Ingeborg Ribsskog - Baron Adeler Malteserordenen E-post til slottet om Mette-Marit videoen Er noe galt i Martine-saken? Problemer med Grandiosa? johncons-MUSIKK johncons-REISE johncons-FOTBALL

mandag 11. september 2017

Jeg sendte en e-post til the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman

Erik Ribsskog

Complaint about LGO/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

Erik Ribsskog 11. september 2017 kl. 09:54
Til: Phso Enquiries

Hi,

I wanted to complain about that LGO's general enquiry e-mail-address isn't working, (it seems).

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog


---------- Videresendt e-post ----------
Fra: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
Dato: 11. september 2017 kl. 09:01
Emne: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
Til: eribsskog@gmail.com


Feilikon

Fant ikke adressen

Meldingen ble ikke levert til L.Mailbox@lgo.org.uk fordi adressen ikke ble funnet. Sjekk om det finnes skrivefeil eller unødvendige mellomrom, og prøv på nytt.
Svaret fra den eksterne tjeneren var:
554 5.1.1 <L.Mailbox@lgo.org.uk>: Recipient address rejected: undeliverable address: host listerine.dublin.tstechnology.net[10.254.0.188] said: 554 5.1.1 <L.Mailbox@lgo.org.uk>: Recipient address rejected: undeliverable address: host mx1.lgo.org.uk.lister[82.163.236.165] said: 550 5.1.1 User unknown (in reply to RCPT TO command) (in reply to RCPT TO command)

Final-Recipient: rfc822; L.Mailbox@lgo.org.uk
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: dns; clustera.tstechnology.net. (91.199.74.9, the server for the
 domain lgo.org.uk.)
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 554 5.1.1 <L.Mailbox@lgo.org.uk>: Recipient address rejected: undeliverable address: host listerine.dublin.tstechnology.net[10.254.0.188] said: 554 5.1.1 <L.Mailbox@lgo.org.uk>: Recipient address rejected: undeliverable address: host mx1.lgo.org.uk.lister[82.163.236.165] said: 550 5.1.1 User unknown (in reply to RCPT TO command) (in reply to RCPT TO command)
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 01:01:22 -0700 (PDT)


---------- Videresendt e-post ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
To: LGOAT Mailbox <L.Mailbox@lgo.org.uk>
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 09:01:18 +0100
Subject: Complaint/Fwd: Undeliverable: Council Tax-bill 2017/18. (Council Tax Reference No: 52829153)
Hi,

I wanted to complain about, that Liverpool City Council's general enquiry
e-mail-address isn't working.

(See forwarded e-mail).

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <postmaster@liverpool.gov.uk>
Date: 2017-09-11 8:47 GMT+01:00
Subject: Undeliverable: Council Tax-bill 2017/18. (Council Tax Reference
No: 52829153)
To: eribsskog@gmail.com


*Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:*

Liverpool Direct (liverpool.direct@liverpool.gov.uk)
<liverpool.direct@liverpool.gov.uk>
The email address you entered couldn't be found. Please check the
recipient's email address and try to resend the message. If the problem
continues, please contact your helpdesk.







*Diagnostic information for administrators:*

Generating server: CTY1601.city.liverpool.gov.uk

liverpool.direct@liverpool.gov.uk
Remote Server returned '550 5.1.1 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipNotFound; not found'

Original message headers:

