Ingeborg Ribsskog - Baron Adeler Malteserordenen E-post til slottet om Mette-Marit videoen Er noe galt i Martine-saken? Problemer med Grandiosa? johncons-MUSIKK johncons-REISE johncons-FOTBALL
Viser innlegg med etiketten Legal aid. Vis alle innlegg
Viser innlegg med etiketten Legal aid. Vis alle innlegg

fredag 12. februar 2010

Jeg sendte en ny e-post til Community Legal Advice, om Arvato-saken




Google Mail - Community Legal Advice










Google Mail


Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>




Community Legal Advice











Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>



Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:45 PM




To:
Simpson Hayley <Hayley.Simpson@firstassist.co.uk>






Hi Hayley,

that's brilliant!

I've been in contact with Merseyside Employment Law earlier, (last year or something), about this case, but they didn't reply then.

But I'll try to contact the others on the list.


In your phone-call, you said that Kelly in your Community Legal Advice customer support team, had been speaking with someone from Stephensons in Wigan, who had told you that they couldn't help me with the mentioned employment-case against Arvato's (Microsoft Scandinavian Product Activation-campaign).


But I was just wondering if it would be possible to know who at Stephensons in Wigan that your colleague has been speaking with there, since I haven't heard anything back from the law-firm, Stephensons, myself.


Thank you very much in advance for any help!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog


On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Simpson Hayley <Hayley.Simpson@firstassist.co.uk> wrote:





Dear Erik,



Thank you for taking the time to contact Community Legal Advice.



I have searched in your local area for appropriate legal advisors and can supply the following details:




Merseyside Employment Law
2nd Floor, Gostins Building
32-36 Hanover Street
Liverpool
L1 4LN
Tel: 0151 709 4125

Wirral Health & Safety Welfare Advice Centre

4 St Anne's Street
Birkenhead
CH41 3JU
Tel: 0151 666 1999

Allington Hughes
Newgate Walk
The Precinct
Chester
CH1 1JU
Tel: 01244 312166



Although we make every effort to ensure you get the advice that you need, we cannot guarantee that the organisation or adviser will take on your case.



You may also have to pay for legal advice. Check this with your adviser when you first call them as they should tell you about any charges. It is also worth checking your house/car/credit card insurance policies to see if they provide any cover for legal expenses.



If you have any special requirements, such as wheelchair access, please call the advisor to check they can accommodate these. You should also call ahead to check opening times, find out whether they are likely to be able to help you and, if possible, to make an appointment. If you wish to search for local legal advisors yourself please visit our directory.



If you require any further help please reply to this email or contact our helpline on 0845 345 4 345 where one of our operators will be happy to assist you. Whenever you contact us please quote the following reference number 1121206.



We hope you receive the advice you need.




Best Wishes,



Hayley


CLA Operator






Hayley Simpson| Customer Service Advisor| Community Legal Advice


FIRSTASSIST SERVICES LIMITED

Wheatfield Way, Hinckley

Leicestershire, LE10 1YG






This email (and any attachment(s)) is private and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to the intended recipient) please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.



Please bear in mind that Internet e-mail is not a secure medium, as messages and attachments can be intercepted and read by someone else.
FirstAssist Services Limited reserves the right to monitor, record and retain any incoming and outgoing emails for security reasons and for monitoring internal compliance with FirstAssist policy on staff use. Email monitoring and/or blocking software may be used and email content may be read. You have a responsibility to ensure you comply with the appropriate legal regulations and that these laws are not broken when writing or forwarding emails and their contents. No contracts can be entered into on our behalf by email unless otherwise stated.



Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of FirstAssist Services Limited.



FirstAssist Services Limited checks all mails and attachments for known viruses; however, you are advised that you open any attachments at your own risk.



FirstAssist Services Limited (No.01404718)

Registered in England and Wales at 32-42 High Street, Purley, Surrey CR8 2PP.



