Jeg sendte en klage på the Financial Ombudsman, til EU-kommisjonen i Sverige

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

---

Klage på the Financial Ombudsman, Storbritannia/Fwd: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail

---

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>	Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:46 PM
To: pierre.schellekens@ec.europa.eu
Hei, kan dere se på the Financial Ombudsman, i England også? (Ombudsman er jo et svensk ord, mener jeg). De tuller, og trakasserer, på den måten at de sender meg e-poster, klokken halv åtte, på en søndag morgen, (like etter at jeg har kommet hjem fra 'krogen', som de sier i Sverige). Det må da være sånn at de har spionert på meg, og vet at jeg har vært på byen, og så sender på et tidspunkt de vet jeg ikke er så våken? Det har jo ikke noe med 'business hours' å gjøre. Er det politiet/mob/mafia som tuller? Mvh. Erik Ribsskog ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> Date: Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:17 AM Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail To: "Cox, Rosemary" <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk> Hi, I don't think it's any use with me repeating myself. I don't think you should handle my complaint. The reason is, that if you are to overworked, you get to tired. And in dealing with complaints like these, one obviously needs ones judgement, to be like it should be. If one are out of balance, like I think you could be, then I don't think this is good for how the complaint is being dealt with. So please do as I ask Mrs .Cox, and tell your manager what I said, that I want someone else to deal with my complaint, due to that I think that you must be overworked. Haven't you seen how fine the weather is today, you should have a day off in the fine weather, I think. Sincerely, Erik Ribsskog On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk> wrote: Dear Mr Ribsskog Thank you for your e-mails As previously advised I am not going to debate with you the working hours of this office. I have written to you today to advise the steps we are taking with your complaint. If the firm fail to resolve the situation for you, your complaint will be passed onto our adjudication area for further consideration of the concerns you have raised. I should add that we do not tolerate rude or insulting language at this office, and would expect any further communication to be sent in a more acceptable manner. Kind Regards Rose Cox team manager From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com] Sent: 28 June 2009 10:43 To: Cox, Rosemary Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail Hi, of course you can work on Sundays if you want. But business e-mails should just be sent within the business-hours. Or else, what's going to happen, is obvious. Someone are going to come drunk home from town, and answer the business-e-mails when they are drunk, which is what has happened today, with our correspondence. If this is something, you didn't know from before, then I think this Financial Ombudsman-stuff is just a load of crap really. Try to use the head that God gave you when you were born! Sincerely, Erik Ribsskog On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk> wrote: Dear Mr Ribsskog Thank you for your e-mail I must admit to being surprised and confused with the content of the e-mail. We are an extremely busy department and we often work at the weekends, this is obviously of help to consumers as we are able to deal with their complaints in a more timely manner. I would suggest that It is entirely up to each individual business to determine which hours their staff will work and I do not intend debating this with you. By working this weekend I have been able to deal with your complaint, which as you can appreciate is of a benefit to you. Perhaps you can clarify the spelling mistakes you are referring to? Kind Regards Rose Cox team manager From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com] Sent: 28 June 2009 10:20 Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail Hi again, don't you think it's strange for an institutions like yours to send e-mails on Sunday mornings then? Shouldn't e-mails be sent within normal business hours then you think? This is what it says on Wikipedia: In the United States and United Kingdom, the hours between 9 am and 5 pm are typically considered to be standard business hours http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_hours I think this is rather akward, as I also think your spelling-mistakes are. Sincerely, Erik Ribsskog On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk> wrote: Dear Mr Ribsskog Thank you for your e-mail That's no problem, however I should point out that we are not a government department, we are a independent complaints body. I will be in touch with your again in the next few days Kind Regards Rose Cox team manager From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com] Sent: 28 June 2009 08:02 To: Cox, Rosemary Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail Hi, ok that's very fine, I'm just home from town you see. I thought it was a bit strange, since noone in Government in Norway, work on Sundays. Sorry about this, I forget sometimes that I'm not in Norway any longer. Sorry about this! Yours sincerely, Erik Ribsskog On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk> wrote: Dear Mr Ribsskog Thank you for your e-mail I can assure you this is not a joke, I am currently in the office working today. I presume that you would like us to deal with your complaint, so am responding to your e-mails today Kind Regards Rose Cox team manager