Received: from CTY1604.city.liverpool.gov.uk (10.8.47.84) by
 CTY1601.city.liverpool.gov.uk (10.8.47.81) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 15.0.1263.5; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 08:47:18 +0100
Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com (10.8.27.52) by
 CTY1604.city.liverpool.gov.uk (10.8.47.84) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 15.0.1263.5 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 08:47:18 +0100
Return-Path: <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Received: from [85.158.139.3] by server-7.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id
BC/2F-02208-68F36B95; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 07:47:18 +0000
Authentication-Results: mx.messagelabs.com; spf=pass
  (server-8.tower-90.messagelabs.com: domain of gmail.com designates
  209.85.161.174 as permitted sender)smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass
  (pass)header.i=@gmail.com
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrNIsWRWlGSWpSXmKPExsVyMXThOt0W+22
  RBuf+Mlm8/7KI3YHRo6PVL4AxijUzLym/IoE1Y17TfdaCx+wVN1b+ZG5gvMXWxcjFISQwh1Hi
  XfMMMIdF4A6LxLY3H5hAHAmBHywSHxdsZ+9i5ARy8iQu7n/EBGEXSdzdsZsZxv506C8jiM0rI
  ChxcuYTFhBbSMBbYuKeVrAaNgFNiY3Pl4LZLAKqElN/9rJA1AdI3HvUCRYXFnCXWHXzLNh8EQ
  ELic57W8H2Mgv4SKy7dYZ9AiPfLCQrZiFJQdiaEq3bf0PZGhIL7uxjhLC1JZYtfM28gJF1FaN
  GcWpRWWqRrpGFXlJRZnpGSW5iZo6uoYGpXm5qcXFiempOYlKxXnJ+7iZGYIDWMzAw7mDsW+V3
  iFGSg0lJlPfd8S2RQnxJ+SmVGYnFGfFFpTmpxYcYZTg4lCR4Gey2RQoJFqWmp1akZeYAYwUmL
  cHBoyTC6waS5i0uSMwtzkyHSJ1idOW4cOfSHyaOGw+vA8kDe24ByQ037wLJfSBSiCUvPy9VSp
  zXGqRZAKQ5ozQPbjQszi8xykoJ8zIyMDAI8RSkFuVmlqDKv2IU52BUEub1BpnCk5lXAnfBK6D
  jmICO47m0BeS4kkSElFQDY0mVsuIWicsx1x0DisM7nvepLPunl6o5oXdpaaPddNlMFVmfQ1M/
  Fy6aOenl5aBTvMvn5b71Szh2YFXFnv7zYdPEPdYzdAbZyxy23LT+ysu7gT1OC61W3FzCuZLhl
  vmf03PvKk2f2PtNIfDHyreyG48xFPapn03cKKgnE5Qeaj2TO+jJ8wvrVZRYijMSDbWYi4oTAS
  DIC3vuAgAA
X-Env-Sender: eribsskog@gmail.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-8.tower-90.messagelabs.com!1505116035!22578475!1
X-Originating-IP: [209.85.161.174]
X-SpamReason: No, hits=1.2 required=7.0 tests=HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE,
  RCVD_BY_IP
X-StarScan-Received:
X-StarScan-Version: 9.4.45; banners=-,-,liverpool.gov.uk
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 13143 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2017 07:47:15 -0000
Received: from mail-yw0-f174.google.com (HELO
mail-yw0-f174.google.com) (209.85.161.174)
  by server-8.tower-90.messagelabs.com with AES128-GCM-SHA256
encrypted SMTP; 11 Sep 2017 07:47:15 -0000
Received: by mail-yw0-f174.google.com with SMTP id q80so19809755ywg.2
        for <liverpool.direct@liverpool.gov.uk>; Mon, 11 Sep 2017
00:47:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=r29VvlgP9yWMBUvfJykYUZ+0HqLRWGiERF8vM6cvsNo=;
        b=a2sDO1sbpEv9VgDOqupQXGce3BkGgi8u4Mq4O+E0b8cWsKmtvrJ8/y1UMXRB1nd4T2
         o8h4kqYO7x/sgDoIlZjFqej7QYP2piFhNoHxyakFU2vhZQlk3OntJsuSsvOnfct6DMKg
         RIfuyVdsnEeceb6h0oN8GPKXSvXApQp97WNrwvUdDy5WIkUXF+bqEqGhZOQaLhyZanEt
         HgJa5NDHfqZbciRMZrxrI1HjiaGxCzcA6vqc4Rt4zxsJpDLYlGSmz6NnvpXsOOQS0avC
         wNbTPzMJ8bLIYM
----- Message truncated -----

Jeg sendte en e-post til EDF

Erik Ribsskog
Your two letters dated 5/9
Erik Ribsskog 11. september 2017 kl. 09:36
Til: complaintresolutionmanager@edfenergy.com
Hi,

I've gotten two almost identical letters from you, (both from 5/9).

The letters are about two different contract account numbers, ((sensurert av johncons-blogg)), with both account-numbers registered to me, (it seems).

