---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 5:20 PM
Subject: Complaint about Liverpool County Court/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Fail ure)
To: "ccc.enquiries@cityoflondon.gov.uk" <ccc.enquiries@cityoflondon.gov.uk>
Cc: adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk
Hi,
I wasn't informed about a hearing, (I didn't get the courts letter).
Still the court ignored this, and set up a second hearing.
I thought they should first investigate, and didn't prepare.
Then the court called me up in the morning, two mornings in a row, and said the judge wanted to 'see me', like I was a horse, I think.
I sent a complaint to the Admin Appeals they haven't replied.
The Liverpool County Court have also earlier sent me scam-e-mails by probably football-mobsters, I think, which they haven't cleaned up.
I think it's like it's only like 'retards' in the court and at the Admin Appeals, and now the court want to throw me out on Wednesday.
This is horrible, I have nowhere to stay.
Please get the County Court to shape up.
Thanks in advance for any help!
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:20 AM Subject: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Fail ure) To: adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk
Cc: "Liverpool County, Enquiries" < enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk> Hi,
now I got called, by the bailiff, Mr. Campbell, from Liverpool County Court.
Apparently you haven't contacted them about this case, because they still want to go on with the hearing today.
I think we should take one thing at a time.
Could you please tell the court to take one thing at a time.
Why wasn't I informed about the first hearing?
Best regards,
Erik Ribsskog
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 11:07 AM Subject: Complaint/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Fail ure) To: adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk
Hi,
this judge is just lecturing me.
I've gone to business-school, and I think this is inpolite, this isn't a matter of life and death, I think the judge should be civilised and polite, and follow the normal practise, that is to reply in the same way that one get the correspondence.
I think it's strange that he calls, maybe he wants to hide something, I think then.
He says this is urgent, but they forget to find out why I wasn't informed about the first hearing.
I think we should find out about that, before this process goes on, and that's why I send about this to the Administrative Appeals.
Please investigate this, and please inform the Liverpool County Court about this, as I don't want any bailiff on my door.
Hope this is alright!
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Liverpool County, Enquiries <enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk>
Date: Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 10:40 AM Subject: RE: Update/Fwd: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Fail ure) To: Erik Ribsskog < eribsskog@gmail.com>
Mr Ribsskog,
Please note communication can be by
telephone, letter and email. On this occasion it was by telephone as it is an
urgent matter.
As I was saying on the phone there is a
hearing tomorrow, this will definitely be going ahead and you are required to
attend. If you don't attend an order will be made in your absence.
Your email dated 5th August 2011 stated
you did not receive hearing notice, this is why we have re listed the matter.
Therefore hearing tomorrow still stands.
Any further emails received will not be
replied to and placed on file for hearing 9th August 2011 at 10:00am.
Reagrds,
Lee Walker
Lee Walker
Enforcements Section
Liverpool County Court
0151 296 2472
-----Original
Message-----
From: Erik Ribsskog
[mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com]
Sent: 08
August 2011 08:26
Hi,
now Mr. Walker, from
Liverpool County Court, rang me on the phone, to reply to this e-mail.
I think if I send an e-mail then I should get a reply by e-mail.
I think there's definetly something wrong in this process.
---------- Forwarded
message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:10 PM
Subject: Complaint/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
To: enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk
Cc: "adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk"
<adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk>
Hi,
---------- Forwarded
message ----------
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:03 PM
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
To: eribsskog@gmail.com
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
cust.ser.cs@gtnet.gov.uk
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient
domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information
about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was:
550 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected cust.ser.cs@gtnet.gov.uk (state 14).
----- Original message -----
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.213.8.135 with SMTP id h7mr319333ebh.108.1312581782550; Fri,
05 Aug 2011 15:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.213.28.137 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 15:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 23:03:02 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGtfns5NbMY7JnwuJMvZ+OESKw=bxaGCFmPeEv_AB+KPdvaVjA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Complaint/Fwd:
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
To: adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk
<adminappeals@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: cust.ser.cs@gtnet.gov.uk
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c4518e3397e04a9c9423d
Hi,
I send this e-mail, as a complaint, to the Court Service Secretariat for
Crown, High, County Courts, regarding that I wasn't informed about the
hearing, on 1/8.
I think this should be dealt with first, before there is a new hearing.
Hope this is alright!
Yours sincerely,
Erik Ribsskog
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Liverpool County, Enquiries <
enquiries@liverpool.countycourt.gsi.gov.uk>
Date: Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 4:26 PM
Subject:
To: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
**
Thank you for your previous emails.
Please note that as you did not attend the hearing on 1st August 2011, your
application was dismissed and the warrant of eviction is to proceed. However
as a further application was lodged in your email, we have now listed it
again on 9th August 2011 at 10:00am. It is in your own interest to attend
this hearing as if you do not the order may be the same and warrant for
eviction will proceed on this day.
I have placed your appellants notice on file, however there is no order to
appeal and this is why we have listed your application.
Please do not email any further documents and bring them to the hearing as I
cannot guarantee these will be placed on file and referred to a Judge before
the hearing and therefore it will be quicker to bring them to the hearing.
Regards,
Lee Walker
Lee Walker
Enforcements Section
Liverpool County Court
0151 296 2472
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure
Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in
partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case
of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.
|
|
Innlegg
