Ingeborg Ribsskog - Baron Adeler Malteserordenen E-post til slottet om Mette-Marit videoen Er noe galt i Martine-saken? Problemer med Grandiosa? johncons-MUSIKK johncons-REISE johncons-FOTBALL

torsdag 18. september 2008

E-mail to the Minister of Justice.




Google Mail - To the Minister of Justice/Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153










Google Mail


Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>




To the Minister of Justice/Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153











Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>



Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 5:54 PM




To:
general.queries@justice.gsi.gov.uk






Hi,

 

I can't see that I've recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, so I'm sending it again.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Erik Ribsskog


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 1:47 PM

Subject: To the Minister of Justice/Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153
To: general.queries@justice.gsi.gov.uk




Hi,

 

I've tried to escalate a complaint, but it doesn't seem like your representative is answering, to his

correspondence.

 

And I also thought that the original complaint, wasn't answered that well, by another of your

representatives.


So it seems to me, that there are a lot of problems in the Ministry, so I thought it would be

best, to send it to the top of the Ministry, so that you could have the chance to have a look

at these problems, and to get these problems sorted, so that I maybe could get a second

opinion, from the right person in your Ministry, to the original complaint.


Hope this is alright!

 

Yours sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:42 PM
Subject: Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153
To: jan.farenden@justice.gsi.gov.uk




Hi,

 

I can't see that I've recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, so I'm sending it again.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Erik Ribsskog



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>



Date: Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 9:31 AM
Subject: Fwd: Our ref: TO08/2153
To: jan.farenden@justice.gsi.gov.uk



Hi,

 

I called the Ministry of Justice today, and I got your e-mail address, from the clerk there.

 

The reason that I'm sending you this e-mail, is that I was wondering, who it is, that one

should contact, if one are having problems with the IPCC.

 

Since they are not answering my e-mails, and I've already been in contact, with the

complaints-manager there, so I think I've escalated it, as far as it's possible to

escalate, at the IPCC.


So I was wondering, if it isn't the Ministry of Justice, that one should contact, if the

IPCC, are having problems in the way, that they aren't answering e-mails etc.

 

Thanks in advance for any help regarding this!

 

Yours sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Jun 30, 2008 7:23 PM

Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153



To: "Holmes, Ryan" <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk>

 




Hi,

 

thank you very much for your answer!

 

I think that the IPCC, probably recieves founding from the Government.


And, I think, that if the IPCC, don't answer their e-mails etc, then this is a matter, for the Ministry,

who are administratively in charge of the IPCC.

 

Which I think must be the Ministry of Justice.

 

I don't think the Ministry of Justice, can't pretend that they aren't in charge of the Police, like

you are trying now.


So, I write this, mostly, to put it on my blog, and then I'll think further, on how to go forward with this.


Yours sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog

 


On 6/30/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:



Dear Mr Ribsskog



Thank you for your email reply of 23 June.



While I am sorry to read of your ongoing concerns, I am afraid there is little useful information I can add to the previous correspondence that you have received from this Department.



As previously explained, if you choose to further your concerns regarding your complaint with the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), you must address the matter to the IPCC directly. Similarly, the Ministry of Justice is unable to comment on or give advice on how to escalate your case with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) or the American Embassy. I can only confirm that the points you have raised have been thoroughly considered and that the Department has been as helpful as possible in answering your concerns.



I am sorry that I am unable to be of more help, but I hope you can appreciate for the reasons given above that the Department is unable to intervene in your case. Hence, any further correspondence sent that addresses the same points will be placed on file and not responded to.



Yours sincerely,



Ryan Holmes


Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division



-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 23 June 2008 14:20

To: Holmes, Ryan
Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153


Hi,

 

I've already been in contact with the Complaints Manager at the IPCC, but this hasn't resovled the problems.


I suspect could be some corruption involved there, because something is obviouslly wrong there in my opinion.

 

Also I wondering a bit on how to escalate the case I've been in contact with the FBI, or the American Embassy,

about.

 

Also, I've been in contact with the Norwegian equivalent, of the IPCC, that's Spesialenheten, regarding another,

but linked, matter.

 

And they sort under the Norwegian Ministry of Justice.


So, I think that the IPCC are sorting under the British Ministy of Justice(?)

 

If not, who should they then be sorting under?

 

Sorry if I'm asking stupid questions.

 

Yours sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog

 

On 6/23/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:



Dear Mr Ribsskog



Thank you for your email reply of 19 June.