Is this right, that I should receive more than one letter from you, (I was wondering).

Regards,

Erik Ribsskog

Jeg sendte en e-post til the Local Government Ombudsman

Erik Ribsskog
Complaint/Fwd: Undeliverable: Council Tax-bill 2017/18. (Council Tax Reference No: 52829153)
Erik Ribsskog 11. september 2017 kl. 09:01
Til: LGOAT Mailbox
Hi,

I wanted to complain about, that Liverpool City Council's general enquiry e-mail-address isn't working.

(See forwarded e-mail).

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:
Date: 2017-09-11 8:47 GMT+01:00
Subject: Undeliverable: Council Tax-bill 2017/18. (Council Tax Reference No: 52829153)
To: eribsskog@gmail.com


Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:

Liverpool Direct (liverpool.direct@liverpool.gov.uk)
The email address you entered couldn't be found. Please check the recipient's email address and try to resend the message. If the problem continues, please contact your helpdesk.







Diagnostic information for administrators:

Generating server: CTY1601.city.liverpool.gov.uk
liverpool.direct@liverpool.gov.uk
Remote Server returned '550 5.1.1 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipNotFound; not found'
Original message headers:

Received: from CTY1604.city.liverpool.gov.uk (10.8.47.84) by
 CTY1601.city.liverpool.gov.uk (10.8.47.81) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 15.0.1263.5; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 08:47:18 +0100
Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com (10.8.27.52) by
 CTY1604.city.liverpool.gov.uk (10.8.47.84) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 15.0.1263.5 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 08:47:18 +0100
Return-Path:
Received: from [85.158.139.3] by server-7.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id BC/2F-02208-68F36B95; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 07:47:18 +0000
Authentication-Results: mx.messagelabs.com; spf=pass
  (server-8.tower-90.messagelabs.com: domain of gmail.com designates
  209.85.161.174 as permitted sender)smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass
  (pass)header.i=@gmail.com
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrNIsWRWlGSWpSXmKPExsVyMXThOt0W+22
  RBuf+Mlm8/7KI3YHRo6PVL4AxijUzLym/IoE1Y17TfdaCx+wVN1b+ZG5gvMXWxcjFISQwh1Hi
  XfMMMIdF4A6LxLY3H5hAHAmBHywSHxdsZ+9i5ARy8iQu7n/EBGEXSdzdsZsZxv506C8jiM0rI
  ChxcuYTFhBbSMBbYuKeVrAaNgFNiY3Pl4LZLAKqElN/9rJA1AdI3HvUCRYXFnCXWHXzLNh8EQ
  ELic57W8H2Mgv4SKy7dYZ9AiPfLCQrZiFJQdiaEq3bf0PZGhIL7uxjhLC1JZYtfM28gJF1FaN
  GcWpRWWqRrpGFXlJRZnpGSW5iZo6uoYGpXm5qcXFiempOYlKxXnJ+7iZGYIDWMzAw7mDsW+V3
  iFGSg0lJlPfd8S2RQnxJ+SmVGYnFGfFFpTmpxYcYZTg4lCR4Gey2RQoJFqWmp1akZeYAYwUmL
  cHBoyTC6waS5i0uSMwtzkyHSJ1idOW4cOfSHyaOGw+vA8kDe24ByQ037wLJfSBSiCUvPy9VSp
  zXGqRZAKQ5ozQPbjQszi8xykoJ8zIyMDAI8RSkFuVmlqDKv2IU52BUEub1BpnCk5lXAnfBK6D
  jmICO47m0BeS4kkSElFQDY0mVsuIWicsx1x0DisM7nvepLPunl6o5oXdpaaPddNlMFVmfQ1M/
  Fy6aOenl5aBTvMvn5b71Szh2YFXFnv7zYdPEPdYzdAbZyxy23LT+ysu7gT1OC61W3FzCuZLhl
  vmf03PvKk2f2PtNIfDHyreyG48xFPapn03cKKgnE5Qeaj2TO+jJ8wvrVZRYijMSDbWYi4oTAS
  DIC3vuAgAA
X-Env-Sender: eribsskog@gmail.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-8.tower-90.messagelabs.com!1505116035!22578475!1
X-Originating-IP: [209.85.161.174]
X-SpamReason: No, hits=1.2 required=7.0 tests=HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE,
  RCVD_BY_IP
X-StarScan-Received:
X-StarScan-Version: 9.4.45; banners=-,-,liverpool.gov.uk
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 13143 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2017 07:47:15 -0000
