johncons: Jeg sendte en ny e-post til IPCC

onsdag 23. mars 2011

Jeg sendte en ny e-post til IPCC

Gmail - RE: TRIM: Re: Your concerns about Merseyside Police

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

RE: TRIM: Re: Your concerns about Merseyside Police

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 5:07 PM

To:
Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>

Cc:
inquiries2@un.org

Besides, one can't trust the English police because they are pigs, I learned when I was at summer-school, in Brighton, in the 80's.

Erik Ribsskog

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:32 PM
Subject: Fwd: TRIM: Re: Your concerns about Merseyside Police

To: Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: inquiries2@un.org

Trim may refer to:

Cutting small pieces off something

Is this the same as the Merseyside Police call me miss that your a mafia-whore, and to cut my pecker off?

Erik Ribsskog

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:22 PM

Subject: Fwd: TRIM: Re: Your concerns about Merseyside Police
To: Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: inquiries2@un.org

And first you refer to my complaint, from 2007, and comment about it, and then in the next e-mail you don't want to discuss the complaint you brought up yourself.

That's very strange I think.

And this with Trim, on top of that.

This is very strange I think.

I think maybe someone in charge, at the IPCC, should answer about this, and give me a second opinion, if that's alright.

Hope this is alright!

Regards,

Erik Ribsskog

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:17 PM
Subject: Fwd: TRIM: Re: Your concerns about Merseyside Police
To: Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>

Cc: inquiries2@un.org

Who is Trim by the way, if I can ask.

Erik Ribsskog

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

Date: Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:13 PM
Subject: Re: TRIM: Re: Your concerns about Merseyside Police
To: Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>

Cc: inquiries2@un.org

Hi,

thank you very much for your e-mail!

Are you sure I should write a new complaint about the same issues?

Shouldn't the old case have been cleaned up?

The complaint-process just stalled, and has never been put back right again.

Shouldn't someone investigate what has been goving on?

Do you have an IPCC complaint-unit?

(Since I think it's a bit strange that I have to complain about the same issues twice).

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

Dear Mr Ribsskog

Thank you for your email.

The IPCC is an independent organisation, I am
therefore unable to comment on your complaint about Merseyside Police. I
have provided you with details of how to make a complaint against them and can
only advise that you consider submitting a new complaint in order to progress
matters.

I have not looked in detail at your previous cases and
complaints with the IPCC as I did not consider this to be relevant to your
enquiry. Your comments have been noted but I have nothing further to add on
this matter.

Yours sincerely

Caroline Wilson

Customer Contact
Advisor
Independent Police Complaints Commission

1st Floor,
Oaklands House,
Washway Road, Sale,
M33 6FS
Tel:
0161 246 8561
Email:caroline.wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk

From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 23 March 2011 14:19
To: Caroline Wilson
Cc:
inquiries2@un.org
Subject: TRIM: Re: Your concerns about Merseyside
Police

Hi,

so you think it's ok for the Merseyside Police to call me 'Miss Erik
Ribsskog'?

I also wrote an appeal, to the IPCC, which was upheld.

Why don't you mention this in your summary?

Have the files been messed with?

Erik Ribsskog

On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>
wrote:

Dear Mr
Ribsskog

Thank you
for your email, I am sorry that you did not find the information helpful.
Having checked our records I note that you sent in a complaint about
Merseyside Police to the IPCC in 2007. With your consent, we
forwarded your complaint to them for their consideration in line
with our procedures. I note that Merseyside Police applied for a dispensation,
which means that they decided that no further action should be taken, and that
this was approved by the IPCC, which concluded the matter.

If you
wish to make a new complaint about Merseyside Police, you may do so by
completing the online form on the IPCC website, the link to which I provided
in my previous email. By law all complaints of misconduct against the
police must be recorded. The IPCC does not have the power to record complaints
and any complaint that you submit to us will, in the first instance, be
forwarded to the Professional Standards Department of Merseyside Police for a
recording decision, as they are the appropriate authority. I should explain
that we are unable to forward your complaint unless you give us your consent
to do so. In other words, if you wish to make a complaint about misconduct of
Merseyside Police officers you need to be willing to engage with
them.

As a way
forward, I would therefore suggest that you include any concerns you have
about misconduct of Merseyside Police officers on the online form and submit
this to begin the complaints procedure through the appropriate
channels.

