johncons: Liverpool & Knowsley Magistrate Court

Viser innlegg med etiketten Liverpool & Knowsley Magistrate Court. Vis alle innlegg

lørdag 23. august 2014

Jeg fikk et brev fra Liverpool & Knowsley Magistrates Court

torsdag 14. august 2014

Det her er et brev, som jeg fikk i posten, for noen dager siden

fredag 8. august 2014

Jeg ble dømt skyldig, i trakassering/'stalking', (av en Jobcentre-ansatt). Men jeg har ikke fått noe dom enda

PS.

Her er mer om dette:

PS 2.

Jeg gikk til retten, klokka halv ni, i dag morges.

Rettsaken min skulle begynne, klokka 10.

Men det stod på brevet, at jeg burde være der, en halvtime før.

(Noe jeg har ignorert tidligere.

Ettersom at min tidligere advokat, Colin Simber, hos Linskills, hadde bedt meg, om å ignorere dette).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

PS 3.

Da jeg dukket opp, i retten, cirka klokka halv ti.

Så var Solicitior Danielle Gibbons, fra Linskills der.

(På tross av at jeg har sendt mange e-poster.

Til the Law Society og til advokatkontorer.

Fordi at jeg ville at et nytt advokatkontor, skulle representere meg.

Siden at Linskills tulla, (vil jeg si), når de sendte meg brev.

For jeg fikk brev i posten, om en ny 'avtale', dagen etter, at denne avtalen, skulle ha funnet sted.

Og så fikk jeg klagebrev også, om at jeg ikke hadde møtt, på dette møtet.

Og Solicitor Colin Simber, (også fra Linskills), skrev også et brev, en stund før dette igjen, hvor han sa opp advokatforholdet).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

PS 4.

Danielle Gibbons, hu hadde med seg en koffert, (hvis jeg ikke så helt feil).

Og jeg var oppe i andre etasje der, og så på lista, over hvor rettsaken skulle være.

(Den skulle være, i rettsal 7.

Som lå i første etasje.

Og de to foregående gangene, som jeg har blitt 'dratt', til denne retten.

Så var rettsakene i en rettsal, i andre etasje.

Jeg hadde ikke engang fått med meg det, at de hadde rettsaler, i første etasje der).

Gibbons ville chatte med meg, i en 'lukket møteboks' der.

Og hu forklarte det, at de hadde prøvd å få utsatt rettsaken.

For de ville at en ekspert, skulle se på, min gamle PC.

For å prøve å finne bevis, på at jeg ikke hadde sendt e-postene.

(En metode, som jeg selv synes, at virker litt dum.

Hvorfor ikke be om å få etterse bevisene, til politiet.

Eller hvorfor ikke kontakte Google.

Og få de til å bekrefte, at jeg ikke hadde sendt, disse e-postene.

Nei, dette virker som tull og tøys, (og kanskje litt som et sofistikert hijack-forsøk), fra Linskills, synes jeg.

Gibbons var i andre etasje der, ved siden av en stor neger, i dress, (husker jeg).

(Hvis jeg ikke blingsa, og det var konstabel Lester, (som jeg seinere så i etasjen under), da).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

PS 5.

Før rettsaken startet, så fikk Gibbons meg til å skrive under, på et ark.

Om at Sarah Bamber ikke behøvde å vitne, for min del.

(Noe sånt).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

PS 6.

Rettsaken varte, fra cirka klokka 10-11, til cirka klokka 16, i dag.

Gibbons prøvde å få utsettelse.

Men retten nektet.

(Gibbons ville ha tid, til å få sett på den gamle PC-en min, (før rettsaken).

En PC, som Lester 'rappa', i april, var det kanskje.

Noe sånt).

Rettsaken gikk etterhvert videre, (med mange pauser).

Sarah Bamber dukka opp der, for å vitne.

Hu forstod bare cirka halvparten, av spørsmålene, fra dommeren, (vil jeg si).

(Hvis dette ikke var spørsmål, fra aktor, da.

Det husker jeg ikke helt).

Sarah Bamber visste seg å være en 47 år gammel 'Miss'.

Hu hadde jobba i cirka femten år, på the Jobcentre.

(Noe sånt).

Og i cirka seks-sju år, (var det vel), på Aintree Jobcentre.

(Noe sånt).

