Ingeborg Ribsskog - Baron Adeler Malteserordenen E-post til slottet om Mette-Marit videoen Er noe galt i Martine-saken? Problemer med Grandiosa? johncons-MUSIKK johncons-REISE johncons-FOTBALL
Viser innlegg med etiketten Muffens?. Vis alle innlegg
Viser innlegg med etiketten Muffens?. Vis alle innlegg

fredag 24. juli 2009

The Financial Ombudsman vil ikke svare, på hvorfor deres ansatte må jobbe på søndagsmorgenene. Her er det nok noe muffens. (In Norwegian)




Google Mail - Reminder/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail










Google Mail


Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>




Reminder/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail











Collins, Jackie
<jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>



Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:42 AM




To:
Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>








Dear Mr Ribsskog


I believe I have answered all of your questions in my
previous email, and I am not prepared to enter into any further discussions
regarding this matter.


Please feel free to email me however, if you have any
queries regarding your complaint.


Regards


Jackie
Collins

Operations Manager
Direct Dial : 020 7964
0116

Direct Fax: 020 7964 0117







From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 23 July 2009 22:23
To: Collins,
Jackie
Subject: Reminder/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier
e-mail


Hi,


I can't see that I've received an answer to this e-mail yet, so I'm trying
to send it again.



Best Regards,


Erik Ribsskog




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date:
Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 2:18 PM
Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier
e-mail
To: "Collins, Jackie" <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>


Hi,


I think I have the right to know this, when your representatives send me
e-mails at

seven o'clock, on a Sunday morning.


I think you should send your business e-mails within the
business-hours, and I'm

conserned about how you treat your staff, and I've contacted Acas about
this.



If you do not expect your staff to work 12-14 hours a week, seven days a
week,

then why are the working on a Sunday morning at six o'clock.


People are going to think that your representatives are some kind of
slaves, if

they have to work at the time of the week, when the other people in
England,

are on their way back from the pub.



If people get e-mails at this hour, they are going to start writing answers
while

they are still drunk.



This sounds insane to me, to have people working, at six o'clock, on a
Sunday

morning, answering e-mails that they could have answered on a Monday.


You have to pay them overtime, for work they just as well could have
done on

a week-day.


Your institution is extreamly poorly managed, and you are wasting the
tax-

payers money, with all the unessesary over-time.



I think there is a law in this country saying that Government should have
openness,

so I think you should explain what the reason for your very strange and
akward

working-hours are.



Sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog








On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Collins, Jackie <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>
wrote:



Dear Mr
Ribsskog


Thank you
for your email.


You will
excuse me for not going into the finer details of our staffing working hours
and holiday allowance. I will however, reassure you we certainly
do not expect or allow our staff to work 12 to 14 hours a day 7 days a
week.



Regards


Jackie
Collins

Operations Manager
Direct Dial : 020 7964
0116

Direct Fax: 020 7964 0117








From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 30 June 2009
16:31



To: Collins, Jackie
Subject: Re: Complaint against
RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail





Hi,


Monday to Friday, 8 am to 6 pm, is alright, I think.


But you also let your staff work Sunday mornings, at 6 am.



It seems to me that you overload your representatives with work, and that
they have to

work 12 to 14 hours 7 days a week.



I thought slavery was forbidden in our time.



Why do you let your representatives work every Sunday morning, when other
people in

England are on their way home from the pub?



Do your staff get summer-holiday at all?


Sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog





On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Collins, Jackie <jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>
wrote:



Dear Mr
Ribsskog


We
always try to provide the best service we can to our customers, and
sometimes that means offering our staff the option of working overtime
during very busy periods.


Please
be assured that they have to work within strict time guidelines, and these
are always checked by Operations Managers to ensure they are not working too
many hours.


The
service our department offers is outside of the usual office hours of
9am till 5pm because we have found that a lot of our customers have
difficulties contacting us whilst they are at work themselves during the 9am
to 5pm times, so we have opening hours of 8am - 6pm, as do many firms
these days.


I hope
this explains.



Regards



Jackie
Collins

Operations Manager

Direct
Dial : 020 7964 0116

Direct Fax: 020 7964
0117








From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 29 June 2009
19:32
To: Collins, Jackie



Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier
e-mail





Ok,


that sound very fine!



But, why is that you let your representatives work over-time every
Sunday then?


