Hvis jeg skal henge meg litt på det her, så kan jeg jo nevne at Sivilombudsmannen vel er jøde, og tuller med meg. Norske aviser skriver heller ikke

http://www.dagbladet.no/2012/04/25/nyheter/innenriks/johan_galtung/antisemittisme/jodehat/21290052/

PS.

Det er mulig at Sivilombudsmannen, Arne Fliflet, ikke er jøde også, forresten.

For å ta litt forbehold.

Men han har ihvertfall en slektning som spiller finsk, jødisk og russisk musikk.

Men det behøver jo ikke å være derfor han tuller med meg selvfølgelig.

Dette var bare noe jeg kom til å tenke på nå, når jeg leste om det utspillet til Johan Galtung, i Dagbladet.no.

Så sånn er det.

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

PS 2.

Her er mer om dette:



http://www.nordasgrenda.no/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=42&Itemid=59

Jeg sendte en ny e-post til NRK

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

---

Oppdatering klage tweet4tweet

---

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>	Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:29 PM
To: info@nrk.no Cc: PFU Pressens faglige utvalg <pfu@presse.no>
Hei, nå kom jeg over en blogg, som skrev om det, at jeg hadde vært på Tweet4Tweet. Jeg vet ikke hvem som har bloggen, men det blir oppsummert som at Jenny Skavlan blir overrasket over at jeg både selger godteri og forteller min historie. Og så sier Jenny Skavlan at 'det lukter litt psykose', av dette. (Jeg sender med skjermbilde fra denne bloggen). Men Jenny Skavlan driver jo med flere ting selv, som å spille i filmer som Fatso, være med i Grandiosa-reklamer, være på TV som programleder og å lage moteklær, mener jeg å ha sett, i nettaviser, osv. Hvis det lukter psykose, fordi jeg driver med to ting, så må jo Jenny Skavlan være tvangsinnlagt da, siden hun driver med fire ting. Er dette vitenskapelig bevist, at man er psykotisk, hvis man driver med to ting? Er dette noe som NRK har fått lære av Snåsamannen? Benekter også NRK Darwins utviklingslære nå? Jeg har Johanitter-ordenen, i slekta, og Jenny er en versjon av navnet Johannes. Er det NRK som lar Johanitterordenen få bruke norske folks skattepenger til å forfølge de som de har i slekta, som de ikke klarer å kue? Dette hører isåfall hjemme i programmet Tro og Liv og ikke i et internett-program. Eller vel egentlig i Dagsrevyen. Dette er den jødisk/kristne/danske verdenskonspirasjonen som NRK spiller på lag med. Shalom! Erik Ribsskog lukter psykose.JPG 120K

PS.

Her er mer om dette:

Jødene vil styre verden

Det som skjer, det er vel at jødene vil styre verden.

Også sitter jøden Seltzer og prater dritt om meg på TV.

Også sitter Ola Nordmann og ser på.

De lar jødene kødde med nordmenna.

For jødene mener at de er guds utvalgte folk, og har rett til å styre verden da.

Og nordmenn er så naive og dumme, at de lar jødene kødde hele livet, med vanlige norske folk som meg da.

Så helvetes jøder og helvetes nordmenn må jeg si da.

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

Her er mer om dette:

Mer fra #blablatemp

Session Start: Sat Apr 02 00:20:07 2011

Session Ident:#blablatemp

[00:20] * Wizz0 was kicked by cons_ (~v_beider@host109-145-111-151.range109-145.btcentralplus.com) Reason (idle)

[04:55] * gakjeir (585878da@ti0171a380-dhcp1747.bb.online.no) has joined #blablatemp

[04:55] <gakjeir> hei

[04:56] <gakjeir> det er jo lørdag i dag

[04:56] <gakjeir> og på mandag blir du kastet ut, som kjent

[04:56] <gakjeir> to dager igjen

[04:56] <gakjeir> i morgen kommer vel han Kieron med en avskjedsgave

[04:56] <gakjeir> har du fortsatt lapp på døren?

[04:57] <gakjeir> har politiet hentet den nye øksen ennå?

