johncons: Jeg sendte en e-post til the Council

tirsdag 3. juni 2014

Jeg sendte en e-post til the Council

Erik Ribsskog

Your Email Enquiry <<#22175-396437#>>

Erik Ribsskog

Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 6:10 PM

To: Liverpool Direct

Cc: Colin Simber , Henrik Wedell-Wedellsborg , "emb.london" , HRW UK , amnestyis , Politikk Høyre , Phso Enquiries , post , Akademikerforbundet , LHT Customer Service , Pia Ribsskog , Bjørn Ribsskog , she , "hv-02.kontakt" , "anne-kathrine.skodvin" , post , "EUteam@amnesty.org" , "SCT@amnesty.org.uk" , hofmarskallatet@kongehuset.dk, Vernepliktsverkets kontaktsenter ved Wenche Molstad , post@slottet.no, Runcorn Office , Info , Benefits Service , "steve.rotheram.mp" , LO Postkasse LO , CONTACT-US , Contact-Us , "sande.vgs" , "president@ansa.no"

Hi,

I was just wondering.

Are you aware of that this was a complaint, that I sent to the High Court.

I merely copied the Council that e-mail.

It doesn't seem like you acknowledge this, in your e-mail.

So I thought I had to send you a reply.

Regards,

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

Could you also please also use my last-name, (Mr. Ribsskog), and not my first name.

The PHSO calls me 'Dear Sir', and when you write 'Dear Erik', then it looks a bit like some 'hippie-stuff' or something, I think.

On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Liverpool Direct <Liverpool.Direct@liverpool.gov.uk> wrote:

Your email reference number is: 396437

Dear Erik
Thank you for your e-mail.

Unfortunately, we cannot help you with this matter because is does not come within the remit of Liverpool City Council. May we suggest you contact the job centre plus regarding this matter.

If you would like any further assistance on this matter or anything else please let me know via the e-mail address below

Kind regards

Jill

Liverpool Direct Limited

Email: liverpool.direct@liverpool.gov.uk

Website: www.liverpool.gov.uk

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. Thank you

Would you prefer to receive your council tax bill via e-mail? Go to www.liverpool.gov.uk and complete the easy online registration form.

--- Original Message ---
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Received: 02/06/14 15:29:07 o'clock BST
To: <rcjchancery.judgeslisting@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>
CC:Colin Simber <colin.simber@linskills.co.uk>, Henrik Wedell-Wedellsborg <ww@bruunhjejle.dk>, emb.london <emb.london@mfa.no>, HRW UK <hrwuk@hrw.org>, amnestyis <amnestyis@amnesty.org>, Politikk Høyre <politikk@hoyre.no>, Phso Enquiries Subject: Complaint about ICE/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Complaint about alienation/Fwd: New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Your letter from 22/5, (ICE Ref: DWP00088/14)/Fwd: Your letter from 9/5/Fwd: Brev fra David Simms, Work Services Director, fra 4. april

Hi,

I wanted to complain about ICE.

They don't seem to be able to correspond in the way normal people do, I think.

After I sent them my comlaint.

Then they do some funny in-house process with it, and send it back,
and call my complaints 'elements'.

This is wrong for several reasons, I think.

Firstly, I haven't worked with ICE, so I haven't learned about this
process they have, where they break complaints into elements.

So they alienate me, I think.

They actually want me to look at the funny results of their in-house
'element-process', and then in some way 'compare' it, with my initial
complaint.

And then I'm supposed to say if they've done it right.

But I then I'm so kind of slave, for ICE, I think.

And I have to understand the case-worker.

It should be ICE who should understand the citizen, I think.

When they write to me, in this funny, unconventional way, then it's
insulting, harassing and alienating, I think.

When they write about 'elements', then they really call my writings
raw-material, I think.

And that's insulting and harassing, I think.

If they can't deal with peoples complaints in a normal and
conventional way, then perhaps they should be closed down, I think.

This is like systematical harassment of the citizens, (jobseekers), I think.

I don't think I can be part of this madness, (I think I have to call
it), and at the same time keep my self-respect.