Denne 'Miss'-en, hadde også en datter, (ble det nevnt igjen).

(Uten at jeg vet, hvordan en Miss, kan ha en datter.

For Miss betyr vel frøken.

Og en frøken er vel en jomfru, skulle man vel tro.

Men dette var kanskje den gjenfødte Jomfru Maria, da.

Noe sånt).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

PS 7.

Jobcentre-sjefen Cathrine, (fra Aintree Jobcentre), var det vel.

Hu slapp å vitne, (av en eller annen grunn).

Og da var det konstabel Lester, som skulle vitne.

Han sa det, at de to aktuelle ip-adressene, var fra min PC, og Liverpool City Council.

(Noe sånt).

Men dette var bare hans vitneforklaring.

Det ble vel ikke fremlagt noen papirer, som liksom skulle bekrefte dette.

(Sånn som jeg forstod det, ihvertfall).

Lester sa at det fantes to typer ip-adresser.

Statiske ip-adresser.

Og en annen type ip-adresser, som ikke var statiske.

(Dette var vel noe som jeg hadde forklart, i et avhør, på enten Wavertree eller St. Anne St. politistasjon, i enten januar eller april).

På spørsmål fra Gibbons, så svarte Lester det, at han ikke hadde noe særlig bra IT-kunnskaper.

(Noe sånt).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

PS 8.

Gibbons ga meg råd, om ikke å vitne.

(Dette var vel etter en pause, som var fra cirka halv et til kvart på to, vel.

Noe sånt).

Og jeg hørte da på det, og vitna ikke.

Og de tre med-dommerne, de satt kanskje i en halvtime, (eller noe sånt), for å finne ut hva de skulle dømme.

(Dette var to damer og en mann.

En lyshåret dame, i 50-åra.

En afrikansk dame, i 50-åra.

Og en mann, i 60/70-åra, med 'kronprins Haakon-skjegg'.

Noe sånt.

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

PS 9.

Han i juryen, med skjegget.

Han sa det, at de dømte meg som skyldig, fordi at jeg ikke ville vitne.

(Noe sånt).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

PS 10.

Dommeren, (var det vel), foreslo, noe med 'probation'.

Og aktor, (var det vel), sa det, at jeg ikke var straffet fra før.

Men bare hadde en advarsel, for 'theft', fra 2008.

Så det var greit for han.

(Noe sånt).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

PS 11.

Aktor sa mye negativt om meg, i sitt slutt-innlegg.

Han sa blant annet et par ting, som fikk meg til å ta opp min syvende sans-bok.

Og gjøre et par notatet.

Og det var, at jeg var en 'fantasist'.

Og at jeg ikke viste noe 'empaty', ovenfor Sarah Bamber.

Gibbons spurte meg seinere, hvorfor jeg hadde skrevet opp noen notater.

Og jeg forklarte det, at jeg aldri hadde blitt kalt noe lignende, av fantasist, tidligere.

Så jeg reagerte negativt på det.

(Jeg synes at det er æreskrenkelse, for å si det sånn).

Og de kunne vel ikke forvente det, at jeg skulle være som ektemannen til Sarah Bamber.

De blandet følelser inn i det.

Min rolle er ikke å vise empati, ovenfor Sarah Bamber.

Det må hennes ektemann/kjæreste gjøre, mener jeg.

Jeg blir uskyldig straffet, for noe jeg ikke har gjort.

Og så får jeg skjenn, for å ikke vise empati, ovenfor en arbeidsformidlings-byråkrat, (som er som ei heks, i møtene, vil jeg si).

Dette blir som noe russisk, vil jeg si.

Aktor gjorde også et poeng av det, at jeg ikke hadde noen venner.

Og at alt mitt sosialliv, foregikk via nettet.

Det er jo som i kommunist-Russland, vil jeg si.

De blir så personlige og klamme, vil jeg si.

Og aktor sa også noe om 'aliens', osv.

Så dette var jo helt hinsides, (vil jeg si).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

PS 12.

Aktor leste opp referater, fra møtene, mellom Lester og hans kolleger, og meg, på politistasjonene.

Men annenhvert ord omtrent, var 'inaudible'.

(Altså 'umulig å høre'.

Noe sånt).

Nettbutikkene mine, ble ikke nevnt.

Bøkene mine ble nevnt bare en gang.

Men bloggen min, den nevnte aktor, veldig mange ganger.