[04:58] <gakjeir> Kieron skrev vel at du måtte tømme leiligheten og vaske osv.

[04:58] <gakjeir> og være ute i tide

[04:59] <gakjeir> kommer du til å gå ut frivillig på mandag?

[04:59] <gakjeir> eller vil du la politiet bære deg ut?

[05:00] <gakjeir> jeg antar at hvis du ikke fjerner tingene dine selv, så vil kieron leie noen til å fjerne og kaste alt innboet ditt

[05:00] <gakjeir> husk å få med deg laptopen når du går, hvertfall ;-)

[05:01] <gakjeir> hvor skal du sover når det lir mot kvelden på mandag?

[05:01] <gakjeir> er det for kaldt til å sove i parker osv. i liverpool nå?

[05:02] <gakjeir> du er Erik Ribsskog!

[05:03] <gakjeir> Alle tiders Erik Ribsskog!

[05:04] <gakjeir> Hipp hipp!

[05:04] <gakjeir> Litt respekt for Erik Ribsskog!

[05:05] * gakjeir (585878da@ti0171a380-dhcp1747.bb.online.no) Quit ( Quit: http://chat.efnet.org (EOF) )

[10:17] * gorg (~gorg@ti0210a340-0149.bb.online.no) has joined #blablatemp

[10:18] <gorg> Hei c. I morgen er det den tredje, var det ikke da Mr. Grimes kom innom med avskjedsgave?

[10:18] <gorg> Hva er det, mon tro

[10:18] <gorg> Marsipankake?

[11:15] <gorg> Risperdal?

[11:24] <gorg> Abonnement på Gaylord Online?

[11:59] * cons_ sets mode +b *!*@ti0210a340-0149.bb.online.no for #blablatemp

[11:59] * gorg was kicked by cons_ (~v_beider@host109-145-111-151.range109-145.btcentralplus.com) Reason (gorg)

[13:46] * Quizzie2 (15262@server7.bouncer4you.de) Quit ( Ping timeout: 244 seconds )

[14:00] * Einstein2 sets mode -b *!*@ti0210a340-0149.bb.online.no for #blablatemp

[20:53] * rubena (585878da@ti0171a380-dhcp1747.bb.online.no) has joined #blablatemp

[20:53] <rubena> Israel?

[20:53] <@cons_> hva med israel?

[20:53] <rubena> You're not popular there

[20:54] <@cons_> oh?

[20:54] <@cons_> i have never been there

[20:54] <@cons_> so that seems strange

[20:54] ->> rubena is 585878da@ti0171a380-dhcp1747.bb.online.no ([585878da] I <3 EFnet)

[20:54] ->> rubena is on: #blablatemp

[20:54] ->> rubena using chat.efnet.org (slower traffic keep right)

[20:54] ->> rubena :End of /WHOIS list.

[20:54] <rubena> but it's not really

[20:55] <rubena> You're a well known Israel hater, on the Internet

[20:55] <@cons_> i can't say i'm an israel hater

[20:55] <rubena> but why do you hate Jews/Israel/zionism?

[20:56] <@cons_> well i'm trying to find out what zionism is

[20:56] <@cons_> i'm writing about 'world-zionism'

[20:56] <rubena> see, there you go again

[20:56] <rubena> that's anti-semitic

[20:56] <@cons_> well, i haven't invented that term

[20:57] <@cons_> is it anti-semitic to mention world sionism?

[20:57] <rubena> yes

[20:57] <@cons_> well for the first it's freedom of speach

[20:57] <@cons_> i'm trying to understand what that term means

[20:57] <@cons_> that has nothing to do with rasism

[20:57] <rubena> why are you in doubt?

