Is it inteligence that are f-ing with me?

The Government have done something wrong, and are using inteligence to try to get away with doing what?

From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
To: Sarah.Brown@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk Sarah Brown
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 17:41:53 +0000
Subject: Re: IPCC Case Reference 2007/017332

Hi,

thank you very much for your answer!

But shouldn't the ipcc have answered me regarding the letter from the
Merseyside Police Complaints Investigation Bureau, that I sent the ipcc on
5/12?

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog


On 1/2/08, Sarah Brown wrote:
>
> Dear Mr Ribsskog.
>
> Thank you for your email.
>
> I would like to inform you of the following. I am the case work manager
> for a complaint you have made against a female member of police staff at
> Walton Lane Police Station in November 2007. It is not too late for the
> police to consider this complaint, if you would like the police to consider
> this complaint please provide your consent to forward the details of your
> complaint to the Professional Standards Department. Unless you provide
> consent I am unable to assist you further with this matter. I am aware you
> are thinking about this.
>
> With regards to any questions you have about the police complaints
> procedure please feel free to contact me on my telephone number or email
> address as previously provided. If you have any urgent quires please
> contact the telephone number for the department where an available member of
> staff will be able to speak to you, this number is 0845 3 002 002.
> If you prefer to use email and have an urgent query please contact *
> enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk* where an available
> member of staff will contact you.
>
> Please note that the IPCC will not be able to make decisions on your
> behalf, pass comment about your complaint or make comment about contact you
> have had with the police, this is so that the IPCC can remain independent
> and impartial, as we may have to make decisions about your complaint at a
> later stage.
>
> As I have stated in my previous correspondence any concerns or queries you
> have about the investigation into your complaint should be directed and
> discussed with the Professional Standards Department of the Merseyside
> Police as it is their responsibility to investigate your complaint.
>
> Any further emails you send me I will copy to your file, however I will
> not respond unless you are making a new complaint against police, have a
> question about the complaints procedure or you wish to continue with the
> your complaint (case reference 2007/017332) and you are providing me with
> your consent. This is due to high work volume.
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
>
> *Sarah Brown*
> *Casework Manager*
> *Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)*
> *90 High Holborn, London WC1V 6BH*
> *Phone: 0207 166 3934*
> *sarah.brown@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk*
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 02 January 2008 16:50
> *To:* Sarah Brown
> *Subject:* Re: IPCC Case Reference 2007/017332
>
>
> Hi,
>
> like I wrote, I'm going to need a bit of time to think this through.
>
> There is also the issue with the psd wanting an answer before Christmas
> regarding the letter I asked the ipcc about
> in the e-mail from 5/12:
>
> ' found that I had to contact you again, since I haven't heard anything
> from Mr. Gibbs, and in the meantime, I've recieved one letter from the
> Merseyside Police Complaints Investigation Bureau,
> from 03/12 (it also says that they sent a letter on 23/11, but I can't see
> that I have recieved
> that letter).'.
>
> That I sent Joanne Fitzgerald at the ipcc.
>
> It's the letter from the Merseyside Police Complaints Investigation
> Bureau, that I'm also wondering about now,
> since they needed an answer before Christmas.
>
> And I haven't heard anything back from the ipcc regarding this, even I
> sent the e-mail on 5/12.
>
> So now this is to late already, to send a letter or do anything, since the
> police needed a reply before Christmas,
> and the ipcc have yet to get back to me regarding this.
>
> So I was wondering what has been going on regarding this.
>
> Thank you very much in advance for your reply!
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> Erik Ribsskog
>
>
> On 1/2/08, Sarah Brown wrote:
> >
> > Dear Mr Ribsskog,
> >
> > Thank you for your email. I am unable to comment about the different
> > email addresses you have been given by the police as my role is to provide
> > information about the complaints process.
> >
> > Please re read the information I have provided you regarding the
> > complaints process and decide whether you wish to continue with this
> > process. If you do decide to continue please contact me with your consent
> > to forward the details of your complaint to the Professional Standards
> > Department. Please note that without your consent I am unable to assist you
> > further regarding this matter.
> >
> > Yours sincerely,
> >
> >
> > *Sarah Brown*
> > *Casework Manager*
> > *Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)*
> > *90 High Holborn, London WC1V 6BH *
> > *Phone: 0207 166 3934*
> > *sarah.brown@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk*
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > *From:* Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com ]
> > *Sent:* 02 January 2008 16:22
> > *To:* Sarah Brown
> > *Subject:* Re: IPCC Case Reference 2007/017332
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > but now it is to late, because the psd department was expecting an
> > answer before Christmas, and I didn't
> > get this email before today.
> >
> > Even if I sent the e-mail about this, right away, after the meeting in
> > November.
> >
> > I would have to think a bit on how I should go forward with this, since
> > I haven't really got any confidence in
> > the department after the last harassment-episode, and the problems with
> > the department having two e-mail
> > addresses.
> >
> > I work as a company researcher now, and if a company has got two
> > different general enquiery email addresses,