Og han sa også noe sånt som, (da han leste opp referater, fra møtene med meg, på politistasjonene), at jeg var en: 'Earlier home defence man in Iraq'.

(Hvis jeg hørte det riktig).

Så her har det vært noe klussing, med referatet, (eller noe i den duren), vil jeg si.

(Noe sånt).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

tirsdag 5. august 2014

Jeg fikk et brev fra Liverpool & Knowsley Magistrates Court

søndag 29. juni 2014

Jeg sendte en e-post til Liverpool

Erik Ribsskog

Update/Fwd: To: Liverpool & Knowsley Magistrate Court/Fwd: Complaint

Erik Ribsskog

Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 5:44 AM

To: me-customersupportliverpool@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

Cc: CONTACT-US , Wedell-Wedellsborg , "emb.london" , HRW UK , amnestyis , Phso Enquiries , post , Akademikerforbundet , Service , Ribsskog , she , "hv-02.kontakt" , "anne-kathrine.skodvin" , post , "EUteam@amnesty.org" , "SCT@amnesty.org.uk" , hofmarskallatet@kongehuset.dk, ved Wenche Molstad , post@slottet.no, Office , Info , Service , "steve.rotheram.mp" , LO Postkasse LO , rcjchancery.judgeslisting@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk, "sande.vgs" , "president@ansa.no" , Google Press , post@canica.no, billing@spexhost.com, Colin Simber , Contact-Us , Politikk Høyre , "mail.gva" , info@linskills.co.uk, findasolicitor@lawsociety.org.uk, admin@lpl-norwegian-consulate.org.uk, ITCGM- Norwegian Consulate , royaldanishconsulate@dantechuk.com

Hi again,

also, there is a website, on the internet, where some deranged people,
(I think I have to call it), encouriges other deranged people, to
troll againts me:

The "How to" Guide & Dox

Trolling Erik Ribsskog is about as difficult as stealing a bike from
yo former massas.

Send him an e-mail claiming to represent the mafia, and that you have
not forgotten him.
Make fake subscriptions for gay magazines. [13]
Plant strange ideas in his head, which he will subsequently process in
his batshit insane mind before sending enraged complaints to the
Norwegian government.[14]
Address him as "Miss Erik Ribsskog" (Merseyside Police once did this,
which has since served as a source of numerous conspiracy theories)

Although he is completely convinced that he is followed by the
"mafian" and that this mafia wants to kill him at all costs, he posts
his home address about 200 times daily on his blog. His address is:

10 Keith Court
Keith Avenue
Liverpool
L4 5XJ

+44 0790 5206018

eribsskog@gmail.com'.

https://encyclopediadramatica.es/Erik_Ribsskog

This must be some nerds, (or something), who don't have a life.

And who think its fun, to be sadist, and distroy other peoples lives.

Something like that.

So even if e-mails appear to be from me, it could be e.g. these
maniacs, who fabricate them.

At least I haven't sent the mentioned e-mails.

And also, how can e-mails be stalking?

And also, the mentioned e-mails have been sent to a work email
address, and not a private e-mail address.

So I'm a bit worried if someone are also dramatising here, (not only
on the mentioned website).

Regards,

Erik Ribsskog

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 1:03 PM
Subject: To: Liverpool & Knowsley Magistrate Court/Fwd: Complaint
To: me-customersupportliverpool@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
Cc: CONTACT-US <CONTACT-US@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, Wedell-Wedellsborg
<ww@bruunhjejle.dk>, "emb.london" <emb.london@mfa.no>, HRW UK
<hrwuk@hrw.org>, amnestyis <amnestyis@amnesty.org>, Phso Enquiries
<phso.enquiries@ombudsman.org.uk>, post <post@mfa.no>,
Akademikerforbundet <post@akademikerforbundet.no>, Service
<csc@lht.co.uk>, Ribsskog <bribsskog@gmail.com>, she
<she@topdanmark.dk>, "hv-02.kontakt" <hv-02.kontakt@mil.no>,
"anne-kathrine.skodvin" <anne-kathrine.skodvin@ica.no>, post
<post@spesialenheten.no>, "EUteam@amnesty.org" <EUteam@amnesty.org>,
"SCT@amnesty.org.uk" <sct@amnesty.org.uk>,
hofmarskallatet@kongehuset.dk, ved Wenche Molstad
<vpv.kontakt@mil.no>, post@slottet.no, Office
<runcornoffice@taroe.org>, Info <info@tpas.org.uk>, Service
<benefits.service@liverpooldirectlimited.co.uk>, "steve.rotheram.mp"
<steve.rotheram.mp@parliament.uk>, LO Postkasse LO <lo@lo.no>,
rcjchancery.judgeslisting@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk, "sande.vgs"
<sande.vgs@vfk.no>, "president@ansa.no" <president@ansa.no>, Google
Press <press@google.com>, post@canica.no, billing@spexhost.com, Colin
Simber <colin.simber@linskills.co.uk>, Contact-Us
<Contact-Us@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk>, Politikk Høyre
<politikk@hoyre.no>, "mail.gva" <mail.gva@efta.int>,
info@linskills.co.uk, findasolicitor@lawsociety.org.uk,
admin@lpl-norwegian-consulate.org.uk, ITCGM- Norwegian Consulate
<norconsulate@itcgm.co.uk>, royaldanishconsulate@dantechuk.com