For more information about FirstAssist please visit our web site: http://www.first-assist.com











fredag 23. oktober 2009

Jeg sendte en e-post til et britisk advokatfirma, angående Arvato-saken, og Legal Aid




Google Mail - FW: Reminder/Fwd: Employment-case against Bertelsmann Arvato










Google Mail


Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>




FW: Reminder/Fwd: Employment-case against Bertelsmann Arvato











Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>



Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:42 PM




To:
Tom Mooney <tmo@stephensons.co.uk>






Hi,

thanks very much for the phone-number!

I called LSC now, and they explained me how to log on, to their website, and answering some questions, that would determine, if I was eligible for legal aid, or not.


And here's what the website said:


As you or your partner are receiving one of the following:

  • Income Support
  • Income Based Job Seeker's Allowance

  • Income-based Employment and Support Allowance
  • Guarantee Credit


you are automatically financially eligible for the following levels of service:

Legal Help
Help at Court
Immigration cases: Legal Representation before the Immigration and Asylum Tribunal; and the High Court

Asylum cases: Legal Representation before the Immigration and Asylum Tribunal; and the High Court
Family Mediation
Help with Mediation
Other Legal Representation
General Family Help



So it shouldn't be a problem with the legal aid!

That's good news!


I also have a website, where I've published about the empoyment-case.

It's on this link:


http://www.scribd.com/groups/view/14830-arvato-services-ltd-s-microsoft-scandinavian-product-activation


And in this link, I explain about some of the problems that were going on, but there where also a lot more problems, that I was constructivly dismissed as well, and more:


http://www.scribd.com/doc/4661735/7


I post the links, since it was so much problems there, so it isn't easy for me, to summarise it, since there were so many problems going on there, in the one year and three months I worked there.


Hope it's alright that I just refer to the website, but if it's anything I should answer, then please just tell me, and I'll explain it properly!


Thanks again for you help so far!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog



On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Tom Mooney <tmo@stephensons.co.uk> wrote:











Erik,


My apologies, the LSC's telephone contact is 0845 345 4345.


Kind regards






Tom Mooney

Trainee Solicitor


Employment Department

For and on behalf of Stephensons Solicitors LLP

Wigan Investment Centre, Waterside Drive, Wigan WN3 5BA

Direct Dial: 01942 774170

Direct Fax: 01942 774525







From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]


Sent: 23 October 2009 14:19

To: Tom Mooney

Subject: Re: FW: Reminder/Fwd: Employment-case against Bertelsmann Arvato





Hi,



thank you very much for your e-mail!




I was just wondering, shouldn't it be one more number in the phone-number you gave, to call to check if I'm eligible for receiving legal aid?



Is this number to the LSC?



I think I'm eligible because I'm unemployed at the moment, due to the finance-crises, etc., unfourtuntly, even if I have a lot to do, with working on the employment-case and writing a blog etc.




Thanks again for your e-mail!



Best regards,



Erik Ribsskog





On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Tom Mooney
<tmo@stephensons.co.uk>
wrote:














Eric,





To qualify for legal aid you must be financially eligible and your claim must also have sufficient prospects of success.


In relation to the first requirement I would invite you to call 0845 345 434 to enable an advisor to ask you several questions to determine whether you are financially eligible to receive legal aid.
If you are eligible, you will receive a reference number and you claim can then be assessed.


Kind regards























Tom Mooney

Trainee Solicitor


Employment Department

For and on behalf of Stephensons Solicitors LLP

Wigan Investment Centre, Waterside Drive, Wigan WN3 5BA

Direct Dial: 01942 774170

Direct Fax: 01942 774525




































From:
eribsskog@gmail.com [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]


Sent: 09 October 2009 06:19

To: Enquiries

Subject: Reminder/Fwd: Employment-case against Bertelsmann Arvato





Hi,


I can't see that I've received an answer to this e-mail, so I'm sending a reminder about this.



Yours sincerely,



Erik Ribsskog





---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 3:47 AM

Subject: Employment-case against Bertelsmann Arvato

To: enquiries@stephensons.co..uk





Hi,


I've been trying regularly, since 2006, to find some advice, within the legal aid-programme, regarding an employment-case I have, against Bertelsmann Arvato.