From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com] Sent: 28 June 2009 07:36 To: Cox, Rosemary Subject: Re: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail Hi, why do send the e-mails early on a Sunday morning, by the way. Is this some kind of joke? Sincerely, Erik Ribsskog On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Cox, Rosemary <Rosemary.Cox@financial-ombudsman.org.uk> wrote: Dear Mr Ribsskog Thank you for your e-mails I will contact you again once I have considered the information. Kind Regards Rose Cox team manager From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com] Sent: 27 June 2009 14:59 To: Cox, Rosemary Subject: Complaint against RBS/Fwd: Earlier e-mail Hi, thank you for you e-mail, that I recieved today. I'll contact your collegue back, regarding the Barclays-complaint. I sent the complaint on RBS Dale St., to Yvonne Williams at RBS, but she also harassed me, like this, she writes 'Dear Ms Ribsskog', even if my name is Erik, and in Britain, you have a movie called 'Erik the Viking', and Eric is also a quite usual name, in English-speaking countries. So I think Yvonne Williams, the complaint-investigator, also bullied me. I think this must have been a deliberate mistake. This ended with the complaint being partly resolved, in the way that RBS, gave me the bonus of £100, for moving my account to them, from Barclays, (who I also had problems with, that I'll exlain about to your collegue, like I mentioned earlier). I'll also find the actual complaint against RBS Dale St. now, and forward it to you. What I meant with the complaint-form, was that it didn't look anything at all like the ones you've sent me now. Maybe the complaint-form I was sent, was to do with other financial institutions, than banks? Like share-fonds etc? Have you also got other complaint-forms, other than to banks, perhaps someone sent me the wrong form intentionally? Just a thought I had. But anyway, thank you very much for your e-mail, and I'll also find the actual RBS Dale St. complaint, and e-mail it to you now. Yours sincerely, Erik Ribsskog ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Williams, Yvonne (CRU) <Yvonne.Williams@rbs.co.uk> Date: Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 4:30 PM Subject: RE: Earlier e-mail To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> Dear Ms Ribsskog Could you please arrange another copy of your email to be sent to me for my investigation Regards Yvonne Williams From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com] Sent: 19 June 2007 14:04 To: Williams, Yvonne (CRU) Subject: Earlier e-mail *** WARNING : This message originates from the Internet *** Hi, I'm refering to the e-mail I sent you on 5/6. I was just wondering if you have recieved this e-mail, because I cant see that I have recieved any answer to it yet. Please just contact me if you want me to send you the e-mail again. Yours sincerely, Erik Ribsskog The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, Registered in Scotland No. 90312. Registered Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. This e-mail message is confidential and for use by the addressee only. If the message is received by anyone other than the addressee, please return the message to the sender by replying to it and then delete the message from your computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily secure. The Royal Bank of Scotland plc does not accept responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that the onward transmission, opening or use of this message and any attachments will not adversely affect its systems or data. No responsibility is accepted by The Royal Bank of Scotland plc in this regard and the recipient should carry out such virus and other checks as it considers appropriate. This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to it. This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail. Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. This email has originated from the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as above. This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to it. This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail. Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. This email has originated from the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as above. This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to it. This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail. Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. This email has originated from the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as above. This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to it. This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail. Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. This email has originated from the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as above. This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy, disclose or take any action in reliance to it. This e-mail and any attachments have been checked by virus detection software before transmission. You should carry out your own virus checks on the contents of this communication. We accept no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or by interception or interruption of this mail. Unless otherwise indicated, this e-mail has no contractual effect and may only be used for the purpose(s) indicated in it. The statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. This email has originated from the Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd. South Quay Plaza, 183 Marsh Wall, London E14 9SR, United Kingdom. Registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 3725015. Registered office as above.