Hi,

I'm refering to your letter from 19/6, which I received today, (and
attach a scanned copy of).

(I'm not sure if it was delivered with Royal Mail or TNT.

I just got a letter through the door now.

And the other day a guy in a white sweater was here with a letter, it seemed.

So it isn't like in Norway, were we only have Posten, (like I remember
it, at least)).

I wanted to inform you, that I've now contacted the Law Society, about
Linskills, (since I have a bit low confidence in them now, like I've
explained, in the forwarded e-mail).

(Even if I've been having problems with the Law Society before.

To do with an employement-case, where I was messed with, (I think I
have to say), by the Citizens Advice Bureu and the Police and more).

I was wondering why you refer to Aintree Jobcentre as 'Walton Vale',
in your letters, (and in court).

Aintree is in Sefton.

So why isn't this case in Sefton Magistrates Court, I have been wondering.

Also, in Aintree they have a racehourse-track.

My grand-father Øivind Olsen, told me in the 70's or 80's that people
who went to the 'travbane', (like we say in Norway), weren't fine.

So he would probably have said that Aintree weren't since they have a
travbane, (or a 'galoppbane').

So are you trying to hide that this is the Jobcentre in a place where
they have a trav/gallopp-bane, I was wondering.

(So that this place isn't fine, like I think my grandfather would have said).

Also, you write that I have bad character.

But one of the people who brought me up, was my Danish-born
grand-mother Ingeborg Ribsskog, who was from Danish nobility, (or at
least upper-class).

So I think this sounds a bit like an insult, when you write, that I
have bad character.

I lived my 34 first years, in Norway.

And I was never in prison, never arrested, never in jail, never in court even.

So this I'm not sure if I agree on.

In Norway, I'm known as a respected Store Manager, Home Defence-man
and IT-graduate, I think.

This case seems silly to me.

It should just be to contact Google, and they should be able to
conform, (since I reackon they must have logged the e-mails I've sent
from my g-mail-accounst).

And then Google should be able to confirm that this is spoofing, and
not something I've sent.

I hope the law society can help me find a new solicitor now, for the
reasons mentioned in the forwared e-mail.

Even if my confidence with the Law Society isn't high, after what
happened to do with the mentioned employement-case, which I started
against Bertelsmann Arvato's Microsoft Scandinavian Product
Activation, (in the Cunard Building, here in Liverpool), in 2006.

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 2:52 PM
Subject: Re: Complaint
To: Colin Simber <colin.simber@linskills.co.uk>
Cc: julian.linskill@linskills.co.uk, findasolicitor@lawsociety.org.uk

Hi,

when I was at your office the last time, I walked there, from Walton.

The problem is that the Jobcentre mess with me, and don't send my allowance.

Why don't you do anything with this, since you are my solicitor?

I now have around £3 on my bank-account.

And next-week it's not going to be any money there, due to that I need
these money for food.

And you don't want to correspond by e-mail.

Is this that you say I'm guilty?

And you don't write a salutation, (like 'regards').

I therefore send an update, of this e-mail, to Mr. Linskill.

I think you shouldn't let the Jobcentre mess with me, while you are my
solicitor.

I can't see that you have done anything to get the Jobcentre to stop
breaking the agreements, (I thnk I have to call it).