> > then it means that something is wrong, and I wouldn't be adding the
> > company for the business-directory, since I
> > would think it was not a proper/thrustworthy company.
> >
> > Then I wouldn't have recomended the company to the customers of the
> > directory, if the company had two different
> > official general enquiery email addresses, there should really just be
> > one.
> >
> > It's like the IPCC should have this e-mail address:
> >
> > *enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk*
> >
> > and this e-mail address:
> >
> > enquiries.@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
> >
> > And claiming that both of them were the real, official e-mail address.
> >
> > Then I wouldn't have trusted the ipcc, or recomended them to eg. other
> > people/companies etc.
> >
> > So I need a bit of time to think this through.
> >
> > I'm not so used with dealing with things like this.
> >
> > Hope that this is alright, and thanks in advance for the reply!
> >
> > Yours sincerely,
> >
> > Erik Ribsskog
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 1/2/08, Sarah Brown wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear Mr Ribbsskog,
> > >
> > > Thank you for contacting the Independent Police Complaints Commission
> > > (IPCC).
> > >
> > > As stated in my previous email to you, with regards to your lose of
> > > confidence in the police investigation into your complaint. Unfortunately
> > > whilst the police are conducting an investigation into your complaint the
> > > IPCC is unable to intervene and is not able to dictate which department
> > > carries out this investigation. You will need to speak to the Professional
> > > Standards Department (PSD) of Merseyside Police to discuss further.
> > >
> > > It is the responsibility of the PSD to resolve your complaint and this
> > > may involve them contacting you to establish further facts and understand
> > > what you would like to happened as a result of making a complaint. If you
> > > do not wish to meet face to face with an officer then you may wish to
> > > consider writing to the department instead. I would suggest that you make
> > > contact with the PSD to advise them of your preferred method of contact.
> > >
> > > It is your decision if you wish to continue with the complaints
> > > process.
> > >
> > > If you would like to proceed with the next stage of your complaint
> > > please provide your consent on the form I sent to your postal address on the
> > > 30 November 2007 or you can send an email . Your consent will allow
> > > me to forward your complaint details to the Professional Standards
> > > Department of the Merseyside Police for their consideration.
> > >
> > > Yours sincerely,
> > >
> > > *Sarah Brown*
> > > *Casework Manager*
> > > *Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)*
> > > *90 High Holborn, London WC1V 6BH *
> > > *Phone: 0207 166 3934*
> > > *sarah.brown@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk *
> > >
> > > ------------------------------
> > > *From:* Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
> > > *Sent: *23 December 2007 20:09
> > > *To:* Sarah Brown
> > > *Subject:* Fwd: IPCC Case Reference 2007/017332
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I can't see that I have recieved a reply to this e-mail yet, that's
> > > why I'm trying to send it again.
> > >
> > > Hope that this is alright!
> > >
> > > Yours sincerely,
> > >
> > > Erik Ribsskog
> > >
> > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > From: Erik Ribsskog <>
> > > Date: Dec 11, 2007 3:47 PM
> > > Subject: Re: IPCC Case Reference 2007/017332
> > > To: Sarah Brown <>
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > thank you very much your answer!
> > >
> > > But the Standards Unit don't even know their own e-mail address.
> > >
> > > And when I go there to discuss the complaint against the Police, then
> > > I'm being harassed.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure if it's right that I should go back to the meetings with
> > > the Police then.
> > >
> > > I think that would like saying that I liked to be harassed, and thats
> > > not what I mean at all.
> > >
> > > Do you understand what I mean now?
> > >
> > > Thank you very much again for your answer!
> > >
> > > Yours sincerely,
> > >
> > > Erik Ribsskog
> > >
> > >
> > > On 12/11/07, Sarah Brown wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dear Mr Ribsskog,
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for your emailed dated 07 December 2007.
> > > >
> > > > Your new complaint will need to be raised separately from your
> > > > current appeal. This is so that if the police are unable to resolve the
> > > > matter to your satisfaction you then have the right of appeal to the
> > > > IPCC.
> > > >
> > > > With regards to your lose of confidence in the police investigation
> > > > into your complaint. Unfortunately whilst the police are conducting an
> > > > investigation into your complaint the IPCC is unable to intervene and is not
> > > > able to dictate which department carries out this investigation. You will
> > > > need to speak to the Professional Standards Department (PSD) of Merseyside
> > > > Police to discuss further.
> > > >
> > > > If you would like to proceed with the next stage of your complaint
> > > > please provide your consent on the form I sent to your postal address on the
> > > > 30 November 2007. Your consent will allow me to forward your complaint
> > > > details to the Professional Standards Department of the Merseyside Police
> > > > for their consideration.
> > > >
> > > > Yours sincerely,
> > > >
> > > > *Sarah Brown*
> > > > *Casework Manager*
> > > > *Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)*
> > > > *90 High Holborn, London WC1V 6BH *
> > > > *Phone: 0207 166 3934*
> > > > *sarah.brown@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk *
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------
> > > > *From:* Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
> > > > *Sent: *07 December 2007 16:14
> > > > *To:* Sarah Brown
> > > > *Subject:* TRIM: Re: IPCC Case Reference 2007/017332
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > thank you very much for your answer!
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure if you think that this case should be dealt with
