E-mail to the Euro Ombudsman, 30/6/08.

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

---

The European Economic Area.

---

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>	Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 8:57 PM
To: euro-ombudsman@europarl.europa.eu
Hi,   I'm a Norwegian citizen living in Britain.   Here, there have been many problems, at work, and regarding a complaint against the Police etc., that I haven't got any help with. (I've also contacted the Norwegian Government, regarding these problems, but they don't answer my e-mails, and the Sivilombudsmannen, is part of a cover-up, from the Government, it seems, even if I wont explain this in detail now, but I can explain more detailed if it's needed).   I was wondering, since Norway, are part of the European Economical Area. So Norwegian citizens, are allowed, to live and work, in Britain, like if they were EU-Citizens, as I've understood it. But, I was wondering if this means, that one, as a Norwegian citizen in Britain, also has the right, to get help/advice from the Police, and other Goverment in Britain, like if one was an EU-citizen?   I think, that if one have the right to work and live in an EU-country, like the 'EFTA/EØS-agreement' says, then only has the right help from the Government, it that EU-country (the Police etc), like if one were an EU-citizen, right?   I just wanted to try to get this clear, since I'm having some problems, both with the Norwegian and the British Goverment now, so I just wanted to know, if some this could be something to do, with that one aren't that well protected by rights, if one are a Norwegian citizen living in the EU? Hope that you have the chance to answer about this, and thanks in advance for the reply!   Yours sincerely, Erik Ribsskog

---

Rare ting i England. (In Norwegian).

I England, så er det sånn, som det også er i Norge, at klager på politiet, går til en klageinstans, som heter IPCC.

Som står for the Independent Police Complaints Commission, tror jeg.

Det er noe lignende av Spesialenheten i Norge.

Og der skal liksom klagene stoppe opp(?)

Det er bare tullball, mener jeg.

For man må se hvor pengene kommer fra, til politiet.

Og de kommer vel fra finansdepartementet, og blir gitt til justisdepartementet, som gir penger til politiet.

Så her, burde også klager på politiet gå, i hvertfall hvis det er annet en rene rutine-klager da.

Men hvis det er spesielle klager, så burde de gå tjenesteveien, synes jeg, som alle andre steder.

Hvis ikke, så betyr det, at politiet kan bare gjøre hva de vil.

Eller, det betyr at myndighetene gir penger til politiet, men de har ikke ansvar for hva politiet gjør.

Enda, at myndighetene, vel er den som ansetter politisjefer og ministere.

Altså regjeringen da, eller statsministeren.

Så dette systemet med IPCC og Spesialenheten, det virker litt som lureri, synes jeg.

Som en måte for politikerne og embedsverket, å avskrive seg ansvaret for hva politiet gjør, enda de gir de penger, og ansetter lederne.

Så dette får jeg ikke til å høres riktig ut, dessverre.

Her er det noe lureri.

Og muligheter for å utnytte politiet, til å gjøre politiske motiverte ting, f.eks., uten at politikerne/embedsverket, må ta ansvaret for dette.

For politiet må være politisk styrt, vil jeg tro, siden politisjefer osv., utnevnes av poltikere.

Så her er det helt klart noe lureri, vil jeg si.

En annen ting i England, som også er noe lureri.

Det er dette Citizens Advice Buraux.

Dette er formellt en veldedig organisasjon, men de får nesten alle pengene fra myndighetene.

Så egentlig så er nok disse politisk styrt.

Men politikerne har ikke noe ansvar.

Hvis noe går galt, så er de med en gang, kun en veldedig organisasjon, som man ikke har noen rettigheter fra.

Dette gjør det mulig, å eventuelt, for politikerne, bruke pengestøtten som pressmiddel, f.eks., å eventuelt blande seg inn i enkeltsaker f.eks.

Uten å måtte ta noe ansvar, for dette.

Så CAB (Citizens Advice Buraux), er litt underfundig, vil jeg si.

Den er 'Government', når det passer den.