And why do you appologize on behalf of you collegue?

Shouldn't her manager do that?

And I'm not sure if you understand what the problem is, surrounding
that someone have been spoofing me.

So I send a copy e-mail to Mr. Linskills.

I have worked as a Store Manger.

But not as an Office Manager.

How can you have errors like that in your formal letters, I was wondering.

Regards,

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

What's this title of yours: 'Accredited Police Station Representative'.

Does it mean you really are some kind of cop I was wondering.

Is this some kind of candid camera?

On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Colin Simber
<colin.simber@linskills.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Sorry about the error.
> I have just written a letter to you with a new appointment for Thursday 03/07/14 at 10am.
> I have mentioned that if you have difficulty with travel costs we will refund your bus fare while you are here.
> I would rather not correspond by email bearing in mind the nature of your case.
>
>
> Save the environment by only printing this email if absolutely necessary.
>
> Colin Simber
> Senior Clerk/Accredited Police Station Representative
> DD: 0151 243 0111
> Email: colin.simber@linskills.co.uk
>
> This email and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you must not: copy or store this message or any attachment; disclose the contents to any other person; or use it for any purpose whatsoever. Copyright in this e-mail (and any attachments created by Linskills Solicitors) belongs to Linskills Solicitors. If you have received this message in error please notify us immediately.
>
> Any liability (in negligence, contract or otherwise) arising from any third party taking any action, or refraining from taking any action on the basis of any of the information contained in this e-mail is hereby excluded. Linskills Solicitors does not accept service of documents by e-mail unless otherwise expressly agreed.
> Linskills Solicitors is a Partnership Authorised and Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority, SRA number 00053249. The Partners are Julian Linskill, Alaric H. Walmsley. Any reference to Partner in relation the firm means a member, consultant or employee with equivalent standing or qualifications. Guidelines can be viewed at www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/code-of-conduct.page.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
> Sent: 27 June 2014 12:56
> To: Julian Linskill
> Cc: Colin Simber
> Subject: Complaint
>
> Hi,
>
> I got a letter in the post today, from Carole Clarke, at your company.
>
> (She represented me in court, last week.
>
> And earlier I've had meetings with Colin Simber and Danielle to do with the same case).
>
> She says I'm supposed to go to a meeting, with Colin Simber, on 25/6.
>
> But that was the day before yesterday.
>
> Is this the candid camera, I was wondering.
>
> Perhaps Carole Clarke is overworked and needs a holiday, I was wondering.
>
> Regards,
>
> Erik Ribsskog

troll website.JPG
116K

PS.

Her er vedlegget:

lørdag 28. juni 2014

Jeg sendte en Liverpool & Knowsley Magistrates Court

Erik Ribsskog

To: Liverpool & Knowsley Magistrate Court/Fwd: Complaint

Erik Ribsskog

Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 1:03 PM

To: me-customersupportliverpool@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

Hi,

I'm refering to your letter from 19/6, which I received today, (and
attach a scanned copy of).

(I'm not sure if it was delivered with Royal Mail or TNT.

I just got a letter through the door now.

And the other day a guy in a white sweater was here with a letter, it seemed.

So it isn't like in Norway, were we only have Posten, (like I remember
it, at least)).

I wanted to inform you, that I've now contacted the Law Society, about
Linskills, (since I have a bit low confidence in them now, like I've
explained, in the forwarded e-mail).

(Even if I've been having problems with the Law Society before.

To do with an employement-case, where I was messed with, (I think I
have to say), by the Citizens Advice Bureu and the Police and more).

I was wondering why you refer to Aintree Jobcentre as 'Walton Vale',
in your letters, (and in court).

Aintree is in Sefton.

So why isn't this case in Sefton Magistrates Court, I have been wondering.

Also, in Aintree they have a racehourse-track.

My grand-father Øivind Olsen, told me in the 70's or 80's that people
who went to the 'travbane', (like we say in Norway), weren't fine.

So he would probably have said that Aintree weren't since they have a
travbane, (or a 'galoppbane').

So are you trying to hide that this is the Jobcentre in a place where
they have a trav/gallopp-bane, I was wondering.

(So that this place isn't fine, like I think my grandfather would have said).

Also, you write that I have bad character.

But one of the people who brought me up, was my Danish-born
grand-mother Ingeborg Ribsskog, who was from Danish nobility, (or at
least upper-class).