> > > > together with the other compalaint and appeal-case (see the last e-mail I
> > > > sent your collegue).
> > > >
> > > > And I was also enquiering, in connection with the e-mail I sent some
> > > > weeks ago, were I explained that I seem to have lost a bit
> > > > of confidence with the police department conducting the
> > > > investigation, so I was wondering if you think that it would maybe be
> > > > possible for another department to handle the complaint and appeal,
> > > > like I've enquiered about earler.
> > > >
> > > > And I havn't recieved an answer to this enquiery.
> > > >
> > > > And I was wondering if I maybe should have had receved such an
> > > > answer, because, now I'm not sure how to reply to the
> > > > Merseyside Police, regarding the letter that I sent a scanned copy
> > > > of, with the e-mail to your collegue.
> > > >
> > > > So I was wondering who I should contact, if I was wondering how to
> > > > go forward with this.
> > > >
> > > > Hope that this is alright, and thanks in advance for the help!
> > > >
> > > > Yours sincerely,
> > > >
> > > > Erik Ribsskog
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 12/7/07, Sarah Brown wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Dear Mr Ribsskog,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you for contacting the Independent Police Complaints
> > > > > Commission (IPCC). Miss Joanne Fitzgerald has asked me to reply to your
> > > > > email regarding your new complaint. If I could inform you that Miss
> > > > > Fitzgerald no longer works within the casework department of the Commission
> > > > > and so will no longer have involvement in the handling of your complaints.
> > > > >
> > > > > I am the Casework Manager for your new complaint surrounding
> > > > > issues you raised about a female front desk staff member at the Walton Lane
> > > > > Police Station. If you would like to continue with the next stage of the
> > > > > complaints process please provide your consent on the form that I sent you
> > > > > on the 30 November 2007. Once your consent has been received I will forward
> > > > > your complaint details to the Professional Standards Department of the
> > > > > Merseyside Police for consideration.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please note that the details of your new complaint have been noted
> > > > > under reference : 2007/017332. Please quote this reference when contacting
> > > > > the IPCC regarding your new complaint.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yours sincerely,
> > > > >
> > > > > *Sarah Brown*
> > > > > *Casework Manager*
> > > > > *Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)*
> > > > > *90 High Holborn, London WC1V 6BH*
> > > > > *Phone: 0207 166 3934*
> > > > > *sarah.brown@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk*
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ******************************************************************************
> > > > The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
> > > > privileged.
> > > > It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended
> > > > recipient
> > > > please notify the sender and delete this email; any disclosure,
> > > > copying or
> > > > distribution of this email is prohibited and may be unlawful. The
> > > > content of
> > > > this email represents the views of the individual and not
> > > > necessarily those
> > > > of IPCC. IPCC reserves the right to monitor the content of all
> > > > emails in
> > > > accordance with lawful business practice.This e-mail has been swept
> > > > for
> > > > computer viruses but IPCC does not accept any liability in respect
> > > > of your
> > > > receipt of this email.
> > > >
> > > > Independent Police Complaints Commission
> > > > 90 High Holborn
> > > > London,
> > > > WC1V 6BH.
> > > >
> > > > ******************************************************************************
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
> > > > Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in
> > > > partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On
> > > > leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
> > > > Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
> > > > and/or recorded for legal purposes.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the
> > > Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in
> > > partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In
> > > case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.
> > > Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
> > > and/or recorded for legal purposes.
> > >
> > > The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
> > > Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in
> > > partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On
> > > leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
> > > Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
> > > and/or recorded for legal purposes.
> > >
> >
> >
> > This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government
> > Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership
> > with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of
> > problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.
> > Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> > recorded for legal purposes.
> >
> > The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
> > Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in
> > partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On
> > leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
> > Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> > recorded for legal purposes.
> >
>
>
> This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government
> Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership
> with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of
> problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.
> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> recorded for legal purposes.
>
> The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
> Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in
> partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On
> leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> recorded for legal purposes.
>