Shouldn't you as a main rule conduct your business, within the
business hours?


Yours sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog




On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Collins, Jackie
<jackie.collins@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>
wrote:



Dear
Mr Ribsskog


Rosemary Cox has passed your complaint to me to take over as
you have requested that she no longer deals with your
case.


I can
confirmed that a letter has been sent to the firm, and we have asked that
they issue you with a final response letter within 14 days. We have
also asked them to copy us in on that response.


If you
remain unhappy with the firms response, or you have not received a
response from them within 14 days, please let me know and I will arrange
for your complaint to be moved forward for investigation by an
Adjudicator.


Regards



Jackie Collins
Operations
Manager

Direct Dial : 020 7964
0116

Direct Fax: 020 7964
0117








From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 28 June 2009 11:17
To: Cox,
Rosemary
Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier
e-mail


Hi,


I don't think it's any use with me repeating myself.



I don't think you should handle my complaint.


The reason is, that if you are to overworked, you get to
tired.



And in dealing with complaints like these, one obviously needs ones
judgement, to be like

it should be.


If one are out of balance, like I think you could be, then I
don't think this is good for how the

complaint is being dealt with.


So please do as I ask Mrs .Cox, and tell your manager what I
said, that I want someone else

to deal with my complaint, due to that I think that you must be
overworked.


Haven't you seen how fine the weather is today, you should have a
day off in the fine weather,

I think.


Sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog





On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Cox, Rosemary
<Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>
wrote:







Dear Mr
Ribsskog


Thank you for your
e-mails


As previously advised I am not going to
debate with you the working hours of this
office.


I have written to you today to advise the
steps we are taking with your complaint. If the firm fail to resolve the
situation for you, your complaint will be passed onto our adjudication
area for further consideration of the concerns you have
raised.


I should add that
we do not tolerate rude or insulting language at this
office
, and would expect any further communication to be sent in
a more acceptable manner.



Kind Regards


Rose Cox


team manager







From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 28 June 2009 10:43



To: Cox, Rosemary
Subject: Re: Complaint
against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail





Hi,


of course you can work on Sundays if you want.


But business e-mails should just be sent within the
business-hours.


Or else, what's going to happen, is obvious.


Someone are going to come drunk home from town, and answer the
business-e-mails when they are drunk, which is what has happened today,
with our correspondence.


If this is something, you didn't know from before, then I think
this Financial Ombudsman-stuff is just a load of crap really.



Try to use the head that God gave you when you were born!


Sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog





On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Cox, Rosemary
<Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>
wrote:







Dear Mr Ribsskog


Thank you for your e-mail


I must admit to being surprised and
confused with the content of the
e-mail
.


We are an extremely busy department and we often
work at the weekends, this is obviously of help
to consumers as we are able to deal with their complaints in
a more timely manner. I would suggest that
It is entirely up to each individual business to
determine which hours their staff will work and I do not intend
debating this with you.


By working this weekend I have been able to deal
with your complaint, which as you can appreciate is of a benefit to
you.


Perhaps you can clarify the spelling mistakes you
are referring to?


Kind Regards




Rose Cox

team manager







From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 June
2009 10:20



Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier
e-mail





Hi again,


don't you think it's strange for an institutions like yours to
send e-mails on Sunday mornings then?


Shouldn't e-mails be sent within normal business hours then
you think?



This is what it says on Wikipedia:



In
the United
States
and United Kingdom, the hours between 9 am and 5 pm are typically considered to be standard
business hours






I
think this is rather akward, as I also think your spelling-mistakes
are.


Sincerely,


Erik
Ribsskog




On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Cox, Rosemary
<Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>
wrote:






Dear Mr Ribsskog


Thank you for your e-mail


That's no problem, however I should point out
that we are not a government department, we are a independent
complaints body.


I will be in touch with your again in the next
few days




Kind Regards



Rose Cox

team manager






From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 28
June 2009 08:02



To: Cox, Rosemary
Subject: Re: Complaint
against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail





Hi,


ok that's very fine, I'm just home from town you see.


I thought it was a bit strange, since noone in Government
in Norway, work on Sundays.


Sorry about this, I forget sometimes that I'm not in Norway
any longer.


Sorry about this!



Yours sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog





On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Cox,
Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>
wrote:






Dear Mr Ribsskog


Thank you for your e-mail


I can assure you this is not
a joke, I am currently in the office working
today.


