johncons: 21. mai 2008

onsdag 21. mai 2008

Tazte priv, ble sendt på radio, NRK P3, høsten 2004. (In Norwegian).

http://www.last.fm/music/tazte+priv

Wikiquote: Tazte priv/Lena fra Døden på Oslo S. (In Norwegian).

Lena fra Døden på Oslo S

[rediger] Om politikk
Fy fader, jeg hater politikerforakt!
Jeg stemmer Venstre, for Venstre er jo de små og mellomstore bedriftenes parti, og jeg, Lena, er en liten eller mellomstor bedrift avhengig av hvor mange liggeturer jeg får.
Frihet under ansvar? For et jævla dustete opplegg.

[rediger] Om jøder
Skjønner du ikke at jødene styrer Norge? Faen ta dem, jævla sionister ass!
Hvis bare jødene setter alle klutene til, de jævla jødeklutene sine, fy faen
Hvorfor tror du Haakon Magnus har så krum nese? Hvorfor tror du Jens Stoltenberg egentlig heter Jens Schtoltzenbürg? Hvorfor tror du at stortingspresident Jørgen Kosmo, hvis du bare bytter om på bokstavene, så får du jøden Kosmo? Bytta ut r og g med en d der hvis du er interessert i å høre på.

[rediger] Diverse
Fy faen du er så jævla frekk! Men du treffer spikern på hodet.
Hodet ditt vokser opp og ned og mikrofonen ser ut som et snyteskaft, din gris! Nå tror jeg vi må runde av dette intervjuet fort som faen Bård.
Hadet bra du og, trehoda troll med børstemark ut av nesa!
Jeg digger deg! Jeg hater deg... Jeg er likegyldig til deg.
Jeg skulle ønske folk ville ha meg for den jeg er, ikke bare for det jeg har mellom beina... Vet du hva jeg har mellom beina? En piercing det har gått verk i!
Hadet på badet din gamle sjokolade! Merkelig uttrykk egentlig... Ser deg i kveld gamle karamell!

http://no.wikiquote.org/wiki/Tazte_priv

Lena fra Døden på Oslo S., kommenterer om omgangstonen i det moderne Norge. (In Norwegian).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GoWCTRL7EGI

Her hører vi Lena fra Døden på Oslo S., forteller om omgangstonen i Norge:

Faen så uhøflige folk har blitt.

Det er slutt på høflige fraser.

Alle skal si akkurat hva de mener.

Samfunnet har blitt uformelt, joda.

Men samtidig har vi ikke mistet noe på veien?

Faen, er det rart folk setter seg overdoser når høflighetsfrasene har blitt toatelt fraværende?

Fy faen!

Politikerne hva gjør de?

Nå sier jo folk at jeg må huske å ta medisinene mine osv., men jeg lurer på om ikke Eia, vet et par ting, om hva som foregår, og synes det er artig, å vitse om dette, som en slags meta-humor, i programmene sine på radio og TV?

F.eks, så prater han jo om Jahve, i forbindelse med noe nattverd her, som vel går på det greiene, som Dagbladet skrev om, med Bohemian Groove, og Illuminati osv.:

http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/2008/05/problemer-med-menneskeofring-og-misbruk.html

Og en del andre ting han prater om, jeg lurer på om han er 'in the know', angående noen New World Order agendaer som foregår i Norge osv., og liker å vitse med det, som en slags meta-humor, jeg har også synes det kan virke sånn med Jarle i Åpen Post osv., også.

Men nå sier jo folk på Dagbladets kommentarfunksjon, at jeg må huske å ta medisinene mine, så da tar jeg sikkert feil da.

Men da er vi tilbake til omgangstonen, og den synes jeg er mye bedre i England, enn i Norge, så sånn sett, så trives jeg mye bedre i England, enn f.eks. i Oslo.

Det er bare sånn jeg oppfatter det privat.

Men det betyr jo ikke at det er sånn, andre kan jo mene at det er motsatt, at omganstonen er mye høfligere og bedre i Oslo.

Det er mulig.

Men dette her er jo min blogg, så da får jeg skrive hva jeg mener her da.

Så får man håpe at det er i orden!

Med vennlig hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

PS.

Når Eia mobber Elg, mobber han egentlig Tufte Johansen da, lurer jeg på.

Hvorfor er tonen så uhøflig i Norge? Er det derfor nordmenn er så forknytte? Har det alltid vært sånn? Er det organisert? (In Norwegian).