From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
To: Sarah.Brown@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk Sarah Brown
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 16:50:23 +0000
Subject: Re: IPCC Case Reference 2007/017332

Hi,

like I wrote, I'm going to need a bit of time to think this through.

There is also the issue with the psd wanting an answer before Christmas
regarding the letter I asked the ipcc about
in the e-mail from 5/12:

' found that I had to contact you again, since I haven't heard anything from
Mr. Gibbs, and in the meantime, I've recieved one letter from the Merseyside
Police Complaints Investigation Bureau,
from 03/12 (it also says that they sent a letter on 23/11, but I can't see
that I have recieved
that letter).'.

That I sent Joanne Fitzgerald at the ipcc.

It's the letter from the Merseyside Police Complaints Investigation Bureau,
that I'm also wondering about now,
since they needed an answer before Christmas.

And I haven't heard anything back from the ipcc regarding this, even I sent
the e-mail on 5/12.

So now this is to late already, to send a letter or do anything, since the
police needed a reply before Christmas,
and the ipcc have yet to get back to me regarding this.

So I was wondering what has been going on regarding this.

Thank you very much in advance for your reply!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog


On 1/2/08, Sarah Brown wrote:
>
> Dear Mr Ribsskog,
>
> Thank you for your email. I am unable to comment about the different
> email addresses you have been given by the police as my role is to provide
> information about the complaints process.
>
> Please re read the information I have provided you regarding the
> complaints process and decide whether you wish to continue with this
> process. If you do decide to continue please contact me with your consent
> to forward the details of your complaint to the Professional Standards
> Department. Please note that without your consent I am unable to assist you
> further regarding this matter.
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
>
> *Sarah Brown*
> *Casework Manager*
> *Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)*
> *90 High Holborn, London WC1V 6BH*
> *Phone: 0207 166 3934*
> *sarah.brown@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk*
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 02 January 2008 16:22
> *To:* Sarah Brown
> *Subject:* Re: IPCC Case Reference 2007/017332
>
>
> Hi,
>
> but now it is to late, because the psd department was expecting an answer
> before Christmas, and I didn't
> get this email before today.
>
> Even if I sent the e-mail about this, right away, after the meeting in
> November.
>
> I would have to think a bit on how I should go forward with this, since I
> haven't really got any confidence in
> the department after the last harassment-episode, and the problems with
> the department having two e-mail
> addresses.
>
> I work as a company researcher now, and if a company has got two different
> general enquiery email addresses,
> then it means that something is wrong, and I wouldn't be adding the
> company for the business-directory, since I
> would think it was not a proper/thrustworthy company.
>
> Then I wouldn't have recomended the company to the customers of the
> directory, if the company had two different
> official general enquiery email addresses, there should really just be
> one.
>
> It's like the IPCC should have this e-mail address:
>
> *enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk*
>
> and this e-mail address:
>
> enquiries.@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
>
> And claiming that both of them were the real, official e-mail address.
>
> Then I wouldn't have trusted the ipcc, or recomended them to eg. other
> people/companies etc.
>
> So I need a bit of time to think this through.
>
> I'm not so used with dealing with things like this.
>
> Hope that this is alright, and thanks in advance for the reply!
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> Erik Ribsskog
>
>
>
>
> On 1/2/08, Sarah Brown wrote:
> >
> > Dear Mr Ribbsskog,
> >
> > Thank you for contacting the Independent Police Complaints Commission
> > (IPCC).
> >
> > As stated in my previous email to you, with regards to your lose of
> > confidence in the police investigation into your complaint. Unfortunately
> > whilst the police are conducting an investigation into your complaint the
> > IPCC is unable to intervene and is not able to dictate which department
> > carries out this investigation. You will need to speak to the Professional
> > Standards Department (PSD) of Merseyside Police to discuss further.
> >
> > It is the responsibility of the PSD to resolve your complaint and this