[20:58] <@cons_> well it's not in my vocabulary

[20:58] <@cons_> we didn't learn at school in norway

[20:58] <@cons_> about what sionism

[20:58] <@cons_> or world-sionism

[20:58] <@cons_> means

[20:58] <rubena> "Zionism (Hebrew: ×¦×™×•× ×•×ªâ€Ž, Tsiyonut) is a Jewish political movement that, in its broadest sense, has supported the self-determination of the Jewish people in a sovereign Jewish national homeland"

[20:58] <@cons_> ok i'm not against that

[20:58] <@cons_> but i see the guaridan using the term 'world-zionism'

[20:58] <rubena> you write a lot about Jews and Zionism at your blog

[20:59] <@cons_> so i'm wondering what that's about

[20:59] <@cons_> not really that much

[20:59] <@cons_> i write about the illuminati and everything

[20:59] <@cons_> i'm just trying to understand what's going on

[20:59] <@cons_> i'm not writing in a bombastic way

[20:59] <rubena> why do you write about the Illuminati?

[20:59] <@cons_> so i'm not a hater or anything

[21:00] <@cons_> why this and why that

[21:00] <@cons_> there's freedom of speach isn't it?

[21:00] <@cons_> but you shouldn't worry in israel

[21:00] <rubena> i'm not sure

[21:00] <@cons_> i'm not a jew-hater or anything

[21:00] <@cons_> i'm not writing in a bombastic way

[21:00] <@cons_> i'm just trying to find out what's going on

[21:00] <@cons_> in the world

[21:01] <@cons_> i'm not that interested in the midle-east to be honest

[21:01] <@cons_> never been there

[21:01] <@cons_> the closest is cyprus

[21:01] <@cons_> so i'm sorry if i've offended anyone in israel

[21:01] <@cons_> i haven't meant to do that

[21:01] <rubena> You spent your childhood in Yugoslavia, right?

[21:01] <@cons_> my blog is mostly a norwegian project really

[21:01] <@cons_> no

[21:01] <@cons_> i was there for two week a summer-holiday, the summer i was 10 years

[21:02] <@cons_> i've lived in norway all my life

[21:02] <rubena> and now you're about 50 or so?

[21:02] <@cons_> (except for the latest 5 years or so)

[21:02] <@cons_> no, i'm 40 y.o.

[21:02] <@cons_> who are you rubena?

[21:02] <rubena> Rubena

[21:02] <@cons_> ok

[21:02] <rubena> a native of

[21:02] <rubena> the USA

[21:03] <@cons_> okey, i see you use a norwegian ISP

[21:03] <rubena> that's right

[21:03] <@cons_> if i'm not mistaking

[21:03] <rubena> now i live in norway

[21:03] <@cons_> ok

[21:03] <@cons_> rubena is a female name, is that right?

[21:03] <rubena> yes

[21:04] <@cons_> ok, well i don't hate anyone really, i'm just trying to get my rights really

[21:04] <rubena> http://www.thinkbabynames.com/meaning/0/Rubena

[21:04] <@cons_> ok,

[21:04] <rubena> do you have children?

[21:04] <@cons_> no, why?

[21:04] <rubena> do you want children?

[21:05] <@cons_> are these some kind of threats?

[21:05] <rubena> ?

[21:05] <rubena> why would they be threats?

[21:06] <@cons_> ok, you changed the subject a bit fast that's all

[21:06] <@cons_> it's not so easy on the net

[21:06] <rubena> i came to think of baby names, because of the link i posted

[21:06] <@cons_> oh ok

[21:07] <@cons_> well i guess, sometime in the future if i find a wife and have a job and a house, or at least a flat

[21:07] <rubena> do you think you would be a good father?

[21:08] <@cons_> why these personal questions?

[21:08] <@cons_> have you been drinking?

[21:08] <rubena> no

[21:08] <rubena> i don't drink

[21:08] <rubena> I'm very religious

[21:08] <@cons_> ok, are you a muslim?

[21:08] <rubena> no

[21:08] <@cons_> ok, you are jewish?