The Ministry of Justice is unable to submit a complaint on your behalf to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC). Additionally, a complaint against the IPCC cannot be directed to the Ministry of Justice for review as this does not fall within the remit of this Department. If you wish to make a complaint against the IPCC you must do this by addressing your concerns to the IPCC directly. The information provided below outlines how to do this.



If you have a complaint or query about a casework decision, the IPCC will do their best to clearly explain the reason for their decisions and answer any concerns you have. Please note however that IPCC casework decisions are final and they will not necessarily be able to change the outcome. For further information or advice on your rights you can contact a Citizens Advice Bureau, solicitor or your local MP.



If you have a complaint about a member of staff at the IPCC, in the first instance you can contact the person concerned and the matter may be resolved there and then. As mentioned in my previous email, Casework Manager Sarah Brown is one of a number of IPCC staff that has conducted an investigation into your file and she can be contacted on 0207 166 3934 should you wish to discuss the details of your complaint further. However, since you mention that Miss Brown has not contacted you in the past, you may wish to raise any issues of concern through a line manager, or write to the Internal Complaints Manager. Alternatively, you can download a complaint form via the link


http://www.ipcc.gov.uk/index/contact-us/complaints_ipcc.htm and make your complaint against the IPCC using the contact details below.


Internal Complaints Manager


Independent Police Complaints Commission


90 High Holborn


London


WC1V 6BH


Fax: 0207 404 0695


Email:

internal.complaints.unit@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk.


I do hope that this information is of some use to you.



Yours sincerely,



Ryan Holmes


Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division


 



-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 19 June 2008 20:35
To: Holmes, Ryan
Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153



Hi,

 

thank you very much for your e-mail, and the advice!

 

I wanted to complain about the IPCC, since the whole case is a mess, and they don't reply to my e-mails,

and they don't call me, you mention Brown, she has been supposed to call me, regarding the problems

with the missing answers on the e-mails, but she haven't called.


I think that the IPCC must have some serious problems, with handeling the complaints I sent them,

which I view as one case really.


So I was wondering, how I could submit this complaint, on the IPCC, to the Ministry of Justice.


If you think that you could please submit this complaint for me.

 

Also, I've contacted the FBI, in the American Embassy, in London.

 

And I asked them, on how should go forward, regarding reporting a crime in the US, that someone,

has set up a hate-blog against me there.

 

The FBI/The American Embassy Legal Advice, tells me to contact my local police-station, about this.


But I've lost a bit of confidence, with the Merseyside Police, due to the things mentioned in the

complaints, sent to the IPCC, and more.


And then I thought, that I could contact the IPCC about this then, since I didn't think I could contact

the local Police about this.

 

But now there has been so much problems, with the IPCC, so that I've lost a bit of confidence, in

the IPCC, as well.

 

So then I have to contact the Ministry of Justice about this, since I don't think that eighter the

Merseyside Police or the IPCC, have showed themselves, to be worthy, of much confidence,

unfortunatly.


So I'm mentioning this now.

 

Hope this is alright!


Yours sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog



 

On 6/19/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:



Dear Mr Ribsskog



Thank you for your email reply of 5 June. I am also in receipt of your email dated 13 June.



As explained in my previous reply, the Law Society is the regulatory body for solicitors in England and Wales and will keep a comprehensive list of solicitors practising in your local area. Their website promotes a searchable database to help you find a solicitor which allows you to search by firm name, area of law and/or post code. To alleviate your concerns about contacting the Law Society due to previous personal experiences, I should point out that this list is a resource to assist the public locate suitable legal representation and promote solicitors across England and Wales. You can access the facility via the following link:


http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/choosingandusing/findasolicitor.law.


Alternatively, you could also look through a local directory, such as the Yellow Pages, which might help identify a suitable firm. As suggested in my previous reply, you may wish to contact the Law Centres Federation on 0207 428 4401 who can provide contact details for your local Law Centre. Also, you may find it helpful to access the Community Legal Services Direct website for information on providers of legal advice at


www.clsdirect.org.uk. These are all alternative options available to you that do not involve the assistance of the Law Society.


With regard to the complaint you have submitted to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), I have contacted the IPCC to investigate the status of your complaint. Senior lawyers at the IPCC inform me that without your expressed consent, I am unable to obtain any information that relates to your complaint. I was informed however that Casework Manager Sarah Brown is one of a number of IPCC staff that has conducted an investigation into your file and she can be contacted on 0207 166 3934 should you wish to discuss the details of your complaint further.



