Jeg sendte en ny e-post til IPCC

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

---

RE: TRIM: Re: Your concerns about Merseyside Police

---

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>	Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 5:07 PM
To: Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk> Cc: inquiries2@un.org
Besides, one can't trust the English police because they are pigs, I learned when I was at summer-school, in Brighton, in the 80's. Erik Ribsskog ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:32 PM Subject: Fwd: TRIM: Re: Your concerns about Merseyside Police To: Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk> Cc: inquiries2@un.org Trim may refer to: Cutting small pieces off something Is this the same as the Merseyside Police call me miss that your a mafia-whore, and to cut my pecker off? Erik Ribsskog ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:22 PM Subject: Fwd: TRIM: Re: Your concerns about Merseyside Police To: Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk> Cc: inquiries2@un.org And first you refer to my complaint, from 2007, and comment about it, and then in the next e-mail you don't want to discuss the complaint you brought up yourself. That's very strange I think. And this with Trim, on top of that. This is very strange I think. I think maybe someone in charge, at the IPCC, should answer about this, and give me a second opinion, if that's alright. Hope this is alright! Regards, Erik Ribsskog ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:17 PM Subject: Fwd: TRIM: Re: Your concerns about Merseyside Police To: Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk> Cc: inquiries2@un.org Who is Trim by the way, if I can ask. Erik Ribsskog ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:13 PM Subject: Re: TRIM: Re: Your concerns about Merseyside Police To: Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk> Cc: inquiries2@un.org Hi, thank you very much for your e-mail! Are you sure I should write a new complaint about the same issues? Shouldn't the old case have been cleaned up? The complaint-process just stalled, and has never been put back right again. Shouldn't someone investigate what has been goving on? Do you have an IPCC complaint-unit? (Since I think it's a bit strange that I have to complain about the same issues twice). Best regards, Erik Ribsskog On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk> wrote: Dear Mr Ribsskog Thank you for your email. The IPCC is an independent organisation, I am therefore unable to comment on your complaint about Merseyside Police. I have provided you with details of how to make a complaint against them and can only advise that you consider submitting a new complaint in order to progress matters. I have not looked in detail at your previous cases and complaints with the IPCC as I did not consider this to be relevant to your enquiry. Your comments have been noted but I have nothing further to add on this matter. Yours sincerely Caroline Wilson Customer Contact Advisor Independent Police Complaints Commission 1st Floor, Oaklands House, Washway Road, Sale, M33 6FS Tel: 0161 246 8561 Email:caroline.wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com] Sent: 23 March 2011 14:19 To: Caroline Wilson Cc: inquiries2@un.org Subject: TRIM: Re: Your concerns about Merseyside Police Hi, so you think it's ok for the Merseyside Police to call me 'Miss Erik Ribsskog'? I also wrote an appeal, to the IPCC, which was upheld. Why don't you mention this in your summary? Have the files been messed with? Erik Ribsskog On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk> wrote: Dear Mr Ribsskog Thank you for your email, I am sorry that you did not find the information helpful. Having checked our records I note that you sent in a complaint about Merseyside Police to the IPCC in 2007. With your consent, we forwarded your complaint to them for their consideration in line with our procedures. I note that Merseyside Police applied for a dispensation, which means that they decided that no further action should be taken, and that this was approved by the IPCC, which concluded the matter. If you wish to make a new complaint about Merseyside Police, you may do so by completing the online form on the IPCC website, the link to which I provided in my previous email. By law all complaints of misconduct against the police must be recorded. The IPCC does not have the power to record complaints and any complaint that you submit to us will, in the first instance, be forwarded to the Professional Standards Department of Merseyside Police for a recording decision, as they are the appropriate authority. I should explain that we are unable to forward your complaint unless you give us your consent to do so. In other words, if you wish to make a complaint about misconduct of Merseyside Police officers you need to be willing to engage with them. As a way forward, I would therefore suggest that you include any concerns you have about misconduct of Merseyside Police officers on the online form and submit this to begin the complaints procedure through the appropriate channels. Yours sincerely Caroline Wilson Customer Contact Advisor Independent Police Complaints Commission 1st Floor, Oaklands House, Washway Road, Sale, M33 6FS Tel: 0161 246 8561 Email:caroline.wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com] Sent: 22 March 2011 16:54 To: Caroline Wilson Cc: joe.anderson@liverpool.gov.uk; inquiries2@un.org; mail.gva@efta.int; Harker, David; emb.london@mfa.no; Liverpool County, Enquiries Subject: TRIM: Re: Your email correspondence to the IPCC Hi, no, this isn't helpful at all. If you read the e-mail again, it should be possible for you to understand, that this is a complaint, on that you haven't processed the complaint against the Merseyside Police, which I sent you, 3 or 4 years ago. Now it looks to me, like you make yourself dumb, like we say in Norway. Have you read my e-mail at all, I'm wondering. Sorry if I'm direct now, but I'm really very disappointed in you. But you have been messing me around for years, so I guess you, (the IPCC), will find a way out of this, so that you don't have to do your job, again. Also at least one of the people writing to me, on behalf of the Liverpool County Court today, was a hoax, it seems, from what the County Court wrote me directly. I think it's so degrading for me to contact the Merseyside Police now, after they've called me 'Miss Erik Ribsskog', and after you've not charged them/told them off, for this, so I don't like to contact them. But I mention it now. I'm not sure if I should write regards since you are just messing with me, I think, Erik Ribsskog PS. I'm also sending this as an update to the organisations I sent to earlier today. On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Caroline Wilson <Caroline.Wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk> wrote: Dear Mr Ribsskog Thank you for writing to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC). We are an independent body responsible for making sure that the police complaints system in England and Wales works effectively and