---

Jeg sendte en klage til Everton F.C., for jeg tror jeg ble 'mobbed', da jeg var der på kampen igår

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

---

Mobbed at Goodison Park

---

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>	Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 1:41 AM
To: everton@evertonfc.com
Hi, I went to see the Everton - Everton game yesterday, and I think I was being mobbed, at the box-office. I was in the queue, number 4, and a man in his early twenties, sat there. I asked if I could get a ticket for free, since I had a receipt from Tesco, showing that I bought four Chang-beer, for £4, on Tuesday. But the young man said no. I then asked for a £10 ticket, for the main stand. But he said that there was only tickets for Lower Bullens left. Now the strange thing happened. The young man, left his seat, and a woman, in her early twenties, in a thight blouse, sat down, and looked away, (while her boobs where pointing at me, from behind the thight blouse). She sat like that for a minute or two. Then I think the young man was back, with the ticket. What did he do with it? I think he must have made it 'in-valid', in a machine, because when I got to the turn-stile, then my ticket didn't work. So that's why I think I was mobbed. (I overheard in Oslo, in 2003, that I was followed by some 'mafian' there. And I was attemped killed, in Norway, in 2005, on a farm belonging to my uncles woman). I was at game at Goodison, in 2005, a Champions League-qualifier, against Villa Real. And then a guy I heard was called a 'mafia-guy', messed with me, and provoked me, by taking a string, or something, at his jacket, against the back of my head, and he was there with a foreign guy, who didn't speak any English almost. And I haven't much money, and I've used most of my spare-time, to try to get my rights. So I haven't been on any other games, but I've been on a guided tour at Goodison, twice, actually. I'm really a refugee, here in the UK, but the UK government, don't let me be a refugee officially. Yesterday, a very muscular man in his 50's sat next to me, so there was almost no room for me to sit on my seat. But I can't say if that also was a mobster-plot. It could be, because, the young man, in the box-office, probably ran to get a plot-ticket for a set-up, (have you got e.g. muslim mob at Goodison?). I think you have a problem with mobsters. I've supported Everton, since 1977, I think it was, when Everton beat Coventry 6-0 at Goodison. And my mother, Karen Ribsskog, who had been an au-pair, in the UK, in the late 60's told me Everton were a good team, and she said she tought I should pick Everton, as my English team, to support. Since English football is very popular in Norway, the main broadcasting company, NRK, used to show a match from the highest division in England, every Saturday, in the 70's and 80's, so almost all Norwegians who where boys, in the 70's and 80's support an English football-team. But I can't go to see Everton play at Goodison, without being mobbed, it seems, even if I've supported Everton for more than 30 years. So this makes me sad. Just wanted to complain about this. Yours sincerely, Erik Ribsskog PS. I have a football-blog, so I took some pictures, of what happend at the box-office and at the turn-stile, so enclose so pictures, to show to help explain a bit what went on. 4 attachments Photo 0683.jpg 278K Photo 0686.jpg 130K Photo 0687.jpg 316K Photo 0692.jpg 226K

---

PS.

Her er vedleggene:

Bruken av forsterkning, på Arvato's skandinaviske Microsoft-aktivering

Nå har jeg jo skrevet det, at Bertelsmann og Microsoft, brukte (negativ) forsterkning, (altså psykologi), for å kontrollere medarbeiderne, istedet for å bruke motivasjon og ledelse.

Men, det kan jo være at dette bare var på Arvato Liverpool.

Hun Team-leaderen, Vivian Steinsland, hun sa jo også det, at forsterkningen, det var noe de tidligere Team leaderne hadde lært dem å bruke.

Dette var kanskje bare noe hun lærte å bruke muntlig da, og ikke gjennom kursmateriale fra Bertelsmann, f.eks.

Det er mulig.

Så det er mulig at det f.eks. var en katolsk mafia, eller muslimsk mafia, som kontrollerte Arvato Liverpool, gjennom at de tok kontroll over de som ble Team-leadere.

For Team-leaderne, de var alltid unge damer, i begynnelsen av 20-årene.

Så om det var et nettverk der, som gjorde de damene de ville ha som horer, til Team-leadere.

