.


Please just contact me if you want me to send you the e-mail
again.


Yours sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog


The Royal Bank of
Scotland plc, Registered in Scotland No. 90312. Registered Office: 36 St
Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB

Authorised and regulated by the
Financial Services Authority.

This e-mail message is confidential
and for use by the addressee only. If the message is received by anyone
other than the addressee, please return the message to the sender by
replying to it and then delete the message from your computer. Internet
e-mails are not necessarily secure. The Royal Bank of Scotland plc does
not accept responsibility for changes made to this message after it was
sent.

Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the
transmission of viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to
ensure that the onward transmission, opening or use of this message and
any attachments will not adversely affect its systems or data. No
responsibility is accepted by The Royal Bank of Scotland plc in this
regard and the recipient should carry out such virus and other checks as
it considers
appropriate.





This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this
e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to
it.


This e-mail and any attachments have been
checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should
carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication.
We accept no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by
software viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail.


Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has
no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated
in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of
the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd.


This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,
United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.
3725015. Registered office as above.












This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this
e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to
it.


This e-mail and any attachments have been
checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry
out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept
no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software
viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail.


Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in
it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the
author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman
Service Ltd.


This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,
United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.
3725015. Registered office as above.












This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this
e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to
it.


This e-mail and any attachments have been checked
by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your
own virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no
liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or
by interception or interruption of this mail.


Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it.
The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service
Ltd.


This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,
United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.
3725015. Registered office as above.












This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this
e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to
it.


This e-mail and any attachments have been checked
by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own
virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for
any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception
or interruption of this mail.


Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it.
The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service
Ltd.


This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,
United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.
3725015. Registered office as above.












This e-mail and any attachments are confidential
and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient,
please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachment
from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy,
disclose or take any action in reliance to it.


This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by
virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own
virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for
any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception or
interruption of this mail.


Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The
statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do
not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United
Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015.
Registered office as above.
















torsdag 12. august 2010

Enda en e-post til EU-kommisjonen i Sverige. (Som det ble noe krøll med, men som jeg håper kom fram, på andre forsøk)




Gmail - Complaint about the Local Goverment Ombudsman/Fwd: Complaint against Liverpool City Council










Gmail


Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>




Complaint about the Local Goverment Ombudsman/Fwd: Complaint against Liverpool City Council











Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>



Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 7:48 PM




To:
pierre.schellekens@ec.europa.eu


Cc:
post@mfa.no






Hei,

dette er angående klagen som jeg først sendte til EU-kommisjonen i Danmark.


Derfor er noe av det på norsk.

Og så klagde jeg på de danske, siden de søkte på meg og Mette Marit på
Google, noe som jeg så på StatCounter, som jeg har på bloggen.

Så ble det sendt til en brite, tror jeg han er, Arthur Poole.


Men så klager han, på at det er på norsk, enda dette jo først ble sendt til
Danmark, noe han vel burde ha forstått.

Så det blir jo helt bisarr.

Så dette sender jeg til dere i Sverige også.

Kanskje han briter opplever noe kulturelle forskjeller, og vil hevde seg,

ovenfor meg, siden jeg er fra Norge, og Norge ikke er i EU, mistenker jeg.

Sender kopi til norsk UD, siden de er involvert.

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog


PS.


Det er mer korrespondanse, men jeg har problemer med spam-filteret deres.



---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: <Arthur.Pooley@ec.europa.eu>
Date: Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:48 PM
Subject: Complaint about the Local Goverment Ombudsman/Fwd: Complaint against Liverpool City Council

To: eribsskog@gmail.com






dear sir



i refer to your email of 7 june and to your previous
emails, some in norwegian which is not an official language for
us,


and i refer to the commission answers including an email
from mrs wigbold on 2-9-2009 and a letter from me on
22-12-2009


unfortunately i find your communications rather strange and
apparently on subjects far from the competences of the
commission


your suggestion that the commission could make the
liverpool city council or the local government ombudsman pay you
money


is quite eccentric, and really not a subject for
correspondence, apart from your repeated references to "a sweaty
gym"


your suggestion that the commission should be seaching
about you on the internet is not understood either


in these circumstances i have reached the conclusion that
the commission will not enter into further correspondence with
you


on these subjects, to avoid wasting taxpayers money, so any
further such emails will not receive any answer



your
faithfully
af
pooley
head of unit
SG-R2
mail and document management











From: Erik Ribsskog
[mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 4:50
PM
To: SG PLAINTES
Subject: Complaint about the Local
Goverment Ombudsman/Fwd: Complaint against Liverpool City
Council


Hi,


I'm from Norway, but live in the UK.



Here one can see how some people treats Norwegians in the UK.


They bully me and call me 'Ms', like mobsters, and they suggest to
meet foreigners at a sweaty Gym, instead of replying in writing, like I
wanted.