Bra!

Hvor ble innlegget av?

Skrevet av Ratatoskr 20.05.2008 kl. 14:09

Argh! Hvor ble Cons' innlegg av?? Kom igjen Dagbladet, det var morsomt!

Jeg som hadde så mange kommentarer klare....

Nytt innlegg Svar på innlegg Varsle

anbefalinger

Bra!

RE: Hvor ble innlegget av?

Skrevet av cons 20.05.2008 kl. 14:20

Dem fikk telefon fra Stoltenberg og Kolberg.

Jeg har det på blogg da:

http://johncons-mirror.blogspot.com/2008/05/ser-norske-myndigheter-ogs-ubter-in.html

Nytt innlegg Svar på innlegg Varsle

anbefalinger

Bra!

RE: Hvor ble innlegget av?

Skrevet av fredrik 21.05.2008 kl. 10:42

Ojojojojoj, håper at du tar medisinen din

Nytt innlegg Svar på innlegg Varsle

anbefalinger

Bra!

RE: Hvor ble innlegget av?

Skrevet av cons 21.05.2008 kl. 10:57

Det er alltid hyggelig å debattere med sine landsmenn.

Jeg har merket det, etter at jeg flyttet til England, at det er så høflig tone i Norge.

Med vennlig hilsen

Erik Ribsskog

Nytt innlegg Svar på innlegg Varsle

http://www.dagbladet.no/nyheter/2008/05/20/535742.html?commentId=1973658#comments_container

Did Merseyside Police fail to help fireball murder victim Monika Szmecht?

Did police fail the fireball murder victim Monika Szmecht?
May 10 2008 by Michelle Fiddler, Liverpool Echo

AN INVESTIGATION was underway today to see if a Polish waitress stabbed and torched by her abusive boyfriend was given enough police protection.

Monika Szmecht was imprisoned in a van and then driven to a remote country lane, where she was doused in petrol and set alight last June.

Ex-soldier Anthony Clarke was jailed for life after being convicted of her murder last week.

The Independent Police Complaints Commission is now investigating the way Merseyside Police dealt with domestic violence allegations prior to her horrific death.

Officers from Merseyside police were in contact with Ms Szmecht and she expressed concern about Clarke’s behaviour in the days leading up to her murder.

During Clarke’s trial, Liverpool crown court heard the 27-year-old lashed out at his ex-lover days before her death after discovering texts from another man.

He also threatened to burn down her house – forcing her to secretly move.

Weeks before she died, Ms Szmecht told police she had been assaulted by Clarke.

She ended up with bruises and a fractured bone in her hand and was due to make a statement against him.

Clarke claimed in his defence he met up with Miss Szmecht on the day she died in order to hand over £1,000 in return for her not making the statement.

During the trial, his sister Shareen Clarke told the jury she, in fact, attacked the Polish waitress.

On the day of her death, Clarke bundled Ms Szmecht, who at the time was living in Wellesbourne Place, Norris Green, into his van, where he kept her imprisoned for four hours.

He then took her to an isolated country lane in Rainford and stabbed her six times.

When she struggled to her feet Clarke, a divorced dad-of-three, doused her in petrol and set her alight.

Merseyside police referred concerns regarding the way they dealt with Ms Szmecht and handled her allegations of domestic violence at the hands of Clarke to the IPCC on December 11 last year.

IPCC Commissioner for the North West Mike Franklin decided an independent investigation was needed.

The watchdog could not launch the investigation until criminal proceedings against Clarke were completed.

Mr Franklin said: “This was a horrifically brutal murder and my condolences go out to Ms Szmecht’s family and friends.

“It is known that Merseyside police had been in contact with Ms Szmecht and she had raised concerns about Mr Clarke’s behaviour towards her in the days leading up to her murder.

“Our investigation will examine whether officers observed the correct policies and procedures and whether Ms Szmecht was afforded sufficient protection.”

A Merseyside police spokesman said: “We can confirm the force has looked into the police response to issues of domestic violence in the case of Monika Szmecht.

“The matter was voluntarily referred to the IPCC and we support their decision to carry out an independent enquiry.”

michellefiddler@liverpoolecho.co.uk0151 472 2529

http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/liverpool-news/local-news/2008/05/10/did-police-fail-the-fireball-murder-victim-monika-szmecht-100252-20889166/

E-mail to the LGO, 21/5/08.

