Ingeborg Ribsskog - Baron Adeler Malteserordenen E-post til slottet om Mette-Marit videoen Er noe galt i Martine-saken? Problemer med Grandiosa? johncons-MUSIKK johncons-REISE johncons-FOTBALL

mandag 7. april 2008

E-mail to the Ministry of Justice, 7/8/08.

From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
To: Ryan.Holmes@justice.gsi.gov.uk Holmes, Ryan
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 16:28:40 +0100
Subject: Re:

Hi,

thank you very much for your answer!

You write that I should seek legal advice.

But thats what these problems are about.

That there has been problems, surrounding that I have been trying to get
legal advice.

I'm really a refugee, from Norway, I think I must say, so I haven't got that
much fonds.

So I can't finance a court-case myself, so I try to get help through the
legal aid program
etc., since I was sent by the Police to the CAB, to bring the harassment at
work-case up
for the Crowns Court, like they said.

But then all the problems started, that led me to the Ministry of Justice,
in the way explained
in the earlier correspondence.

So I'm not really sure how I should go forward, regarding bringing this up
in the legal-system,
since I haven't really managed to get any help from this system.

But maybe I should try once more, with this case.

I was just wondering if you have any advice on how you think I should go
forward with this, when
I'm a refugee from Norway, and haven't got that much fonds.

Thank you very much in advance for any advice!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog


On 4/7/08, Holmes, Ryan wrote:
>
> Dear Mr Ribsskog
>
> Thank you for your email of 19 March, addressed to the Ministry of
> Justice, regarding making a complaint against the Legal Services Ombudsman
> (LSO). The letter has been forwarded to the Legal Services Regulation and
> Redress Division as we are responsible for the policy relating to this
> matter.
>
> While I am sorry to hear of the difficulties you have experienced, I
> should explain from the outset that the legal profession is both independent
> and self-regulating and therefore, neither Ministers nor their officials are
> able to intervene in, or comment on individual cases.
>
> Similarly, the Legal Services Ombudsman (LSO) is independent of both the
> legal profession and the Government and, in order to preserve that
> independence, Ministers and officials are not able to comment on, intervene
> in, or vary her conclusions. However, with regard to your query about the
> complaints procedure of the LSO, if you do have a complaint about the
> service that the Ombudsman provides - for example, they failed to reply to
> your correspondence or did not answer your telephone calls - you should
> write to their Corporate Services Manager. She will investigate your
> complaint, and provide you with a response within ten working days.
> However, the Corporate Services Manager has no authority to review decisions
> taken by the Ombudsman. If you have a complaint about the Ombudsman's
> report, you should address your concerns to the Ombudsman.
>
> If you wish to complain about the service you have received from the LSO
> (but not the decision - see below) you must contact your MP who will decide
> whether to pass the complaint on to the Parliamentary and Health Services
> Ombudsman (PHSP). The PHSO can look at the service you have received and,
> if it finds any evidence of poor service, can take action to put the matter
> right. There is usually a twelve month limit, from the time you were aware
> that there was a reason to complain, upon this kind of complaint. The
> Ombudsman's powers and responsibilities are set out in an Act of Parliament
> (the Parliamentary Commissioner Act 1967) which says that complaints must be
> sent to them through Members of Parliament.
>
> There is no appeal against the LSO's decision. However, the LSO's
> decisions, like the decisions of other public authorities, are open to
> judicial review and you may consider taking your case to the High Court in
> order to have a judicial review of the LSO's decision. It is important to
> bear in mind that judicial review is not an appeal procedure and is not
> generally concerned with the merits of the decision. Instead, it examines
> whether the decision reached by a public body was done in a lawful manner.
> Therefore, I would recommend that you seek independent legal advice should
> you wish to pursue this course of action.
>
> Additionally, you may be interested to know that the Government has
> brought forward legislation to overhaul the regulatory structure of legal
> services in England and Wales. The Legal Services Act 2007 provides for the
> creation of the Legal Services Board (the Board), a single oversight body,
> independent of both the Government and the legal professions. It will be a
> publicly accountable body with the power to enforce high standards in the
> legal sector, replacing the current maze of regulators with overlapping
> responsibilities. Its Chair and the majority of its members will be lay
> persons.
>
> The Act will also establish a single and fully independent Office for
> Legal Complaints (OLC). Its Chair and the Majority of its members will also
> be lay. The OLC will administer an ombudsman scheme providing a single
> point of entry for consistent handling of all consumer complaints about
> providers of regulated legal services. This will replace the current system
> whereby complaints against the different types of legal professionals are
> handled by their own representative bodies.
>
> I am sorry that I cannot be of more assistance, although I do hope that
> this information is of some use to you.
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> *Ryan Holmes*
>
> *Legal Services Regulation and Redress Division*
>
> This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the
> addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not
> permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies
> and inform the sender by return e-mail.
>
> Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be
> intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding
> whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.
>
> This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
> monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
> monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read
> at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when
> composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
> The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
> Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless in
> partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2007/11/0032.) On
> leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> recorded for legal purposes.
>
>

Bloggarkiv

Populære innlegg

Om meg

Bildet mitt
Overhørte på Rimi Bjørndal, (jeg jobbet som butikksjef/leder i ti år, i mange forskjellige butikker), i 2003, at jeg var forfulgt av 'mafian', mm. Har etter dette ikke fått rettighetene mine, i mange saker. Blogger derfor om problemer med å få rettigheter, mm. Mine memoarer, (Min Bok 1-10), kan også finnes på johncons-blogg, (se: 'Etiketter'). Jeg blogger også om slektsforskning, (etter at min danskfødte mormor, som var etter adelige/kongelige, døde i 2009). Har også vært såvidt innom Høyre/Unge Høyre, i sin tid. Har også studert informasjonsbehandling/IT/Computing, (på NHI, HiO IU og University of Sunderland). Har også bakgrunn fra handel og kontor, (grunnkurs, økonomi med markedsføring og data). Er/var også i Heimevernet, (etter at jeg ble overført dit, etter førstegangstjeneste i infanteriet, (og en rep-øvelse i mob-hæren), i forbindelse med omorganiseringer, i Forsvaret, etter den kalde krigen). Blir også utsatt for mye nettmobbing, mm. johncons-blogg, (og mine memoarer og nettbutikk), er kjent fra TV-programmet Tweet4Tweet, i 2012, (selv om jeg måtte klage, for programmet var veldig useriøst/nedlatende, mm.).

Totalt antall sidevisninger

Etiketter