Blog.dk. (In Norwegian).

From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
To: kundeservice@vix.dk
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:32:37 +0000
Subject: Fwd: Sletting av blogg

Hei,

jeg kan ikke se at jeg har mottatt noe svar på denne e-posten ennå, derfor
prøver jeg å sende den igjen.

Håper dette er i orden!

Med vennlig hilsen

Erik Ribsskog


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Jan 31, 2008 10:44 AM
Subject: Sletting av blogg
To: kundeservice@vix.dk


Hei,

dere kan ikke bare uten videre slette en blogg.

Det går under ånsverksloven, det har vi i Norge, så det regner jeg med
finnes i Danmark og.

Så dette vil jeg gjerne klage på, og jeg håper at dere gjenoppretter
bloggen.

Mvh.

Erik Ribsskog

Arvato-case.

From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
To: enquiriesC@allingtonhughes.co.uk
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:20:11 +0000
Subject: Fwd: Legal Aid/Harassment at Work-case.

Hi,

I can't see that I have recieved an answer to this e-mail yet, that's why
I'm sending it again.

Hope this is alright!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Jan 31, 2008 11:57 AM
Subject: Legal Aid/Harassment at Work-case.
To: enquiriesC@allingtonhughes.co.uk


Hi,

I called just now, and spoke with Mrs. Jennifer Claytons secretary, and I
was adviced
to send an e-mail to the general enquiery e-mail address, regarding this
enquiery.

Since I've been in contact with the LSC, and they adviced me to search on
their
web-site for a solicitors firm, that could possibly help me with an
harassment at
work case, regarding my former employer.

And Mrs. Claytons secretary, adviced me to send you an e-mail on this e-mail
address.

I have been in contact with other solicitors from before, regarding this,
but I thought I'd
try to send you an e-mail, since Chester isn't that far away from where I
live, and I've
already been in contact with the companies from Liverpool on the list, so I
thought I'd
try to hear with your company, if you please had the oppertunity to help.

I can send the files I've got regarding the case, by post or e-mail, or I
could eg. take
the train and meet with the documents.

So I think it would be very fine if you have the chance to have a look at
this, my phone-
number by the way, is 0151 236 3298, if it's needed.

Or else, please just e-mail me back, and then if it's something I've
forgotten to explain,
then I'll contact you back as soon as possible.

Hope this is alright, and thanks in advance for the help!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

LGO.

From: eribsskog@gmail.com Erik Ribsskog
To: r.agnew@lgo.org.uk Rosemary Agnew
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:56:25 +0000
Subject: Fwd: Your letter of 23. January 2008. (07/C/06289/RA).

Hi,

I can't see that I have recieved any answer to this e-mail yet, that's why
I'm sending it again.

Hope this is alright!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Feb 8, 2008 10:26 PM
Subject: Your letter of 23. January 2008. (07/C/06289/RA).
To: Rosemary Agnew <r.agnew@lgo.org.uk>


Hi,

I know there have been some correspondence already surrounding issues like
this, but
I'm just writing you now, anyway, just to try to make things clear.

You write in your letter of 23/1, that 'you had not exhausted the Council
complaint procedure'.

But, it was actually the Council, who didn't stick to the complaint
procedure.

I sent the Council a complaint, but the Council didn't answer my e-mail.

And it says in the complaint-procedure, that complaints should be answered
within 2 weeks,
which the Council didn't.

So I'm sure exactly why it is that you are writing, that I haven't exhausted
the Council complaint
procedure.

Because I wrote to you, the LGO, since the Council didn't answer me.

And then, the Council wanted to investigate another comlaint, than my
complaint, and meet
me to discuss another complaint than my complaint.

I've tried to contact both you and the Council regarding this.

Since, it isn't possible for me, to exhaust the Council complaint procedure,
when the Council
aren't dealing with my complaint.

So that's where the problems are.

I'll try to summarise them.

