Jeg sendte en e-post til LSC

Erik Ribsskog

---

Complaint/Fwd: Oppdatering/Fwd: Klage/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Delay) 1 message

---

Erik Ribsskog	Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:08 PM
To: legal.lsc@legalservices.gov.uk Cc: she , Politikk Høyre , Akademikerforbundet , LHT Customer Service , Runcorn Office , Info , Bjørn Ribsskog , admin , ITCGM- Norwegian Consulate , "hv-02.kontakt" , "anne-kathrine.skodvin" , "post@nav.no" , "steve.rotheram.mp" , rcjchancery.judgeslisting@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk, "HRET (postmottak)" , findasolicitor , "emb.london"
Hi, I was at Liverpool & Knowsley Magistates Court today. In a meeting with National Probation Service. A Mr. Peter Lochart, (I think his name was). The meeting lasted for around two hours. And Mr. Lochart explained, that my solicitor-company Linskills, had informed, (the court I guess), in June, that I had Aspbergers. But that's a lie. I don't have any thing like that. So my own solicitor-company is doing sabotage against me, it seems. I've earlier complained about them, to the Law Society, and to you at LSC. Other solicitors says I have to stick with Linskills. (Even if I've tried to switch several times). Due to some administrative formalities to do with legal aid. (April Roberts-Cadwell from Kerwins told me this). But can that be right, I was wondering. (Linskills has also sent me letters to late. Letters regarding new apointments. So that I received the letters after the apointment-time. And then they naged at me for not going to the meeting. Is this the candid camera I'm wondering). Is it right I can't switch solicitor-company at the time I want? This seems strange and as a type of corruption in society I think. Erik Ribsskog ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 13:58:52 +0100 Subject: Oppdatering/Fwd: Klage/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Delay) To: "emb.london" <emb.london@mfa.no> Cc: Legal LSC <legal.lsc@legalservices.gov.uk>, she <she@topdanmark.dk>, Politikk Høyre <politikk@hoyre.no>, Akademikerforbundet <post@akademikerforbundet.no>, LHT Customer Service <csc@lht.co.uk>, Runcorn Office <runcornoffice@taroe.org>, Info <info@tpas.org.uk>, Bjørn Ribsskog <bribsskog@gmail.com>, admin <admin@lpl-norwegian-consulate.org.uk>, ITCGM- Norwegian Consulate <norconsulate@itcgm.co.uk>, "hv-02.kontakt" <hv-02.kontakt@mil.no>, "anne-kathrine.skodvin" <anne-kathrine.skodvin@ica.no>, "post@nav.no" <post@nav.no>, "steve.rotheram.mp" <steve.rotheram.mp@parliament.uk>, rcjchancery.judgeslisting@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk, "HRET (postmottak)" <post@hoyesterett.no> Hei, jeg var hos Liverpool og Knowsley Magistrates Court, i dag. I moete med noe som heter National Probation Service. Det var et cirka to timer langt moete, med en Peter Lochart, (het han vel). Det fremkom i moetet, at mitt solicitor-firma Linskills har sagt, (i juni, ifoelge Lochart), at jeg har asberger. Men det er oppdiktet. Jeg maa si det er sabotasje mot meg, fra mitt eget advokatfirma. (Som representerer meg i en 'dum' sak. Politi og dommere later som at de ikke forstaar hva spoofing er. Og noen har sendt rare e-poster, fra min e-post-konto, til en Jobcentre-dame, ved aa forfalske avsender-feltet, i e-posten. Og jeg ble funnet skyldig, i denne justismord-saken. Hvor baade advokater, politi og dommere preges av ignoranse, vil jeg si. Hva er dette for noe tull, lurer jeg). Jeg har kontaktet min soester Pia, for aa faa et noedlaan, for aa flytte tilbake, til Norge. Men hu svarer ikke. Saa jeg gjentar mitt spoersmaal til ambassaden, om et noedlaan, paa i stoerrelseorden 5 - 10.000 NOK. For flybillett, noedpass og opphold i Norge, de foreste dagene, etter hjemkomsten. (Foer jeg faar noe bosted gjennom Oslo kommune, etc). Politiet her i England, terroriserer meg, gjennom mangfoldige tulle-arrestasjoner. Som jeg har opplyst dere om tidligere. De bryter seg inn i leiligheten min og hamrer paa doera, og braaker som om det er tyske bombefly, under krigen. Ogsaa kidnapper de meg, og holder meg innelaast, paa glattcelle i timevis/dagevis, og tvinger meg til aa prate med 'mental-nurse', osv. Her blir jeg lurt opp i stry, mener jeg. Jeg bodde i Norge, de foerste 34 aarene, av mitt liv. Og jeg ble ikke arrestert, en eneste gang. Saa dette vil jeg klage paa, og om dere kunne begynne aa