To: eribsskog@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:57:48 +0100
Subject: Your BBC Posting has been removed
Dear BBC Community member,
Thank you for contributing to a BBC community site. Unfortunately we've had to remove your content below because it contravened one of the House Rules.
Postings to BBC messageboards will be removed if they:
*Break the law, or condone or encourage unlawful activity. This includes defamation and contempt of court.
You can find out more about Defamation at http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/hub/HouseRules-Defamation
You can read the BBC messageboards House Rules in full here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/messageboards/newguide/popup_house_rules.html
Please be careful when you copy the text of someone else’s message into your post. If their posting is subsequently removed, your posting may also have been removed, as it contained a copy of their failed text.
If you can rewrite your contribution to remove the problem, we'd be happy for you to post it again.
Please note that anyone who seriously or repeatedly breaks the House Rules may have action taken against their account.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/messageboards/newguide/popup_breaking_rules.html
Regards,
The BBC Communities Team
http://www.bbc.co.uk/messageboards/newguide/
URL of content (now removed):
http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/england/F2770282?Thread=4653901&post=54166234
Subject:
The use of Negative Reinforcement as a Management-method at the Arvato Microsoft Scandinavian Product Activation in Liverpool.
Posting:
At least the team-leader in the meeting, refered to it as reinforcement, which they had learned at team-leader training.
Well the 'team leader' was using the word incorrectly. This team leader training sounds pretty cowboyish. No management theory would advocate this kind of behaviour. It is bullying and illegal.
I was in contact, with the Merseyside Police, about these problems, and other problems, which seems clear to me are harassment, in January.
But the police just sent me on to the CAB, who sent me on to a solicitor, who didn't accept founding from the 'legal aid scheme'.
And another law-firm, canceled a duty solicitors meeting, regarding advice about the legal aid scheme.
And I've sent complaints to the Law Society, I've contacted the LCS, but they had some problems finding the e-mails in their e-mail system.
I've complained about how the Merseyside Police has been dealing with the case, to the ipcc.
The Merseyside Police, declined to investigate, so I sent an appeal, which has been upheld, to the ipcc.
And I've also contact a few organisations, and the Norwegian Consulate in Liverpool, the Norwegian Embassy, the Norwegian Special Police, 'Kripos', since this case seems to be linked with an organised crime case, which the Norwegian Embassy, has adviced me to contact the police in Britain and Norway about, if I want them to cooperate on the case. (Which I've done).
But I haven't managed to get much progress on the case.
Some of the documents for the case, are on a blog, in connection with a complaint sent to the CAB:
http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/
The documents, can be found, in the folders: 'Enclosures 1-25', 'Enclosure A-B', 'Enclosure I-XII', 'Enclosure new1-new8' and in the file 'Explanation CAB'.
The files can be found, in the menu, a bit down, on the right side of the screen, in the blog.
The file, from this thread, where the 'negative reinforcement' issue, and other issues are brought up, are in the file 'enclosure 7'.
This enclosure, was also included, in the files which I gave the police in January, but they told me it was an employement matter, and sent me to the CAB.
The CAB, and the legal firm, they set me up to meet in a duty solicitors meeting, failed to inform me, that the law firm, didn't accept founding from the 'legal aid' scheme, so this problem, that the law firm didn't accept this founding, made me send a complaint to the Law Society.
The Law Society, adviced me, that I should send a complaint through their complaint procedure, about this company, and another law-firm.
But now, many months later, it has been explained to me, that these companies, shouldn't have been complained about to the Law Society, they should have been complained about to the LCS, since the problems with poor service/unprofessional conduct etc, appeared in connection with the duty solicitor scheme.
So now I'm back to 'square one' again, so to speak, and I've been adviced, by the LCS, to contact Merseyside Employement Law, about the possibilities, to get help with bringing up the case, under the legal aid scheme.
So I've been sending Merseyside Employment Law, three e-mails, in the last couple of weeks, but I haven't managed to get a reply from them yet.
But what I was wondering about, was, if you know any smart way, for me to explain, to the law-firm, like in a summary in an e-mail etc., how I should explain to them, about this problem with the use of negative reinforcement etc., discussed in this thread.
Do you know any smart way, in which one could summarise this, in the context, on eg. which laws that are breached, and how to explain the practice that I described as 'negative reinforcement'.
Is it just called bullying? And you would coincidentaly know how I could explain, to the law company, about how the pracsis breached the laws, in a way that would make the law company understand what I'm meaning, in an easy to grasp way?
I think it would be very fine if someone has some advice on this, and also if anyone have some advice, on how I should go forward with case.
So thanks very much for any help in regards to this!
This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received
it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose
the information in any way, and notify us immediately. The contents of
this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the
BBC, unless specifically stated.
Innlegg