> > may involve them contacting you to establish further facts and understand
> > what you would like to happened as a result of making a complaint. If you
> > do not wish to meet face to face with an officer then you may wish to
> > consider writing to the department instead. I would suggest that you make
> > contact with the PSD to advise them of your preferred method of contact.
> >
> > It is your decision if you wish to continue with the complaints process.
> >
> > If you would like to proceed with the next stage of your complaint
> > please provide your consent on the form I sent to your postal address on the
> > 30 November 2007 or you can send an email . Your consent will allow me
> > to forward your complaint details to the Professional Standards Department
> > of the Merseyside Police for their consideration.
> >
> > Yours sincerely,
> >
> > *Sarah Brown*
> > *Casework Manager*
> > *Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)*
> > *90 High Holborn, London WC1V 6BH *
> > *Phone: 0207 166 3934*
> > *sarah.brown@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk*
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > *From:* Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
> > *Sent:* 23 December 2007 20:09
> > *To:* Sarah Brown
> > *Subject:* Fwd: IPCC Case Reference 2007/017332
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I can't see that I have recieved a reply to this e-mail yet, that's why
> > I'm trying to send it again.
> >
> > Hope that this is alright!
> >
> > Yours sincerely,
> >
> > Erik Ribsskog
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Erik Ribsskog <>
> > Date: Dec 11, 2007 3:47 PM
> > Subject: Re: IPCC Case Reference 2007/017332
> > To: Sarah Brown <>
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > thank you very much your answer!
> >
> > But the Standards Unit don't even know their own e-mail address.
> >
> > And when I go there to discuss the complaint against the Police, then
> > I'm being harassed.
> >
> > I'm not sure if it's right that I should go back to the meetings with
> > the Police then.
> >
> > I think that would like saying that I liked to be harassed, and thats
> > not what I mean at all.
> >
> > Do you understand what I mean now?
> >
> > Thank you very much again for your answer!
> >
> > Yours sincerely,
> >
> > Erik Ribsskog
> >
> >
> > On 12/11/07, Sarah Brown wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear Mr Ribsskog,
> > >
> > > Thank you for your emailed dated 07 December 2007.
> > >
> > > Your new complaint will need to be raised separately from your current
> > > appeal. This is so that if the police are unable to resolve the matter to
> > > your satisfaction you then have the right of appeal to the IPCC.
> > >
> > > With regards to your lose of confidence in the police investigation
> > > into your complaint. Unfortunately whilst the police are conducting an
> > > investigation into your complaint the IPCC is unable to intervene and is not
> > > able to dictate which department carries out this investigation. You will
> > > need to speak to the Professional Standards Department (PSD) of Merseyside
> > > Police to discuss further.
> > >
> > > If you would like to proceed with the next stage of your complaint
> > > please provide your consent on the form I sent to your postal address on the
> > > 30 November 2007. Your consent will allow me to forward your complaint
> > > details to the Professional Standards Department of the Merseyside Police
> > > for their consideration.
> > >
> > > Yours sincerely,
> > >
> > > *Sarah Brown*
> > > *Casework Manager*
> > > *Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)*
> > > *90 High Holborn, London WC1V 6BH *
> > > *Phone: 0207 166 3934*
> > > *sarah.brown@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk *
> > >
> > > ------------------------------
> > > *From:* Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
> > > *Sent: *07 December 2007 16:14
> > > *To:* Sarah Brown
> > > *Subject:* TRIM: Re: IPCC Case Reference 2007/017332
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > thank you very much for your answer!
> > >
> > > I'm not sure if you think that this case should be dealt with together
> > > with the other compalaint and appeal-case (see the last e-mail I sent your
> > > collegue).
> > >
> > > And I was also enquiering, in connection with the e-mail I sent some
> > > weeks ago, were I explained that I seem to have lost a bit
> > > of confidence with the police department conducting the investigation,
> > > so I was wondering if you think that it would maybe be
> > > possible for another department to handle the complaint and appeal,
> > > like I've enquiered about earler.
> > >
> > > And I havn't recieved an answer to this enquiery.
> > >