There were problems with constructed dismissal, a lot of bullying and harassment from managers, illegal management-methods, etc.



I've published about the employment-case, on this url:








Hope you can help with giving advice regarding this case!




Yours sincerely,



Erik Ribsskog


















Debt Recovery Special Offer...



If you have 5 or more debts to recover, instruct us to act now for only £5 plus VAT per Letter Before Action.
This offer is valid until 30th September 2009. You must instruct us to send 5 or more Letter Before Actions to be eligible for this offer.




Save energy, money and the environment - do you need to print this message?




The information in this e-mail (which includes any files transmitted with it) is confidential and may also be legally privileged.
It is intended for the addressee only. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized.
Unauthorized recipients are required to maintain confidentiality.
If you have received this e-mail in error please notify us immediately, destroy any copies and delete it from your computer system.
Any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. Copyright in this e-mail and any document created by us and sent as an attachment to this e-mail will be and remain vested in us and will not be
transferred to you.
All messages are scanned for viruses by McAfee VirusScan but please carry out such virus and other checks as you consider appropriate.
No responsibility is accepted by us in this regard.
Stephensons Solicitors LLP is a limited liability partnership.
Registered in England and Wales, registered number OC322962, registered office is 24 Lord Street, Leigh,
WN7 1AB. Telephone: 01942 777777.
A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office.
Members of Stephensons Solicitors LLP will be referred to as partners.
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. For the SRA rules click
www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/code-of-conduct.page
.
Service of Documents by e-mail not accepted.



































































Nå fikk jeg en e-post, fra et advokatfirma, angående Arvato-saken. De vil at jeg skal sjekke om jeg har rett til 'legal aid'. Jeg er jo arb.ledig så




Google Mail - FW: Reminder/Fwd: Employment-case against Bertelsmann Arvato










Google Mail


Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>




FW: Reminder/Fwd: Employment-case against Bertelsmann Arvato











Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>



Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 2:19 PM




To:
Tom Mooney <tmo@stephensons.co.uk>






Hi,

thank you very much for your e-mail!

I was just wondering, shouldn't it be one more number in the phone-number you gave, to call to check if I'm eligible for receiving legal aid?


Is this number to the LSC?

I think I'm eligible because I'm unemployed at the moment, due to the finance-crises, etc., unfourtuntly, even if I have a lot to do, with working on the employment-case and writing a blog etc.


Thanks again for your e-mail!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog


On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Tom Mooney <tmo@stephensons.co.uk> wrote:













Eric,





To qualify for legal aid you must be financially eligible and your claim must also have sufficient prospects of success.


In relation to the first requirement I would invite you to call 0845 345 434 to enable an advisor to ask you several questions to determine whether you are financially eligible to receive legal
aid.
If you are eligible, you will receive a reference number and you claim can then be assessed.


Kind regards


















Tom Mooney

Trainee Solicitor


Employment Department

For and on behalf of Stephensons Solicitors LLP

Wigan Investment Centre, Waterside Drive, Wigan WN3 5BA

Direct Dial: 01942 774170

Direct Fax: 01942 774525

















From: eribsskog@gmail.com [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]


Sent: 09 October 2009 06:19

To: Enquiries

Subject: Reminder/Fwd: Employment-case against Bertelsmann Arvato





Hi,


I can't see that I've received an answer to this e-mail, so I'm sending a reminder about this.



Yours sincerely,



Erik Ribsskog





---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 3:47 AM

Subject: Employment-case against Bertelsmann Arvato

To: enquiries@stephensons.co..uk





Hi,


I've been trying regularly, since 2006, to find some advice, within the legal aid-programme, regarding an employment-case I have, against Bertelsmann Arvato.




There were problems with constructed dismissal, a lot of bullying and harassment from managers, illegal management-methods, etc.



I've published about the employment-case, on this url:








Hope you can help with giving advice regarding this case!