I do hope that this information is of some use to you.



Yours sincerely,



Ryan Holmes


Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division



-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 05 June 2008 01:51

To: Holmes, Ryan
Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153



Hi,

 

thank you very much for your e-mail!

 

I have been thinking about contacting the Law Society, regarding getting a list, like you say,

for law firms, who take on law-cases on a 'pro bono' service basis.


But, like I might have forgotten to explain, the Law Society, are already involved in this,

I have complained about them to the Legal Services Ombudsman, who I have been contacting

you about.


So I've maybe lost a bit of confidence, in the Law Society, since I think they gave a bit of wrong

information, and some errors, that I thought were a bit strange, so they are really involved in this

from before.


So then I was wondering about, if it would be right to involve the Law Society again, since they

are involved from before.


Maybe there is someone else one could contact about getting the name of companies like this?


Sorry if I'm asking a lot of questions.


I've also sent a complaint, on the Merseyside Police, to the IPCC.


But the IPCC, aren't dealing with the complaint at all, it seems, so I was wondering who I should

contact then, if I wanted to compain about the IPCC not dealing with the complaint on the Police?

 

Sorry again that I'm asking so many questions!


Thanks in advance for the reply!

 

Yours sincerely,


Erik Ribsskog

 

On 4/25/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:


Dear Mr Ribsskog


Thank you for your email reply of 7 April, in which you request further advice on ways to proceed forward with your complaint against the Legal Services Ombudsman (LSO).  To assist you with your concerns, I shall set out the avenues of legal assistance available to you that acknowledge your specific financial concerns.


Firstly, while I understand you have already been in contact with the Citizen's Advice Bureau (CAB), you may also wish to consider contacting your local Law Centre.  Contact details for your local Law Centre can be found via the Law Centres Federation on 0207 428 4401, or by accessing their website www.lawcentres.org.uk. You may also find it helpful to access the Community Legal Services Direct website for information on providers of legal advice at www.clsdirect.org.uk.  Alternatively, you may choose to contact Community Legal Advice for free confidential help regarding your legal queries on 0845 345 4345.


Secondly, it may be worth investigating the possibility of a Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA).  This allows a solicitor to accept a case on a 'no won, no fee' basis, under which they receive a fee from you only if the case is won.  It is worth pointing that the solicitor's standard fees can be increased by up to 100% to reflect the degree of risk to the solicitor in taking the case on (the 'success fee').  However, should you lose your case, you may still be liable to pay the successful party's costs, as well as expert witness fees and other disbursements.  There are insurance schemes that, for a premium, provide cover for these items.  As part of the implementation of the Access to Justice Act 1999, we have made it possible for the successful side to recover their lawyer's success fee and insurance premium form the loser. Effectively, this has made the operation of conditional fees fairer and more attractive to clients.


Thirdly, some solicitors may be prepared to take on your case on a pro bono agreement (i.e. provide you with a free service).  You can contact the Law Society who can provide you with a list of solicitors that may provide pro bono services.  The Law Society is the regulatory body for solicitors in England and Wales and you can write to them at the following address:


The Law Society


113 Chancery Lane


London


WC2A 1SX


Tel: 0870 606 2555.


Alternatively, you can access the Law Society's website at www.solicitors-online.com.


I do hope that you find this information useful.


Yours sincerely


Ryan Holmes


Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division



This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.


Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.


This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

























This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.


This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.


Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.


This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.





















This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.



This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.


Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.


This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

















This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.


This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.


Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.


This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.























Det her var nyhet for meg. (In Norwegian).


Etter
Stoltenberg



Skrevet
av Erik 17.09.2008 kl. 13:23



Hvorfor
ikke innføre ny tidsregning etter valget neste år:
"Etter Stoltenberg".



Nytt
innlegg

Svar
på innlegg

Varsle



2



anbefalinger



Bra!



 



RE:
Etter Stoltenberg



Skrevet
av What do we want? More lies &
infotainment bullshit, PLEASE!!

17.09.2008 kl. 13:34



Ja
han er jo jøde han også, så!



Nytt
innlegg

Svar
på innlegg

Varsle









http://www.dagbladet.no/nyheter/2008/09/16/547060.html#comments_container

Spikring av vinduer på SIA. (In Norwegian).