(I've gone to commerce and office-school, in Norway, and have worked
as a grocery store staff/manager, for many years, including at the
hypermarked Matland/OBS Triaden, in Lørenskog, Norway, where it was a
lot of competition, from other hypermarkets, so we were trained to
treat the customers, in a polite and respectful way.

So when I meet this inpolitenes and disrespectfulnes and this
harassment, then I have to complain, I think).

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

I attach a letter from ICE, that I received today, about my latest
case with them, and this letter inititated this complaint.

Because enough is enough, I think.

When they, (ICE), refuse to correspond in a way, that normal people do.

(Since they don't want to refer to my complaint, in a conventional way.

But they break it into elements.

And present these elements in a way, that makes it difficult to
understand the context, to their 'code'/'short-hand').

Then it's like some gnomes, have a head-quarter somewhere.

Where they refuse to do things, in the way that people do it.

But they only want to correspond in their own, funny ways.

And it isn't right that ICE threat people like gnomes, I think.

People are people, (or humans), like Depeche Mode, (that my old
'brother in law' Cecilie Hyde, used to listen to, when she and my
sister moved in at the flat I lived in, in 1988/89), sings, in a song.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, May 25, 2014 at 8:48 PM
Subject: Update/Fwd: Complaint about alienation/Fwd: New update/Fwd:
Update/Fwd: Your letter from 22/5, (ICE Ref: DWP00088/14)/Fwd: Your
letter from 9/5/Fwd: Brev fra David Simms, Work Services Director, fra
4. april
To: DWP ICE gateway team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: Colin Simber <colin.simber@linskills.co.uk>, "emb.london"
<emb.london@mfa.no>, HRW UK <hrwuk@hrw.org>, amnestyis
<amnestyis@amnesty.org>, Politikk Høyre <politikk@hoyre.no>, Phso
Enquiries <phso.enquiries@ombudsman.org.uk>, post <post@mfa.no>,
Akademikerforbundet <post@akademikerforbundet.no>, LHT Customer
Service <csc@lht.co.uk>, Pia Ribsskog <pia@nfunorge.org>, Bjørn
Ribsskog <bribsskog@gmail.com>, she <she@topdanmark.dk>,
"hv-02.kontakt" <hv-02.kontakt@mil.no>, "anne-kathrine.skodvin"
<anne-kathrine.skodvin@ica.no>, post <post@spesialenheten.no>,
"EUteam@amnesty.org" <EUteam@amnesty.org>, "SCT@amnesty.org.uk"
<sct@amnesty.org.uk>, hofmarskallatet@kongehuset.dk, Liverpool Direct
<liverpool.direct@liverpool.gov.uk>, Vernepliktsverkets kontaktsenter
ved Wenche Molstad <vpv.kontakt@mil.no>, post@slottet.no, Runcorn
Office <runcornoffice@taroe.org>, Lars Aasen <lbf@lbf.no>, Info
<info@tpas.org.uk>, Benefits Service
<benefits.service@liverpooldirectlimited.co.uk>, "steve.rotheram.mp"
<steve.rotheram.mp@parliament.uk>, LO Postkasse LO <lo@lo.no>,
rcjchancery.judgeslisting@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

Hi,

and after I finished my conscription-service, in Norway, in the summer of 1993.

Then I was unemployed, for some months.

And there, there are no fourthnightly sign on-meetings.

People just send a post-card, in the post, where they write a cross,
for the days they've been job-seeking.

(If I remember it right).

And I always got the money on time.

(And no letters where missing in the post).

And I didn't have a phone then.

And now you 'nag' about my voicemail etc., even if I've been a victim
of telepest, and am from Norway, (and there only can get pay as you
go-mobiles, (which are expensive to call from), since I'm not on the
electoral register).

And also, I think it seems like you got my forms to late, (for some
'funny' in-house dead-line).

Since you alienated ('fremmedgjøre' in Norwegian) me, and wrote the
date you wanted the forms on your desk.

Which I think shows this routine have been developed by
fascits/nazists/haters, who can't even imagine how it is for a
jobseeker.