Og så brukte disse horene/Team-leaderne, til å hersje med resten av bemanningen.

Var det noe sånt som foregikk?

Hvem vet.

Meg ville de jo ikke ha som Team-leader.

(Enda jeg har en grad i IT, og har 10 års ledererfaring, fra Rimi).

Ble den stillingen utlyst, fordi de ville ha kontroll over hun unge, lyshårede Emelie Wallin, fra Sverige?

På samme måte som med hun Marianne Høksaas, fra Norge.

Det virka som at hun mista litt kontrollen, og begynte å grine, etter møter om å få forlenget vikariat som Team-leader.

Det var bare betalt 1000 kroner mer i måneden ca., fortalte hun Marianne.

Men hun har da kanskje skrytt til hele hjembyen sin, osv., om at hun hadde blitt sjef på Microsoft.

Også ville de ikke gi henne forlenget kontrakt som leder.

Men hun måtte gå tilbake til å være vanlig ansatt, (like etter nyttår, 2006).

Så da husker jeg at hun Marianne Høksaas, gråt etter et møte med Senior Team-leader, Aidan Tippins, het han vel.

Foran kjæresten sin, Kjell, som jobba på Arvato som vanlig medarbeider.

Og i månedene etter, så begynte hun å oppføre seg rart og uvennlig ovenfor meg, mener jeg å huske.

Hun Marianne Høksaas.

Enda jeg hadde gitt henne CD-er med 'Lost'-episoder osv., de første ukene på jobben.

For det stod en PC på det rommet jeg tok over, etter hun finske Taru, som dro til Irland.

Så jeg brente musikk, og sånn, til de kollegene mine på Arvato da.

Men kanskje hun da sa ja til å bli hore, på jobben, for å beholde sjefsstillingen?

Før hun flytta til Oslo, (og ikke hjembyen sin, på Sørlandet), noen måneder senere.

Hvem vet.

Det kan vel kanskje ha vært noe sånt som skjedde, tenker jeg nå.

Så vi får se hva som skjer.

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

Mer fra Dagbladets kommentarsystem

http://www.dagbladet.no/2009/09/14/nyheter/utenriks/danmark/markedsforing/8100229/?commentId=3371061#comment_3371061

PS.

Og når det er snakk om froskmenn, så var det froskmenn i bassenget, på hotellet jeg trener på, en dag, for en del uker sida.

Så bare en liten av del av bassenget, var det lov å svømme i.

Har dette vært noe plott, lurer jeg på, for jeg har aldri sett froskmenn, på et treningsstudio før.

Skulle de holde meg på bunnen og drukne meg, mens så var det ei dame der, som de ikke var 'mob', så de fikk ikke kontroll?

Hvem vet.

Noe rart var det vel ihvertfall.

Eller, det er kanskje vanlig, at froskmenn leier et privat treningsstudios svømmebasseng, og bruker ca. 80% av plassen i svømmebassenget, for froskmann-trening?

Hvem vet.

Jeg syntes dette var litt rart, ihvertfall.

Så sånn var det.

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

Jeg sendte en e-post til Liverpool Community College

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

---

Course in Web Database Integration (PHP/MySQL)

---

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>	Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 6:20 PM
To: ian.griffiths@liv-coll.ac.uk
Hi, I've applied to this course on Liverpool Community College, some weeks ago, since I want to update my knowledge, from four years at university-colleges, in Norway. I got a strange phone-call today, telling me that I should rather take the Dreamweaver-course, since this course, was in the way, that it was SQL in october, PHP in january and Database Integration, in May. But this isn't what it says, on your website, there it says that this course is an introduction to all these things, SQL, PHP and Database Integration. So I guess this call must have been from some 'mob', since I'm from Norway. Could you please confirm that the course is an all-in-one course, and not like the way I was told in the 'funny' phone-call today. Yours sincerely, Erik Ribsskog

---

StatCounter: Bertelsmann Arvato er ivrige lesere på johncons-blogg. (In Norwegian).

http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&safe=off&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=arvato%20blog%20liverpool&spell=1

PS.