So I think this sounds a bit like an insult, when you write, that I
have bad character.

I lived my 34 first years, in Norway.

And I was never in prison, never arrested, never in jail, never in court even.

So this I'm not sure if I agree on.

In Norway, I'm known as a respected Store Manager, Home Defence-man
and IT-graduate, I think.

This case seems silly to me.

It should just be to contact Google, and they should be able to
conform, (since I reackon they must have logged the e-mails I've sent
from my g-mail-accounst).

And then Google should be able to confirm that this is spoofing, and
not something I've sent.

I hope the law society can help me find a new solicitor now, for the
reasons mentioned in the forwared e-mail.

Even if my confidence with the Law Society isn't high, after what
happened to do with the mentioned employement-case, which I started
against Bertelsmann Arvato's Microsoft Scandinavian Product
Activation, (in the Cunard Building, here in Liverpool), in 2006.

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 2:52 PM
Subject: Re: Complaint
To: Colin Simber <colin.simber@linskills.co.uk>
Cc: julian.linskill@linskills.co.uk, findasolicitor@lawsociety.org.uk

Hi,

when I was at your office the last time, I walked there, from Walton.

The problem is that the Jobcentre mess with me, and don't send my allowance.

Why don't you do anything with this, since you are my solicitor?

I now have around £3 on my bank-account.

And next-week it's not going to be any money there, due to that I need
these money for food.

And you don't want to correspond by e-mail.

Is this that you say I'm guilty?

And you don't write a salutation, (like 'regards').

I therefore send an update, of this e-mail, to Mr. Linskill.

I think you shouldn't let the Jobcentre mess with me, while you are my
solicitor.

I can't see that you have done anything to get the Jobcentre to stop
breaking the agreements, (I thnk I have to call it).

And why do you appologize on behalf of you collegue?

Shouldn't her manager do that?

And I'm not sure if you understand what the problem is, surrounding
that someone have been spoofing me.

So I send a copy e-mail to Mr. Linskills.

I have worked as a Store Manger.

But not as an Office Manager.

How can you have errors like that in your formal letters, I was wondering.

Regards,

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

What's this title of yours: 'Accredited Police Station Representative'.

Does it mean you really are some kind of cop I was wondering.

Is this some kind of candid camera?

On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Colin Simber
<colin.simber@linskills.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Sorry about the error.
> I have just written a letter to you with a new appointment for Thursday 03/07/14 at 10am.
> I have mentioned that if you have difficulty with travel costs we will refund your bus fare while you are here.
> I would rather not correspond by email bearing in mind the nature of your case.
>
>
> Save the environment by only printing this email if absolutely necessary.
>
> Colin Simber
> Senior Clerk/Accredited Police Station Representative
> DD: 0151 243 0111
> Email: colin.simber@linskills.co.uk
>
> This email and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you must not: copy or store this message or any attachment; disclose the contents to any other person; or use it for any purpose whatsoever. Copyright in this e-mail (and any attachments created by Linskills Solicitors) belongs to Linskills Solicitors. If you have received this message in error please notify us immediately.
>
> Any liability (in negligence, contract or otherwise) arising from any third party taking any action, or refraining from taking any action on the basis of any of the information contained in this e-mail is hereby excluded. Linskills Solicitors does not accept service of documents by e-mail unless otherwise expressly agreed.
> Linskills Solicitors is a Partnership Authorised and Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority, SRA number 00053249. The Partners are Julian Linskill, Alaric H. Walmsley. Any reference to Partner in relation the firm means a member, consultant or employee with equivalent standing or qualifications. Guidelines can be viewed at www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/code-of-conduct.page.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
> Sent: 27 June 2014 12:56
> To: Julian Linskill
> Cc: Colin Simber
> Subject: Complaint
>
> Hi,
>
> I got a letter in the post today, from Carole Clarke, at your company.
>
> (She represented me in court, last week.
>
> And earlier I've had meetings with Colin Simber and Danielle to do with the same case).
>
> She says I'm supposed to go to a meeting, with Colin Simber, on 25/6.
>
> But that was the day before yesterday.
>
> Is this the candid camera, I was wondering.
>
> Perhaps Carole Clarke is overworked and needs a holiday, I was wondering.
>
> Regards,
>
> Erik Ribsskog

4 attachments