Of couse the jobseeker is going to want to know the date for posting
the letter, (and not your in-house dead-line), I think.

So you tricked me, I think I have to say, by writing an un-interesting
date, in a letter, when the natural thing to do, (since I'm your
client and this is to do with posting), would be to write the
posting-date).

And then you play in the negative room, (like Russian mafia/KGB likes
to do, according to Norulf Øvrebotn, a Norwegian writer), and pretend
you haven't gotten the letter.

(That's how it seems to me, at least.

Because letters almost always get to the right address, I think I've
learned, as a stamp-collector, I've been a bit interessted, about
news-articles etc., about the postal-system).

And then I get a letter, (from Ian Marshall, manager of Birkenhead
Benefit Centre, I think), about that I haven't _'attended a meeting'_.

(And I was therefore sanctioned).

So this is like the Jobcentre in Hell, I think.

There is just more and more 'funny' stuff and chaos, the whole time.

So I have to say you make me miss the Jobcentre in Norway, (even if
one guy there, at Stovner Jobcentre, was very inpolite to me, at the
induction-meeting after I finished my conscription-service, and
another guy, at Schous Plass Jobcentre, 'dragged' me to a
job-interview at a Sivil-defence-ministry-department, after I went
there, after I was kind of chased from Stovner Jobcentre, (even if I
wasn't meant to speak with anyone at Schous Plass really, I think,
since I really was with Stovner, but I almost went into shock by the
hostile staff at Stovner at the induction).

After being unemployed in the UK, (mostly in Liverpool), since 2008.

Regards,

Erik Ribsskog

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: 2014-05-25 18:12 GMT+01:00
Subject: Complaint about alienation/Fwd: New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd:
Your letter from 22/5, (ICE Ref: DWP00088/14)/Fwd: Your letter from
9/5/Fwd: Brev fra David Simms, Work Services Director, fra 4. april
To: DWP ICE gateway team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: Colin Simber <colin.simber@linskills.co.uk>, "emb.london"
<emb.london@mfa.no>, HRW UK <hrwuk@hrw.org>, amnestyis
<amnestyis@amnesty.org>, Politikk Høyre <politikk@hoyre.no>, Phso
Enquiries <phso.enquiries@ombudsman.org.uk>, post <post@mfa.no>,
Akademikerforbundet <post@akademikerforbundet.no>, LHT Customer
Service <csc@lht.co.uk>, Pia Ribsskog <pia@nfunorge.org>, Bjørn
Ribsskog <bribsskog@gmail.com>, she <she@topdanmark.dk>,
"hv-02.kontakt" <hv-02.kontakt@mil.no>, "anne-kathrine.skodvin"
<anne-kathrine.skodvin@ica.no>, post <post@spesialenheten.no>,
"EUteam@amnesty.org" <EUteam@amnesty.org>, "SCT@amnesty.org.uk"
<sct@amnesty.org.uk>, hofmarskallatet@kongehuset.dk, Liverpool Direct
<liverpool.direct@liverpool.gov.uk>, Vernepliktsverkets kontaktsenter
ved Wenche Molstad <vpv.kontakt@mil.no>, post@slottet.no, Runcorn
Office <runcornoffice@taroe.org>, Lars Aasen <lbf@lbf.no>, Info
<info@tpas.org.uk>, Benefits Service
<benefits.service@liverpooldirectlimited.co.uk>, "steve.rotheram.mp"
<steve.rotheram.mp@parliament.uk>, LO Postkasse LO <lo@lo.no>,
rcjchancery.judgeslisting@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

Hi again,

sorry I write many e-mails.

But when the Jobcentre write the date they need the signing by
post-forms on their desk, (in the letter), and not the date I'm
supposed to post the signing by post-forms.

Then that's alienation.

And when you refer to my complaint in your funny 'element'-way.

(Instead of in a normay/conventional way).

Then that's also alienation, I'd say.

So that I wanted to complain about.