På begynnelsen av 90-tallet, så jobba jeg på OBS Triaden, i Lørenskog, i et par år.

Da hadde jeg to kamerater, som het Øystein og Glenn, som hadde gått på skole sammen, i Lillestrøm, eller noe sånt.

Øystein var også tremenningen min, for mora hans, var kusina til fattern.

Så dem hadde et sommerhus, etter foreldra hennes, eller noe, nederst ved fjorden, helt nederst i Havnehagen, fordi 'teskjekjærringa'.

Dem kallte det Sand.

Men Sand, for meg, det var litt lenger bort mot Svelvik.

Så jeg ville sagt, at det var på Bergeråsen.

Siden det var like på nedsida, av husene, som lå på Bergeråsen.

Så det var litt rart, synes jeg, at de kallte det Sand.

Men de kallte Oslo S., for 'S-en' og, eller i hvertfall tremenningen min.

Så jeg synes de var litt artige, for de, eller spesiellt Øystein da, brukte så mange rare ord og utrykk osv., fra Lørenskog osv., som ikke var så kjent på Bergeråsen.

Og i helgene, på Bergeråsen, så hang han og jeg og Kjetil Holshagen, ofte oppe i leiligheten min, i Leirfaret.

Og da så vi på de nyeste Hollywood action-filmene, og spilte de nyeste C64-spillene, og spiste masse junkfood, Pizza Grandiosa, og potetgull og Cola osv.

Dette var veldig kult, synes jeg, i hvertfall da jeg gikk på ungdomsskolen osv.

En gang, da jeg gikk i 2. klasse på videregående, så tok Øystein og slukka en røyk, i hånda mi.

Så da synes jeg ikke det var så artig.

Det var vel i 1987, kan jeg tenke meg.

Og jeg har arr enda.

Såvidt.

21 år sida.

Men da fikk jeg jo skikkelig sår osv.

Så jeg ble så sinna, så jeg heiv ut Øystein og Kjetil og søstra mi, fra leiligheten i Leirfaret, og snakka nesten ikke med dem, på et halvt år.

Og det var litt ergelig, for vi hadde egentlig en bra tone, på den tida, synes jeg.

Men etter den sigarett-stumpinga, i hånda mi, fra Øystein, så var det ikke like bra lengre.

Så det var litt dumt.

Så jeg lot han få en pause, på et halvt år, etter det her, før jeg prata med han igjen.

Det er mulig det ikke var for lang pause.

Det er mulig.

Men men.

Men ihvertfall.

Sånn rundt 1990 og 91, så hang jeg en del sammen med Øystein og Glenn, og spilte biljard og flipper osv., etter jobben, på OBS.

Vi pleide å henge i en biljardhall, på Skårer, som ble eiet av familien til Bengt Rune, fra Rasta, som vi ble kjent med, siden vi hang der, ganske tilfeldig vel.

Men vi pleide å henge på bowlinga, på Metro senteret.

Men så åpna den biljardhallen, så da hang vi der og.

Senere så hang jeg en del med Glenn, på bowlinga på Strømmen Storsenter.

Og vi pleide å være hos meg eller Øystein, å spille poker og black jack, og se på kino, som Øystein hadde på rommet, noe projektor, som han kjøpte billig fra konferansesenteret, på hotellet på Triaden, da dem gikk konkurs, sånn rundt 1990.

Så Øystein var ganske før sin tid, når det gjaldt hjemmekino osv.

Vi pleide også å kjøre til Strømmen å kjøpe pizza.

Eller vi dro på Robsrudjordet grill, og der jobba kusina til Øystein.

Jeg husker ikke hva hu heter.

Øystein var adoptert fra Korea, men kusina hans, som også var naboen, i Markus Thranes Vei, hadde lyst hår, og var ikke adoptert.

Hun jobba på cruise-båt en gang, og likte ikke det, men kom hjem, fordi arbeidsforholdene var så dårlige, sa hu.

Anita, tror jeg kanskje hu het.

Noe sånt.

En gang, så skulle hu vaske klær for meg, sommeren 1990, eller noe, etter at jeg Øystein hadde vært i England.

Da hadde jeg ikke noe sted å bo den sommeren.

For jeg sa opp leiligheten på Abilsø, etter juni måned.

Så den sommeren, 1990, så var jeg i Brighton, hos Øystein på Hanaborg, hos bestemuttern på Sand i Svelvik, hos bestemuttern i Stavern, og jeg tror også, hos onkelen min, i Son.