Og den er en 'Charity', når det passer den.

Så den CAB, burde man helst ikke ha noe med å gjøre, den er veldig sleip.

Så sånn er det.

Og CAB, sendte politiet meg til, og sa de var 'Government'.

Så politiet er nok minst like sleipe.

Så hvem man kan stole på, som nordmann, av myndighetene i Storbritannia, det vil ikke jeg si noe sikkert om, men hvis jeg skulle gjette, så ville jeg tippe, at det nok ikke var så veldig mange av de.

Så sånn er det.

Med vennlig hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

E-mail to the Ministry of Justice, Ryan Holmes, 30/6/08.

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

---

RE: Our ref: TO08/2153

---

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>	Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 7:23 PM
To: "Holmes, Ryan" <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk>
Hi,   thank you very much for your answer!   I think that the IPCC, probably recieves founding from the Government. And, I think, that if the IPCC, don't answer their e-mails etc, then this is a matter, for the Ministry, who are administratively in charge of the IPCC.   Which I think must be the Ministry of Justice.   I don't think the Ministry of Justice, can't pretend that they aren't in charge of the Police, like you are trying now. So, I write this, mostly, to put it on my blog, and then I'll think further, on how to go forward with this. Yours sincerely, Erik Ribsskog   On 6/30/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote: Dear Mr Ribsskog Thank you for your email reply of 23 June. While I am sorry to read of your ongoing concerns, I am afraid there is little useful information I can add to the previous correspondence that you have received from this Department. As previously explained, if you choose to further your concerns regarding your complaint with the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), you must address the matter to the IPCC directly. Similarly, the Ministry of Justice is unable to comment on or give advice on how to escalate your case with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) or the American Embassy. I can only confirm that the points you have raised have been thoroughly considered and that the Department has been as helpful as possible in answering your concerns. I am sorry that I am unable to be of more help, but I hope you can appreciate for the reasons given above that the Department is unable to intervene in your case. Hence, any further correspondence sent that addresses the same points will be placed on file and not responded to. Yours sincerely, Ryan Holmes Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division -----Original Message----- From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com] Sent: 23 June 2008 14:20 To: Holmes, Ryan Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153 Hi,   I've already been in contact with the Complaints Manager at the IPCC, but this hasn't resovled the problems. I suspect could be some corruption involved there, because something is obviouslly wrong there in my opinion.   Also I wondering a bit on how to escalate the case I've been in contact with the FBI, or the American Embassy, about.   Also, I've been in contact with the Norwegian equivalent, of the IPCC, that's Spesialenheten, regarding another, but linked, matter.   And they sort under the Norwegian Ministry of Justice. So, I think that the IPCC are sorting under the British Ministy of Justice(?)   If not, who should they then be sorting under?   Sorry if I'm asking stupid questions.   Yours sincerely, Erik Ribsskog   On 6/23/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote: Dear Mr Ribsskog Thank you for your email reply of 19 June. The Ministry of Justice is unable to submit a complaint on your behalf to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC). Additionally, a complaint against the IPCC cannot be directed to the Ministry of Justice for review as this does not fall within the remit of this Department. If you wish to make a complaint against the IPCC you must do this by addressing your concerns to the IPCC directly. The information provided below outlines how to do this. If you have a complaint or query about a casework decision, the IPCC will do their best to clearly explain the reason for their decisions and answer any concerns you have. Please note however that IPCC casework decisions are final and they will not necessarily be able to change the outcome. For further information or advice on your rights you can contact a Citizens Advice Bureau, solicitor or your local MP. If you have a complaint about a member of staff at the IPCC, in the first instance you can contact the person concerned and the matter may be resolved there and then. As mentioned in my previous email, Casework Manager Sarah Brown is one of a number of IPCC staff that has conducted an investigation into your file and she can be contacted on 0207 166 3934 should you wish to discuss the details of your complaint further. However, since you mention that Miss Brown has not contacted you in the past, you may wish to raise any issues of concern through a line manager, or write to the Internal Complaints Manager. Alternatively, you can download a complaint form via the link http://www.ipcc.gov.uk/index/contact-us/complaints_ipcc.htm and make your complaint against the IPCC using the contact details below. Internal Complaints Manager Independent Police Complaints Commission 90 High Holborn London WC1V 6BH Fax: 0207 404 0695 Email: internal.complaints.unit@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk. I do hope that this information is of some use to you. Yours sincerely, Ryan Holmes Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division   -----Original Message----- From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com] Sent: 19 June 2008 20:35 To: Holmes, Ryan Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153 Hi,   thank you very much for your e-mail, and the advice!   I wanted to complain about the IPCC, since the whole case is a mess, and they don't reply to my e-mails, and they don't call me, you mention Brown, she has been supposed to call me, regarding the problems with the missing answers on the e-mails, but she haven't called. I think that the IPCC must have some serious problems, with handeling the complaints I sent them, which I view as one case really. So I was wondering, how I could submit this complaint, on the IPCC, to the Ministry of Justice. If you think that you could please submit this complaint for me.   Also, I've contacted the FBI, in the American Embassy, in London.   And I asked them, on how should go forward, regarding reporting a crime in the US, that someone, has set up a hate-blog against me there.   