Regards,

Erik Ribsskog

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: 2014-05-25 17:30 GMT+01:00
Subject: New update/Fwd: Update/Fwd: Your letter from 22/5, (ICE Ref:
DWP00088/14)/Fwd: Your letter from 9/5/Fwd: Brev fra David Simms, Work
Services Director, fra 4. april
To: Colin Simber <colin.simber@linskills.co.uk>
Cc: DWP ICE gateway team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>, "emb.london"
<emb.london@mfa.no>, HRW UK <hrwuk@hrw.org>, amnestyis
<amnestyis@amnesty.org>, Politikk Høyre <politikk@hoyre.no>, Phso
Enquiries <phso.enquiries@ombudsman.org.uk>, post <post@mfa.no>,
Akademikerforbundet <post@akademikerforbundet.no>, LHT Customer
Service <csc@lht.co.uk>, Pia Ribsskog <pia@nfunorge.org>, Bjørn
Ribsskog <bribsskog@gmail.com>, she <she@topdanmark.dk>,
"hv-02.kontakt" <hv-02.kontakt@mil.no>, "anne-kathrine.skodvin"
<anne-kathrine.skodvin@ica.no>, post <post@spesialenheten.no>,
"EUteam@amnesty.org" <EUteam@amnesty.org>, "SCT@amnesty.org.uk"
<sct@amnesty.org.uk>, hofmarskallatet@kongehuset.dk, Liverpool Direct
<liverpool.direct@liverpool.gov.uk>, Vernepliktsverkets kontaktsenter
ved Wenche Molstad <vpv.kontakt@mil.no>, post@slottet.no, Runcorn
Office <runcornoffice@taroe.org>, Lars Aasen <lbf@lbf.no>, Info
<info@tpas.org.uk>, Benefits Service
<benefits.service@liverpooldirectlimited.co.uk>, "steve.rotheram.mp"
<steve.rotheram.mp@parliament.uk>, LO Postkasse LO <lo@lo.no>,
rcjchancery.judgeslisting@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

Hi,

you don't even refer to my complaint, when you do your writings.

If it's something you wonder about, you could write e.g.: 'In your
e-mail, you write that ...., did you mean ...'.

But you just write some 'commie-stuff'.

You seem to process the complaints, in a type of industrial way, it seems.

So that's very strange, I think.

I guess this could be some kind of in-house process, that you have.

But when you deal with me, I would like you to refer to my complaint,
in a conventional/normal way.

And not write in this funny way, which you call 'element', I think.

I hope this is alright!

Best regards,

Erik Ribsskog

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: 2014-05-25 17:09 GMT+01:00
Subject: Update/Fwd: Your letter from 22/5, (ICE Ref:
DWP00088/14)/Fwd: Your letter from 9/5/Fwd: Brev fra David Simms, Work
Services Director, fra 4. april
To: DWP ICE gateway team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: "Cc: Colin Simber" <colin.simber@linskills.co.uk>, "emb.london"
<emb.london@mfa.no>, HRW UK <hrwuk@hrw.org>, amnestyis
<amnestyis@amnesty.org>, Politikk Høyre <politikk@hoyre.no>, Phso
Enquiries <phso.enquiries@ombudsman.org.uk>, post <post@mfa.no>,
Akademikerforbundet <post@akademikerforbundet.no>, LHT Customer
Service <csc@lht.co.uk>, Pia Ribsskog <pia@nfunorge.org>, Bjørn
Ribsskog <bribsskog@gmail.com>, she <she@topdanmark.dk>,
"hv-02.kontakt" <hv-02.kontakt@mil.no>, "anne-kathrine.skodvin"
<anne-kathrine.skodvin@ica.no>, post <post@spesialenheten.no>,
"EUteam@amnesty.org" <EUteam@amnesty.org>, "SCT@amnesty.org.uk"
<sct@amnesty.org.uk>, hofmarskallatet@kongehuset.dk, Liverpool Direct
<liverpool.direct@liverpool.gov.uk>, Vernepliktsverkets kontaktsenter
ved Wenche Molstad <vpv.kontakt@mil.no>, post@slottet.no, Runcorn
Office <runcornoffice@taroe.org>, Lars Aasen <lbf@lbf.no>, Info
<info@tpas.org.uk>, Benefits Service
<benefits.service@liverpooldirectlimited.co.uk>, "steve.rotheram.mp"
<steve.rotheram.mp@parliament.uk>, LO Postkasse LO <lo@lo.no>,
rcjchancery.judgeslisting@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

Hi,

I'm not even a client of ICE, I think.