Received: from mail-yw0-f174.google.com (HELO mail-yw0-f174.google.com) (209.85.161.174)
  by server-8.tower-90.messagelabs.com with AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted SMTP; 11 Sep 2017 07:47:15 -0000
Received: by mail-yw0-f174.google.com with SMTP id q80so19809755ywg.2
        for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 00:47:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=r29VvlgP9yWMBUvfJykYUZ+0HqLRWGiERF8vM6cvsNo=;
        b=a2sDO1sbpEv9VgDOqupQXGce3BkGgi8u4Mq4O+E0b8cWsKmtvrJ8/y1UMXRB1nd4T2
         o8h4kqYO7x/sgDoIlZjFqej7QYP2piFhNoHxyakFU2vhZQlk3OntJsuSsvOnfct6DMKg
         RIfuyVdsnEeceb6h0oN8GPKXSvXApQp97WNrwvUdDy5WIkUXF+bqEqGhZOQaLhyZanEt
         HgJa5NDHfqZbciRMZrxrI1HjiaGxCzcA6vqc4Rt4zxsJpDLYlGSmz6NnvpXsOOQS0avC
         wNbTPzMJ8bLIYMKpsuMUiVw7EPjgkrjIF+/ZB9w3AUI6E0lCjBxHwFot5B6fHe0FzIc1
         SyFw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=r29VvlgP9yWMBUvfJykYUZ+0HqLRWGiERF8vM6cvsNo=;
        b=rVSlB5JUE3vf1FLAEh00s6+Rmago8vqzMf+4Q25+4ynIEKUP69x6pbg/cK/u4o16ZK
         NxjyoB5flblHSrlR6FUs9O+78jSDfkyNZXUGKglceG9d1ySto5Z5iyMK3YmIqy62Y1C+
         g11VhvnVAWRi3AtUr+Hj49VPBk7SyvYC94w7Ozty7aWoG+WkEN4OiJ+mkUA5jX490JqV
         wY7kLwOcnfo12Bw/0tTUkt9h0XALvJb4SYqlbmRzWEzfP+ADEuD8nyGSdmkoAQeu+X5j
         CWmy/U4W77Q/ecOlu2SwOWqFkuSvfsitPe43PKBaoBOSbbLVbveOkHWfRMB2w+T9hOI1
         gIhg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUj7tlsCxm1Wj6rIL2iQG4ldKseUiDlLiqq/Y/PD2vZAlzBwHJ4z
nKMW3+pXu8XtSVO5WnW1VGMI6Z622g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBcQ/pvwnGJIO+dYzZfzrFk5hSMDFEkaGkIP5TkVr5kf+JXREvJGIvvEEpB9EH2eAOmAYoXcSyRAHEbc+xn08k=
X-Received: by 10.37.170.203 with SMTP id t69mr8361815ybi.99.1505116034416;
 Mon, 11 Sep 2017 00:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.164.76 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 00:47:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: Erik Ribsskog
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 08:47:13 +0100
Message-ID:
Subject: Council Tax-bill 2017/18. (Council Tax Reference No: 52829153)
To: Liverpool Direct
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c056e9093c2aa0558e52239"

______________________________________________________________________
DISCLAIMER:

The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be read, copied or used only by the intended recipient(s). If you have received it in error please contact the sender immediately by replying to the e-mail or by telephoning a number contained in the body of the e-mail and please then delete the e-mail without disclosing its contents elsewhere. No responsibility is accepted for loss or damage arising from viruses or changes made to this message after it was sent. The views contained in this email are those of the author and not necessarily those of the authors employer.

This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious content by Symantec Cloud Security for your protection, but this is no guarantee of safety
______________________________________________________________________

Final-Recipient: rfc822;liverpool.direct@liverpool.gov.uk
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.1.1 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipNotFound; not found
X-Display-Name: Liverpool Direct



---------- Videresendt e-post ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog
To: Liverpool Direct
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 08:47:13 +0100
Subject: Council Tax-bill 2017/18. (Council Tax Reference No: 52829153)
Hi,

I moved in at this address, ((sensurert av johncons-blogg)), on 5/9.