I presume that
you would like us to deal with your complaint, so am responding to
your e-mails
today



Kind Regards



Rose Cox

team manager







From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 28
June 2009 07:36
To: Cox, Rosemary
Subject: Re:
Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail





Hi,


why do send the e-mails early on a Sunday morning, by the
way.


Is this some kind of joke?



Sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog




On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Cox,
Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk>
wrote:




Dear Mr Ribsskog


Thank you for your
e-mails


I will contact
you again once I have considered the
information.


Kind Regards



Rose Cox

team manager







From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 27
June 2009 14:59
To: Cox, Rosemary
Subject:
Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail





Hi,


thank you for you e-mail, that I recieved today.


I'll contact your collegue back, regarding the
Barclays-complaint.



I sent the complaint on RBS Dale St., to Yvonne Williams at
RBS, but she

also harassed me, like this, she writes 'Dear Ms Ribsskog',
even if my name

is Erik, and in Britain, you have a movie called 'Erik the
Viking', and Eric is

also a quite usual name, in English-speaking
countries.


So I think Yvonne Williams, the complaint-investigator,
also bullied me.



I think this must have been a deliberate mistake.



This ended with the complaint being partly resolved, in the
way that RBS,

gave me the bonus of £100, for moving my account to them,
from Barclays,

(who I also had problems with, that I'll exlain about to
your collegue, like I

mentioned earlier).


I'll also find the actual complaint against RBS Dale
St. now, and forward it

to you.


What I meant with the complaint-form, was that it
didn't look anything at all

like the ones you've sent me now.


Maybe the complaint-form I was sent, was to do with
other financial institutions,

than banks?


Like share-fonds etc?



Have you also got other complaint-forms, other than to
banks, perhaps someone

sent me the wrong form intentionally?



Just a thought I had.


But anyway, thank you very much for your e-mail, and
I'll also find the actual

RBS Dale St. complaint, and e-mail it to you now.


Yours sincerely,



Erik Ribsskog





---------- Forwarded message
----------
From: Williams, Yvonne
(CRU)
<Yvonne.Williams@rbs.co.uk>
Date:
Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 4:30 PM
Subject: RE: Earlier
e-mail
To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>




Dear Ms Ribsskog


Could you please arrange another copy of your email to be
sent to me for my investigation


Regards


Yvonne Williams





From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 19 June
2007 14:04
To: Williams, Yvonne
(CRU)
Subject: Earlier e-mail


*** WARNING : This message
originates from the Internet ***


Hi,


I'm refering to the e-mail I sent you on 5/6.


I was just wondering if you have recieved this e-mail,
because I cant see

that I have recieved any answer to it yet.


Please just contact me if you want me to send you the
e-mail again.


Yours sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog


The Royal
Bank of Scotland plc, Registered in Scotland No. 90312.
Registered Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2
2YB

Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services
Authority.

This e-mail message is confidential and for
use by the addressee only. If the message is received by anyone
other than the addressee, please return the message to the
sender by replying to it and then delete the message from your
computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily secure. The Royal
Bank of Scotland plc does not accept responsibility for changes
made to this message after it was sent.

Whilst all
reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of
viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure
that the onward transmission, opening or use of this message and
any attachments will not adversely affect its systems or data.
No responsibility is accepted by The Royal Bank of Scotland plc
in this regard and the recipient should carry out such virus and
other checks as it considers
appropriate.





This e-mail and any attachments
are confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you
are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachment from your
system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy,
disclose or take any action in reliance to it.


This e-mail and any attachments have
been checked by virus detection software before transmission.
You should carry out your own virus checks on the contents of
this communication. We accept no liability for any loss or
damage which may be caused by software viruses or by
interception or interruption of this mail.


Unless otherwise indicated, this
e-mail has no contractual effect and may only be used for the
purpose(s) indicated in it. The statements and opinions
expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do not
necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service
Ltd.


This email has originated from the
Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh
Wall, London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a limited
company in England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as
above.












This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not
the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and
delete this e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are
not the intended recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any
action in reliance to it.


This e-mail and any attachments have
been checked by virus detection software before transmission. You
should carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this
communication. We accept no liability for any loss or damage which
may be caused by software viruses or by interception or
interruption of this mail.


Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail
has no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s)
indicated in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this
e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect
those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.


This email has originated from the
Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall,
London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in
England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as above.