I'm writing to you, as a citizen, I think.

And ICE is like an Ombudsman, I think.

So you should just deal with my complaint, and not send me all your
'in-house' stuff.

And also, about the letters.

A manager can tell an employe, that he needs a file, on his desk, by a
specific date and time.

But I'm not sure if the Jobcentre can say that.

They should be focues on how the client should go forward, I think.

And when it's about signing by post.

Then it's about the post, I think.

So when the Jobcentre then mentions a date, then people who reads the
letter, would naturally think that this date is the posting-date.

That's the date you should focus on then.

But when you just mention the date you need it on your desk.

(And not the posting-date).

When it's about signing by post.

Then you don't care about the clients, I think.

You ignore the client, and just think about yourselves, I think.

Then you don't threat your clients fine, I think.

Just something I thought about.

Regards,

Erik Ribsskog

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: 2014-05-25 16:45 GMT+01:00
Subject: Your letter from 22/5, (ICE Ref: DWP00088/14)/Fwd: Your
letter from 9/5/Fwd: Brev fra David Simms, Work Services Director, fra
4. april
To: DWP ICE gateway team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: Colin Simber <colin.simber@linskills.co.uk>, "emb.london"
<emb.london@mfa.no>, HRW UK <hrwuk@hrw.org>, amnestyis
<amnestyis@amnesty.org>, Politikk Høyre <politikk@hoyre.no>, Phso
Enquiries <phso.enquiries@ombudsman.org.uk>, post <post@mfa.no>,
Akademikerforbundet <post@akademikerforbundet.no>, LHT Customer
Service <csc@lht.co.uk>, Pia Ribsskog <pia@nfunorge.org>, Bjørn
Ribsskog <bribsskog@gmail.com>, she <she@topdanmark.dk>,
"hv-02.kontakt" <hv-02.kontakt@mil.no>, "anne-kathrine.skodvin"
<anne-kathrine.skodvin@ica.no>, post <post@spesialenheten.no>,
"EUteam@amnesty.org" <EUteam@amnesty.org>, "SCT@amnesty.org.uk"
<sct@amnesty.org.uk>, hofmarskallatet@kongehuset.dk, Liverpool Direct
<liverpool.direct@liverpool.gov.uk>, Vernepliktsverkets kontaktsenter
ved Wenche Molstad <vpv.kontakt@mil.no>, post@slottet.no, Runcorn
Office <runcornoffice@taroe.org>, Lars Aasen <lbf@lbf.no>, Info
<info@tpas.org.uk>, Benefits Service
<benefits.service@liverpooldirectlimited.co.uk>, "steve.rotheram.mp"
<steve.rotheram.mp@parliament.uk>, LO Postkasse LO <lo@lo.no>,
rcjchancery.judgeslisting@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

Hi,

I'm refering to your letter from 22/5, which I received yesterday,
(and attach a copy of).

I think that when you ask me to rephrase my complaint, then you threat
me like I'm an employee of the Jobcentre, and not a client.

This is the same, as when I do signing by post.

Then you say the letter has to be with the Jobcentre, before a certain date.

So you threat me like an employee, I think.

When I went to comerce and office-school in Norway, then we learned
about that a letter should be _sent_ by a certain date.

So when you deal with clients, you should tell them to post a letter
before a certain date, I think.

You shouldn't tell them when you need the letter.

That's the difference between how to threat an employee and a client, I think.

If the Jobcentre threat me like both an employee and a client.

Then I get a double-role.

This I don't want.

Then it's power-abuse, from the Government, I think, if I can't be
threated as a client.

Like I've explained earlier, (in meetings etc., with the jobcentre),
at commerce and office-school, we also learned, (in Marketing), that
food is a basic need.

I'm dependant of the Government here, to get money for food.

And I then think things should be fine.