Google Mail - complaint against Liverpool City Council our ref 08 000 279

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

complaint against Liverpool City Council our ref 08 000 279

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Wed, May 21, 2008 at 8:03 AM

To:
st3 york <st3york@lgo.org.uk>

Hi,

I'm refering to our phone-call, on Monday, where I explained that I would have a closer look at the compaint, and

call you back the next day. (Tuesday, yesterday).

Unfortunaltly, I was a bit busy yesterday, but I have thought a bit more about this now, so I'm sending you this

e-mail.

Like I explained in the phone-call, my main complaint, against the gym, was that the (female) washing-staff,

where washing the mens chaning-room, within the opening hours, on several (at least two) occations.

I also explained, that I had been working-out in other council/university-run gyms, in Oslo and Sunderland,

but that I hadn't seen this before, that the female washing-staff was washing the mens changing room,

within the opening hours.

I've been thinking a bit more about how to explain this, and I think one must probably say, that this, that

the washing-women wash the mens changing-room within the opening hours of the gym, must be said

to be indicent(?)

And this gym is not like a private gym, but it's a council run gym, open to all members of the public, and

run by the tax-payers money.

The council, explained that they had changed the 'washing-regime', after recieving my complaint, but after

I've been thinking more about this, I think it's a bit strange anyway.

Since, I think that the staff at the gym should have stopped the washing-women, acting like this, I remember

that there was plenty of staff there, the last time this happend, they were just standing in the reception-area,

without doing any work-tasks, maybe 10 or 15 minutes before the gym closed, looking at me, more or less,

smiling, when I left the gym, the last time this happend.

So, I think that staff must have been aware of this.

So, I think that there must have been something going on at the gym, since the staff didn't react, when the

washing women did this.

So I don't think it's enough by the Council, to say they've changed the washing regime, since I think there

must be problems with the staff as well, since they didn't reflect or react at this procedure.

I think both the washing-staff, and the gym-staff and management, should have understood, by themselves,

that it's maybe a bit indecent, to let the washing-women wash the mens changing-room during the opening

hours of the gym, while the changing-room is being used.

So I think that there must be something going on there, since noone reflected on this.

So, I think that maybe the situation at the gym, should be looked a more into, by the Ombudsman, since

I think that there must have been something strange going on there.

I haven't had the time to look at the complaint that much, and this was from last year, so I don't remember

the details that well, but I remember that I was thinking, that there were a lot of strange things going on at

the gym.

So I'm forwarding you the complaint I sent the gym, so maybe you could have a look at this, and see what

you think yourselves, of the other complaints than the main complaint mentioned in this e-mail, if you don't

think the things going on at the gym, weren't a bit strange.

So then I'll trust your judgement on the other complaints, since I am a bit after shedule with work etc. here.

Hope this is alright!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

On 5/14/08, st3 york <st3york@lgo.org.uk> wrote:

Dear Mr Ribskkog

I refer to your complaint against Liverpool City Council. I tried calling you today and last Wednesday but have been unsuccessful. I would like to have a chat with you about your complaint. Please would you telephone me today or on Monday, Tuesday or Wednesday next week (19-21 May) sometime between 9.15am and 4.30pm so that I can make progress on your complaint. If I am not available when you call, please leave a message giving details of the best time to get back to you.

Yours sincerely

Julie Murray

Investigator

Commission for Local Administration in England

Tel: 01904 380220

Website: www.lgo.org.uk

NOTICE - This message contains information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you have received this message in error please advise us at once and do not make any use of the information.

Google Mail - Complaint

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Complaint

Erik Ribsskog
<eribsskog@gmail.com>

Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 5:06 AM

To:
Richard.Little@liverpool.gov.uk

Cc:
"Lennon, Linda" <linda.lennon@liverpool.gov.uk>, "Southern, Lesley" <Lesley.Southern@liverpool.gov.uk>

Hi,

I'm refering to phone-call last week (4/7). I know I said I'd send this e-mail no

later than Wednesday, but I didn't get to start on it untill late on Wednesday,

so it's probably going to be Thursday untill I get to actually send the e-mail,

so sorry about that!

Problems with washing women/girls in the mens changing-room during opening hours:

The first thing I wondered about, was regarding the problems described in

the e-mail I sent to Linda Lennon on 8/6, about the washing girl/women in

the mens changing-room.