[21:08] <rubena> yeah

[21:08] <@cons_> ok

[21:09] <@cons_> i don't think i've chatted with many jews before

[21:09] <@cons_> so that's a new experience for me

[21:09] <@cons_> there aren't that many jews in norway

[21:09] <@cons_> but there are many muslims

[21:09] <rubena> you have written on your blogs that you are persecuted by the Jews. Maybe that's the reason

[21:10] <@cons_> well i don't think i've written that in a bombastic way

[21:10] <@cons_> but maybe i've been wondering what's going on

[21:10] <rubena> i've read it

[21:10] <rubena> that's really anti-semitic

[21:10] <@cons_> ok sorry then

[21:10] <@cons_> i don't know that many jews, so i don't mean to be inpolite, or hurt

[21:10] <rubena> what *is* really going on, did you find out eventually?

[21:10] <@cons_> no

[21:11] <@cons_> i have the order of st. john

[21:11] <@cons_> in my fathers new family

[21:11] <@cons_> so it could be them who are following me as well

[21:11] <@cons_> i can't say for sure unfortunately

[21:11] <rubena> why would they follow you?

[21:11] <rubena> Order of St. John nowadays is a religious fringe group, afaik

[21:11] <@cons_> maybe because the couldn't control me as a child

[21:11] <@cons_> i'm wondering

[21:12] <@cons_> ok, i guess it could be the illuminati or something

[21:12] <rubena> why would they want to control you as a child?

[21:12] <rubena> that sounds paranoid

[21:12] <@cons_> well, my mother sent me to my father when i was nine years old

[21:12] <@cons_> and then my father let me live alone from i was nine years old

[21:13] <@cons_> so something must have been going on

[21:13] <rubena> what has that got to do with the Order of St John?

[21:13] <@cons_> i also remember strange episodes

[21:13] <@cons_> well my father found a new woman, and her daughters half-brother is in that order

[21:13] <@cons_> and i had to read about it in a newspaper-archive

[21:13] <@cons_> to find out

[21:13] <@cons_> noone has told me

[21:14] <@cons_> so i almost got shock when i found out

[21:14] <rubena> do you think they should have told you?

[21:14] <@cons_> and i'm wondering what this is about

[21:14] <@cons_> well yes, it shouldn't be in the way that one find out about things like this, unexpetedly, in a newspaper archive, i think

[21:15] <@cons_> it shows somethings wrong in my family at least

[21:15] <@cons_> but the reason i ran from norway

[21:15] <@cons_> was because i overheard i was followed by the 'mafian' in oslo in 2003 and 2004

[21:15] <@cons_> and i was attempted to be killed, in larvik, in 2005

[21:15] <rubena> Is this your diagnosis that's posted here: http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Erik_Ribsskog

[21:15] <@cons_> so after that i've been in the uk

[21:16] <@cons_> well it's not a real diagnose

[21:16] <@cons_> just a working-diagnose

[21:16] <@cons_> i've compained to 'helsedirektoratet' in norway

[21:16] <@cons_> about it

[21:16] <@cons_> it's just a lot of non-sense really

[21:16] <rubena> you don't believe in it?

[21:17] <rubena> you're right and they're wrong?

[21:17] <@cons_> no, noone has told me i have a diagnose

[21:17] <@cons_> they can't just say 5 or 6 years later that i have a diagnose

[21:17] <@cons_> and she also gets a lot of facts about me wrong

[21:17] <rubena> and you'll be homeless by monday, right?

[21:17] <rubena> what are you going to do then?

[21:17] <@cons_> writes i'm 24 years old, while i'm 34 years old, etc

[21:18] <@cons_> well, i'm not really, my landlord can't just throw me out without a possessioning-order

[21:18] <rubena> how do you know?

[21:18] <@cons_> well i've read up about this on the net etc

[21:19] <rubena> they were quite clear on that from what i've read, viz., they are going to evict you forcefully on monday if you don't leave

[21:20] <@cons_> well anyhow, then won't have the law on their side, because the law is clear, they need a possesstion order

[21:20] <rubena> even if they don't have the law on their side, bottom line is, you will have nowhere to live, right?

[21:20] <@cons_> well, i don't take my landlord that seriously

[21:21] <@cons_> they have threaten to throw me out earlier

[21:21] <rubena> i can tell

[21:21] <@cons_> last year

[21:21] <@cons_> and nothing happened

[21:21] <rubena> why did they back off then?