So I don't like it when you give me this double-role, like I get, when
you threat me like an employee.

(Since I'm a client, of the Jobcentre, from before, I think).

So I wanted to please complain about this.

Regards,

Erik Ribsskog

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: 2014-05-18 15:18 GMT+01:00
Subject: Your letter from 9/5/Fwd: Brev fra David Simms, Work Services
Director, fra 4. april
To: DWP ICE gateway team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: Colin Simber <colin.simber@linskills.co.uk>,
l.kennedy@easylaw.co.uk, "emb.london" <emb.london@mfa.no>, HRW UK
<hrwuk@hrw.org>, amnestyis <amnestyis@amnesty.org>, Politikk Høyre
<politikk@hoyre.no>, Phso Enquiries <phso.enquiries@ombudsman.org.uk>,
post <post@mfa.no>, Akademikerforbundet <post@akademikerforbundet.no>,
LHT Customer Service <csc@lht.co.uk>, Pia Ribsskog <pia@nfunorge.org>,
Bjørn Ribsskog <bribsskog@gmail.com>, she <she@topdanmark.dk>,
"hv-02.kontakt" <hv-02.kontakt@mil.no>, "anne-kathrine.skodvin"
<anne-kathrine.skodvin@ica.no>, post <post@spesialenheten.no>,
"EUteam@amnesty.org" <EUteam@amnesty.org>, "SCT@amnesty.org.uk"
<sct@amnesty.org.uk>, hofmarskallatet@kongehuset.dk, Liverpool Direct
<liverpool.direct@liverpool.gov.uk>, Vernepliktsverkets kontaktsenter
ved Wenche Molstad <vpv.kontakt@mil.no>, post@slottet.no, Runcorn
Office <runcornoffice@taroe.org>, Lars Aasen <lbf@lbf.no>, Info
<info@tpas.org.uk>, Benefits Service
<benefits.service@liverpooldirectlimited.co.uk>, "steve.rotheram.mp"
<steve.rotheram.mp@parliament.uk>, LO Postkasse LO <lo@lo.no>,
rcjchancery.judgeslisting@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

Hei,

jeg fortsetter å skrive på norsk til dere, (i denne saken), siden det
er mitt førstespråk, og denne saken er rimelig komplisert, for å si
det sånn.

For det første, dere er tjenesteytere, og burde være fokusert på å
tjene klienten, (mener jeg).

Dere oppgir ikke noen referanse, for meg, (som har sendt dere mange
klager tidligere).

Så når jeg åpnet brevet deres, så brukte jeg en del tid, på å undre
på, hva dette liksom skulle være svar på.

Har dere hørt om å skrive, for eksempel: 'Vi viser til Deres brev fra
den og den datoen'.

At dere ikke skriver sånn, det vitner om at dere ikke respekterer
deres klienter, mener jeg.

Dere lever i en verden hvor alt dreier seg om staten, liksom.

Som i noe av Orwell eller Kafka.

Noe sånt.

Også, i denne saken har the Jobcentre 'svimet' så mye.

Så at dere diskuterer detaljene fortsatt er en skandale, mener jeg.

Jeg forklarer her, på mitt nettsted, (johncons.angelfire.com), om hva
denne svimetheten/forrvirretheten, fra the Jobcentre, består i:

'7.3.2014: Etter at jeg ble arrestert og varetektsfengslet, 10.
januar, (etter falske anklager og tyveri av PC-en min, fra
politiet), så ble jeg 'bannet', fra Aintree Jobcentre, i tre måneder,
(og måtte utføre 'sign on by post'). les mer (link til
johncons-blogg). Etter å ha utført 'sign on by post', i en drøy måned,
så stoppet plutselig arbeidsledighetstrygden min,
fordi at jeg 'did not attend'. les mer (link til johncons-blogg). Men
jeg hadde sendt de avtalte skjemaene, i posten, (på
den måten, som jeg hadde blitt bedt om), så dette er bare noe slags
terror, fra the Jobcentre, vil jeg si, (og at de prøver
å få meg til å sulte ihjel, eller noe lignende). les mer (link til
johncons-blogg)'.