Yours sincerely,



Erik Ribsskog

















Debt Recovery Special Offer...



If you have 5 or more debts to recover, instruct us to act now for only £5 plus VAT per Letter Before Action. This offer is valid until 30th September 2009. You must instruct us to send 5 or more Letter Before Actions to be eligible for this offer.



Save energy, money and the environment - do you need to print this message?




The information in this e-mail (which includes any files transmitted with it) is confidential and may also be legally privileged. It is intended for the addressee only. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. Unauthorized recipients are required to maintain confidentiality. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify us immediately, destroy any copies and delete it from your computer system. Any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. Copyright in this e-mail and any document created by us and sent as an attachment to this e-mail will be and remain vested in us and will not be transferred to you. All messages are scanned for viruses by McAfee VirusScan but please carry out such virus and other checks as you consider appropriate. No responsibility is accepted by us in this regard. Stephensons Solicitors LLP is a limited liability partnership. Registered in England and Wales, registered number OC322962, registered office is 24 Lord Street, Leigh, WN7 1AB. Telephone: 01942 777777. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Members of Stephensons Solicitors LLP will be referred to as partners. Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. For the SRA rules click www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/code-of-conduct.page. Service of Documents by e-mail not accepted.



















































fredag 21. august 2009

Jeg prøver fortsatt å få hjelp til den saken jeg har mot Bertelsmann Arvato, og deres Microsoft-aktivering, i 2005 og 2006




Google Mail - Employment-case agains Arvato etc.










Google Mail


Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>




Employment-case agains Arvato etc.











Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>



Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 6:19 PM




To:
paulanolan@heatkensington.org.uk






Hi,

I searched on the LSC website, for legal advisors, who accepted founding through the Legal Aid-programme, and found you.
gu
When I worked at Arvato, I was bullied by managers, and was almost made to work myself to death, before I was constructivly dismissed.


I've tried to bring this up with the Merseyside Police, the Liverpool Central CAB, the Law Society ect., since this happened, in December
2006, but I haven't got anyone to help, even if I've brought this up, with a lot of Law-companies, but the also seem to bully and harass me.


I've even published the documents to do with the case, online, in this link:



I find it difficult now, to find a new job, even if I have education at university-level and have been working as a food-shop manager, in Norway,
so I wonder if Arvato and/or some other of my old employers, are 'messing with me' still, when employers call for references.


Something like this.

So I was wondering if you have the chance to look at this, or I guess you only help people who live in Kensington, since you have this name?

Perhaps you know some other organisations, that can give help?


Thanks in advance for the help!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog







fredag 24. oktober 2008

The Law Society never asked me to explain about the lies from Morecrofts in this file. They must have bought them. I didn't behave out of line at all.







Resolution form





Part 1:





Alison Lobb


Morecrofts
Solcitors


Ground Floor,
Tithebarn House, 1-5 Tithebarn Street, Liverpool, L2 2NZ.





Solicitors
reference: I called your office last week, and I was at your office
today,


agreeing that
I would send this resolution form to your companies e-mail address.





My name:





Erik Ribsskog


Flat 3


5 Leather
Lane


Liverpool


L2 2AE





Phone-number:
0151 236 3298.


Mobile: 0775
834 9954.








Part 2:





The person
dealing with my case is or was:





First it was
Eleanor Pool who dealt with the case as a duty solicitor from
Morecrofts


on the
meeting in the CAB on 27/2.





Then, after I
agreed with Pool on that I would pay for the case with a payment-plan


type of
founding, then the case was dealt with by Mr. Milletts secretary
Samantha,


on behalf of
Mr. Millett.








My complaint is:





1. Pool told me on 11/4
that it would be ok for me to pay for the case with a payment-


plan type of founding.





Yet, when Samantha called
me on 24/4, (after I had called Pool earlier that day to


ask why noone had called
me about a meeting, like we had agreed on when I went


to Morecrofts on 11/4),
she said that I first had to pay Morecrofts £250, before I
could


get to speak with Mr.
Millett about the case.