svare, paa mine e-poster. For det har jeg til gode aa se enda, vil jeg si. Erik Ribsskog ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 02:24:14 +0100 Subject: Klage/Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Delay) To: "emb.london" <emb.london@mfa.no> Cc: post <post@mfa.no> Hei, nå er det noe tull, hos konsulatet deres, i Manchester også. Jeg har fått masse rare e-poster fra dem, i hele kveld. Og dere har stengt på onsdager og svarer ikke. Det er så mye tull, med den løven deres nå, synes jeg. Har den mista potene, (og øksa), sånn som den katta, (i Norge), som det har vært om, i nettavisene, i det siste? Erik Ribsskog ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com> Date: Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 2:01 AM Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Delay) To: eribsskog@gmail.com This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY. YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE. Delivery to the following recipient has been delayed:      norconsulate@itcgm.co.uk Message will be retried for 2 more day(s) Technical details of temporary failure: The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect. Learn more at http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?answer=7720 [(0) mailgate.manchester-enterprises.co.uk. [217.113.164.131]:25: Connection timed out] [(10) mailgate.megroup.co.uk. [217.113.164.131]:25: Connection timed out] ----- Original message ----- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;         d=gmail.com; s=20120113;         h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to          :cc:content-type;         bh=F1E6DE19SfY/MFnKBvWbkYLyWoNplz3zsmkx+DzYtiI=;         b=ltWGbMi62cBlLoy/cKqMw41sXqtxYiG1znxpRWsDRoBafKo2Ip6IpjFL3TvtICDtmG          zlsYEWvmwaWOr7dxko9/KaZfQMVM449Z0TwUS4TXTyCU5zwsULewhwYO0AKL0ehAJFwW          b9zBhlSs75FaqldxTV7Sv1lE7QP0xYLFjlWCapDXaoJMZcfQB7ZnrYzHEVvqAxME64ES          Q2GpqGK1RDkeCBtxIOxPkSkpaNyP2UGLEAmkF4jtc+kBVU5AqQKPA+Z1alC4ATvC3lB/          XQNWIEiVyIundBItSRBl0i4BoTkCbgj5i2GVEs33SNdmPkCSfh6O07TZ06zsgl31nzYU          K9Cg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.141.109 with SMTP id rn13mr10124609pab.117.1408751082565;  Fri, 22 Aug 2014 16:44:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.14.194 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 16:44:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6B1C1C191AA6F24D943E18C93CA8345197C71C4C@LEOEXPR01.LegalOmbudsman.me> References: <6B1C1C191AA6F24D943E18C93CA8345197C71C4C@LEOEXPR01.LegalOmbudsman.me> Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 00:44:42 +0100 Message-ID: <CAGtfns6Dt0X9mM4QJ1kuRWpuP7E8At+nj1aB6LUgseLqHCu2gQ@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: CASE_201410256 From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com> To: Enquiries <Enquiries@legalombudsman.org.uk> Cc: Legal LSC <legal.lsc@legalservices.gov.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Bcc: norconsulate@itcgm.co.uk Hi, thank you for your e-mail! I have escalated about this, to the Legal Services Comission. (Since I've earlier complained, to a different legal ombudsman. The Legal Services Ombudsman. I wasn't aware of that they had closed down. And I wasn't aware of you, (the new legal ombudsmans status). So I have escalated about this, to the Legal Services Commission). Thanks again for your e-mail about this. Best regards, Erik Ribsskog On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Enquiries <Enquiries@legalombudsman.org.uk> wrote: > Thank you for contacting the Legal  Ombudsman. > > > > Please see the attached letter. > > *********************** > > This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the > addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not > permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies > and > inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. > Any > reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please > bear > that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this > message > by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be > monitored, recorded and retained by the Legal Ombudsman. E-mail monitoring / > blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. > You > have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or > forwarding > e-mails and their contents. > > > ***********************