Hvis staten hadde vært en person, så hadde man sagt at den var
forrvirret, hvis personen hadde oppført seg, som staten, i denne
saken.

Og personen ville blitt lagt inn på hvilehjem, eller noe.

Så dette er altså at staten, sitter på hvilkehjem, og skal diskutere
detaljene, i en sak, som den er overbevist om, at den ikke har surret
med, og etter å ha straffet meg, og fratatt meg trygd.

Hvis staten er sendt på hvilehjem, (noe jeg mener at er greit å si,
etter å ha pastet den forklaringen, fra mitt nettsted), så må staten
trekke seg ut, og innrømme at den har 'bæsja på leggen'.

Men her går staten bare videre, som en gal mann.

Her må noen få sparken, mener jeg.

Jeg har tidligere klaget til dere, for at dere ringte meg, da jeg var
på Tesco Superstore, etter å ha vært, på Williamsson Square Jobcentre.

Dere ville at jeg skulle forklare, om min klage, per mobil, mens jeg
var på super'n.

Dette ble bare tull og tøys.

Og seinere, så har jeg ikke klart å få dere til å forrandre på deres
gjenskrevne klager.

Dere deler klagene opp i 'elementer'.

Hvor lærer man å gjøre dette?

Har dere vært på studiebesøk hos arbeidsformidlingen i Moskva eller
Albania, lurer jeg.

Dette virker som noe fremmed og rart, for meg.

Kan dere ikke bare behandle klagene som de er da?

Dette med å gjøre om klagene til elementer er vel bare et unødvendig
mellomledd, (som jeg har erfaring med at brukes, for å 'ufarliggjøre'
og endre klager, sånn at de ikke gir den samme meningen lenger. Det er
helt meningsløst og også noe en galning kunne tenkes å gjøre, mener
jeg, å ha et sånt system, nei staten inn på galehuset, mener jeg, sånn
som dere holder på, med å svime, og med disse elementene. Elementer
for meg, er noe min farfar lagde, for Jensen Møbler. Min farfar hadde
snekkerverksted, og lagde noen elementer, som ble brukt, i madrassene,
til Jensen Møbler, som holdt til i samme kommune).

Så at man skal lage elementer, av klager, (råvarer).

Det blir som noe nedlatende for meg, at mine klager skal kalles råvarer.

Det er æreskrenkelse og trakassering, fra staten, mener jeg.

Det er en uting, som staten burde slutte med, mener jeg.

Jeg ser også at dere bruker uttrykket 'deadline'.

Det er bedre å si 'frist', mener jeg.

Deadline for meg, er noe de har i aviser.

Jeg synes det virker litt makabert at staten skal prate om død, i sin
korresponanse, med sine jobcentre-klienter.

Skjerpings!

Erik Ribsskog

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: 2014-04-14 11:46 GMT+01:00
Subject: Brev fra David Simms, Work Services Director, fra 4. april
To: DWP ICE gateway team <ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: "emb.london" <emb.london@mfa.no>, post <post@mfa.no>, "mail.gva"
<mail.gva@efta.int>, Pia Ribsskog <pia@nfunorge.org>, Politikk Høyre
<politikk@hoyre.no>, info@linskills.co.uk

Hei,

jeg velger å skrive til dere på norsk, siden det er EØS nå, og siden
at norsk er mitt førstespråk.

Det nevnte brevet inneholder en del sludder.

Noe jeg synes det er enklest å ta for meg på norsk.

Sludderet er at det ikke finnes bevis for at jeg har sendt det aktuelle brevet.

Det har jeg påpekt, i tidligere korresponanse, at jeg tok et bilde, av
da jeg postet brevet.

Og jeg lastet opp brevet på Flikcr, før fristen hos the Jobcentre.

Det er bevis, mener jeg.

Jeg har tidligere linket til en bloggpost, hvor dette bildet kan sees.

Dette ignorerer direktøren.

Og så skriver han noe sludder, om at det ikke kan bevises, at jeg har
sendt brevet.

Det er da man skjønner at den norske politiker Berntsen i sin tid
kalte en britisk kollega for en drittsekk.