I told Samantha, on the
phone on 24/4, that this was not what I had agreed with Pool.


I told Samantha that Pool
had said it would be ok with a payment-plan type of founding,


but Samantha said that it
wouldn't be possible with a payment-plan.





I said that I needed some
more time to think about this, and after this phone-call, I


have been in contact with
the Law Society and others, to get advice on how to deal with


this situation.





I've also been in regular
contact with Samantha after this, to update her about what I've


been doing to try to sort
with the founding, and more, regarding the case.





I took some weeks for it
to get clear to me exactly how I should go forward to complain


about this approperatly,
but last week, I recieved a Resolution form from the Law Society,


and I called your
reseption on 18/5, asking for the name of the solicitor who deals
with


complaints, and also
informing on that I would go to your office this week with the


resolution form.





I asked the reseptionist
to inform Samantha about this, and also asked her if she could


inform the other persons
in the company that she thought needed to be informed about


this.





Complaint 1A: I would like
to complain about that I was promised by Pool on 11/4 that the


case could be payed for
with a payment-plan founding solution, but that Samantha


later told me that the
case couldn't be payed for with a payment-plan founding solution.





I think that when Pool
tells me that this is ok on 11/4, then what she says as a


representative of
Morecrofts is binding for the company, and then it shouldn't


be changed later by the
company.





Complaint 1B: I would also
like to complain about that even if I told Samantha that


I had agreed with Pool on
11/4 to pay for the case with a payment-plan founding


solution, Samantha still
insisted on that this wasn't possible.



I think Samantha
shouldn't have ignored what I was saying. And if she didn't trust me,


she could have checked
this with Pool, and got it confirmed that we had already


agreed on that I could pay
for the case with a payment-plan solution.





2. When Samantha called me
on 24/4, she said told me that she had been trying to


call me on my mobile three
times since 11/4. (To set up a meeting for me with Mr.


Millett, must have been
the reason for her to call me. I agreed with Pool on 11/4,


that someone from your
company would call me to set up a meeting with Mr.


Millett about the case.)





Since I was in contact
with the police in January, (and also started applying for new jobs


etc. in January), I have
been carefull with having the ring-tone level on my two mobile-


phones on a high level, so
that I shouldn't miss calles from new employers, the police


etc.





(And I try to use my
newest mobile for buisness-calls, but I might have given Pool the


number to my old mobile on
the meeting at the CAB on 27/2, since it got a bit stressful


in the meeting that day,
since the meeting was only scheduled to last thirty minutes,


and I wasnt aware of that
untill the thirthy minutes had passed, so it could be that I


gave her the number to my
old mobile, from old habit, when Pool asked me for my


contact-information).





But because I had taken
care to have both the phones switched on, and also have


the ring-tone volume-level
on loud on both mobiles, then I found it very unlikely that


I would manage to miss
three phone-calls from Morecrofts between 11/4 and 24/4.





So I asked Samantha if she
had been calling from the number that are on your


letters, and first she
didn't answer, she just asked me why I was asking so many


questions.





I answered that I was
really only asking one question, and then she answered that she


had been calling from that
number.





After the call, I checked
the call-registry on both my mobiles, just to be 100% certain,


but I couldn't find any
calls from Morecrofts on any of the call-registries.





Complaint 2A: I would like
to complain about that noone called me from Morcrofts to


set up a meeting about the
case, even if Pool on 11/4 said that someone would.





Complaint 2B: I would like
to complain about that Samantha said that she had tryed


to call me three times
between 11/4 and 24/4, on my mobile, but this can't be right,


since on my there haven't
been any calls from Morecrofts to any of my mobiles, in


this periode.





3. On the meeting with
Pool on the CAB on 27/2, I wasn't informed on that the meeting


only lasted thirty
minutes, untill Pool informed me about this when the thirty minutes


had passed.





Complaint 3: I think Pool
should have informed me on that the meeting only lasted


thirthy minutes, before
the meeting started, then it would have been possible for


me to plan which things I
wanted to bring up in the meeting, in a way so that


I could get the most
imortant things brought up before the meeting had ended.