The FBI/The American Embassy Legal Advice, tells me to contact my local police-station, about this. But I've lost a bit of confidence, with the Merseyside Police, due to the things mentioned in the complaints, sent to the IPCC, and more. And then I thought, that I could contact the IPCC about this then, since I didn't think I could contact the local Police about this.   But now there has been so much problems, with the IPCC, so that I've lost a bit of confidence, in the IPCC, as well.   So then I have to contact the Ministry of Justice about this, since I don't think that eighter the Merseyside Police or the IPCC, have showed themselves, to be worthy, of much confidence, unfortunatly. So I'm mentioning this now.   Hope this is alright! Yours sincerely, Erik Ribsskog   On 6/19/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote: Dear Mr Ribsskog Thank you for your email reply of 5 June. I am also in receipt of your email dated 13 June. As explained in my previous reply, the Law Society is the regulatory body for solicitors in England and Wales and will keep a comprehensive list of solicitors practising in your local area. Their website promotes a searchable database to help you find a solicitor which allows you to search by firm name, area of law and/or post code. To alleviate your concerns about contacting the Law Society due to previous personal experiences, I should point out that this list is a resource to assist the public locate suitable legal representation and promote solicitors across England and Wales. You can access the facility via the following link: http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/choosingandusing/findasolicitor.law. Alternatively, you could also look through a local directory, such as the Yellow Pages, which might help identify a suitable firm. As suggested in my previous reply, you may wish to contact the Law Centres Federation on 0207 428 4401 who can provide contact details for your local Law Centre. Also, you may find it helpful to access the Community Legal Services Direct website for information on providers of legal advice at www.clsdirect.org.uk. These are all alternative options available to you that do not involve the assistance of the Law Society. With regard to the complaint you have submitted to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), I have contacted the IPCC to investigate the status of your complaint. Senior lawyers at the IPCC inform me that without your expressed consent, I am unable to obtain any information that relates to your complaint. I was informed however that Casework Manager Sarah Brown is one of a number of IPCC staff that has conducted an investigation into your file and she can be contacted on 0207 166 3934 should you wish to discuss the details of your complaint further. I do hope that this information is of some use to you. Yours sincerely, Ryan Holmes Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division -----Original Message----- From: Erik Ribsskog [mailto:eribsskog@gmail.com] Sent: 05 June 2008 01:51 To: Holmes, Ryan Subject: Re: Our ref: TO08/2153 Hi,   thank you very much for your e-mail!   I have been thinking about contacting the Law Society, regarding getting a list, like you say, for law firms, who take on law-cases on a 'pro bono' service basis. But, like I might have forgotten to explain, the Law Society, are already involved in this, I have complained about them to the Legal Services Ombudsman, who I have been contacting you about. So I've maybe lost a bit of confidence, in the Law Society, since I think they gave a bit of wrong information, and some errors, that I thought were a bit strange, so they are really involved in this from before. So then I was wondering about, if it would be right to involve the Law Society again, since they are involved from before. Maybe there is someone else one could contact about getting the name of companies like this? Sorry if I'm asking a lot of questions. I've also sent a complaint, on the Merseyside Police, to the IPCC. But the IPCC, aren't dealing with the complaint at all, it seems, so I was wondering who I should contact then, if I wanted to compain about the IPCC not dealing with the complaint on the Police?   Sorry again that I'm asking so many questions! Thanks in advance for the reply!   Yours sincerely, Erik Ribsskog   On 4/25/08, Holmes, Ryan <Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk> wrote: Dear Mr Ribsskog Thank you for your email reply of 7 April, in which you request further advice on ways to proceed forward with your complaint against the Legal Services Ombudsman (LSO).  To assist you with your concerns, I shall set out the avenues of legal assistance available to you that acknowledge your specific financial concerns. Firstly, while I understand you have already been in contact with the Citizen's Advice Bureau (CAB), you may also wish to consider contacting your local Law Centre.  Contact details for your local Law Centre can be found via the Law Centres Federation on 0207 428 4401, or by accessing their website www.lawcentres.org.uk. You may also find it helpful to access the Community Legal Services Direct website for information on providers of legal advice at www.clsdirect.org.uk.  Alternatively, you may choose to contact Community Legal Advice for free confidential help regarding your legal queries on 0845 345 4345. Secondly, it may be worth investigating the possibility of a Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA).  This allows a solicitor to accept a case on a 'no won, no fee' basis, under which they receive a fee from you only if the case is won.  It is worth pointing that the solicitor's standard fees can be increased by up to 100% to reflect the degree of risk to the solicitor in taking the case on (the 'success fee').  However, should you lose your case, you may still be liable to pay the successful party's costs, as well as expert witness fees and other disbursements.  There are insurance schemes that, for a premium, provide cover for these items.  As part of the implementation of the Access to Justice Act 1999, we have made it possible for the successful side to recover their lawyer's success fee and insurance premium form the loser. Effectively, this has made the operation of conditional fees fairer and more attractive to clients. Thirdly, some solicitors may be prepared to take on your case on a pro bono agreement (i.e. provide you with a free service).  You can contact the Law Society who can provide you with a list of solicitors that may provide pro bono services.  The Law Society is the regulatory body for solicitors in England and Wales and you can write to them at the following address: The Law Society 113 Chancery Lane London WC2A 1SX Tel: 0870 606 2555. Alternatively, you can access the Law Society's website at www.solicitors-online.com. I do hope that you find this information useful. Yours sincerely Ryan Holmes Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