> > > And I was wondering if I maybe should have had receved such an answer,
> > > because, now I'm not sure how to reply to the
> > > Merseyside Police, regarding the letter that I sent a scanned copy of,
> > > with the e-mail to your collegue.
> > >
> > > So I was wondering who I should contact, if I was wondering how to go
> > > forward with this.
> > >
> > > Hope that this is alright, and thanks in advance for the help!
> > >
> > > Yours sincerely,
> > >
> > > Erik Ribsskog
> > >
> > >
> > > On 12/7/07, Sarah Brown wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dear Mr Ribsskog,
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for contacting the Independent Police Complaints
> > > > Commission (IPCC). Miss Joanne Fitzgerald has asked me to reply to your
> > > > email regarding your new complaint. If I could inform you that Miss
> > > > Fitzgerald no longer works within the casework department of the Commission
> > > > and so will no longer have involvement in the handling of your complaints.
> > > >
> > > > I am the Casework Manager for your new complaint surrounding
> > > > issues you raised about a female front desk staff member at the Walton Lane
> > > > Police Station. If you would like to continue with the next stage of the
> > > > complaints process please provide your consent on the form that I sent you
> > > > on the 30 November 2007. Once your consent has been received I will forward
> > > > your complaint details to the Professional Standards Department of the
> > > > Merseyside Police for consideration.
> > > >
> > > > Please note that the details of your new complaint have been noted
> > > > under reference : 2007/017332. Please quote this reference when contacting
> > > > the IPCC regarding your new complaint.
> > > >
> > > > Yours sincerely,
> > > >
> > > > *Sarah Brown*
> > > > *Casework Manager*
> > > > *Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)*
> > > > *90 High Holborn, London WC1V 6BH*
> > > > *Phone: 0207 166 3934*
> > > > *sarah.brown@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk*
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ******************************************************************************
> > > The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
> > > privileged.
> > > It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended
> > > recipient
> > > please notify the sender and delete this email; any disclosure,
> > > copying or
> > > distribution of this email is prohibited and may be unlawful. The
> > > content of
> > > this email represents the views of the individual and not necessarily
> > > those
> > > of IPCC. IPCC reserves the right to monitor the content of all emails
> > > in
> > > accordance with lawful business practice.This e-mail has been swept
> > > for
> > > computer viruses but IPCC does not accept any liability in respect of
> > > your
> > > receipt of this email.
> > >
> > > Independent Police Complaints Commission
> > > 90 High Holborn
> > > London,
> > > WC1V 6BH.
> > >
> > > ******************************************************************************
> > >
> > >
> > > The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
> > > Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in
> > > partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On
> > > leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
> > > Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
> > > and/or recorded for legal purposes.
> > >
> >
> >
> > This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government
> > Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership
> > with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of
> > problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.
> > Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> > recorded for legal purposes.
> >
> > The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
> > Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in
> > partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On
> > leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
> > Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> > recorded for legal purposes.
> >
>
>
> This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government
> Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership
> with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of
> problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.
> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> recorded for legal purposes.
>
> The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
> Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in
> partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On
> leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> recorded for legal purposes.
>