I'll copy the text from that e-mail into this e-mail, since I have some questions

regarding that episode:

to		linda.lennon@liverpool.gov.uk
	date		Jun 8, 2007 10:58 PM
	subject		Fwd: Statement
	mailed-by		gmail.com

Hi,

I just got back from the gym, it closed at 9 pm.

I just had to eat a bit and relax a bit after the work-out, or else I would have sent the

email at once.

Because what I'm wondering about with the gym, is:

Is it really right that there should be female washing-staf in the mens wardrobe

at 8.45 pm, when the gym closes at 9pm?

This happened again today, and it has also happened once before.

I used to workout a bit when I lived in Oslo and Sunderland as well, but they never

used to start washing the wardrobe until after the closing hours.

So I think that since the gym is run by the Council, I think that they shouldn't

have the washing-routines that includes female staff starting to wash in the

mens wardrobe as early as 8.45 pm.

I think they should wait until after closing-hours to wash the mens wardrobe,

and that if they have to wash, then they could maybe instead wash the machines

in the gym or something else before the gym is closed.

When I went into the mens wardrobe at 8.45 pm then there was a female washing

staff washing there, about 40 years maybe with dark hair.

I think she was talking with a colleague in there, it was probably the other washing-

woman.

I was working out on the tread-mill by the reception untill a bit before 8.45 pm, and

then I saw the washing-staff walking around in the reception-area at around 8.40 pm.

And one of the washing-staff looked quite young, maybe 16-17 years.

I think it must have been her that the washing-woman with dark hair spoke with in

the mens wardrobe at 8.45.

I don't think there should be that young female washing staff in the mens wardrobe

at 8.45, when the gym closes at 9.00pm.

It has happened once earlier as well that there were female washing staff in the

mens wardrobe at around 8.45, and I just think that this isnt right.

I think that both the staff in the gym and the washing staff should understand by

themselves that the female washing staff shouldnt start to wash in the mens

wardrobe untill after the closing hours at 9 pm, so thats why I havent complained

about this to the staff in the gym or the washing staff.

I think that it should be unecessary for me to tell this to them, I think they should

have understood this by themselves.

And Im not really sure whos in charge there in the evenings eighter.

There has also been other incidents at the gym that I have thought to complain

about, but I havent untill now.

But with the washing-staff in the mens wardrobe again today at 8.45 pm, was

a bit like the final drop, so since Im not really sure whos in charge there in the

evening I thought that I could send you an email about this.

And also since one of the washing women was so young, it makes me a bit

worried about whats going on in the gym, when they put a washing woman/

girl that looked like she was maybe 16 or 17 in the mens wardrobe at 8.45pm,

so therefore I thought I should really just write the email now, because that this

is a bit unacceptable for a gym thats run by the Council.

I know its a bit late to send emails at this hour, but it thought that since I think

that this way of organising the washing-routines in the gym is a bit unaceptable,

I thought that if I sent the email about this right after I got back from the gym,

then there would be less possibilites that eg. someone could say that I must have

mistaken the time etc, since now its just a quite short time since I left the gym,

so I reckoned that its best to send it right away, while I still have the details at

mind so to speak.

So I hope that this is alright!

Sorry that I send the email this late.

Regards,

Erik Ribsskog

- Show quoted text -

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Erik Ribsskog <
eribsskog@gmail.com>
Date: Jun 8, 2007 3:45 PM
Subject: Statement
To: linda.lennon@liverpool.gov.uk

Hi,

I refer to the phone-call earlier today, and send the statement from

the bank about the duplicate payment with the direct-debit.

Pleare just contact me if there is anything else I should have remembered.

Hope that this is alright!

Regards,

Erik Ribsskog

So my questions regarding this is:

1. How come that there are washing women/girls in the mens changing-room at 8.45 pm,

when the gym closes at 9 pm?

2. Is the gym going to change its washing-routine, so that the washing women/girls dont

start to wash the mens changing-room untill after the gym is closed. (Because like I explained

in the e-mail to Linda Lennon, this with the washing women in the mens changing-room has

also happened earlier at the Millenium gym, but I've never seen it in other gyms).

Problems with direct-debit processing errors/duplicate payments:

Also, I have been in contact with Lesley Southern, about some problems regarding processing

errors/duplicate direct debits from the gym.