4. In the meeting on 27/2,
Pool adviced me on telling the details of the case to


the jobcentre, who then
would have given it on to my old employer.





(This was regarding a
question-form that the jobcentre had sent me, and which


they only gave me a week
to reply on).





Since I wasn't aware on
that the meeting only lasted thirty minutes, untill the


thirty minutes had passed,
the meeting got a bit stressful at the end.





I only had a couple of
days left to deliver the answer to the jobcentre-form or


else I could have lost my
allowance, since I was unemployed at that time.



So I reckoned that
this was about the only chance I would get to get advice


on how to answer the form,
since I reckoned that it would take more than


a couple of days to
arrange a new similar meeting.



So I asked if Pool
could have a look at the form before we ended the meeting.



Then Pool advised me
to answer the questions to the job-centre.





Complaint 4A: I'm not sure
if Pool should have adviced me to answer the


questions to the
job-centre, since those questions were about the same


things that were covered
about the case.





So, I think that, since
that I from November last year, have been in contact


with the police, the CAB,
and your company about this case in which


these questions are dealt
with, then I think that these questions shouldnt


been dealt with at the
jobcentre, or other places, untill the legal-process


that I started by
contacting the police in Novemeber had ended.





Complaint 4B: I'm not an
expert on this, but this is how I see this after thinking


more about this. I reckon
that Pool should maybe have set up a new meeting


to disuss the rest of
issues that we didn't have time to disuss on the first


meeting. (I'm not an
expert on how duty solicitor meetings should be


arranged, but I reckon
that if I want to find out if this was done right, I should


write it in this form
now.)





5. I didn't know anything
about legal-aid and how the other different founding


alternatives (payment plan
etc.), for cases that was sent from the police,


via the CAB, to a duty
solicitor, untill the weeks after the meeting on


the CAB on 27/2.





Complaint 5: I think that
I should have been informed on in the meeting


at the CAB on 27/2 that
Morecrofts only accepted founding from private


founds (and not from
legal-aid).



I didnt get aware of
this untill Pool told me this when I went to your office


on 19/3.





I think that since this
was an employement case, I should have been


informed on that it wasn't
possible to pay for the case by legal-aid.







6. When Samantha called me
on 24/4, I remember that she kept


interupting me all the
time while we were speaking about the case


and the things regarding
the case.





At the end of the call I
explained to her that I fould it difficult to comunicate


with her, when she kept
interupting me all the time.





I got her to agree on that
we should try to speak only one at the time


for the rest of the call,
and we managed to do that for the remainding


one or two minutes of the
call.





Complaint 6: I think that
it shouldn't be necessary to make special


agreements about that one
should interrupt eachother during a call.





I think people working for
legal firms, and that are used to dealing


with members of the puplic
regarding legal cases, should know this


from before.





So I would like to
complain about this anyway, even if it went fine with


the call for the last one
or two minutes.





7. When I called Samantha
on 11/5, I explained that I had tryed to call


her earler that week, and
that I had left her a voice-mail etc.





Samantha said that I could
have called her the day before, that she


was in then.



But I had try to call
her the day before, and the reseptionist had told


me that Samantha wasn't in
that day.





Also Samantha told me that
I should have left her a voice-message,


even if I did this when I
tryed to call her on 9/5.





I had also told the
reseptionist to tell Samantha that I had been trying


to call her on 10/5.





On 8/5 I also tryed to
call Morecrofts on the number that is on their


letters, at around 3.30
pm. (I tryed to call at least twice around that


time on your main
phone-number, 0151 236 8871).





Complaint 7A: So I'd like
to complain about your company not answering


the phone on 8/5, and on
Samantha saying that I should have left a


voice-mail when I had done
it, and on Samantha saying that she was


in on 10/5, when the
reseptionist had told me that she was not in.





I think one incident like
this could be accepted, but when there are


three incidents like this,
just to get in contact with a person in your


company, than I think
isn't really acceptable.