From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
To: Sarah.Brown@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk Sarah Brown
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 16:22:18 +0000
Subject: Re: IPCC Case Reference 2007/017332

Hi,

but now it is to late, because the psd department was expecting an answer
before Christmas, and I didn't
get this email before today.

Even if I sent the e-mail about this, right away, after the meeting in
November.

I would have to think a bit on how I should go forward with this, since I
haven't really got any confidence in
the department after the last harassment-episode, and the problems with the
department having two e-mail
addresses.

I work as a company researcher now, and if a company has got two different
general enquiery email addresses,
then it means that something is wrong, and I wouldn't be adding the company
for the business-directory, since I
would think it was not a proper/thrustworthy company.

Then I wouldn't have recomended the company to the customers of the
directory, if the company had two different
official general enquiery email addresses, there should really just be one.

It's like the IPCC should have this e-mail address:

*enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk*

and this e-mail address:

enquiries.@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk

And claiming that both of them were the real, official e-mail address.

Then I wouldn't have trusted the ipcc, or recomended them to eg. other
people/companies etc.

So I need a bit of time to think this through.

I'm not so used with dealing with things like this.

Hope that this is alright, and thanks in advance for the reply!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog




On 1/2/08, Sarah Brown wrote:
>
> Dear Mr Ribbsskog,
>
> Thank you for contacting the Independent Police Complaints Commission
> (IPCC).
>
> As stated in my previous email to you, with regards to your lose of
> confidence in the police investigation into your complaint. Unfortunately
> whilst the police are conducting an investigation into your complaint the
> IPCC is unable to intervene and is not able to dictate which department
> carries out this investigation. You will need to speak to the Professional
> Standards Department (PSD) of Merseyside Police to discuss further.
>
> It is the responsibility of the PSD to resolve your complaint and this may
> involve them contacting you to establish further facts and understand what
> you would like to happened as a result of making a complaint. If you do not
> wish to meet face to face with an officer then you may wish to consider
> writing to the department instead. I would suggest that you make contact
> with the PSD to advise them of your preferred method of contact.
>
> It is your decision if you wish to continue with the complaints process.
>
> If you would like to proceed with the next stage of your complaint please
> provide your consent on the form I sent to your postal address on the 30
> November 2007 or you can send an email. Your consent will allow me to
> forward your complaint details to the Professional Standards Department of
> the Merseyside Police for their consideration.
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> *Sarah Brown*
> *Casework Manager*
> *Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)*
> *90 High Holborn, London WC1V 6BH*
> *Phone: 0207 166 3934*
> *sarah.brown@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk*
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 23 December 2007 20:09
> *To:* Sarah Brown
> *Subject:* Fwd: IPCC Case Reference 2007/017332
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I can't see that I have recieved a reply to this e-mail yet, that's why
> I'm trying to send it again.
>
> Hope that this is alright!
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> Erik Ribsskog
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Erik Ribsskog
> Date: Dec 11, 2007 3:47 PM
> Subject: Re: IPCC Case Reference 2007/017332
> To: Sarah Brown
>
>
> Hi,
>
> thank you very much your answer!
>
> But the Standards Unit don't even know their own e-mail address.
>
> And when I go there to discuss the complaint against the Police, then I'm
> being harassed.
>
> I'm not sure if it's right that I should go back to the meetings with the
> Police then.
>
> I think that would like saying that I liked to be harassed, and thats not
> what I mean at all.
>
> Do you understand what I mean now?
>
> Thank you very much again for your answer!
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> Erik Ribsskog
>
>
> On 12/11/07, Sarah Brown wrote:
> >
> > Dear Mr Ribsskog,
> >
> > Thank you for your emailed dated 07 December 2007.
> >
> > Your new complaint will need to be raised separately from your current
> > appeal. This is so that if the police are unable to resolve the matter to
> > your satisfaction you then have the right of appeal to the IPCC.
> >
> > With regards to your lose of confidence in the police investigation into
> > your complaint. Unfortunately whilst the police are conducting an
> > investigation into your complaint the IPCC is unable to intervene and is not
> > able to dictate which department carries out this investigation. You will
> > need to speak to the Professional Standards Department (PSD) of Merseyside
> > Police to discuss further.
> >
> > If you would like to proceed with the next stage of your complaint
