More from the ush.net message-board.

Re: A crazy person emails the queen

by johncons on Fri Aug 29, 2008 8:45 am
Dave M wrote:
dont you just hate it when the police use phony e-mail addresses


Hi,

what happened, was that I complained, to the IPCC, about unproffesional conduct, from the Merseyside Police, in connection with
the case I have, against Aravato/Microsoft.

The IPCC, arranged a meeting, at Walton Lane Police Station, in Novemeber last year, where it was agreed, that I was to e-mail,
the documents regarding the case, to the Police, the next day.

The e-mail address, that I was given, in a meeting, was:

civil.litigation.e@merseyside.police.uk

http://www.scribd.com/doc/4848292/encl- ... laddresses

Where as the address, that is written on their letters, is:

civil.litigation.e.@merseyside.police.uk (An extra dot, after the 'e').

http://www.scribd.com/doc/4848297/encl- ... laddresses

I asked the Police about this, and then they said, that the first e-mail address, was the correct one.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/4848223/email ... resses-etc (This is where I explained to the IPCC about this,
but the actual e-mail from the Police, is one of the e-mails in this link: http://www.scribd.com/doc/4847797/walton-police-email ).

So the Merseyside Police, (the Standards Unit), have printed their e-mail address wrongly, on their offical letters.

I work as a Company Researcher, and I'm used with evaluating companies.

If a company, have two official general enquiery e-mail addresses, then I'd say that something isn't right.

And I wouldn't have trusted the company, and I wouldn't have added them on the directory, that I'm working on.

The same with the Police Standards Unit, if they have two official general enquiery e-mail addresses for the unit, and claim both to be
their official e-mail address, then I find this so unprofessional, so that I don't trust the Police-force any longer, like I reported to the IPCC.

Sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

http://www.ush.net/board/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=229585