---

E-post til Sivilombudsmann Arne Fliflet, 30. juni 2008. (In Norwegian).

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>

---

Til Sivilombudsmann Arne Fliflet. Ref. 2007/2263

---

Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>	Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 7:03 PM
To: post@sivilombudsmannen.no
Hei,   jeg viser til brev fra 26. juni, angående min forespørsel om ny saksbehandler.   Jeg skal oppsumere litt, hvordan jeg ser dette.   - Jeg sender dere klager på manglenede svar fra forskjellige etater og departementer.   - Dere ber meg sende et kort, undertegnet brev. (som en formalitet nærmest, for at klagene sendt på e-post skulle være formelle).   - Jeg sender et kort, undertegnet brev.   - Dere skriver tilbake, at jeg må sende alle klagene på nytt og forklare på nytt, og sende et nytt brev, siden dere later som at dere har blitt forvirret, av en oppdatering. (Virker som et set-up for meg).   - Jeg skriver at jeg sender en og en klage av gangen og starter med SMK.   - Jeg får avslag på klagen.   - Jeg ber om ny saksbehandler, på de andre klagene.   - Du later som at du ikke forstår hva jeg mener.   Dette er helt på tryne, for å si det på vanlig norsk.   Jeg skriver denne e-posten mest for å ha en kopi av denne e-posten på bloggen min, sånn at folk  kanskje skjønner hva som foregår. For jeg lurte, om jeg skulle skrive nå, og spørre hvorfor det står, 'Stortingets Sivilombudsmann', på brevene deres. Har jeg kommet til feil Sivilombudsmann? Hva er adressen til Sivilombudsmannen som er for vanlige folk?   Dette tenkte jeg at jeg skulle skrive, for å forklare hva jeg synes. Så skal jeg tenke mer gjennom hvordan jeg skal gå frem i forbindelse med dette.   Med hilsen Erik Ribsskog