1. The Council, didn't answer my complaint within two weeks, so they didn't
stick to the Council
Complaint procedure.

2. If point 1, isn't enough, then later, the Council, weren't dealing with
my complaint at all, but
wanted to discuss another complaint than my complaint.

And I can't be expected to exhaust a complaint procedure that doesn't belong
to my complaint.

I shouldn't be blaimed for not exhausting a complaint procedure that doesn't
belong to my complaint.

This is the Councils fault, since they want me to exhaust a
complaint-procedure which is belonging
to another complaint, than my complaint.

So, I just wanted to make this clear, before I complain to the Ombudsman
again.

Since I think things like these, the mentioned points, should be made clear,
before I complain to
the Ombudsman again.

Hope this is alright, and thank you very much for your help in advance!

Your sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog


Letter from LGO, 23/1.

LSO.

E-mail to the LSO, 28/2.

BBC.

Letter from the BBC, 18/2.

Krig i Norge? 55. (In Norwegian).

Fattern sa også at ingen hjelper deg, hvis du er forfulgt av noe mafia osv.

Husk hvordan det gikk med han som døde av det radioaktive stoffet i London osv.

Krig i Norge? 54. (In Norwegian).

Fattern ringte for et par timer siden.

Han hadde tatt seg et par øl, siden det snart var påske.

Så det var ikke alt jeg skjønnte like mye av.

Men det han sa, var at det stod i Drammens Tidende, om at mattilsynet skulle rydde opp i probelmet med rottene.

Så sa han at naboen hadde kalt Haldis hore.

Så sa jeg, at det var kanskje fordi hu var blond, fordi utleningene ikke likte blonde.

Så sa fattern, at i Sverige, så kaller de utlendinger for 'svart-skaller'.

Så sa jeg, at jeg trodde ikke fattern likte Sverige.

At han pleide å si, at Volvo ikke er bil.

Så sa han, at det var før det.

Så sa han, at Christell var sammen med en svenske.

Så gjorde han et poeng av at de tre barn.

Så skjønte ikke jeg hvorfor han gjorde et poeng av det, så spurte jeg om det.

Men jeg skjønte ikke helt poenget etter forklaringa heller.

Før det, så prata vi om hva som hadde skjedd, siden jeg dreiv med sånne rettsaker osv., mot Arvato osv.

Så sa jeg, at det virket som om myndighetene i Norge og England, hadde brukt meg som spion/target-guy mot mafian.

Så sa jeg at Skodvin på Rimi, antagelig har satt meg til å jobbe i butikker hvor det var mafia osv., fordi de viste at jeg var streight, og konsentrerte meg om å gjøre jobben.

Så sa fattern, at det var kanskje folk som ville tjene på lure Rimi økonomisk osv., som de ville ha inn i firmaene.

Så sa jeg, at det var mulig.

Men at det i England (På Arvato, Liverpool), så virka det som om de mafia-nettverkene ville ha de Skandinaviske damene som jobba der.

At de dro på masse rare ferier osv., hvor jeg mistenkte at de ble utnytta av noe nettverk da.

Da forandra fattern stemme, så han ikke var så høyrøsta, og sa at det var mulig, eller noe sånt.

Og jeg sa, også at det virka som mafian inne i Oslo, ville kontrollere hele byen.

Jeg sa, at jeg trodde var noe Albanere, eller noe.

Og da sa fattern, at det måtte det vært, for det fantes ikke noe norsk mafia.

Da sa jeg, at politiet i England, prata om at det var en norsk mafia. (De refererte til 'the Norwegian mafia', i et brev).

Da sa fattern, at det er de som satt inne i forbindelse med Nokas-saken, sa de var i fengsel osv.

Det var vel noe sånt, det er mulig jeg fikk rekkefølgen av noen av setningene feil, men det var vel noe sånt.

Så det er tydelig at det er noe som foregår.

Jeg synes fattern reagerte rart, når jeg prata om de skandinaviske damene på jobben i England, og at han plutselig likte svensker.

Så jeg lurer litt på her, så det får jeg heller høre med han neste gang jeg prater med han osv., hva det her eventuelt kan være.