Kan det være sånn, at det sitter en hel gjeng, eller 'mob', på Arvato, i the Cunard Building, her i Liverpool, også tuller de med meg på dette forumet, the Green Forum, hvor det har vært angrep på meg, igår og idag(?):

http://www.amv3.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=9036#9036

Kan det være sånn det henger sammen?

Er det Illuminati som sitter innpå der tro, i the Cunard Building?

Det kan man lure på, det er vel ikke usannsynlig, vil jeg tippe.

Så sånn er det.

Er det sånn at Bertelsmann eies av Illuminati(?)

Hm.

Flashback til 2007: Det norske konsulatet i Liverpool infisert av 'mob'? (In Norwegian).

Nå fikk jeg flashback til våren 2007, da jeg kontaktet det norske konsulatet i Liverpool, angående hvordan jeg skulle gå fram, når jeg ble tullet med av det britiske politiet mm., i forbindelse med arbeidssaken mot Bertelsmann Arvato/Microsoft.

Da måtte jeg ringe konsulatet mange ganger, for personen jeg skulle snakke med jobbet rare arbeidstider.

Jeg fikk flashback til det her nå, og mistenker at det kan ha noe set-up fra noe mob.

At det norske konsulatet i Liverpool er infisert av noe mob.

For det var ikke ei norsk dame jeg fikk prate med der, etter å ha ringt fire ganger, eller noe, og var på møte med.

Det var ei britisk dame, som ikke forklarte ordentlig at hun ringte opp den norske ambassaden.

Så ga hun meg telefonrøret, og da svarte jeg på engelsk, sånn som jeg gjør hjemme, siden jeg bor i Storbritannia.

Men det likte sikkert ikke ambassaden, for den som var i andre enden av linjen var en norsk ambassaderåd, viste det seg.

Så da har kanskje ambassaden blitt sure på meg, og begynt å kødde med meg, siden jeg svarte på engelsk.

Og at dette var viljen fra det norske konsulatet i Liverpool, at det skulle bli sånn.

Siden hun britiske dama der var uklar om hvem jeg skulle prate med.

Det var nok noe set-up dem dreiv med, de dagene jeg måtte ringe på nytt, antagelig.

Sånn virker det for meg at det har vært ihvertfall.

Så hun var nok en slags en spion hun britiske dama på det norske konsulatet, som introduserte seg som Liz Hurley, eller noe.

Noe sånt.

Så her burde norske myndigheter ha mer kontroll på hvem dem ansatter på konsulatene osv., sånn at dem ikke bare ansatter for mange spioner, som det virker for meg at dem driver med i Liverpool.

Så her må det skjerping til hvis det er sånn det virker som for meg.

Så sånn er det.

Med vennlig hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

More ridiculous stuff from the Dagbladet-journalist's blog.

Erik
desember 13, 2008 at 12:34 pm
Put a cork in it you gibbering nutcase.

Youve got a nerve talking about other peoples business when you stick private conversation with people up on your blog without consulting them.

And posting at 2.45am in the morning? Nothing better to do on a friday night? Oh dear

Erik Ribsskog
desember 13, 2008 at 6:59 pm
This is just ridiculus.

A Brit attacking me with personal stuff on a Norwegian blog-discussion that’s about a law in Norway.

I thought I’d ask you if you were some kind of mob.

And if it’s you who have the Swedish girl, Emelie Wallin, who dissapeared from work, from Arvato, in 2006.

But this is just riddiculus really.

My blog is my personal blog, and I can write about my personal stuff on my blog.

If someone wants to discuss something in particular then they can contact me.

But I haven’t written about any personal conversations with any Brits on my blog that I can remember at least.

My problem is that I don’t get my rights from the Government, in eighter Norway or Britain, so I try to find out what’s going on, so that’s why I write about a lot of stuff on my blog.

But again, this is not the topic here, so this is just ridiculus really, I think.

So that’s my opinion at least.

Sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

http://astridmeland.wordpress.com/2008/12/09/for-en-h%c3%a6stkuk/#comment-656