Før jeg flytta til halvbroren min og dem, høsten 1990 da, og leide et rom hos dem, på Furuset.

Så sparte jeg husleia, hos de folka på Abildsø.

Men hvor tinga mine var i mellomtida, det skal jeg ikke si.

Men jeg solgte vannsenga mi, til Øystein.

Men de andre tinga, husker jeg ikke hvor jeg gjorde av, før jeg flytta.

Men jeg stua dem kanskje inn hos broren min og dem, før ferien.

Noe sånt.

Men men.

En dag, i 1991 eller 1992, eller noe.

Så kjørte jeg og Øystein og Glenn, forbi sentralsykehuset i Akershus.

Det ligger vel i Lørenskog, blir det vel.

Hvis jeg husker riktig.

Jeg hadde ikke lappen, for jeg studerte på datahøyskole.

Så jeg hadde ikke hatt råd til lappen og bil.

Men Glenn hadde vært i en mopedulykke, på 80-tallet, og fikk mye erstatning, fordi han skada beinet, i et kryss, på Skjetten.

Det var noe med vikeplikt, eller noe vel.

Noe sånt.

Så fikk han masse penger.

Så starta han og Øystein spilleautomat-firma.

Og det var jo veldig kult, på den tida.

Med masse Street-fighter spill osv.

Jeg hadde jo studert noen økonomifag osv., på handel og kontor, og datahøyskole.

Så egentlig var det meg og Øystein, som skulle starte automatfirma.

Men det ble ikke noe av.

Men de sa jeg kunne kjøpe aksjer.

Men dem visste at jeg ikke hadde så mye penger, siden jeg studerte, så det var mest kødd.

Men det firma gikk etterhvert nedenom og hjem da.

Så kanskje de hadde tjent på, å hatt en blåruss med på laget.

Det er mulig.

Men sånn er det.

Men tilbake til SIA da.

Vi kjørte forbi der, og da sa dem, at dem hadde måttet spikre igjen vinduene der.

Fordi det var så mange folk som hoppa ut, fra de øverste etasjene i sykehusbygget der.

Det var vel 15 etasjer høyt, eller noe sånt.

Så de måtte spikre igjen vinduene, eller noe, var det vel de sa.

Siden det var så mange som heiv seg ut av vinduene.

Så spurte jeg hvorfor de heiv seg ut av vinduene.

Da svarte de ikke.

Men jeg vet ikke hvor smart det egentlig er å være på sånne sykehus.

Jeg vet ikke hvem som egentlig har kontrollen der.

Det virker egentlig litt for meg, som at undergrunnen har det meste av kontrollen i Norge.

Så å havne på sånn sykehus, og bli tullet med av noe undergrunn.

Det høres ikke så fristende ut.

Så det var kanskje derfor de måtte spikre igjen vinduene.

Siden en del pasienter ble plaget av noe undergrunn.

Hva vet jeg.

Med vennlig hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

Bloggarkiv

Populære innlegg

Om meg

Bildet mitt
Overhørte på Rimi Bjørndal, (jeg jobbet som butikksjef/leder i ti år, i mange forskjellige butikker), i 2003, at jeg var forfulgt av 'mafian', mm. Har etter dette ikke fått rettighetene mine, i mange saker. Blogger derfor om problemer med å få rettigheter, mm. Mine memoarer, (Min Bok 1-10), kan også finnes på johncons-blogg, (se: 'Etiketter'). Jeg blogger også om slektsforskning, (etter at min danskfødte mormor, som var etter adelige/kongelige, døde i 2009). Har også vært såvidt innom Høyre/Unge Høyre, i sin tid. Har også studert informasjonsbehandling/IT/Computing, (på NHI, HiO IU og University of Sunderland). Har også bakgrunn fra handel og kontor, (grunnkurs, økonomi med markedsføring og data). Er/var også i Heimevernet, (etter at jeg ble overført dit, etter førstegangstjeneste i infanteriet, (og en rep-øvelse i mob-hæren), i forbindelse med omorganiseringer, i Forsvaret, etter den kalde krigen). Blir også utsatt for mye nettmobbing, mm. johncons-blogg, (og mine memoarer og nettbutikk), er kjent fra TV-programmet Tweet4Tweet, i 2012, (selv om jeg måtte klage, for programmet var veldig useriøst/nedlatende, mm.).

Totalt antall sidevisninger

Etiketter