> > please provide your consent on the form I sent to your postal address on the
> > 30 November 2007. Your consent will allow me to forward your complaint
> > details to the Professional Standards Department of the Merseyside Police
> > for their consideration.
> >
> > Yours sincerely,
> >
> > *Sarah Brown*
> > *Casework Manager*
> > *Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)*
> > *90 High Holborn, London WC1V 6BH *
> > *Phone: 0207 166 3934*
> > *sarah.brown@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk*
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > *From:* Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
> > *Sent: *07 December 2007 16:14
> > *To:* Sarah Brown
> > *Subject:* TRIM: Re: IPCC Case Reference 2007/017332
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > thank you very much for your answer!
> >
> > I'm not sure if you think that this case should be dealt with together
> > with the other compalaint and appeal-case (see the last e-mail I sent your
> > collegue).
> >
> > And I was also enquiering, in connection with the e-mail I sent some
> > weeks ago, were I explained that I seem to have lost a bit
> > of confidence with the police department conducting the investigation,
> > so I was wondering if you think that it would maybe be
> > possible for another department to handle the complaint and appeal, like
> > I've enquiered about earler.
> >
> > And I havn't recieved an answer to this enquiery.
> >
> > And I was wondering if I maybe should have had receved such an answer,
> > because, now I'm not sure how to reply to the
> > Merseyside Police, regarding the letter that I sent a scanned copy of,
> > with the e-mail to your collegue.
> >
> > So I was wondering who I should contact, if I was wondering how to go
> > forward with this.
> >
> > Hope that this is alright, and thanks in advance for the help!
> >
> > Yours sincerely,
> >
> > Erik Ribsskog
> >
> >
> > On 12/7/07, Sarah Brown wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear Mr Ribsskog,
> > >
> > > Thank you for contacting the Independent Police Complaints Commission
> > > (IPCC). Miss Joanne Fitzgerald has asked me to reply to your email
> > > regarding your new complaint. If I could inform you that Miss Fitzgerald no
> > > longer works within the casework department of the Commission and so will no
> > > longer have involvement in the handling of your complaints.
> > >
> > > I am the Casework Manager for your new complaint surrounding
> > > issues you raised about a female front desk staff member at the Walton Lane
> > > Police Station. If you would like to continue with the next stage of the
> > > complaints process please provide your consent on the form that I sent you
> > > on the 30 November 2007. Once your consent has been received I will forward
> > > your complaint details to the Professional Standards Department of the
> > > Merseyside Police for consideration.
> > >
> > > Please note that the details of your new complaint have been noted
> > > under reference : 2007/017332. Please quote this reference when contacting
> > > the IPCC regarding your new complaint.
> > >
> > > Yours sincerely,
> > >
> > > *Sarah Brown*
> > > *Casework Manager*
> > > *Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)*
> > > *90 High Holborn, London WC1V 6BH*
> > > *Phone: 0207 166 3934*
> > > *sarah.brown@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk*
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ******************************************************************************
> > The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
> > privileged.
> > It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended
> > recipient
> > please notify the sender and delete this email; any disclosure, copying
> > or
> > distribution of this email is prohibited and may be unlawful. The
> > content of
> > this email represents the views of the individual and not necessarily
> > those
> > of IPCC. IPCC reserves the right to monitor the content of all emails in
> >
> > accordance with lawful business practice.This e-mail has been swept for
> > computer viruses but IPCC does not accept any liability in respect of
> > your
> > receipt of this email.
> >
> > Independent Police Complaints Commission
> > 90 High Holborn
> > London,
> > WC1V 6BH.
> >
> > ******************************************************************************
> >
> >
> > The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
> > Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in
> > partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On
> > leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
> > Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> > recorded for legal purposes.
> >
>
>
> This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government
> Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership
> with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of
> problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.
> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> recorded for legal purposes.
>
> The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
> Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in
> partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On
> leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> recorded for legal purposes.
>

Suspect.

I suspect that the police have been using some unofficial methods to gain some irregular benefits.