---

Brev fra Sivilombudsmannen, 26. juni 2008. (In Norwegian).

Mer om hvordan jeg tolker hva Gabrielsen/Wiki-admin Flums, sa i telefonsamtale i går. (In Norwegian).

Som jeg skrev i en blogg-post i går.

Så er det jo sånn, at jeg pleier noen ganger å si, etter et møte, eller telefonsamtale, at jeg trenger litt tid på å fordøye det som ble tatt opp i møte, av ny informasjon, før jeg bestemmer meg, hva jeg skal gjøre videre.

For noen ganger, så surrer jo hva som ble sagt i møter osv., det surrer jo litt underbevistheten da.

Og nå tenkte jeg på noe Gabrielsen sa i telefonsamtalen i går.

Og det var, at han hadde lest på bloggen min, at jeg hadde skrevet, at jeg var forfulgt av mafia, i England (også), sa han, at jeg hadde skrevet.

Jeg husker ikke alt jeg har skrevet, men noen ganger skriver jeg hvordan jeg tror, eller mistenker at ting kan være også.

Men Gabrielsen sa dette på en måte, som at han skulle gjøre et poeng av det.

At han latterliggjorde meg litt, vil jeg si.

Han hadde problemer med å ta meg seriøst, sa han først.

Ok, men nå er det sånn, at ingen har forklart meg noe om noe mafia-greier, jeg vet bare det jeg har lest i avisene.

Så jeg skjønner at det morsomt å ha det artig på folks bekostning, som ikke vet om dette 'smart-ass' opplegget, som folk har drevet med i Norge, i det siste.

Jeg vet ikke hvorfor folk ikke forteller om mafia-ting til meg, men det kan ikke jeg gjøre noe med, uansett, hva folk forteller til meg, det er opptill andre folk, og ikke meg å bestemme.

Så at jeg skal bli latterliggjort, for hva andre gjør, eller ikke gjør, det synes jeg er litt rart.

Men sånn jeg tolker det Gabrielsen sa da.

Så er det ikke mafia da, som tuller med meg i England.

Mafia er det som tulla med meg i Norge da.

Som sikkert er tatt ned nå da, på måten Gabrielsen pratet.

De som tuller med meg i England, må vel da være politiet da.

Så er det sikker noe lokal mob, i Liverpool, som er uavhengig av den her mafian da, hvem nå de er.

Noe sånt kanskje.

Så det er tydelig at Gabrielsen vet hva som foregår.

Sånn tolker underbevistheten min, måten han gjorde et poeng av dette, at jeg hadde skrevet at jeg var forfulgt av mafia i England.

Men jeg beklager at jeg ikke er så inne i det her mafia-greiene.

Jeg skulle gjerne lest mer om det i avisa f.eks.

Men når myndighetene og journalistene sensurer virkeligheten, og ingen forteller meg hva som foregår, så er det ikke så mye jeg kan gjøre med det egentlig.

Så sånn er det.

Med vennlig hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

Evneveike folk i myndighetene? (In Norwegian).

Individuelle, universale rettigheter.

Hva er det politiet/myndighetene ikke skjønner her da.

Er dette for vanskelige begreper for politiet/myndighetene å skjønne?