Yet on your letter, (written to 'the Council Tax Payer'), the Council Tax has been calculated, from 11/8.

So I wondered if you could please send me an updated, (and correct), council tax-bill.

Thanks in advance for any help!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

______________________________________________________________________
Take care when opening email from unknown senders. This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious content by Symantec Cloud Security. No email filtering system is 100% effective however and this is no guarantee of safety or validity. Always exercise caution when opening email, clicking on links, and opening attachments.
______________________________________________________________________

Mer fra Liverpool

I dag, (søndag), så har jeg vært, på Asda, (før de stengte, klokka 16.30), og kjøpte en ny TV-antenne og en ny steikepanne, (blant annet).

Og den nye TV-antenna, (av merket: 'One for all'), fikk jeg til å virke.

(I motsetning til Polaroid-antenna, som jeg kjøpte, på lørdag.

Men det er mulig, at jeg gjorde, noe feil, på lørdag kveld, (med den første antenna).

For britene har bytta antenne-kontakt-standard, siden jeg flytta inn, i Leather Lane, (i 2006), kan det virke som.

(Noe sånt).

Og den nye TV-en er også, en HD-TV, (noe ingen av de to TV-ene, som jeg hadde, i Leather Lane var).

Og den nye antenna fikk til slutt inn noen signaler, (som antagelig er fra en sender, i Storeton, (en tidligere norsk/norrøn vikinggård vel), på the Wirral, (cirka en mil unna).

Og jeg fikk også til, å lage både biff, (med en ny panne, som ikke 'bulket seg'), og frossenpizza, (som fikk sprø bunn), i gass-ovnen, som står, i leiligheten.

Så sånn er det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

Her er mer om dette:

storeton sender

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Storeton_transmitting_station

PS 2.

Enda mer om dette:

mer om storeton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Storeton

PS 3.

Og enda mer om dette:

IMG_20170910_154046

IMG_20170910_154625

IMG_20170910_154650

IMG_20170910_154702

IMG_20170910_154752

IMG_20170910_163015

IMG_20170910_163251

IMG_20170910_163436

IMG_20170910_163452

IMG_20170910_164907

IMG_20170910_165819

IMG_20170910_165858

IMG_20170910_165912

IMG_20170910_172359

IMG_20170910_172403

IMG_20170910_172619

IMG_20170910_172731

IMG_20170910_173908

IMG_20170910_173939

IMG_20170910_174046

IMG_20170910_174051

IMG_20170910_180019

IMG_20170910_180532

IMG_20170910_182131

IMG_20170910_234027

IMG_20170910_234045

IMG_20170910_234310

IMG_20170910_235238

IMG_20170910_235310

IMG_20170910_235429

IMG_20170910_235502

IMG_20170910_235541

IMG_20170910_235546

IMG_20170910_235601

IMG_20170910_235610

IMG_20170910_235615

IMG_20170910_235805

IMG_20170910_235830

IMG_20170910_235937

IMG_20170911_000306

IMG_20170911_000400

IMG_20170911_004526

IMG_20170911_004714

IMG_20170911_004744

IMG_20170911_005108

IMG_20170911_010008

IMG_20170911_010040

IMG_20170911_010132

IMG_20170911_010417

IMG_20170911_010648

IMG_20170911_010716

IMG_20170911_011329

IMG_20170911_030640

PS 4.

Det var forresten sånn, at kassadama, (ei med mørkt hår), ikke spurte, om jeg ville ha bæreposer, (da jeg handla, på Asda, i dag, (søndag)).

(Så jeg måtte selv ta opp dette temaet).

Så det var, litt merkelig, (må man vel si).

(Det burde man kunne forvente, at en erfaren kasserer, husker å spørre om, vil jeg si).

Hvordan står det til, med kasserer-drillen, lurer jeg da.

Hm).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

PS 5.

Det var også sånn, i dag, (søndag), at selv om Asda stengte, så tidlig, som klokka 16.30.

Så maste de, 'åkke som', over høytalerne, om at kundene, måtte forte seg.