I think that some mobsters attacked me at the Liverpool City
Council Gym and that some mobsters in the Council and at the Local
Government Ombudsman covered it up.


I guess this could be, since I'm Norway.


And according to the EEA-agreement, I have the same rights as
EU-citizens, in the UK.


So I think you should make the Liverpool City Counil and the Local
Government Ombudsman, pay me a lot of money in compensation, for all their
crap, that I have to take, since I'm from Norway, or why they do this.


Best Regards,


Erik Ribsskog





---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date:
Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: Complaint against Liverpool City
Council
To: LGOAT Mailbox <L.Mailbox@lgo.org.uk>


Hi,


ok, I guess it's nothing to do about that case then.


I thought you let the Coucil get away to easy.


I mean, I send them a written complaint, and the offer to meet me
in a sweaty gym.



I go to the gym to work-out, not to have meetings.


Meetings I think should be held somewhere with less sweat,
endorfines and hormones in the air.



So I thought it was just riddiculus, that you let the Council get
away.


All I wanted was a reply in writing from them.


Which I think is the norm, if one send a written complaint.



But all this non-sense with the Council suggesting meetings at the Gym,
and you at the Ombudsman letting Liverpool City Council getting away with
that.


I think that this reminds me of another smell than the one at the
gym.



All of this smells really, I think.


But I guess it's nothing to do about this.


Regards,


Erik Ribsskog








On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:21 PM, LGOAT Mailbox <L.Mailbox@lgo.org.uk> wrote:




Dear Ms
Ribsskog,



Thank you for your
reply.



You could continue with
the case that you regard more serious if you wish but the previous advice
would still apply and you would need to provide us with evidence that the
council’s complaints process has been completed (The council would
normally respond in writing at each stage of a formal
complaint)



If the issue regarding
harassment at the gym is something that we have considered before however
we would not be able to consider it again.




Yours
Sincerely



Kerry Anne
Hartnett



Customer Service
Advisor
|
LG
O Advice Team
| DL: 02476 820 132 | 0300 061 0614


The Oaks, No 2 | Westwood Way | Westwood Business Park | Coventry | CV4 8JB |



www.lgo.org.uk



LGO 4 col SML at 70%




From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 07 June 2010 15:04
To: LGOAT
Mailbox
Subject: Re: Complaint against Liverpool City
Council



Hi,





I don't think one phone-call like that, is something to
make a fuss about.





But I thought the problems with the harassment
against me at the Council Gym, was more important.





So I thougth that maybe I could go on with that case,
since I didn't think it was properly sorted.





Best Regards,




Erik Ribsskog








On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:08 PM, LGOAT Mailbox <L.Mailbox@lgo.org.uk> wrote:





Dear Mr
Ribsskog,



Thank you for your
email.



I have established from
searching for your details that you had a complaint investigated by the
Local Government Ombudsman which was closed in February 2009. (08 000
279)


If you have a new
complaint with the council you will need to complete the council’s own
complaints procedure before requesting that the Ombudsman considers your
complaint for investigation



Please also note that we
do not simply tell councils what to do, we would only make recommendations
to a council in the event that fault was found during a complaint
investigation by the Ombudsman.



If you would like to
raise a new complaint because you have completed the council’s complaints
procedure then please fill out the attached form and return it with a copy
of the council’s final response to your complaint.



Yours
Sincerely




Kerry Anne
Hartnett



Customer Service
Advisor
|
LG
O Advice Team
| DL: 02476 820 132 | 0300 061 0614


The Oaks, No 2 | Westwood Way | Westwood Business Park | Coventry | CV4 8JB |



www.lgo.org.uk



Error!
Filename not specified.





From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 06 June 2010 23:46
To: LGOAT
Mailbox
Subject: Complaint against Liverpool City
Council





Hi,




I had a complaint against Liverpool City Council,
(Lifestyles Gym), that I wanted them to reply to in writing, (back in
2006!).





You at the Ombudsman said they didn't have to, since
they offered to meet me at the gym.





On 28/5, Lifestyles called me, wanting me to reply to a
customer survey.




I tried to explain, that I had a complaint against
them, and because of this, didn't want to be part of the survey.




But the person calling didn't speak that good
English, I think I have to say.





So it ended with me having to hang up.





Can't you please tell the Council to reply to my
complaint in writing, so that we get this case over with?





Best Regards,

Erik
Ribsskog


NOTICE - This message contains information intended only for the use of the addressee named above.  If you have received this message in error please advise us at once and do not make any use of the information.



NOTICE - This message contains information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you have received this message in error please advise us at once and do not make any use of the information.