This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not
the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and
delete this e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are
not the intended recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any
action in reliance to it.


This e-mail and any attachments have been
checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should
carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this
communication. We accept no liability for any loss or damage which
may be caused by software viruses or by interception or interruption
of this mail.


Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail
has no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s)
indicated in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this
e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those
of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.


This email has originated from the
Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall,
London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in
England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as above.












This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete
this e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the
intended recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in
reliance to it.


This e-mail and any attachments have been
checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should
carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication.
We accept no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by
software viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail.


Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has
no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s)
indicated in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail
are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the
Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.


This email has originated from the
Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall,
London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in
England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as above.












This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this
e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to
it.


This e-mail and any attachments have been
checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should
carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication.
We accept no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by
software viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail.


Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has
no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated
in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of
the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd.


This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,
United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.
3725015. Registered office as above.












This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this
e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to
it.


This e-mail and any attachments have been
checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry
out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept
no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software
viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail.


Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in
it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the
author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman
Service Ltd.


This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,
United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.
3725015. Registered office as above.












This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this
e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to
it.


This e-mail and any attachments have been checked
by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your
own virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no
liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or
by interception or interruption of this mail.


Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it.
The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service
Ltd.


This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,
United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.
3725015. Registered office as above.












This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this
e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to
it.


This e-mail and any attachments have been checked
by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own
virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for
any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception
or interruption of this mail.


Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it.
The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service
Ltd.


This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR,
United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No.
3725015. Registered office as above.













This e-mail and any attachments are confidential
and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient,
please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachment
from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy,
disclose or take any action in reliance to it.


This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by
virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own
virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for
any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception or
interruption of this mail.


Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no
contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The
statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do
not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd.

This email has originated from the Financial
Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United
Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015.
Registered office as above.












fredag 10. april 2009

Identifisering av tullinger: Er det Kølner/Kjølner/Kölner-familien fra Larvik? (In Norwegian)

Det er egentlig ikke så lett for meg å skrive om det her, for jeg har egentlig mange artige minner fra den tida jeg bodde i Larvik.

Og Frode og dem, gikk jeg mye bedre sammen med, enn mora mi og stefaren min.

Så jeg var oppe hos Frode og dem, hele tida.

Men for å ta det som skjedde da, da jeg og Frode og faren skulle til Gurvika.

Da kjente jeg dem kanskje ikke så bra enda da, for jeg tror ikke dem visste at besteforeldrene mine bodde i Nevlunghavn.

Hva vet jeg.

Men da vi var ferdig å besøke hun søstra til faren til Frode da.

Som var hjerneskada.

På Gurvika, som er et feriested for hjerneskada.

Så spurte jeg, om vi ikke kunne besøke besteforeldrene mine, Ingeborg og Johannes, som bodde rett nedi gata der, ovenfor bedehuset.

Bare et par hundre meter, fra der vi parkerte bilen, ved Gurvika der, ca.

Men da ville dem ikke være med.

Var ikke det rart da?

Var det ikke et rart tema, for søndagstur, å ta med en gutt, som de knapt kjente.

(Det her var kanskje allerede sommeren 1978, siden de ikke visste at besteforeldrene mine bodde i Nevlunghavn?)

Å ta med en gutt de ikke kjente, (for vi bodde på Østre Halsen, noen kilometer unna, før det her), på besøk til den hjerneskada tanta i familien.

Det er kanskje en ting.

Men så å ikke ville bli med å besøke besteforeldra da, som bodde like nedi gata.

Blir ikke det to rare ting da?

1. Ta med en gutt fra Østre Halsen, til campingstedet for de hjerneskada.

2. Ikke ville bli med å besøke besteforeldrene til gutten, selv om de bodde like ved den samme campingen for hjerneskada.

Jeg synes det blir to ting jeg.

Og jeg synes at begge tingene kanskje virker litt rare.

Så her mener jeg at det kan være noe muffens med Kjølner/Kølner/Kölner-familien, fra Trygves gt., i Larvik.

Med vennlig hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

Her er firmaet til Frode Kølner da, som var kameraten min, i Larvik, på 70- og 80-tallet.

Jeg mener det var kun regnskapsbyrå tidligere, og i Vestfold.

Men nå er det visst mest inkassobyrå, med base i Oslo.