(Denne masinga begynte, cirka 15-20 minutter, før stengetid.

Men i dag, (søndag), så var det ikke, som en kassett liksom, (vil jeg nesten si, at det hørtes litt ut som), som på lørdag.

Men det var mer, som noe slags 'mumling', (må man vel kalle det), over høyttaler-anlegget.

Noe sånt).

Så sånn var det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

PS 6.

Den biffen jeg åt, i kveld.

Den kjøpte jeg, (på Asda), på lørdag, (sammen med den biffen, som jeg spiste, i går).

Og den i går, var veldig god.

Men den i dag, var litt mer seig, (vil jeg si).

Og det kan kanskje komme av, at jeg lot biffen ligge litt lenge, i panna, (som var veldig varm), etter at jeg hadde slått av komfyren.

Eller at dette liksom var, et dårligere stykke kjøtt.

(For å si det sånn).

Begge biffene var 'rump steak', (som britene kaller det).

Og 'rump steak' det kan være, alt fra indrefilet til mørbrad, (hvis jeg ikke tar helt feil).

Så du kan ikke gå, i butikken, i England, og kjøpe deg, en saftig ytrefilet eller indrefilet.

Neida.

Man 'må' kjøpe en 'rump steak'.

Og så får man se, hvor mør biffen blir, liksom.

Det blir liksom litt, som 'tombola', (å lage biff i England), vil jeg nesten si.

(Noe sånt).

Så sånn er nok det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

PS 7.

Hvis man ser, på den øverste kua, (og så på den nederste kua), så kan man se, at 'rump steak', kan være alt, fra rundstek, (som i Norge, vel blir regnet, for kun å være grytekjøtt), til indrefilet, (som jo er den beste/møreste delen, av dyret):

øverste kua

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cut_of_beef

PS 8.

Når det gjelder disse alarm-brikkene/klistremerkene.

Som mange butikker har.

Så fikk vi dette, på Rimi Bjørndal, mens jeg jobbet, som assisterende butikksjef der, (noe jeg jobbet som, fra 1996 til 1998).

Vi kalte dette for Checkpoint, (etter firmaet som monterte og solgte dette systemet vel).

Og da var det sånn, at det var, en høytaler, (blant annet), ved inngangsporten, til butikken.

(Altså ikke inngangdøra, til butikken.

Men en inngangsport, som markerte starten, på selve salgs-areal-delen, av butikken, vel.

Noe sånt).

Så hvis en kunde, hadde handla noe, i en annen butikk.

Og denne varen, var merket, med en alarm-brikke/klistremerke, som ikke var 'av-magnetisert'.

Så ville høytaler-systemet, ved inngangen begynne, å pipe.

Og rundt scannerene, i kassene.

Så festet Checkpoint noen svarte metall-rammer.

Og disse inneholdt magneter, (eller noe i den duren), var det vel.

Så når varen ble scannet, så ble samtidig alarm-brikken/klistremerket avmagnetisert.

Men hvis varen, (som hadde alarm-brikke/klistremerke på seg), ble liggende, i for eksempel handlevogna.

Så ville noen høyttalere, som stod, i bakkant, (var det vel), på kassene.

De ville da, begynne å pipe.

Og kassereren skulle da rope, på en leder.

(Noe sånt).

Men da jeg handla, på Asda Walton, på lørdag.

Så peip det ikke, i kassa.

Men det peip, i det høytaler/detektor-systemet, som vel skal varsle, hvis kundene har med varer, (med u-avmagnetiserte alarmbrikker), fra andre butikker.

Så her var det nok, at Asda Walton, har kobla, en slags 'tulle-knapp', til dette alarm-systemet.

(For det var også sånn, at da jeg gikk ut, av butikken, på nytt.

Etter at vakten, hadde kikka, på kvitteringa mi.

Så peip ikke alarmen.

Selv om ingen alarm-brikker/klistremerker, hadde blitt av-magnetisert, i mellomtida.

For å si det sånn).

Sånn at de liksom, hadde en unnskyldning, til å plage meg, (som kunde), da.

(Noe sånt).

Så sånn var nok det.

Bare noe jeg tenkte på.

Men men.

Bloggarkiv