[21:21] <@cons_> and they also lie all the time

[21:21] <@cons_> i don't remember

[21:21] <@cons_> after a time you stop taking companies like that seriously

[21:21] <@cons_> after so and so many lies

[21:22] <@cons_> so i'd say that's a hoax

[21:22] <@cons_> the way i see it

[21:22] <rubena> do you want to continue living there?

[21:22] <@cons_> so i don't really take it that seriously unfortunately

[21:22] <@cons_> well i haven't got anywhere else to live

[21:22] <@cons_> so i haven't got much choice the way i see it

[21:22] <rubena> you haven't been looking for a new place

[21:22] <rubena> ?

[21:23] <@cons_> i'm also trying to set up a business here

[21:23] <@cons_> no, like i'm trying to explain

[21:23] <@cons_> that landlord-company can't be taken seriously

[21:23] <@cons_> because they're lieing all the time

[21:23] <@cons_> i have to stand up for my rights i think

[21:24] <rubena> on that, i agree

[21:24] <rubena> it's really nice talking to you

[21:24] <@cons_> yeah the same

[21:25] <@cons_> so i hope you have a nice saturday night

[21:25] <rubena> do you think you will get your rights at some point?

[21:25] <@cons_> well i haven't given up at least

[21:25] <@cons_> i'll try to write less about jews and israel etc

[21:25] <@cons_> i worked for microsoft some years ago

[21:26] <@cons_> and sometimes we got calls from israel

[21:26] <@cons_> when it was overflow on the hebrew line

[21:26] <@cons_> so i remember i spoke with many nice israelian women

[21:26] <rubena> oh, a flirtatious johncons

[21:26] <@cons_> but the men where more aggressive i think

[21:26] <@cons_> no i wasn't flirting

[21:27] <@cons_> but in norway we sometimes have a tone like that

[21:27] <@cons_> nice or jolly or something

[21:27] <rubena> i see

[21:27] <@cons_> :)

[21:27] <rubena> norway is quite new to me

[21:27] <@cons_> ok, what brought to norway then

[21:27] <@cons_> if it's ok to ask

[21:27] <@cons_> work i guess

[21:27] <rubena> yes

[21:28] <@cons_> ok, is it ok to ask what you work with

[21:28] <rubena> as a barber

[21:28] <@cons_> oh

[21:28] <@cons_> ok i found it hard finding good barbers in oslo

[21:28] <@cons_> but the british ones are good i think

[21:28] <@cons_> or maybe i was the problem

[21:29] <@cons_> in norway i have to say 'short' or 'long' hair

[21:29] <@cons_> but in the uk

[21:29] <@cons_> i say 'number 4'

[21:29] <@cons_> and then they get the hair right all the time

[21:29] <@cons_> i don't think i can say 'number 4' in oslo

[21:29] <@cons_> but anyway

[21:29] <@cons_> not that important perhaps

[21:29] <@cons_> i'm working on my webshop now

[21:30] <@cons_> so maybe i should get that done before it's to late

[21:30] <@cons_> but it was very nice chatting with you

[21:30] <rubena> yes, you too

[21:30] <rubena> good bye

[21:30] <@cons_> feel free to chat more here at a later time if you want

[21:30] <@cons_> yep,

[21:30] <rubena> sure

[21:30] <@cons_> nice speaking you!

[21:30] <@cons_> bye!

[21:30] * rubena (585878da@ti0171a380-dhcp1747.bb.online.no) has left #blablatemp

[21:30] <@cons_> i'll try to write less bad about israel etc

[21:31] <@cons_> even if i'll use my freedom of speach, if that's ok

[22:34] * nils- (~gorg@ti0210a340-0404.bb.online.no) has joined #blablatemp

[22:35] <nils-> Hei cons, ville bare tilby deg å ta backup av bloggen nå før 4. april

[22:36] * cons_ sets mode +b *!*@ti0210a340-0404.bb.online.no for #blablatemp

[22:36] * nils- was kicked by cons_ (~v_beider@host109-145-111-151.range109-145.btcentralplus.com) Reason (nils-)

---

Nettavisen skriver at den iranske presidenten egentlig er av jødisk familiebakgrunn

http://www.nettavisen.no/nyheter/article2721966.ece

PS.