fairly. It appears that you have included the IPCC in correspondence sent to Liverpool County Court relating to difficulties you have been experiencing with your landlord. I should explain that the IPCC is unable to assist you with these particular issues as they do not fall within our remit. You may wish to contact the Citizen's Advice Bureau for further advice on how to deal with these matters. You have however mentioned that you complained about Merseyside Police several years ago, but it is not clear from your correspondence whether you wish to make a new complaint against this police force. I thought it may be helpful to explain the process involved, should you wish to complain. You can only make a complaint against the police if you: · have been the victim of the alleged misconduct of a person serving with the police (misconduct could include a police officer or member of police staff being rude to you or using unnecessary force, an unlawful arrest, or a police officer abusing your rights); · were present when the alleged misconduct took place, or were close enough to see or hear the misconduct, and as a result suffered loss, damage, distress or inconvenience, or were put in danger or at risk; · are a friend or relative of the victim of the alleged misconduct, and were distressed by the effects of the incident on the victim; · witnessed the alleged misconduct; or · are acting on behalf of any of the above. When we receive a complaint, the IPCC must seek the complainant’s consent in order to forward the matter to the police force concerned. The complaint is then assessed by the police and they will decide whether to record it officially. If you wish to make a complaint about police misconduct, further details about the process, as well as our online form can be accessed via the following web page: http://www.ipcc.gov.uk/Pages/how_complaint.aspx I hope this response has been helpful to you. Yours sincerely Caroline Wilson Customer Contact Advisor Independent Police Complaints Commission 1st Floor, Oaklands House, Washway Road, Sale, M33 6FS Tel: 0161 246 8561 Email:caroline.wilson@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com] Sent: 22 March 2011 12:00 To: Liverpool County, Enquiries Cc: joe.anderson@liverpool.gov.uk; inquiries2@un.org; mail.gva@efta.int; Harker, David; emb.london@mfa.no Subject: Re: To the Superior of Mr. Johan Hawley/Fwd: Update/Fwd: To the s uperior of Johan Hawley/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Taking my landlord to the County ... (Caroline) Hi, thank you for your reply! This hoax made me distracted now. What initiated my first e-mail was that my Landlord claims he can throw me out, without a possession order. It's really my Landlord who's supposed to contact the County Court, and not me. So it's just that my Landlord is writing a lot of non-sense that upsets me really. Sorry about this! Best regards, Erik Ribsskog PS. Here's more about what my Landlord writes: From: Kieron Grimes <kierongrimes@tjthomas.co.uk> Date: Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:34 PM Subject: Your situation... To: eribsskog@gmail.com Eric, Now there is only 2 weeks before your departure. I read on your blog you are trying to postpone the kick-out, however this idea of yours will never work. I have many years experience handling bad tennants, and the same tactic is used every time(quoting a law paragraph, hardly any relevance of the situation). I hope you find a new place in Liverpool. I don't understand why you don't look for a new place, as I doubt you want to be homeless or live in a church. We will meet soon, as I will come to the apartment 3th of April to deliver a good-bye gift. Sincerly, Kieron Grimes PS 2. I want to do this properly. I don't like it that Mr. Grimes want's to go here with a presant. I want this to be dealt with in court. But like I wrote above, it's really my Landlord who has to take this to Court, and what upset me in his e-mail is really just non-sense, the way I see it. I think I should start to work out a bit more, then maybe I don't care about phoney stuff like this. The Merseyside Police have called me 'Miss Erik Ribsskog', in a letter, that I've put in a compaint of 18 points to IPCC, 3 or 4 yeats ago, which they don't reply to. Or else I would have sent about the hoax with Mr. Johan Hayley to the Merseyside Police. But now I think this would be to degrading for me to do, when the Merseyside Police haven't been told off, for calling me 'Miss Erik Ribsskog'. Just to update. Thanks again for your reply! On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Liverpool County, Enquiries <enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk> wrote: Good Morning, The county Court has received a number or emails from you today, but I must inform you that we do not have a member of staff by the name of Johan Hayley working at this court. I you wish to take out proceedings at court you must seek some legal advice to ensure that you take out the correct type of process. Regards Jim Reid J Reid Issue /File Registry Liverpool Civil & Family Court Tel: 0151 296 2403 -----Original Message----- From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com] Sent: 22 March 2011 11:15 To: enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk Cc: joe.anderson@liverpool.gov.uk; inquiries2@un.org; mail.gva@efta.int; Harker, David; emb.london@mfa.no Subject: To the Superior of Mr. Johan Hawley/Fwd: Update/Fwd: To the superior of Johan Hawley/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Taking my landlord to the County... Hi, why do I get an answer e-mail from Mr. Johan Hawley, when I send this to the Superior of Mr. Johan Hawley. I want to bring this case up in the County Court, that's my main objective in this. Could I please get a reply from Mr. Hawleys line-manager, telling me how to do this, if that's alright? Best regards, Erik Ribsskog ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Liverpool County Court <enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk> Date: Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:06 AM Subject: RE: Update/Fwd: To the superior of Johan Hawley/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Taking my landlord to the County... To: eribsskog@gmail.com I'm afraid UK do not have the castle doctrine laws. Please search "castle doctrine UK" to see evidence or call a lawcentre. Also, it's highly unlikely that the Council, Merseyside Police, IPCC, Landlord, Microsoft, Order of St. John, Goverment in Norway, Goverment in UK, Brits, Muslims or Muslims gangs, Illuminists and CAB is messing to you at the same time as you state in the emails. Instead of emailing what I would belive is prank to us, I would recommend you to meet us at our centre to discuss this in detail and in a formal manner. Regards, Johan Hawley 35 Vernon Street Liverpool Merseyside England L2 2BX DX 702600 Liverpool 5 Court number 251 This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation’s IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation’s IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation’s IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

---