Noe sånt:

http://www.dkr.no/index.php

PS 2.

Grunnen til at jeg ikke er sikker på etternavnet.

Det er fordi, da jeg bodde i Larvik, og besøkte Frode og dem.

Så bodde mora til faren til Frode, tror jeg, også i huset.

Hu bodde i 2. etasje.

Og hu hadde egen ringeklokke.

Men hun hadde ikke hele 2. etasje, forresten.

Neida, det var et rom i 2. etasje, som Frode og dem hadde da.

Jeg tror jeg aldri møtte hu mora til faren jeg.

Hu bodde visst bare der.

Så det var to folk det var noe rart med, i familien dems.

Det var bestemora, (som visstnok var litt rar, ihvertfall sky), og det var tanta, (som var hjerneskada, og mest bodde på Larvik Sykehus, like ved, vel).

Så sånn var det.

Men på ringeklokkene da.

Jeg mener å huske, fra 70-tallet.

At det stod Kölner, på ringeklokka til bestemora.

Også stod det Kølner, på ringeklokka til Frode og dem.

Som var rett under ringeklokka til farmora da.

Noe sånt.

Bare noe jeg kom på.

PS 3.

Mora til Frode, var også ganske sky.

Så det var tre folk, i familien, som det var noe rart med da.

Mora og farmora og tanta.

Men faren, sa Frode, han var veldig barnslig.

Så da var vel stort sett hele familien rare, må man vel si.

Så sånn er det.

PS 4.

Så hører det med til historia, at faren til Frode, han kjenner også faren min, mener jeg å huske.

For en sommer på begynnelsen av 80-tallet.

For jeg mener å huske at faren min spurte, om jeg ikke skulle være med Frode og dem på ferie(?)

Jo, jeg mener det må ha vært sånn det var.

At faren til Frode antagelig må ha kontakta faren min da.

Noe sånt.

Eller om det gikk gjennom mora mi, som fortsatt bodde i Larvik, (og Drammen), i en del år.

Noe sånt.

1980 eller 81, kanskje, mens det var 'Stutum', på Reiseradioen, husker jeg.

For faren til Frode tok alltid vekking, av meg, som sov i et rom nærme radioen, på hytta dems, i Brunlandnes.

Han vekte meg alltid om morgenen, ved å skru på Stutum, på full guffe.

'Hallå Osvold, det er Stutum her'.

Det greiene der.

Og faren til Frode kjenner også bestemor Ingeborg.

En gang jeg var hos bestemor Ingeborg, på 90-tallet, da jeg skulle på bilferie, til Danmark, tror jeg.

Da var bestemor Ingeborg på telefonen med faren til Frode, som jobber/jobba i e-verket, i Larvik.

Så sånn var det.

Mer da.

Joda, faren til Frode kjenner også søstra mi.

Fra tilbake i 1978.

Jeg pleide å ta med søstra mi overalt, i Larvik, for vi bodde i sentrum, og vi hadde nettopp flytta til Larvik.

Og det her var året søstra mi fylte syv år og jeg fylte åtte år.

Og da, så pleide alltid faren til Frode, å kalle søstra mi for 'Pipa'.

(Og ikke Pia).

'Det er Pipa jo', sa han hele tida.

Så om han skremte vekk søstra mi derfra, eller hva han gjorde.

Hvem vet.

Så sånn var det.

Bare mens jeg huska det.

Jeg synes kanskje at faren til Frode ikke skulle ha brukt et tulle-navn, på søstra mi, selv om jeg husker at jeg syntes at det hørtes artig ut, på 70-tallet.

Så sånn var det.

PS 5.

Eller om det var sånn, som jeg mistenkte tidligere.

At dem putta søstra mi i såpa, 'Charlotte kosmetikk'.

(Søstra mi het Pia Charlotte).

For jeg spurte om å besøke søstra mi, i Drammen, en gang.

Og da dro vi først til en butikk, (faren min og onkel Runar kjørte, forbi Mjøndalen der, eller noe, fetterne mine Ove og Tommy, var også med), hvor de hadde såpe, fra Charlotte Kosmetikk, (som faren min hadde kokt, i kjelleren i huset til Ågot).

Hvor vi ble tatt med, etter at vi ble kidnappa, av faren min og onkel Runar, sommeren 1977 vel.

Så sånn var det.

For jeg mener å huske at søstra mi hadde blondt hår.