Nå er det EØS og da kan ikke briter være sånn mot en annen EØS-borger,
mener jeg.

Men men.

Har denne politiker nå begynt å jobbe for DWP, lurer jeg.

Hm.

Dessuten, direktøren skriver at jeg skal ha sendt en e-post, hvor jeg
skriver, at jeg har jobbet 60-70 timer i uken, og tjent 300 pund i
uken.

Dette er det rene sludder.

Jeg har ikke sendt en sånn e-post, og jeg har aldri jobbet så mye,
(eller tjent så mye penger), på nettbutikken min.

Så det er bare tullball.

Her er det dikting og udokumenterte påstander, i stor stil.

Helt klart et angrep på meg, siden jeg har arbeidssaker mot
Bertelsmann/Microsoft, Coop og ICA.

Noe sånt.

Skjerpings!

Her må jeg få en stor erstatning, sånn at jeg slipper å gå på
Jobcentre-kontorer, resten av livet, når jeg blir tullet med sånn av
de.

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

Jeg fulgte dessuten the Jobcentre sine rutiner, når jeg sendte det
nevnte brevet.

Hvorfor skal jeg straffes, for at the Jobcentre har dårlige rutiner?

(Jeg sendte brevet på den måten, som the Jobcentre ba meg om.

Skal jeg straffes for at man ikke kan stole på postmennene, i England?

Nei, dette er tegn på at det britiske samfunnet, er i en krise.

Her diktes det enten opp, at brev blir borte.

Ellers så blir brev borte.

Både Royal Mail og the Jobcentre er myndighetene.

Så dette er uansett de britiske myndigheter sitt ansvar.

Problemet er hos de britiske myndigheter her.

Og jeg blir straffet.

Det er som noe av Kafka eller Orwell.

Et særdeles dårlig samfunn.

Jeg har heller ikke skrevet 'love-e-poster', til embedsfolk, hos the
Jobcentre/Ingeus.

Det er bare oppdiktet.

Som den e-posten om at jeg skal ha jobbet så mye og tjent så mye.

Noen finner opp falske e-poster og sier at jeg har skrevet de.

Jeg vet ikke hvem, men min solicitor burde ha funnet ut dette nå.

Det er Colin hos Linskills.

Han har hatt måneder på seg, og har nok funnet ut hvem tullerne er nå.

Jeg fortalte han at min mor sa at Everton var et bra lag, (og holdt
med dem), rett etter at jeg hadde blitt urettferdig arrestert, i
januar, var det vel.

'That's the first sad thing I've heard all day', svarte han.

Veldig rart vel.

Så at jeg hadde blitt arrestert, var ikke trist?

Nei, dette er en advokater som hater meg, virker det som.

Han sa også: 'You are Erik, aren't you'.

Hva skal det bety?

Selvfølgelig er jeg meg selv.

Erik Ribsskog, det fikk han vel vite, av politiet.

Advokatens oppførsel er besynderlig, vil jeg si.

Kanskje ambassaden i London kan rydde litt.

Er Linskills som heller fører en sak mot meg her, enn å forsvare meg?

Styggdom vil jeg uansett kalle denne 'kommunst-mafia-saken' mot meg.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious content by MessageLabs for your protection
______________________________________________________________________

------ Please do not remove your unique tracking number! ------
<<#22175-396437#>>
______________________________________________________________________
DISCLAIMER:

The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be read, copied or used only by the intended recipient(s). If you have received it in error please contact the sender immediately by returning the e-mail or by telephoning a number contained in the body of the e-mail then and please delete the e-mail without disclosing its contents elsewhere. No responsibility is accepted for loss or damage arising from viruses or changes made to this message after it was sent. The views contained in this email are those of the author and not necessarily those of the authors employer or service provider.

This email has been automatically scanned for viruses and malicious content by MessageLabs for your protection
______________________________________________________________________

tirsdag 3. juni 2014

Jeg sendte en e-post til the Council

Bloggarkiv

Populære innlegg

Om meg

Totalt antall sidevisninger

Etiketter