Yours
sincerely

Caroline
Wilson
Customer Contact Advisor
Independent Police
Complaints Commission
1st Floor, Oaklands House,

Washway Road, Sale,

M33 6FS
Tel: 0161 246 8561
Email:caroline.wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk

From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 22 March 2011 16:54
To: Caroline
Wilson
Cc: joe.anderson@liverpool.gov.uk; inquiries2@un.org; mail.gva@efta.int; Harker,
David; emb.london@mfa.no;
Liverpool County, Enquiries
Subject: TRIM: Re: Your email
correspondence to the IPCC

Hi,

no, this isn't helpful at all.

If you read the e-mail again, it should be possible for you to
understand, that this is a complaint, on that you haven't processed the
complaint against the Merseyside Police, which I sent you, 3 or 4 years
ago.

Now it looks to me, like you make yourself dumb, like we say in
Norway.

Have you read my e-mail at all, I'm wondering.

Sorry if I'm direct now, but I'm really very disappointed in
you.

But you have been messing me around for years, so I guess you, (the
IPCC), will find a way out of this, so that you don't have to do your job,
again.

Also at least one of the people writing to me, on behalf of the
Liverpool County Court today, was a hoax, it seems, from what the County Court
wrote me directly.

I think it's so degrading for me to contact the Merseyside Police now,
after they've called me 'Miss Erik Ribsskog', and after you've not charged
them/told them off, for this, so I don't like to contact them.

But I mention it now.

I'm not sure if I should write regards since you are just messing with
me, I think,

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

I'm also sending this as an update to the organisations I sent to
earlier today.

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

Dear Mr
Ribsskog

Thank you for
writing to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC).
We are an independent body responsible for
making sure that the police complaints system in England and Wales works
effectively and fairly.

It appears that you have
included the IPCC in correspondence sent to Liverpool County Court relating
to difficulties you have been experiencing with your landlord. I should
explain that the IPCC is unable to assist you with these particular issues
as they do not fall within our remit. You may wish to contact the Citizen's
Advice Bureau for further advice on how to deal with these
matters.

You have however mentioned
that you complained about Merseyside Police several years ago, but it is not
clear from your correspondence whether you wish to make a new
complaint against this police force. I thought it may be helpful to
explain the process involved, should you wish to
complain.

You
can only make a complaint against the police if you:

·
have
been the victim of the alleged misconduct of a person serving with the
police (misconduct could include a police officer or member of police staff
being rude to you or using unnecessary force, an unlawful arrest, or a
police officer abusing your rights);

·
were
present when the alleged misconduct took place, or were close enough to see
or hear the misconduct, and as a result suffered loss, damage, distress or
inconvenience, or were put in danger or at risk;

·
are a
friend or relative of the victim of the alleged misconduct, and
were distressed by the effects of the incident on the
victim;

·
witnessed the alleged misconduct; or

·
are
acting on behalf of any of the above.

When we receive a complaint, the IPCC must seek the complainant’s
consent in order to forward the matter to the police force
concerned. The complaint is then assessed by
the police and they will decide whether to record it officially.

If you wish
to make a complaint about police misconduct, further details about the
process, as well as our online form can be accessed via the following web
page:

http://www.ipcc.gov.uk/Pages/how_complaint.aspx

I hope this
response has been helpful to you.

Yours
sincerely

Caroline
Wilson
Customer Contact
Advisor
Independent
Police Complaints Commission
1st Floor, Oaklands
House,
Washway Road,
Sale,
M33
6FS
Tel: 0161 246
8561
Email:caroline.wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk

From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]

Sent: 22 March 2011 12:00
To: Liverpool County,
Enquiries
Cc: joe.anderson@liverpool.gov.uk; inquiries2@un.org; mail.gva@efta.int; Harker,
David; emb.london@mfa.no
Subject: Re: To the Superior
of Mr. Johan Hawley/Fwd: Update/Fwd: To the s uperior of Johan Hawley/Fwd:
Update/Fwd: Taking my landlord to the County ...
(Caroline)

Hi,

thank you for your reply!

This hoax made me distracted now.

What initiated my first e-mail was that my Landlord claims he can
throw me out, without a possession order.

It's really my Landlord who's supposed to contact the County Court, and
not me.

So it's just that my Landlord is writing a lot of non-sense that
upsets me really.

Sorry about this!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

Here's more about what my Landlord writes:

From: Kieron Grimes <kierongrimes@tjthomas.co.uk>

Date: Mon, Mar
21, 2011 at 3:34 PM
Subject: Your situation...
To: eribsskog@gmail.com

Eric,

Now there is
only 2 weeks before your departure.
I read on your blog you are trying to
postpone the kick-out, however this idea of yours will never work. I have
many years experience handling bad tennants, and the same tactic is used
every time(quoting a law paragraph, hardly any relevance of the
situation).