Also in the conversation
with Samantha on 11/5, I had to keep telling


her to please slow down
the speed when she was speaking.



She was speaking very
fast (and with an accent), so it wasn't possible


for me to understand what
she was saying, much of the time.





And even if I repeatedly
asked her to please remember that I wasn't


British, and to therefore
please speak a bit slower, she kept ignoring


me and kept on talking
very fast.





(When I studied at the
University of Sunderland, I took a test that for a


large part was about
understanding spoken English. And I got a good


result on the test, so I
didn't need to take English classes to follow


the lectures at the
universityl. But when I spoke with Samantha on


11/5, I didn't have a
chance of understanding large parts of what she


was saying. I usually
don't have this problem at all when speaking


with English people).





Complaint 7B: I think a
person working with customer in a legal firm,


should try to make an
effort to speak in a way that is easy to understand,


especially if one are
asked to please speak slower many times by


the customer calling.








Part 3





I am happy for you to deal
with my complaint in writing.





I would like the following
to sort out my complaint:





I am seeking further
advice on how to get the case out of the situation it is


in now (regarding the
finance), and this is the most important thing for me,


to get the case
progressing in an appropriate way, including with the founding.





I think that I would
please like to have another contact in your company if


thats possible, due to the
comunication-problems explained in complaint


number 1, 6 and 7.





I also think that the
other issues should be dealt with approperatly.










PS.

Like it says in the letter above, Morecrofts, don't accept founding, from the Legal Aid programme.

Yet, the CAB, set me up, with a meeting with Morecrofts.

Why would I go to the CAB, to speak with a law-firm, that don't accept founding, from the Legal Aid Programme?

It makes no sense to me, at least.

The Police sent me to the CAB, to speak with a Duty Soclicitor, to get help with the employment-case, against Arvato.

I told the Police, that I had to register as unemployed, since I was constructivly dismissed, by Arvato.

I went to the CAB, and they set me up with a meeting, with a Solicitor-firm, that don't accept founding from the Legal-aid programme, but only accept that the customer pays themselves.

This makes no sense to me.

If I had a lot of money, then I wouldn't have had to go to the Law Society, then I could have checked the yellow pages, and contacted a law firm there.

The Police, just told me to go to the CAB.

And that the CAB was 'government'.

I hadn't even heard of the CAB, and had no knowledge of the British legal-system.

So I've been just fooled, by everyone, the Police, the CAB and Morecrofts, and the Law Society, I have to say.

So that's how this is.

We'll see what happens.

Bloggarkiv

Populære innlegg

Om meg

Bildet mitt
Overhørte på Rimi Bjørndal, (jeg jobbet som butikksjef/leder i ti år, i mange forskjellige butikker), i 2003, at jeg var forfulgt av 'mafian', mm. Har etter dette ikke fått rettighetene mine, i mange saker. Blogger derfor om problemer med å få rettigheter, mm. Mine memoarer, (Min Bok 1-10), kan også finnes på johncons-blogg, (se: 'Etiketter'). Jeg blogger også om slektsforskning, (etter at min danskfødte mormor, som var etter adelige/kongelige, døde i 2009). Har også vært såvidt innom Høyre/Unge Høyre, i sin tid. Har også studert informasjonsbehandling/IT/Computing, (på NHI, HiO IU og University of Sunderland). Har også bakgrunn fra handel og kontor, (grunnkurs, økonomi med markedsføring og data). Er/var også i Heimevernet, (etter at jeg ble overført dit, etter førstegangstjeneste i infanteriet, (og en rep-øvelse i mob-hæren), i forbindelse med omorganiseringer, i Forsvaret, etter den kalde krigen). Blir også utsatt for mye nettmobbing, mm. johncons-blogg, (og mine memoarer og nettbutikk), er kjent fra TV-programmet Tweet4Tweet, i 2012, (selv om jeg måtte klage, for programmet var veldig useriøst/nedlatende, mm.).

Totalt antall sidevisninger

Etiketter