(Fra et bilde som stod hos bestemor Ågot, og som kusina mi Heidi, gjorde et poeng av, hvor jeg hadde hvitt hår, sa Heidi, som fire åring, og søstra mi hadde litt mørkere, blondt hår vel).

Noe sånt.

Mens søstra mi nå har brunt hår.

Noe sånt.

Så om det 'pipa'-greiene, var noe med at pipa i huset der.

Hvor faren min og farmora mi, ikke likte å ringe feieren om.

For der faren min kokte såpe, i kjelleren i huset på Sand, var det også en ovn, som gikk på både ved og olje.

Som de varierte litt, hver vinter, hva de brukte av.

Så sånn var det.

Og det var min jobb å hive ved ned i kjelleren der.

Så det var kanskje noe med kjelleren der da, i huset på Sand.

Så sånn var det.

PS 6.

Det siste her er ganske marerittaktig da.

Men søstra mi gjorde aldri noe galt, som jeg kan huske, da vi bodde på Østre Halsen.

Mens i Jegersborggate, da gjorde hun mye rart.

Ødela knappene på TV-en og tok en kniv, og skar mønster i vugga til Axel, osv.

Så her kan det ha vært noe tull med Pia.

PS 7.

Så enten at Pia ble putta i såpa, sommeren 1977.

Eller at hun ble sinnsyk, eller hjernevaska, den samme sommeren.

For jeg husker det sånn, at etter 12 dager eller noe.

Etter at jeg og Pia ble kidnappa til huset på Sand, av faren vår, og onkel Runar.

Så kjørte faren min meg hjem.

Og da husker jeg det sånn, at mora mi var hysterisk.

Og spurte hvor Pia var.

Og da forklarte jeg det, som faren min hadde sagt, at hu skulle dukke opp litt seinere.

Noe sånt.

For jeg var ganske skjelven og ikke meg selv.

Fordi vi hadde blitt kidnappa, og det var sånn rar stemning, i huset på Sand.

Og jeg og faren min gikk til butikken, og da møtte vi en kar, som faren min veksla et ord med.

(Og vanligvis kjørte folk der, som var i 30-åra, på 70-tallet, så det her var rart).

Og da sa faren min, at det var polti, eller noe.

Så da ble jeg litt sånn skjelven da, av hele greiene som foregikk.

Med kidnappinga osv.

For jeg lurte også på hvordan det gikk med mora vår på Østre Halsen osv.

Så sånn var det.

PS 8.

Og det greiene der, det tror jeg bestefar Øivind kan ha vært med på og.

For han sa, til faren min, at 'se på guttungen da'.

At faren min måtte kjøre meg tilbake til Larvik.

For jeg var skjelven, etter møtet med polti, på veien til butikken.

Så det kan ha vært Øivind som var med på tullet da.

Og ikke faren min.

Det kan det også ha vært.

Her må det tenkes litt.

Bloggarkiv

Populære innlegg

Om meg

Bildet mitt
Overhørte på Rimi Bjørndal, (jeg jobbet som butikksjef/leder i ti år, i mange forskjellige butikker), i 2003, at jeg var forfulgt av 'mafian', mm. Har etter dette ikke fått rettighetene mine, i mange saker. Blogger derfor om problemer med å få rettigheter, mm. Mine memoarer, (Min Bok 1-10), kan også finnes på johncons-blogg, (se: 'Etiketter'). Jeg blogger også om slektsforskning, (etter at min danskfødte mormor, som var etter adelige/kongelige, døde i 2009). Har også vært såvidt innom Høyre/Unge Høyre, i sin tid. Har også studert informasjonsbehandling/IT/Computing, (på NHI, HiO IU og University of Sunderland). Har også bakgrunn fra handel og kontor, (grunnkurs, økonomi med markedsføring og data). Er/var også i Heimevernet, (etter at jeg ble overført dit, etter førstegangstjeneste i infanteriet, (og en rep-øvelse i mob-hæren), i forbindelse med omorganiseringer, i Forsvaret, etter den kalde krigen). Blir også utsatt for mye nettmobbing, mm. johncons-blogg, (og mine memoarer og nettbutikk), er kjent fra TV-programmet Tweet4Tweet, i 2012, (selv om jeg måtte klage, for programmet var veldig useriøst/nedlatende, mm.).

Totalt antall sidevisninger

Etiketter