I hope you find a new place in Liverpool. I don't
understand why you don't look for a new place, as I doubt you want to be
homeless or live in a church.

We will meet soon, as I will come to
the apartment 3th of April to deliver a good-bye
gift.

Sincerly,

Kieron
Grimes

PS 2.

I want to do this properly.

I don't like it that Mr. Grimes want's to go here with a
presant.

I want this to be dealt with in court.

But like I wrote above, it's really my Landlord who has to take
this to Court, and what upset me in his e-mail is really just non-sense, the
way I see it.

I think I should start to work out a bit more, then maybe I don't
care about phoney stuff like this.

The Merseyside Police have called me 'Miss Erik Ribsskog', in a
letter, that I've put in a compaint of 18 points to IPCC, 3 or 4 yeats ago,
which they don't reply to.

Or else I would have sent about the hoax
with Mr. Johan Hayley to the Merseyside Police.

But now I think this would be to degrading for me to do, when the
Merseyside Police haven't been told off, for calling me 'Miss Erik
Ribsskog'.

Just to update.

Thanks again for your reply!

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Liverpool County,
Enquiries <enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk>
wrote:

Good
Morning,

The county Court
has received a number or emails from you today, but I must inform you that
we do not have a member of staff by the name of Johan Hayley working at
this court. I you wish to take out proceedings at court you must seek some
legal advice to ensure that you take out the correct type of
process.

Regards

Jim
Reid

J
Reid

Issue /File
Registry

Liverpool Civil
& Family Court

Tel: 0151 296
2403

-----Original
Message-----
From: Erik
Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 22 March 2011 11:15
To: enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk

Cc: joe.anderson@liverpool.gov.uk; inquiries2@un.org; mail.gva@efta.int;
Harker, David; emb.london@mfa.no
Subject: To the Superior of Mr. Johan
Hawley/Fwd: Update/Fwd: To the superior of Johan Hawley/Fwd: Update/Fwd:
Taking my landlord to the County...

Hi,

why do I get an answer e-mail from
Mr. Johan Hawley, when I send this to the Superior of Mr. Johan
Hawley.

I want to bring this case up in the
County Court, that's my main objective in this.

Could I please get a reply from Mr.
Hawleys line-manager, telling me how to do this, if that's
alright?

Best regards,

Erik
Ribsskog

---------- Forwarded message
----------
From: Liverpool County
Court <enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk>
Date:
Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:06 AM
Subject: RE: Update/Fwd: To the superior
of Johan Hawley/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Taking my landlord to the
County...
To: eribsskog@gmail.com

I'm afraid UK do not have
the castle doctrine laws. Please search "castle doctrine UK" to see
evidence or call a lawcentre.

Also, it's highly unlikely that the
Council, Merseyside Police, IPCC, Landlord, Microsoft, Order of St. John,
Goverment in Norway, Goverment in UK, Brits, Muslims or Muslims gangs,
Illuminists and CAB is messing to you at the same time as you state in the
emails.

Instead of emailing what I would belive is prank to us, I
would recommend you to meet us at our centre to discuss this in detail and
in a formal manner.

Regards,

Johan Hawley

35
Vernon Street
Liverpool Merseyside
England
L2 2BX

DX
702600 Liverpool 5

Court number 251

This email was received from the
INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service
supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs.
(CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call
your organisation's IT Helpdesk.
Communications via the GSi may be
automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes.

This e-mail
(and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the
addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is
not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy
all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet
e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be
intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when
deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by
e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient)
may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice.
E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content
may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are
not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their
contents.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by
the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was
certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes.

This email was received
from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus
service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with
MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems,
please call your organisation’s IT Helpdesk.
Communications via the GSi
may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes.

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the
Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was
certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes.

This email was received
from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus
service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with
MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems,
please call your organisation’s IT Helpdesk.
Communications via the GSi
may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes.

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the
Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by
Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified
virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged,
monitored and/or recorded for legal
purposes.

This email was received from
the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service
supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM
Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your
organisation’s IT Helpdesk.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.

Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

onsdag 23. mars 2011

Jeg sendte en ny e-post til IPCC

Bloggarkiv

Populære innlegg

Om meg

Totalt antall sidevisninger

Etiketter