I explained to him that I would also bring up some the issues regarding this with you, so I think

its alright if I also copy the contents of that e-mail:

from		Erik Ribsskog <eribsskog@gmail.com>	hide details	Jul 10 (2 days ago)
	to		"Southern, Lesley" <Lesley.Southern@liverpool.gov.uk>
	date		Jul 10, 2007 6:18 PM
	subject		Re: Earlier e-mails
	mailed-by		gmail.com

Hi,

thank you very much for your answer.

I think it was very fine that you had the time to answer me, and I also think that it was very

fine that you have taken off my arrears due to the amount of time/inconvinience I have had

due to this.

But since there were still some things I was wondering about, I thought I could try to send

you an enquiery about this, to try to maybe found out about this.

I've written an explanation below, as comments on your e-mail, since I thought it was easier

to explain/answer this way.

To summarize my questions:

1. Shouldn't the gym have asked me first if they wanted to withdraw an extra payment (that they

had no mandate for) from my account in June?

2. How come that there were still two payment-requests from the gym waiting to be withdrawn

from my account on 27/6, when firstly, the gym only have a mandate to withdraw one monthly

payment from my account. Secondly, I had agreed with the staff at the gym, that I would pay the

arrears when I recieved the swith-bonus from the bank. And thirdly, I had sent Linda Lennon,

Administration Manager at the Council an e-mail about this problem on 8/6, with a copy of the

statement from the bank, showing that there was a problem with the gym charging me duplicate

payments from my account for the month of June?

3. How come that the gym still wanted to withdraw a (duplicate) payment from my account for the

month of July, when the gym was closed for refurbishment for six weeks from 25/6?

I'm also going to contact the Duty Officer at the gym regarding why the gyms members weren't

informed about the six weeks closure of the gym and more. So it might be that I'll also ask him

about some of the same questions. (Like about why the gym still wanted to charge me even

if they were going to be closed etc.)

I hope you have the time to answer me about this questions, since I thought some of these things

were a bit strange, so it would be nice to be informed about this.

So I hope that you bear over with me if I'm asking many questions!

Thank you very much in advance!

Yours sincerely,

Erik Ribsskog

On 7/3/07, Southern, Lesley <Lesley.Southern@liverpool.gov.uk
> wrote:

Erik

Your enquiry regarding your direct debit payments has been passed onto myself for further investigation.

Unfortunately we cannot refund a payment to a member that has outstanding arrears, this is for audit purposes as we are required to provide details of all miscellaneous payments made to our members.

The action we have taken to date is to take your 1 month overpayment as your cancellation fee (which is normally 2 months) and we have taken your arrears off your membership record for the inconvenience caused as a result of the error.

- Regarding the overpayment, it wasn't actually an overpayment, because when the bank saw that it had been a

process error/duplicate payment from the gym, then they transferred the duplicate payment back as a

'interbranch payment' on 6/6.

(Secondly, I think that I shouldn't recieve a cancellation fee, when the gym suddently closes for 6 weeks

for refurbishment. I think that then the gym should have first sent its members a letter about this, put

up a poster at the gym about this, and also not charged its members for the month that they are closed,

but I have to contact the Duty Officer at the gym about something else, so I'll bring this up with him.)

I have checked the Direct Debit report and it seems that the overpayment dates back to a missed January payment which has been allocated to your account on 30
^th May. I will need to speak to our Direct Debit team to determine why a payment for January has been included in June's Direct Debit report.

I've been speaking with the staff (including the Manager) at the gym several times about the arrears, and we agreed that I would

pay the arrears later, when I recieved some money I was expecting (a switch-bonus from the bank).

This was agreed with Craig at the gym, when we set up the direct-debit agreement in May.

I spoke with Craig about this on 1/6 as well, since I hadn't recieved the switch-bonus yet, and then I was informed

that the arrear was £70.50, and we agreed that I would pay this when I recieved the money from the bank.

So my point is, that they should have told me first if they wanted to withdraw an extra payment from my account

on 1/6, so that I could have planned this in advance.

Also, this (RBS) bank account was set up in May, so I don't really understand how a missed direct-debit

payment to my old (Barclays) account in Januray, could suddently appear on my RBS-account in June?

It seems a bit strange to me that this could happen, when I also had agreed several times with the staff

at the gym (in the month of March and then monthly), that I would pay the running bills, and that I'd pay the

arrears when I recieved the switch-bonus from RBS.

Also I had been told by the staff at the gym, that there was no hurry at all with the arrears, as long as I

paid the running bills.