Jeg sendte en ny e-post til EU-kommisjonen i Sverige




Gmail - Oppdatering/Fwd: To Arthur Pooley/Fwd: Your e-mail of 22/8/2009










Gmail


Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>




Oppdatering/Fwd: To Arthur Pooley/Fwd: Your e-mail of 22/8/2009











Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>



Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 7:25 PM




To:
pierre.schellekens@ec.europa.eu






Hei,

som jeg nevnte i min e-post til dere igår, så har jeg også sendt noe til EU-kommisjonen i Danmark.

Som jeg klagde på, siden de søkte om meg og Mette-Marit, på Google, så jeg på StatCounter, som jeg har på bloggen min.


(Jeg har også sendt om dette til norsk UD).

Men det skjer visst ingenting, rundt denne/disse sakene.

Så hvis dere kan ta dette i samme slengen og, eventuelt.

Isåfall så hadde det vært veldig bra!


Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 3:56 PM
Subject: To Arthur Pooley/Fwd: Your e-mail of 22/8/2009
To: SG-PLAINTES@ec.europa.eu


Hi,

I'm just sending you a reminder, since I haven't heard anything from you, after I received you letter from 22/12, last year.


Hope this is alright!

Yours sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <SG-PLAINTES@ec.europa.eu>

Date: Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 9:51 AM
Subject: Your e-mail of 22/8/2009
To: eribsskog@gmail.com










393930.pdf
27K






onsdag 11. august 2010

Jeg sendte en klage på ICE til EU-kommisjonen i Sverige




Gmail - Klage på ICE i Storbritannia/Fwd: FW: RESTRICTED - PERSONAL DATA - Independent Case Examiner










Gmail


Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>




Klage på ICE i Storbritannia/Fwd: FW: RESTRICTED - PERSONAL DATA - Independent Case Examiner











Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>



Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:41 PM




To:
pierre.schellekens@ec.europa.eu






Hei,

kan dere så på denne saken?

ICE i Storbritannia, har overstyrt meg, når det gjelder å definere min klage, mot the Jobcentre, i Willamsson Sq., i Liverpool.


Jeg har tidligere sendt til EU-kommisjonen i Danmark, angående andre klager, men jeg tenkte jeg kunne prøve å sende til Sverige nå, grunnet at jeg vel da kan skrive på norsk, siden både Norge og Sverige er med i bl.a. Nordisk Råd, og da er det vel greit å skrive på norsk, til etater i Sverige, hvis jeg ikke tar helt feil.


Så jeg prøver ihvertfall, siden det finnes noen norsk EU-kommisjon, og Solvit ber meg sende ting som dette til EU-kommisjonen, og EFTA sier at dette er EU/Solvit sitt bord.

Håper dere har muligehet til å se på dette!


Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog


---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: DWP ICE gateway team <ICE@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>
Date: Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 2:47 PM
Subject: FW: RESTRICTED - PERSONAL DATA - Independent Case Examiner

To: Eribsskog@gmail.com








**********************************************************************

This document is strictly confidential and is intended only for use by the addressee.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other
action taken in reliance of the information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited.
Any views expressed by the sender of this message are not necessarily those of the Department
for Work and Pensions.
If you have received this transmission in error, please use the reply function to tell us
and then permanently delete what you have received.
This email was scanned for viruses by the Department for Work and Pensions' anti-virus services and on leaving the Department was found to be virus free.
Please note: Incoming and outgoing e-mail messages are routinely monitored for compliance
with our policy on the use of electronic communications.
**********************************************************************







RS902279.doc
30K






Bloggarkiv

Populære innlegg

Om meg

Bildet mitt
Overhørte på Rimi Bjørndal, (jeg jobbet som butikksjef/leder i ti år, i mange forskjellige butikker), i 2003, at jeg var forfulgt av 'mafian', mm. Har etter dette ikke fått rettighetene mine, i mange saker. Blogger derfor om problemer med å få rettigheter, mm. Mine memoarer, (Min Bok 1-10), kan også finnes på johncons-blogg, (se: 'Etiketter'). Jeg blogger også om slektsforskning, (etter at min danskfødte mormor, som var etter adelige/kongelige, døde i 2009). Har også vært såvidt innom Høyre/Unge Høyre, i sin tid. Har også studert informasjonsbehandling/IT/Computing, (på NHI, HiO IU og University of Sunderland). Har også bakgrunn fra handel og kontor, (grunnkurs, økonomi med markedsføring og data). Er/var også i Heimevernet, (etter at jeg ble overført dit, etter førstegangstjeneste i infanteriet, (og en rep-øvelse i mob-hæren), i forbindelse med omorganiseringer, i Forsvaret, etter den kalde krigen). Blir også utsatt for mye nettmobbing, mm. johncons-blogg, (og mine memoarer og nettbutikk), er kjent fra TV-programmet Tweet4Tweet, i 2012, (selv om jeg måtte klage, for programmet var veldig useriøst/nedlatende, mm.).

Totalt antall sidevisninger

Etiketter