Dette passer med mye johncons-blogg ting.

Tre-fire ting som jeg kommer på i farten.

Det første er at atombomba ikke eksisterer, men at det er et 'New World Order' (les: 'jødisk'/sionistisk)-plott, og at når disse statene som er utenfor New World Order, når de begynner å prate om å lage atombomber osv., da har egentlig allerede New World Order fått kontrollen.

Jeg er også litt skeptisk til atomkraftverk. Det er jo omtrent bare Norge og Danmark som ikke har disse, så man skjønner at New World Order har god kontroll, i Vesten og Verden, hvis det er slik.

Mer da.

Det var noe mer dette passet med og, som jeg huska istad.

Hm.

Ja, det her får kanskje være nok, så et varsko om at atombomben antagelig ikke eksisterer.

Jo, da støtter dette også litt opp om mine teorier rundt 11. september, synes jeg, som jeg har skrevet om på bloggen tidligere.

Noen fikk jo inn en 'fulltreffer' på Pentagon, (som jeg lurer på om styrte disse flyene som kræsjet inn i WTC).

(Kan det ha vært britene, var det derfor Blair måtte bli Bush's 'puddel', etter 11. september?).

Hvem vet.

Eller det var vel kanskje noen interne amerikanske greier, jeg har lest at det egentlig er en slags krig mellom FBI og CIA, for eksempel, i noe norsk ukeblad eller avis.

Så sånn var det.

Hm.

Jo, at det som traff Pentagon, (som jeg så på video, på nettet, at nok var en rakett og ikke et pasasjerfly).

Om et jagerfly fikk inn en fulltreffer med en atomrakett på Pentagon, for å hevne WTC-bombingene, og at dette jagerflyet var det som falt ned, og styrtet, og ikke det sagnomsuste passasjerflyet, hvor passasjerene ble sagt å være helter.

Neida, her har det jo vært spørsmål rundt disse opptakene fra mobiler osv., om at disse ikke kunne vært tatt ombord i et fly.

Og vi husker jo at alle fly måtte stå på bakken, i mange dager etter 11. september.

Og det har vært ryktet om, at flypassasjerer ble likvidert.

Så da får jeg det til å bli dette:

Det passasjerflyet som liksom styrtet, disse passasjerene landet sikkert, men ble drept av myndighetene, og før de ble drept, så måtte de ringe falske mobilsamtaler.

Et New World Order-plott for å dekke over dette jagerflyet da, som falt ned, og ble omtalt som det fjerde flyet som ble kapret.

Dette får jeg til å passe bedre, enn den offisielle versjonen.

For jeg så med mine egne øyne, det video-opptaket av det som traff Pentagon, og det var en rakett og ikke et fly, vil jeg si.

Jeg skal se om det opptaket finnes på YouTube, eller noe.

Vi får se.

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

PS 2.

Ja, flaks for meg, (sånn at jeg kanskje slipper å bli kalt 'Gale-Mathias', siden jeg skriver om dette), så var det sånn, at en kjent amerikansk general, Albert N. Stubblebind III, også har gått ut i media, og forklart det, at det ikke var et fly, som traff Pentagon, (bl.a. siden at Pentagon-bygget ikke hadde merker etter vinger).

Dette er en general, som er pensjonert nå, men som i 2001, var øverste ansvarlige, for all amerikansk militær-etterettning, kan det virke som.

Og han har lang trening, i å granske fotografier, og han har sett på fotografier, av det som traff Pentagon, og han sier, (som jeg gjør, etter å ha sett en video på TV og internett osv, av da raketten/flyet traff Pentagon), at han er sikker på at dette ikke var et fly.

Her er mer om dette, (i en video med engelsk tale og tysk tekst, som var den eneste versjonen av dette intervjuet jeg klarte å finne, men. Men men):

Hvis en soldat i England, dør i en bilulykke, mens han er under trening for å dra til Irak, så får han ikke en like fin grav, som de som dør i krig