- Also the bank told me when I called them in the beginning of June, that the gym wasn't allowed to

withdraw more than one payment a month from my account, since they only had one mandate.

- Also, when I called the gym on 26/6, to ask if they were open on 26/6, (since they were closed for

no apparent reason on 25/6), then I was told that the gym was closed for refurbishment for six weeks.

I then thought that it wasn't right that the gym should charge me for the month of July, when they were

closed. (I also thought they should have informed the members about the six weeks closure). So due

to this, I called my bank (the RBS customer-support line) on 27/6 to cancel the direct-debit.

I was then told that there were still two direct-debits from the gym on my account, both with the same,

reference-number (LIFE 800 1561).

- So I was wondering, how come that there were still two payment-requests from the gym waiting to

be withdrawn on my account on 27/6, when firstly, the gym only have a mandate to withdraw one

monthly payment from my account. Secondly, I had agreed with the staff at the gym, that I would

pay the arrears when I recieved the swith-bonus from the bank, and thirdly, I had sent Linda Lennon,

Administration Manager at the Council an e-mail about this problem on 8/6, with a copy of the

statement from the bank, showing that there was a problem with the gym charging me duplicate

payments from my account?

Your account has now been set to expired and no payment was requested in July.

Well, there were actually two payments requested in July (see above

So my questions regarding this is:

3. Shouldn't the gym have asked me first if they wanted to withdraw an extra payment (that they

had no mandate for) from my account in June?

4. How come that there were still two payment-requests from the gym waiting to be withdrawn

from my account on 27/6, when firstly, the gym only have a mandate to withdraw one monthly

payment from my account. Secondly, I had agreed with the staff at the gym, that I would pay the

arrears when I recieved the swith-bonus from the bank. And thirdly, I had sent Linda Lennon,

Administration Manager at the Council an e-mail about this problem on 8/6, with a copy of the

statement from the bank, showing that there was a problem with the gym charging me duplicate

payments from my account for the month of June?

Problems around the closure of the gym for six weeks from 25/6 due to refurbishment:

5. How come that the gym still wanted to withdraw a (duplicate) payment from my account for the

month of July, when the gym was closed for refurbishment for six weeks from 25/6?

6. How come that there were no letters sent to the members of the gym regarding the closure

of the gym for six weeks from 25/6 due to refurbishment?

7. How come that there were no poster in the gym informing the users of the gym that the gym

would be closed for six weeks from 25/6 due to refurbishment?

8. How come that there was only a makeshift sign on the entrance-door to the millenium-

building saying 'gym closed', and nothing more when I went there to work out on the

evening on 25/6. (Shouldn't it have been a proper sign, with information about why the

gym was closed, how long the gym was closed for, and not just some makeshift

sign written with an ink-marker)?

9. How come that there were no information about the fact that the gym was closed, when

I went on the lifestyles website:

(www.liverpool.gov.uk/Leisure_and_culture/Sports/Leisure_Centres_and_Pools/Lifestyles_Millennium/index.asp
)

on 26/6 (When the gym had been closed since 25/5)?

(I can see that it says that the gym is closed there now, but on 26/6, there was no information

about the gym being closed at all. I went there to see if it said anything on the website on 26/6,

since the gym was closed for no obvious reason on 25/6, but it didn't say anything about the gym

being closed on the website, so I noted down the phone-number to the gym, and called the gym,

and they told me that the gym was closed for six weeks due to refurbishment.)

10. How come that members of the gym were charged for the whole month of June, when the gym

was closed for refurbishment from 25/6? (Shouldn't the six days from 25/6 to 30/6 have been

deducted from the charge?).

onsdag 21. mai 2008

Tazte priv, ble sendt på radio, NRK P3, høsten 2004. (In Norwegian).

Wikiquote: Tazte priv/Lena fra Døden på Oslo S. (In Norwegian).

Lena fra Døden på Oslo S., kommenterer om omgangstonen i det moderne Norge. (In Norwegian).

Hvorfor er tonen så uhøflig i Norge? Er det derfor nordmenn er så forknytte? Har det alltid vært sånn? Er det organisert? (In Norwegian).

Did Merseyside Police fail to help fireball murder victim Monika Szmecht?

E-mail to the LGO, 21/5/08.

Bloggarkiv

Populære innlegg

Om meg

Totalt antall sidevisninger

Etiketter